Army Gives Family No Answers in Suicide

Army Gives Family ‘No Answers’ in Suicide

By Theola S. Labbe
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 11, 2004; Page A01

KATY, Tex. — Carol Coons keeps her son’s dog tags and framed photo in the living room, on the same shelf as the dried roses from his memorial service.

She keeps her file folder in a kitchen drawer. “I call this my investigation folder,” she said, pulling it out, dog-eared and thick with research, scribbled names and notes from her many phone calls to Washington officials. “We just had all these questions, and they had no answers.”

On June 21, 2003, the Army evacuated Master Sgt. James Curtis Coons, 36, from Kuwait after he overdosed on sleeping pills. He told doctors he was seeing the shattered face of a dead soldier in the mirror. They diagnosed him with post-traumatic stress disorder, sent him to a hospital in Germany and then to their premier treatment facility, Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Northwest Washington. By July 4 he was dead, hanging from a bedsheet in his room at Mologne House, a hotel for outpatients and families on the grounds of Walter Reed.

Nineteen months later, Carol Coons and her husband, Richard, have not given up their quest for answers. Why wasn’t her son admitted as an inpatient? Why, after four days of worried phone calls, did it finally take a 2 a.m. call from his wife to get someone to check on him? How long had he been dead before his body was found?

James’s widow, Robin, has another question, not about how her husband died but how he is remembered. Today, as the nation honors the service and sacrifice of its veterans, she wants to know: After 17 years of military service, after a Bronze Star awarded for Operation Iraqi Freedom, why is the name of James Coons not counted among the Iraq war dead?

“That really makes me angry. How can he not be put in there as a casualty of war? I don’t understand that,” Robin said. “It’s like, because he did that to himself, he’s forgotten.”

‘His Life Was the Army’

The boy his parents called Jimmy seemed destined for the military. At 5, he was enthralled with helicopters and practiced parachute jumps from backyard trees. As a teenager, he displayed a fastidiousness unusual for his years. “He would fold his dirty clothes before putting them in the hamper,” said Carol Coons, 55.

He entered the Army in 1987, right after high school, and spent a short time as a field artilleryman before switching to the specialty that would define his military career, the signal corps. It required attention to detail as well as a way with people. For Coons, working on the computer systems that allowed soldiers to communicate with each other seemed a natural fit.

As a member of the 385th Signal Company, he was stationed in Texas and Japan before moving on to Carlisle Barracks in Carlisle, Pa. Don Watkins, the command sergeant major of the post, was Coons’s next-door neighbor there and became his close friend. In the evenings, the men would chat at the chain-link fence. Coons confided his goal of reaching the rank of sergeant major.

“He was an outstanding, dedicated soldier,” said Watkins, now retired. “His life was the Army, and he always wanted to go to the top.”

Watkins selected Coons as the first sergeant of the company, putting him in charge of 125 soldiers. Coons was 6-foot-2 and handsome. He looked like a recruiting poster for the military.

“Everything was squared away,” said Sgt. Hector Pedroza, 24, who worked under Coons.

He had a no-nonsense attitude with his soldiers, Pedroza said, but he was also approachable. Pedroza sought out Coons when he was unsure whether to marry his military girlfriend because he feared that they would be separated. Coons urged him to make the commitment, and after Pedroza did, his wife got pregnant, which helped get them placed together.

“He was my role model,” Pedroza said. “A lot of things that I did, I thought, ‘What would he do?’ ”

Coons and his wife, Robin, 29, a former preschool teacher whom he met when he worked as a military recruiter in Texas, lived on the Pennsylvania base with his daughter from a previous marriage. He and Robin had a second daughter in 2001.

“He called us ‘his girls,’ ” Robin said. “He just always let us know how much he loved us.”

Coons also played the prankster. In family portraits with Robin and the children, he would pose bug-eyed. He once mooned the children at an extended family party. Still, even at home, the military influence ran deep. He had his children stand in line, backs straight, chests out, eyes forward, then would tell them to relax. Laughing, Robin would admonish: “They’re not your soldiers, they’re your daughters.”

He had one blemish on his military career: In 1990, when he was 22, he was sentenced to 90 days in jail and paid a $1,150 fine for a DWI offense while stationed at Fort Hood, Tex. His mother said he had turned down his father’s offer of a lawyer because he wanted to accept the full punishment. “He liked to take care of things properly,” she said.

