Veteran Wages 54-Year Fight Against VA for War Wounds

Veteran Wages 54-Year Fight Against VA for War Wounds

WESTON, Florida – During World War II, commanders gave fighter pilot Frank Fong some of the Army Air Corp’s highest honors for heroism and skill: two Distinguished Flying Crosses and eight Air Medals.

But it took 48 years for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to concede that a plane crash scarred his left eye and eventually took his sight.

It took two more years for the VA to agree that Fong is seriously disabled by nightmares and flashbacks of violent air combat missions. And nearly three years to fully compensate him for his blind eye and for a back injury from the plane crash, VA records show.

Fong’s battle with the VA isn’t over. He’s still seeking back pay for the years 1950-1997, when the VA refused to acknowledge his blindness.

The highly decorated veteran’s 54-year ordeal illustrates how technicalities in the VA’s disability compensation system shortchange those who lack well-trained advocates and the persistence to keep fighting for years.

VA officials said in a statement that they consider Fong’s case “a perfect example of how VA laws help a veteran. He has reopened his claim for new disabilities on multiple occasions over the past 50 years with favorable outcomes on many.”

But for today’s soldiers in Iraq, Afghanistan and other battlegrounds, Fong’s story is a cautionary tale about the perils of not complaining about injuries in order to remain on duty when your country needs you.

“I always thought our government would take care of us,” said Fong, a retired commercial artist who lives in the Fort Lauderdale suburb of Weston.

frank fongListen to Frank Fong The decorated fighter pilot talks about his experiences in war and with the VA.

The VA’s files are littered with the dropped claims of veterans who gave up. But Fong has battled injustice throughout his life, and at 85 he isn’t about to stop.

“It’s the principle of the thing,” said Fong, who became a pilot even though the Army initially rejected him for flight school because he’s of Chinese ancestry. “It’s the whole damn idea that they’d jerk me around like this.”

By all accounts, Fong was an exemplary pilot, cited over and over for his “courage, coolness and skill,” military records show.

But during a mission over Germany in the spring of 1944, Fong had the accident that would later cause him to go blind in his left eye.

Flying low at 300 mph, Fong was strafing locomotives when his P-47 Thunderbolt skimmed over a small hill, crashed through the top of some trees and then hit the ground.

His face slammed into the gun sight as the plane bounced back into the air. “It just knocked me silly. For a good second I was out,” he said.

With torn propeller blades and battered wings on his plane, Fong made an emergency landing.

Shards from his sunglasses had lodged in his left eye, and his back had suffered a tremendous jolt. After about 10 days in the hospital, Fong said he told his doctors he was fine to return to duty – even though his vision wasn’t quite right.

“You’ve got to understand, I did something really stupid,” Fong said. “I should not have flown for at least a couple of weeks while the damage healed.”

The glass shards had gouged his retina, altering his depth perception and making landings particularly dangerous.

Still, Fong flew two missions on D-Day with the 359th Fighter Group, this time in a P-51 Mustang. On his second mission, flak tore a hole the size of a basketball in the plane’s canopy, Fong said, slamming pieces into his head and aggravating his eye condition.

From June 5-13, his flight record shows that he flew 10 missions before a flight surgeon ordered him transferred to a regional hospital for treatment and evaluation.

“I had slight peripheral vision,” he said. “Of course, when they asked me how it was, of course I said, ‘I see fine.’ “

But by April 12, 1945, Fong’s flight rating was downgraded and a flight surgeon noted: “Severe spinal injury. Healing. Curvature is evident. Eye (retina) damage.”

Fong was reassigned to an air-sea rescue unit.

Then in November 1945, he was sent to Nautilus Hospital in Miami Beach with recurring problems with his left eye and spinal injuries, records show.

Yet when he left active duty in May 1946, Fong’s official Army discharge exam listed his eyesight as 20/20 in both eyes. It makes no mention of any crash injuries.

The VA used that against him for decades.

Fong first asked the VA to compensate him for his blindness in July 1950. The VA denied his claim, saying that being near-sighted “is not a disability within the meaning of applicable laws.” But the VA awarded him $15 a month for an ear infection.

The letter puzzled Fong because it didn’t mention his left eye or the crash.

The VA doctor’s report, obtained by Knight Ridder through a Privacy Act review of Fong’s file at the VA’s St. Petersburg, Fla., regional office, notes that his vision was far from perfect: 20/70 in the left eye and 20/60 in the right. (Elsewhere in the report, the doctor ascribes the worse vision to the right eye.) The exam appears to be the work of a general practitioner, and there’s no indication that he examined Fong’s retina.

Dr. Harry Hamburger, a Miami ophthalmologist and eye trauma expert, said the scar on Fong’s retina would have been evident in 1950, and there’s no question that it was the result of the 1944 crash.

“He’s got a permanent scar there. He’s worse than legally blind,” said Hamburger, a former consulting surgeon at Florida’s Homestead Air Force Base who’s examined Fong and his military records. “He just sees shapes, just gross shapes.”