After three years in Pennsylvania, when the time came for Coons to be deployed again, he had a choice of Korea or Kuwait. He chose Kuwait. After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Robin said, “he wanted to be a part of that.”

He arrived at Camp Doha in Kuwait in July. The signals corps there had already supported several missions in Afghanistan. But the country was on the brink of a much bigger war.

‘Our Rock of Gibraltar’

In the months leading up to the March 2003 invasion of Iraq, Camp Doha was bustling. Members of the 385th Signal Company readied telephones, computers and other communication infrastructure. Coons supervised the soldiers and civilian contractors on the base, working more than 100 hours a week in the desert heat. At night, the troops slept in bunkers to avoid incoming missiles.

Coons called his wife at least once a week. Always organized, he kept scribbled notes in his planner and reminded Robin about dentist and doctor appointments for the children. Coons also spoke often with his father; Richard, 56, had served in the signals corps in Vietnam, and the two men compared notes.

“The closer it got to the actual conflict, you could tell that he was pumped up, he really wanted to talk,” Richard said.

Coons was patriotic and eager. “What I do now is not about me. It’s about the American flag,” Coons wrote to his mother in February. In an e-mail two days before the invasion, he wrote: “I am very proud to have this opportunity to serve and lead soldiers into possible combat.”

The military recognized Coons’s leadership during Operation Iraqi Freedom with a Bronze Star. “His actions ensured complete dominance and victory on the battlefield,” the citation reads.

But the flush of victory had worn off by June, and the bodies of soldiers killed during the occupation arrived at the Camp Doha morgue.

Coons set up the morgue communications network. One time, he asked a morgue worker to show him a body so he could pay his respects. He told his friend Carol Hairston, a contractor, that he couldn’t get the image out of his mind. “He said he would go home and dream about them, and it felt like he was in a nightmare.”

At first he couldn’t sleep. According to Coons’s medical records, he went to a doctor on June 1 complaining of headaches and stress. The doctor diagnosed depression and prescribed an antidepressant, possible counseling and a follow-up visit in two weeks.

Coons was close to going home. The unit was scheduled to return at the end of the month, and he had trained his replacement. He would be reunited with his family and had been accepted to the Army’s Sergeant Majors Academy, the realization of his longtime dream. He would start in January.

But he was haunted by the mutilated face. When he looked in the mirror, according to his medical records, he saw the face of the corpse instead of his own. On June 17, he took 10 sleeping pills and then had his stomach pumped at the base hospital. “I just wanted to make it stop,” he said, according to his medical records.

Lt. Col. Anthony R. Williams, commander of the 54th Signal Battalion, went to the hospital that night. When doctors told him that Coons had tried to hurt himself, “I was blown away,” Williams said. “I saw him every day, and he performed above and beyond. I never saw a sign of someone under stress. He was our Rock of Gibraltar.”

Doctors labeled it a “suicidal gesture” and admitted Coons as a psychiatric patient for four days. At first, Coons denied that he had intended to kill himself and seemed anxious about how the incident could affect his military career.

But after the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder, he said he realized that he needed help. Under constant observation, Coons isolated himself in the hospital, slept for hours and refused to participate in ward activities.

He was evacuated to Germany, where he stayed for several days, and called his family and friends.

“He told me he was sick, and when I asked him about it, he said, ‘I’ll tell you about it when I get home,’ ” said Richard Coons.

Robin said she last spoke to her husband on June 28. He told her he was headed for Walter Reed.

“I asked him if he wanted me to meet him, and he said no, because he thought he would only be there for a few days. He said he would call when he arrived, or would have someone else call if he couldn’t,” Robin said.

Her phone never rang.

Coons was evacuated from Germany on June 30, and his medical report said, “Not an imminent risk to self/others.”

‘It’s an Insult’

Exhibit 32 of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Report referring to July 4, 2003:

“At about 2:15 a.m., lady called who said she was the wife of Rm 179 (Coon). . . . She wanted to know if anyone had seen him since he checked in on the 30th. I asked housekeeping to go over and check it out. Door was bolted from inside. . . . We waited a while then . . . got permission to get key.”

Exhibit 6 of the report:

“I opened the door, and noticed a strong smell of decay, then saw the body of a male hanging by the neck just inside the door. I immediately closed the door and went . . . to contact the police.”