In 1951, the Air Force recalled Fong to serve during the Korean War in the Air Intelligence Group in Washington, D.C.

His official military medical exam in March 1951 reports near perfect vision in both eyes.

In contrast, various reports written by a Bolling Air Force Base flight surgeon show Fong was cleared only for temporary flight duty: “Officer has history of severe eye and spinal injuries. Some hearing loss. Vision loss due to air crash mainly to left eye. Severe spinal injury from impact.”

But the VA never pulled Fong’s flight records, which often don’t find their way into the official service medical files that are used to determine a veteran’s eligibility for compensation. Fong had no way of knowing this.

A week after he was discharged from active duty in April 1953, Fong reopened his VA disability claim. Again, it was denied.

Fong said he didn’t think there was anything else he could do. And he didn’t seek help from any of the big national veterans groups.

“I didn’t go to them because I thought the VA was helping me,” he said. “I didn’t get wise until years later.”

Fong built a life in the Miami area. He had a successful career as a commercial artist and remained passionate about flight, even serving on a NASA committee that helped select teacher-in-space candidates.

He dabbled in acting, getting bit parts on “Miami Vice” and the movie “Miami Rhapsody,” starring Sarah Jessica Parker.

But the blindness in his left eye was making work as an artist impossible. He also wasn’t coping well with life, although he didn’t know why.

In 1997, this time with the expert help of a service officer from the Florida Department of Veterans’ Affairs, Fong filed another claim with the VA for his blindness, as well as a new claim for his back injury.

He also got a piece of advice from another veteran that he’s followed ever since.

“He told me, ‘Frank, when they turn you down, appeal it. Appeal the crap out of them,’ is what he said, ‘and you’ll get something.’ And I noticed each time I appealed I got something.”

At a reunion of his World War II fighter group, Fong learned how to get copies of his flight logs to prove his claims. With this new evidence, the VA granted his claims for blindness and back injury in October 1998, making payments retroactive to the filing of his 1997 claim.

The service officer also recognized that Fong had the classic symptoms of post- traumatic stress disorder. He sent Fong to the Miami Vet Center, where counselors diagnosed him with the disorder, records show, and he began to get treatment.

But the VA denied his post-traumatic stress disorder claim, based on a VA doctor’s opinion that Fong didn’t have the disorder. So the service officer helped Fong get two additional expert opinions to refute the denial. Eventually another VA psychiatrist said what the others had said all along: Fong suffers from severe post-traumatic stress disorder. In June 2000, the VA finally granted his claim.

In 2002, the VA denied Fong’s request that the effective date on his blindness claim be set back to 1950 – the date he first applied. He’s been appealing that ever since.

Fong’s lack of success isn’t surprising.

The VA’s arcane rules give veterans a year to appeal a denied claim, otherwise the clock stops on any back pay. So it doesn’t matter that in 1950 a VA doctor failed to diagnose the scar on Fong’s retina. All that matters is that Fong didn’t file an appeal within a year, the VA has ruled.

But based on questions raised by Knight Ridder about the adequacy of the VA doctor’s exam and the agency’s failure to pull Fong’s flight surgeon records, VA officials last month said the St. Petersburg Regional Office will take another look at whether Fong’s entitled to back pay for his blindness. Knight Ridder, the VA said, “brings up some relevant points regarding the left eye injury.”

Last month, based on questions raised by Knight Ridder, VA officials said they’d take another look at whether Fong is entitled to back pay for his blindness.

This time the VA came to a different conclusion – but the agency still won’t be giving Fong any back pay.

On Feb. 16, the VA agreed that Fong’s eye injury existed back in 1950, but it says there’s no proof that it was disabling enough then to warrant any compensation.

The VA appears to have focused solely on those medical records that say Fong had 20/20 or 20/30 vision in the 1950s. Agency officials gave little explanation about how they weighed contradictory evidence in Fong’s file that show his vision loss and downgraded flight ratings in the 1940s and 1950s.

Hamburger, the eye expert, said the damage to Fong’s left eye was clear in 1950. “He was blind from the very beginning and should be compensated for it,” he said. “The man needed to fly and a doctor put down that he could see temporarily so he could go back up in his plane and fight again. People will do that in a time of great emergency.”

Fong says he’ll file another appeal. Despite his age – Fong turns 86 in April – VA officials said he isn’t eligible for expedited processing.

“They don’t want to pay out the money,” Fong said. “It’s as simple as that.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Veteran Wages 54-Year Fight Against VA for War Wounds

Oakland VA office making strides to improve service to veterans

Oakland VA office making strides
BUSY CLAIM CENTER, ONCE AMONG NATION’S WORST, HAS TAKEN STEPS TO REDUCE ITS BACKLOG OF CASES

Three years ago, the Oakland regional office of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs was among the nation’s worst at processing claims in a timely manner, state and federal audits showed.

The office, which handles disability claims for all Northern California veterans, had a backlog of 23,000 cases and took an average of more than 33 weeks to process a claim.

Today, that number is down to 11,135 and the processing time has been cut by six weeks at the office, which is the third busiest in the nation with more than 94,500 veterans receiving disability benefits. But a variety of factors could swell the number of claims waiting to be processed, adding to the frustration of veterans who have to deal with the system.

California veterans have reason to be frustrated: The state’s three regional centers had a higher percentage of people who waited 12 months or more for claims to be processed than 39 other states, according to a 2003 Veterans Affairs survey obtained by Knight Ridder. And if a claim is denied, it still takes an average of 12 months to process an appeal, according to the Oakland office.

“They are tremendously overworked,” said Elinor Roberts, legal director for Swords to Plowshares, a San Francisco non-profit that provides counseling, housing and legal assistance to veterans. “Having said that, it’s no excuse for some of the things that slip between the cracks or amount of time it takes.”

Roberts said one of her first cases, in 1990, involved a Vietnam veteran whose disability claim had been repeatedly denied since he filed it when he got out of the military in 1974. The claim was finally granted in 1992.

“The system is just not user-friendly,” she said.

Despite backlogs and delays, lawyers and others who help veterans in the paper chase for benefits say the Oakland office is one of the better ones. Fifty-nine percent of veterans who filed claims there expressed some level of satisfaction, according to a recent Veterans Affairs survey.

The department has had “a change in attitude in dealing with claims,” said Jack Kerwin, California’s chief of veterans services. “They seem to be a little more customer oriented, and it’s nice to see. Any improvement is welcome.”

In 2001, the California Association of County Veterans Service Officers conducted a survey asking veterans to comment on their experiences with the Veterans Affairs claims process. The responses were mostly “unforgiving,” according to the association, which published a sample.

“The VA has taken two years to process my claim,” one veteran responded. “They sent me to basic training, advanced infantry training and 12 months of combat in less time! This is a disgrace!”

Things began to change after an audit three years ago by the inspector general, when the Oakland regional office said it was adding people to a satellite office in Sacramento to help reduce the backlog.

Currently, Oakland’s processing time is a little under 28 weeks. But that is still well over the federal department’s goal of 14 weeks.

Not surprisingly, regional director C.L. Smith said in an e-mail that the most frequent complaint from veterans is, “Why is my claim taking so long?”

“Unfortunately, it sometimes takes longer than we would like for us to obtain the necessary evidence we need in order to support a claim and make an appropriate determination,” she said.

The poor preparation of some claims also can slow things down. Veterans can and do submit claims on their own, but they’d be better off doing it through a county Veterans Services office, according to many familiar with the system. The county offices are run with state and county funds and serve as a veteran’s representative, preparing claims and following them through the regional offices.

But when veterans are given a realistic explanation of what to expect, they tend to be more satisfied, said George Compton, president of the association and head of the Ventura County veterans office. “I look them in the face and say it’s going to be six to nine months,” Compton said.

Contact Pete Carey at pcarey@mercurynews.com or (408) 920-5419

Posted in VA Claims Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , | Comments Off on Oakland VA office making strides to improve service to veterans

St. Paul office has top claims-approval rate

St. Paul office has top claims-approval rateWomen and minority veterans in Minnesota weren’t applying for U.S. government benefits promised to them for injuries suffered in the service of their country. The same was true for Vietnam veterans with diabetes and for those whose injuries had worsened over the years.

So the state went out and found them.

Minnesota spends as much as $1 million a year to reach veterans who may have been injured during their service — to help them navigate the Department of Veterans Affairs’ behemoth bureaucracy and to keep tabs on the VA employees who determine whether compensation is deserved.

Mike Pugliesi, commander of the Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs, considers it an investment.

According to the most recent VA annual benefits report for fiscal year 2003, Minnesota had 39,139 veterans receiving disability compensation and a federal payout on that compensation of $308 million.

More veterans say they are pleased with the VA in Minnesota than in any other state, according to an annual VA survey of veterans.

It’s no wonder. Veterans using the St. Paul regional office reported their claims were approved 89 percent of the time — the highest percentage among the VA’s 57 regional offices, according to a 2003 VA survey of veterans. (The number excludes claims that were pending at the time of the survey.)

The numbers reflect a philosophical change that evolved over the past decade, Pugliesi said. The regional office dropped the view that undeserving veterans were out to scam the system, and the adversarial relationship between the state and federal governments softened, Pugliesi said.

“Years ago, the attitude and the mind-set of trying to do what’s right by our veterans wasn’t exactly there,” Pugliesi said. But now, “the law says benefit of the doubt goes to the veteran. They adhere to that.”

To ensure that end, Pugliesi said the state veterans department serves as watchdog over the federal office in St. Paul. If a federal ratings representative routinely denies veterans’ claims, the state brings it to the attention of the director, Pugliesi said.