The report cleared a Walter Reed doctor of negligent homicide in Coons’s death.

Walter Reed responded to five requests for an interview with a written statement issued yesterday through the U.S. Army: “To minimize the risk of suicide” among psychiatric patients, “we do a thorough clinical assessment, referral to an appropriate level of care, and monitoring for changes in risk status. Regrettably, even with the highest level of care, suicide is not always predictable or preventable.”

No suicides have occurred at the hospital since January, the statement said. Another soldier reportedly killed himself then.

Coons’s autopsy, performed by the office of the D.C. medical examiner, lists the date of death as July 4, the day the body was found. At the request of The Washington Post, the coroner of Allegheny County, Pa., Cyril H. Wecht, reviewed the autopsy and said the level of decomposition suggested that Coons had been dead “at least 72 hours.”

Coons missed a doctor’s appointment July 1, according to the investigation report, which does not address whether anyone followed up. The date of death matters greatly to his mother, who spoke of her son’s patriotism. “For someone to say he died on the Fourth of July, it’s an insult to his memory,” she said. “He loved this country.”

Peter Anderson, general manager of Mologne House, did not return calls seeking comment.

Richard, Carol and Robin Coons visited Walter Reed the month after James died but came away unsatisfied. “If somebody screwed up, be man enough to tell me you screwed up and my son fell through the cracks, and this is what we’re going to do to make sure that it doesn’t happen again,” Richard Coons said.

No public announcement was made about Coons’s death, and his name does not appear on the official Department of Defense listing of Iraq war dead.

A Defense Department official said yesterday that the department is revising its casualty policy and considering whether to include “mental health casualties” — soldiers who served in war and died by suicide outside the combat zone. The policy now recognizes soldiers who commit suicide only while in the war zone. If Coons had died in Kuwait from his overdose, the Army would have considered him a war casualty.

But each service branch has some discretion in how it classifies deaths. Col. Joseph G. Curtin, an Army spokesman, said the Army review board “is willing to communicate with the family on this matter.”

Staff researcher Bobbye Pratt contributed to this report.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Army Gives Family No Answers in Suicide

The Things They Wrote: The Just-In-Case Letters Home from Fallen Soldiers


November 11, 2004

VETERANS DAY

The Things They Wrote

A year ago the Op-Ed page marked Veterans Day by publishing excerpts from letters written home by soldiers who lost their lives in Iraq. At the time, fewer than 400 Americans had died in Operation Iraqi Freedom. This year Veterans Day takes place during the battle for the Iraqi city of Falluja, where at least 11 Americans have been killed this week. Since the beginning of the war, the number of American dead in Iraq, according to the Pentagon, stands at 1,149. Thousands more have been wounded.

Below are passages from letters sent this year by men and women, now dead, to their families in the United States.


Excerpts from letters to his parents from Pfc. Moisés A. Langhorst of the Marines. Private Langhorst, 19, of Moose Lake, Minn., was killed in Al Anbar Province on April 6 by small-arms fire.

March 13

As far as my psychological health, we look out for each other pretty well on that. … I’ve been praying a lot and I hope you’re praying for the Dirty 3rd Platoon, because there is no doubt that we are in the Valley of the Shadow of Death.

March 15

After standing in the guard tower for seven-and-a-half hours this morning, we went on our first platoon-size patrol from about 1200 to 1700. It was exhausting, but it went very well. I had to carry the patrol pack with emergency chow, a poncho and night vision goggles. That’s what really wore me out.

We toured the mosques and visited the troublesome abandoned train station. The people were friendly, and flocks of children followed us everywhere.

When I called you asked me if Iraq is what I expected, and it really is. It looks just like it does on the news. It hardly feels like a war, though. Compared to the wars of the past, this is nothing. We’re not standing on line in the open – facing German machine guns like the Marines at Belleau Wood or trying to wade ashore in chest-deep water at Tarawa. We’re not facing hordes of screaming men at the frozen Chosun Reservoir in Korea or the clever ambushes of Vietcong. We deal with potshots and I.E.D.’s. With modern medicine my chances of dying are slim to none and my chances of going home unscathed are better than half. Fewer than 10 men in my company have fired their weapons in the 10 days we’ve been here.

March 24

While not always pleasant, I know this experience is good for me. It makes me appreciate every little blessing God gives me, especially the family, friends and home I left behind in Moose Lake.