Vince Crawford, director of the VA’s regional office in St. Paul, refused repeated requests for interviews. In a written statement, he said the office approves or denies claims based only on the law. Those that are rejected lack medical evidence linking the disability to the veterans’ military service, the statement said.

For the small percentage of veterans whose claims are rejected each year, the appeals process can be frustrating and tedious at best, lawyers who appeal the denials say. With cases that have lingered in the VA’s appeal process more than five years, it is difficult to believe the St. Paul regional office has the best record for approving claims, said Minneapolis lawyer Tracy Capistrant.

One of her clients, Paul Gregor Jr., a National Guard reservist who injured his knees in 1993 while training for active duty in Corpus Christi, Texas, fits in both sides of St. Paul’s VA system. After 12 years of appeals, the VA approved his claim. In December, he was awarded a $108 monthly check and $12,000 for benefits he should have received while appealing his initial claim.

Still, Gregor, 43, continues to appeal the VA’s ruling because it found that only his right knee was cause for compensation. Gregor says he suffers from the same ailment — chondromalacia patella — in his left knee, which the VA has ignored. Doctors say they aren’t sure what caused the injury, but Gregor said he’s sure it’s related to the training. Just before he started, he said, he could run two miles in 15 minutes.

“Sometimes I feel like I want to give up and just say the heck with it — but with my kids, I can’t,” said Gregor, who lives in Arco, just west of Marshall, Minn., with his wife and four children.

Had a veterans’ representative with better knowledge of the system handled Gregor’s claim, his lawyer said, he might have received benefits earlier.

The state’s 87 counties each employ at least one representative — a veterans’ service officer — to handle the initial paperwork involved in a veteran’s benefits claim. Unlike many other states, Minnesota tests its service officers, certifies them every year and provides at least two training conferences a year, Pugliesi said.

The county representative hands off the claim to one of 15 representatives, employed by the state or a veterans organization, who will then argue the case before the regional office. The state is looking to hire at least two more representatives to handle the crush of claims, Pugliesi said.

In the meantime, the state VA continues to push more claims through the regional office.

Pugliesi said female and minority veterans received half the benefits paid to white male veterans. So the state hired a former police officer to find the veterans and help them apply for benefits.

Since he started visiting barbershops, churches and social workers in September, Reggie Worlds said he has signed up 23 veterans.

Two years ago, using a computer database of veterans it had compiled, the state tried to find Vietnam veterans who might have developed Type 2 diabetes through exposure to Agent Orange.

The next veterans the state plans to contact are those with gunshot wounds. Errors were made when the veterans from World War II, Korea and Vietnam were first evaluated and the veterans may be due more money.

“We’re going to find every reason why we should grant, versus any reason we should deny,” Worlds said.

MINNESOTA VETS

Number of veterans in Minnesota: 420,000

VA regional office: Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling. Hours: 7:30 a.m. to 8 p.m., Monday through Friday. 800-827-1000.

Minneapolis VA Medical Center: 1 Veterans Drive, Minneapolis. 612-725-2000.

St. Cloud VA Medical Center: 4801 Veterans Drive, St. Cloud. 320-252-1670.

Two years ago, using a computer database of veterans it had compiled, the state tried to find Vietnam veterans who might have developed Type 2 diabetes through exposure to Agent Orange.

Beth Silver can be reached at bsilver@pioneerpress.com or 612-338-6516.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on St. Paul office has top claims-approval rate

Lawyers look for errors in VA claims

Lawyers look for errors in VA claims


Mistakes occur at every level, they say

Tracy Capistrant and Becca Wong know they can win government checks for the disabled veterans who visit their law office after years of fighting the Veterans Administration.

The trick, the two Minneapolis lawyers say, is to find the government’s error — something they say exists in nearly every case they come across.

Capistrant and Wong are two of just a hundred or so lawyers across the country who practice in this legal niche. The cases can drag on for years. The pay is paltry. The process of deciphering 10-inch-thick stacks of veterans’ service and medical records is tedious.

Yet, they believe, with persistence they will prevail for veterans who they say fought for their country and shouldn’t have to fight for their benefits.

“If you have acute attention to detail, you will find within those files where the VA has made a misstep,” Wong said.

Errors are made on every level and by everyone: the veterans filing the claims, the service officers who represent them and the regional office that has denied their claims, Capistrant and Wong said. Often, the VA simply fails to notify the veteran of an appeal in a timely manner or sends correspondence to the wrong address, they said.

Another common mistake occurs when a VA doctor examines the veteran making the benefits claim. If the doctor fails to reference the veteran’s case file, the lawyers will argue that it was an inadequate exam, and the VA may reverse its decision, Capistrant said.

Capistrant and Wong said they also work around the VA. They hire their own doctors to perform medical exams on the vets, and if the doctors can attest that the veterans were injured while in service and that they still suffer from the injuries, the VA may approve the claims, Capistrant said.

Nearly nine out of 10 veterans who apply for disability benefits in Minnesota receive them, according to an annual VA survey of veterans.

The veteran first applies to the regional office in St. Paul. If that office denies the claim, the veteran can ask that the Board of Veterans Appeals review it, and the claim may ping-pong between those two levels for three to five years, on average, before it reaches the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, Capistrant said. Only then does federal law allow a veteran to seek legal representation.

Capistrant, 41, began taking veterans’ cases in 1997 when a partner in her Uptown law firm told her a judge was seeking lawyers to work for veterans. Wong, 52, joined her fellow William Mitchell Law School classmate in 2002. Together, they have represented about 30 veterans, they said. Half of their cases are ongoing claims.

Wong and Capistrant said they’re not in it for the money, but because they think it’s the right thing to do.

“They pay a huge price for their country, and they come back and get the door shut in their face,” Capistrant said.

Beth Silver can be reached at bsilver@pioneerpress.com or 612-338-6516.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Lawyers look for errors in VA claims

Georgia Veteran’s Advice: Get documentation on military injury to get VA benefits

Georgia Veteran’s Advice: Get documentation on military injury to get VA benefits

Ned Reese is considerably more successful helping other veterans get disability benefits than he has been with his own case.

After having trouble with a claim he filed to the Department of Veterans Affairs, Reese volunteered to be a service officer at the state headquarters for Disabled American Veterans in Macon. In 1996, the Vietnam veteran sought benefits for post traumatic stress disorder, and his case is still pending.

But he has learned in recent years just what documentation veterans need to get benefits. He has also taken annual training to assist veterans.

“If they come to me and I do it, it may take a year or two but they get it,” he said.

The key, he said, is to have an abundance of proof that an injury is related to war service. It’s not always easy.

“They may know you got hurt, but you’ve got to prove you got hurt,” he said.

A Knight Ridder investigation found that it can sometimes take years for veterans to obtain disability benefits through the VA, and thousands die before they get benefits.

Michael Lynch, president of the Middle Georgia Chapter of Vietnam Veterans of America, also said documentation is key to speeding the process.

“The main things people are doing, or not doing, is they walk into the VA and say they have a problem, and they can’t substantiate that problem,” Lynch said.

A common difficulty, he said, is that soldiers often suffer minor injuries in combat that do not become a problem until they get older. That’s why so many have trouble proving an injury is combat-related.

It’s not uncommon, he said, to see ads in veterans magazines that are seeking fellow soldiers who might have been in a certain battle on a certain day and saw a certain soldier get injured. Such witnesses are often needed to prove combat-related injuries, Lynch said.

To file a disability claim, veterans in Bibb and six surrounding counties must go to the Georgia Veterans Service office on Second Street in Macon, where three people handle an estimated 15,000 to 25,000 veteran contacts per year.

Office manager George Canavaggio said delays in obtaining benefits are not caused by shortage of staff, but more often by a shortage of documentation from the applicant.

“They need the medical evidence to support their claims,” he said.

Newly discharged veterans who have been injured recently in combat can usually have an answer on their claim within a few weeks, Canavaggio said, because most of the time it’s not difficult to document the injury. But veterans seeking claims from the Vietnam era or earlier could expect to wait up to 18 months, he said.

Reese said the difficulty with his claim is that the VA concluded his condition didn’t exist, but he says he has ample proof. He believes a big problem is that medical examinations for benefit claims are done by physician’s assistants.

“I think what is wrong is they don’t have experienced people grading these things,” he said. “These guys, I don’t think, are qualified.”

For soldiers currently serving in Iraq, Reese’s advice is to make sure they get as much documentation as possible if they get injured, even if the injury does not seem serious at the time.

“I would do my best to make sure you get names, places, dates,” he said.

To contact Wayne Crenshaw, call (478) 275-1116 or e-mail wcrenshaw@macontel.com

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Georgia Veteran’s Advice: Get documentation on military injury to get VA benefits

A Fighting Strategy for Veterans

A Fighting Strategy for Veterans

Military veterans are crying foul over President Bush’s budget proposals to cut spending on their health care. The budget must not be balanced “on the backs of veterans,” wrote Stephen P. Condon, the chairman of the Air Force Association, in a recent letter to The Times, a point that was echoed by other veterans at Congressional hearings last month. We agree with the veterans – but for somewhat different reasons than they have put forth.

The veterans’ goal is to block the president’s attempt to impose new hospital fees, higher prescription co-payments and other spending constraints – all of which would add up to an estimated 16 percent reduction in veterans’ benefits in 2010. (The estimate is from the nonprofit Center on Budget and Policy Priorities because the administration, breaking with 16 years of budget tradition, did not provide five-year projections for specific programs.) But if veterans succeed in preserving only their own benefits, they will have been outfoxed by the administration.