Excerpt from an e-mail message to her cousin on his wedding day from Sgt. First Class Linda Ann Tarango-Griess of the Army. Sergeant Tarango-Griess, 33, of Sutton, Neb., was killed on July 11 in Samarra by an improvised explosive device.

May 14

So today is your big day? Wow! It seems like just yesterday that I was making you peanut butter and jelly sandwiches and Malt-O-Meal. We experienced a lot together as we grew up and for the life of me, I can’t think of a time that you and I never got along. IS THAT NORMAL?

I never thought I would see the day that you settle down and get married, but here you are. You couldn’t have picked a more wonderful person than Rachel. She is very sweet, very giving and most important, she loves you. Be good to her. I am sorry I can’t be there to share in your day, but here I am in hopes that one day, these people will have the chance to be as happy as you. Just know that I AM with you … just close your eyes, place your hands on your heart, and you will feel me there.


Excerpts from letters to his 2-year-old son and his wife from Sgt. Christopher Potts of the Army. Sergeant Potts, 38, of Tiverton, R.I., was killed on Oct. 3 in Taji by small-arms fire.

January

Hi my big guy. How are you? I miss you bad. I miss things like you calling for me in the morning when you hear me in the kitchen, or when you come home at the end of the day. I also miss cooking for you and Mom. But most of all I miss your big hugs. I enjoy hearing your voice on the phone and seeing the pictures you draw for me. I’m sorry for not writing you till now. But the days are very long here, and we only get about four-and-a-half hours sleep a night. I got up a little early to write this because I know you need your own letter too.

March 18

Hi my love. Well, where should I start? First we left Kuwait after being issued a combat load of ammo – M-16 ammo, grenades, smoke grenades, grenade-launcher ammo and C-4. I knew that night that this is for real. Some people paced, some people slept, some of us had to write the just-in-case letters, some just sat. The letter-writing was a real hard thing to do, it definitely makes you aware of the situation and your life. But you’ll never have to read it – unless you want to when I get home. It’s weird because I’m not afraid of what might happen, or the pain of it. I’m just afraid of not being able to see you again.

The first leg of the trip through the desert was really bad. There were children of all ages from God knows where begging for food and water. The dust was blowing all over them, and some had torn outgrown clothes, and some were barefoot. I looked over at my driver and we were both crying after a few miles. I said to him, You know, this is why I’m here, so that my kids won’t ever have to live like that. Then we just drove in silence for a while.

As we got closer to Baghdad you could see blown-up military equipment, ours and theirs. People were on the side of the road selling gasoline out of plastic jugs. There was diesel and fuel spilled everywhere … then you’d see some slaughtered lambs on the side of the road. The meat is hanging out in the sun and dirt and germ-infested air. Farther down the road there were people bathing and washing up. Other people were picking through garbage.

I hope today I can call. I miss you so much that as I write this part my eyes are running. The TV in the mess hall said you got snow yesterday. I wish I was there to shovel. I hope you are being taken care of.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on The Things They Wrote: The Just-In-Case Letters Home from Fallen Soldiers

The Forgotten Casualties of War: Over 17,000 U.S. Troops Wounded

The Forgotten Casualties of War: Over 17,000 U.S. Troops Wounded

President Bush predicted victory in Fallujah and wished U.S. soldiers “Godspeed” in their mission as the bloody U.S. assault on the city entered its third day.

His comments came during a visit of wounded soldiers at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington DC. It was Bush’s sixth visit to wounded troops at the veteran hospital since he launched his so-called “war on terror” in late 2001. He spent two hours with soldiers recuperating from injuries suffered in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush said “It’s so uplifting to see their spirit, their drive to become rehabilitated, their love of their country, their support of the mission.”

While Bush was with the recuperating wounded, American casualties continued to mount. 10 U.S. troops have been killed in the bloody urban warfare in Fallujah. The total U.S. death toll in Iraq has surpassed 1,100. While the number of U.S. soldiers killed is widely reported, what is rarely mentioned is the many thousands more wounded.

  • Mark Benjamin, UPI Investigations editor. He has been closely following the hidden US casualties from the Iraq war. He was awarded the American Legion’s top journalism award for 2004 for his reporting last year on the plight of hundreds of sick, wounded and injured soldiers at Fort Stewart, Ga.