Mr. Bush knows that wartime is no time to go after veterans’ benefits. But by proposing changes that are politically implausible while challenging Congress to cut spending, the administration gains a bargaining chip: if lawmakers aren’t willing to make the veterans’ cuts the president has proposed, they will be pressured to make even deeper cuts in programs for people who don’t have the veterans’ ability to fight back.

In effect, Mr. Bush’s budget pits veterans against the 660,000 women, infants and children whose food assistance is on the chopping block; against the 120,000 preschoolers who would be cut from Head Start; against the 370,000 families and disabled and elderly individuals who would lose rental assistance; against the whole communities that would lose support for clean air and drinking water; and so on.

The only way for veterans to avoid those unacceptable trade-offs is to refuse to fight on the president’s terms. The size and scope of Mr. Bush’s proposed spending cuts are a direct result of his refusal to ask for tax-cut rollbacks – that is, to ask wealthy investors, who have had lavish, deficit-bloating tax cuts over the past four years, to contribute toward deficit reduction. On the contrary, Mr. Bush’s budget proposes even more tax breaks, specifically for people with six-figure incomes or more and overflowing investment portfolios.

Most galling, the new tax cuts would be, in themselves, so large that the net spending cuts Mr. Bush has requested would not be enough to pay for them, let alone reduce the existing deficit.

Veterans have the moral and institutional clout to argue that no one group should be singled out to make sacrifices until all groups are asked to sacrifice. Bolstering that case is the fact that all successful deficit-cutting budgets have included tax increases on the affluent, including President Reagan’s 1983 budget, the first President George Bush’s 1991 budget and President Bill Clinton’s 1994 budget. Mr. Bush’s 2006 budget must do the same. If veterans drive that point home, the benefits they’ll save will be their own, and those of many women and children, too.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on A Fighting Strategy for Veterans

New VA Secretary Blames VA Workers for Disparities in Disability Payments

New VA Secretary Blames VA Workers for Disparities in Disability Payments

Illinois’ wounded veterans are receiving among the lowest disability pay in the nation possibly because federal Veterans Affairs disability raters in Chicago are too harsh and inadequately trained, top VA officials said Friday.

“The difficulty comes in when the claims are subjective or vague — lower back pain or a mental disability,” VA Secretary Jim Nicholson told a crowd of veterans and VA officials at the Yorkville American Legion in Kendall County.

“There’s a human factor of a guy sitting on this side of the desk rating and there’s a veteran over there. That’s a subjective call. That’s where the difficulty is.”

In his first official visit to Illinois since assuming the top post nearly five weeks ago, Nicholson said subjectivity in disability decisions is just one factor in the VA inspector general’s investigation into the national disability system.

That investigation began in December after a Chicago Sun-Times series revealed Illinois veterans have received among the lowest disability pay in the country for the last 70 years. Most recently, that disparity has left Illinois’ wounded veterans with $5,000 less on average than disabled veterans from other states and Puerto Rico.

Nicholson said he was “quite surprised” and “troubled” when he learned of the disparity from the newspaper and is determined to find answers. He refused to say what the inspector general’s investigation has discovered so far, and said the probe won’t be done for “a few more months.”

Handpicked veterans attend

Another issue federal investigators are focusing on is whether disability raters have standardized training in making decisions in at least five kinds of cases that require individual judgment, such as when a veteran has post-traumatic stress disorder or schizophrenia.

Another puzzling finding investigators are questioning is why Illinois’ percentage of veterans receiving disability compensation is the lowest in the country; only 6 percent of Illinois veterans receive disability pay.

“That has to be a factor in this whole thing,” Vice Admiral Daniel Cooper, the VA undersecretary for benefits, told veterans.

Appearing in Yorkville and at the Elgin VFW, Nicholson and his staff spoke with about 60 veterans Friday as he traveled with U.S. House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert in Hastert’s district. VA officials and workers nearly outnumbered the veterans, who were handpicked by their organizations to meet with Hastert and Nicholson. A few uninvited veterans showed up at the Yorkville American Legion and were allowed to sit in the back as long as they didn’t ask any questions, they said.

Nicholson, who called himself the nation’s “chief veterans advocate,” tried to relate to his rural audience by saying he grew up in a small town in Iowa, where his first exposure to the VA was when a buddy came back from Korea with an amputated leg and sought care.

Why so long, vets ask

Veterans questioned Nicholson about a variety of issues, including the federal budget, privacy surrounding a claim of post-traumatic stress disorder, health care for National Guard and Reserve veterans and treatment of homeless veterans. But the question that came up most frequently was why it takes so long for a veteran to get a decision on his or her disability claim and even longer on an appeal.

Nicholson said there are 330,000 backlogged claims — an improvement from 432,000 claims just 2-1/2 years ago — and he hoped to hire more raters and step up training to improve the claims turnaround.

Nicholson’s visit to rural Illinois angered U.S. Senators Barack Obama and Dick Durbin, who had both invited him to Chicago before he took office. Both senators are tiring of an investigation that is entering its third month.

“We are disappointed that these brave veterans are still waiting for the answers they deserve and that Secretary Nicholson will not have an opportunity to speak with more of the veterans who are hurting all across Illinois,” the senators said in a statement.

Obama later told the Sun-Times he didn’t think the inspector general’s investigation should take long to produce, and that he and Durbin had been cut out of Nicholson’s meeting.

Hastert defended Nicholson’s visit, which bypassed Chicago, where the majority of the state’s nearly 1 million veterans live.

“Those senators have to worry about the whole state,” Hastert said. “I can only bring him into my district. That’s where I can go.”

Nicholson said he would come to Chicago before the report is complete, but he couldn’t answer questions about the disability disparity until the inquiry was concluded.

Contributing: Dave McKinney

Posted in VA Claims Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , | Comments Off on New VA Secretary Blames VA Workers for Disparities in Disability Payments

Knight Ridder Removes Article Highly Critical of VA

Vanishing News: “VA’s red tape squelches veterans’ long-overdue disability claims”

 

Knight Ridder investigative reporters Chris Adams and Alison Young wrote a lengthy news article claiming more than 13,000 veterans died during the past ten years while awaiting word from the Department of Veterans Affairs about their disability benefits.

 

Update: Knight Ridder releases article 3/6/05

 

http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/index.cfm?Page=Article&ID=2928

 

 

Their investigative news article also profiled several veterans and their problems dealing with VA and provided many interesting statistics resulting from a lawsuit by Knight Ridder against VA.  The article detailed how some veterans’ families may have lost tens of thousands of dollars due to unreasonable delays at VA.

 

VA Secretary Robert James Nicholson had no comment about the serious difficulties experienced by veterans uncovered by Knight Ridder.

 

Unfortunately, the article vanished from dozens of Knight Ridder newspaper web sites yesterday

during the time between when veterans sent links to Veterans for Common Sense and then VCS staff went to post the news to VCS.

 

An extensive search of the internet found only “XXXX” where the text of the article was previously distributed by Knight Ridder at more than one dozen news papers.

 

The scrubbing of the article raises very serious questions.  Was the publication of the article a mistake?  Was Knight Ridder pressured into retracting the investigation?  VCS will follow this news closely.

 

Update (March 4, 2004): VCS has obtained through one of our members the original text of the article which was purged.  Read the original article here:

 

http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/index.cfm?Page=Article&ID=2913

 

VCS provides links below so veterans and supporters can see the article actually existed but is no longer available.

 

To replicate this search, go to “Google,” enter “Chris Adams” and “VA,” and then search news.  More than one dozen links will appear with the headline,” VA’s red tape squelches veterans’ long-overdue disability claims. 

 

Then try to click on any of the links provided by Google.  Instead of the article, readers will discover “XXXX” and a posting date of March 3, 2005.

 

The text below is all that remains of the article when searches are conducted at each specific Knight Ridder newspaper:

 

http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/search/search_results.htm?pubName=charlotte&orderBy=date&pageStart=1&sitesToSearch=charlotte{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d}2Cobserver{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d}2Crealcities&pageSize=10&fieldsToSearch=HEADLINE{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d}2CFORSEARCH{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d}2CLEAD{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d}2CBYLINE&queryType=all&searchSelect=article&query=Chris+adams

 

DRY RIDGE, Ky. – Like thousands of his fellow veterans of America’s wars, Alfred Brown died waiting.  In 1945, when he was a 19-year-old soldier fighting in Italy, shrapnel from an enemy shell ripped into his abdomen.  His wounds were so severe that he was twice administered last rites.  When Brown came home, the government that had promised to care for its wounded veterans instead shorted him.

 

Here are links to other Knight Ridder newspapers where the article vanished:

 

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/mld/sanluisobispo/news/nation/11040334.htm

 

http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/news/nation/11040334.htm

 

http://www.grandforks.com/mld/grandforks/news/nation/11040334.htm

 

http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/nation/11040334.htm

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Knight Ridder Removes Article Highly Critical of VA

The Sand Storm: Stories from the Front

“This Decalogue of monologues has shocking force and awesome honesty…candid, uncensored, and blistering…heart-clutching, eye-witness mosaic…”

—Los Angeles Times

In remembrance of the two-year anniversary of the war in Iraq, a private Operation Truth benefit show will launch the play on Thursday, March 17 at 8pm.

Cocktails and a panel discussion featuring Sean Huze and OpTruth’s Paul Rieckhoff and Robert Acosta will follow the performance. Tickets are $100 and are only available by contacting Parveen Doshi at (212)

982-9699 or parveen@optruth.org.