RUSH TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is available free of charge, however donations help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
Donate$25, $50, $100, more…

AMY GOODMAN: We are joined by Mark Benjamin. He is an investigations editor with UPI, who has closely followed the hidden U.S. casualties from the Iraq war. He won the American Legion’s top journalism prize for 2004 for his reporting last year on the plight of hundreds of sick and wounded and injured soldiers at Ft. Stewart, Georgia, and their lack of care. Mark Benjamin, welcome to Democracy Now!

MARK BENJAMIN: Thank you for having me.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about the numbers, as you understand them today, of, not the dead, but the wounded?

MARK BENJAMIN: Well, with respect to the wounded, the Pentagon does report a number that it says is the number of soldiers that are wounded in the war. I think we’re running around 7,000 or 8,000 in Iraq. But what that number does not include is the number of soldiers who are wounded or ill, or injured in operations that are not directly due to the bullets and bombs of the insurgents. So, for example, as of mid-September, if you take actually Afghanistan and Iraq together, there were 17,000 soldiers who were injured or ill enough to be put on airplanes and flown out of theater, and none of those casualties, and I call them casualties because they fit the Pentagon’s definition of casualties, none of those casualties appear on any public casualty lists.

AMY GOODMAN: How do you get these figures, and why aren’t they being more reported?

MARK BENJAMIN: You have to ask the right questions. If you go to the Pentagon, and you take their own definitions of casualties and ask you them the right questions, they will give you some answers. So, for example, the reason why I started asking questions is that I visited eight major military facilities around the country — well, in the United States and Europe, and frankly, I just saw more soldiers that were hurt than seemed to be reflected in the Pentagon reports. They — the Pentagon says, when I asked them what was on and not on their casualty lists, they said they weren’t keeping track of the number of soldiers. The Pentagon told me we are not keeping track of the number of soldiers who are wounded or ill or injured that are not hit by the enemy’s bullets and bombs. If you go to the Pentagon’s transportation command, however — these are the people that put wounded soldiers on airplanes and fly them out — they will give you some data. What the Pentagon says is, well, not every single person who is put on an airplane and flown out of Iraq is a casualty; some of them may have appendicitis, and so on and so forth. But they won’t tell you how many of each category there are. So in other words, we know that there are thousands and thousands and thousands of potential casualties that are not being reported.

AMY GOODMAN: And how are these troops being treated? You could refresh people on your groundbreaking story on Ft. Stewart, Georgia, and what was happening there. But what has happened since, as well?

MARK BENJAMIN: What has happened since is that essentially the treatment of the soldier, I think, depends to a certain extent on how badly they’re injured, how they’re injured and what stage of the treatment they’re in. So for example, the military is very, very good at getting to wounded soldiers in the field and putting them on airplanes, flying them out of Iraq, taking them to Lahnstuhl, Germany, taking care of them and bringing them to Walter Reed. These are people hit by, for example, improvised explosive devices and missing arms and legs. As you go down the spectrum of casualties in terms of people that have their backs broken in car accidents, or frankly, people that have mental problems which is a growing and very serious toll from this war, which I think is also underreported, the treatment, at least according to soldiers, is not as good. I would add one other thing. The new, I think the latest, phenomenon that seems to be occurring is we now see an increasing number of soldiers reaching the end of their medical care with the military, and being put out of the military, now in the hands of the VA. And while I believe there’s some very, very capable people and caring people at the Veteran’s Administration, they appear to be overloaded, and we’re reaching a situation now where sick, wounded and otherwise hurt soldiers are being essentially put out of the military and not getting the kind of care that I think they would like at the VA. And I think there are some soldiers that are starting to fall through the cracks.

AMY GOODMAN: Mark Benjamin, as when you see once again, President Bush going to Walter Reed Hospital, your final thoughts?

MARK BENJAMIN: I’m certainly glad that the president is visiting the troops. I think he’s probably seeing part of the picture. For example, I suspect they probably took him to the — one of the wards there where they have more of the traditional war injuries as opposed to, for example, Ward 54, which is where I visited, which is the in-patient psychiatric ward where we have soldiers who frankly have been driven deeply insane by combat. I wish that the American people knew more about what is happening with respect to the toll of this war, because I think it’s a lot bigger and a lot more troubling than most people know.