The play addresses the experiences of Sean Huze, an actor who joined the U.S. Marine Corps on September 12th, in direct response to the events of September 11th. The story is based on the war as experienced by some of the Marines of 2nd Light Armored Reconnaissance Battalion. They fought through Nasirya, Al Kut, Baghdad, Tikrit and many places in between. Now their stories can be heard. Their accounts of the war, related in ten chilling monologues, expose the rage, honor, courage, commitment, doubt, fear, and remorse experienced by the men who followed their orders and accomplished every mission they received. These men earned the name of ‘Destroyers’ from the Iraqi opposition and were among the most feared units the Iraqis encountered.

According to the LA Times, ‘The Sand Storm’ “serves up experiential truth without editorializing, as first time playwright Huze himself has so heroically done.”

The Sand Storm: Stories from the Front will open to the public on March 18 and run to April 23, 2005, on Thu, Fri, & Sat @ 8 at the Elephant Asylum Theater, 6320 Santa Monica Blvd., Hollywood, CA 90038. All seats are $20. For tickets, call Plays411 at (323) 960-4410 or visit:

www.plays411.com/sandstorm

More info is available at www.thesandstorm.com and www.optruth.org .

 

 

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on The Sand Storm: Stories from the Front

Key Iraq War Wound: Brain Trauma

Key Iraq War Wound: Brain Trauma

A growing number оf U.S. troops whоѕе bоdу armor helped thеm survive bomb аnd rocket attacks аrе suffering brain damage аѕ a result оf thе blasts. It’s a type оf injury ѕоmе military doctors say hаѕ bесоmе thе signature wound оf thе Iraq wаr.
Edinburg personal injury lawyers gives you compensation for your injury which you deserve. Shaun Radhay , a Marine, suffered brain damage and other injuries in a mortar blast. By H. Darr Beiser, USA TODAY

Known аѕ traumatic brain injury, оr TBI, thе wound іѕ оf thе sort thаt mаnу soldiers іn previous wars nеvеr lived lоng еnоugh tо suffer. Thе explosions оftеn саuѕе brain damage similar tо “shaken-baby syndrome,” says Warren Lux, a neurologist аt Walter Reed Army Medical Center іn Washington.

“You’ve got great bоdу armor оn, аnd уоu don’t die,” says Louis French, a neuropsychologist аt Walter Reed. “But there’s a whоlе оthеr set оf possible consequences. It’s sort оf like whеn thеу started putting airbags іn cars аnd started seeing аll thеѕе orthopedic injuries.”

Thе injury іѕ оftеn hard tо recognize — fоr doctors, fоr families аnd fоr thе troops thеmѕеlvеѕ. Months аftеr bеіng hurt, mаnу soldiers mау look fully recovered, but thеіr brain functions remain labored. “They struggle muсh mоrе thаn уоu think just frоm talking tо thеm, ѕо thеrе іѕ thаt sort оf hidden quality tо it,” Lux says.

Tо identify cases оf TBI, doctors аt Walter Reed screened еvеrу arriving servicemember wounded іn аn explosion, аlоng wіth thоѕе hurt іn Iraq оr Afghanistan іn a vehicle accident оr fall, оr bу a gunshot wound tо thе face, neck оr head. Thеу fоund TBI іn аbоut 60{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} оf thе cases. Thе largest group wаѕ 21-year-olds.

Frоm January 2003 tо thіѕ January, 437 cases оf TBI wеrе diagnosed аmоng wounded soldiers аt thе Army hospital, Lux says. Slightly mоrе thаn half hаd permanent brain damage. Similar TBI screening began іn August аt National Naval Medical Center іn Bethesda, Md., near Washington. It showed 83{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} — оr 97 wounded Marines аnd sailors — wіth temporary оr permanent brain damage. Forty-seven cases оf moderate tо severe TBI wеrе identified earlier іn thе year.

Thе wound mау соmе tо characterize thіѕ wаr, muсh thе wау illnesses frоm Agent Orange typified thе Vietnam Wаr, doctors say. “The numbers make іt a ѕеrіоuѕ problem,” Lux says.

An explosion саn саuѕе thе brain tо mоvе violently inside thе skull. Thе shock wave frоm thе blast саn аlѕо damage brain tissue, Lux says. “The good news іѕ thаt thоѕе people wоuld hаvе bееn dead” іn earlier wars, says Deborah Warden, national director оf thе Defense аnd Veterans Brain Injury Center. “But nоw they’re alive. And wе need tо help them.”

Symptoms оf TBI vary. Thеу include headaches, sensitivity tо light оr noise, behavioral changes, impaired memory аnd a loss іn problem-solving abilities.

In severe cases, victims muѕt relearn hоw tо walk аnd talk. “It’s like bеіng born аgаіn, literally,” says Sgt. Edward “Ted” Wade, 27, a soldier wіth thе 82nd Airborne Division whо lost hіѕ right arm аnd suffered TBI іn аn explosion lаѕt year near Fallujah. Today, hе ѕоmеtіmеѕ struggles tо formulate a thought, аnd hіѕ eyes blink repeatedly аѕ hе concentrates.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Key Iraq War Wound: Brain Trauma