AMY GOODMAN: Mark Benjamin, I want to thank you for being with us. UPI reporter.

MARK BENJAMIN: Thank you for having me.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on The Forgotten Casualties of War: Over 17,000 U.S. Troops Wounded

For women vets, a battle along with a war


For women vets, a battle along with a war

FORT BRAGG, N.C. – With their buddies driving Humvees and dodging snipers in Iraq, a group of seven Fort Bragg soldiers – all women – formed their own convoy yesterday, en route to a wreath-laying ceremony in Washington, D.C., to honor America’s 1.7 million women vets, and all those who came before.

Link to Falluja Combat Photographs: http://www.csmonitor.com/slideshows/fallujah/slide1.html

Their predecessors broke some of the most stubborn barriers in the US Armed Forces. But this group has made its own contributions to military lore: Capt. Betsy Hove is one of only six serving Army women to have graduated from the Army’s Sapper leadership and combat training, and Capt. Lee Ann Campbell has logged more helicopter combat missions than any other woman pilot in her battalion’s history. They joined several hundred women vets from World War II, Korea, and Vietnam to lay a wreath and present a quilt made by women aboard the USS Comfort on the steps of the Women’s Veterans Memorial at Arlington National Cemetery.

“We really want to honor all the ones who have gone before, but we want to make sure our living history is preserved, too,” says Capt. Mara Boggs of the 82nd Airborne Division.

It was only 30 years ago that some women wore makeup to basic training and never laid a finger on a rifle trigger. But today’s women veterans are poised to not only make history, but challenge popular perceptions of “girl soldiers” and battle national concerns over how, exactly, women should be allowed to serve. They’re still barred from about 30 percent of active-duty roles, including Special Forces and ground combat on the front lines. Yet in the asymmetrical Iraq conflict, with its snipers, road bombs, and perilous supply lines, not carrying an M-16 is scant protection against getting killed. This war, as these seven Joans of Arc know, is helping define how this fastest-growing group of US veterans is popularly perceived.

“The Iraq war has seen the most women lost since World War II, and is really the first time that people are aware that women are out there, the first time that’s in their face,” says First Sgt. Paula Keehn (ret.), webmaster of militarywoman.org in Sioux County, Iowa, and a 20-year Army veteran. “You turn on the TV and there’s a Humvee with a 50 caliber on top and a little tiny girl behind it, just shooting the heck out of somebody.”

Though US servicewomen aren’t fighting in Fallujah, roughly 1 in 7 Americans serving in Iraq is female, and the officers corps is rising rapidly, as is the women’s medal count. So far, 26 American women soldiers and three civilians have died, many of them in combat.

American women have fought, sometimes disguised as men, since the Revolutionary War, and their legacy is one of rough ascent, struggling to dispel rumors and resentment in the trenches as they fight old stereotypes.

“In the Gulf War, the image was more of ‘Mommy goes to war,’ but today there’s much more of a perception of women out there in the field, doing stuff that we used to think only men did,” says Navy Capt. Lory Manning (ret.), director of the Women in the Military Project at the Women’s Research and Education Institute. “But that also means we’ve seen the good, the bad, and the ugly.”

Indeed, from the kidnapping and dramatic rescue of Pfc. Jessica Lynch, to the photos of Pfc. Lynndie England mocking Iraqi detainees at Abu Ghraib, the narratives from this war have focused on stereotypes: the spunky waif and the deviant. There have been stories of rape and harrassment, too. But on the ground, women are forging ahead as part of an integrated Army and fighting for equal opportunity in the ranks.

“I’m not ready to say that integration is going smoothly, and I think the public needs to get a more balanced picture of what’s going on,” says Chris Hanson, a University of Maryland journalism professor writing a book about leadership’s view of women soldiers, tentatively called “Spinning Justice.”

Critics worry that the country is seeing the feminists’ view, and not a reality that may be harder to bear. “One woman soldier was blown up by a roadside bomb … but lived long enough to die in the arms of her husband, who was stationed nearby. It was a very, very sad story, yet hardly anyone ever heard of it,” says Elaine Donnelly, the director of the Center for Military Readiness, which opposes combat roles for female soldiers.

Indeed, the recommendations of the Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces were never heard by Congress after Bill Clinton was elected president, a failure that critics say set a bad precedent. What’s more, says Ms. Donnelly, moves like the 1994 inclusion of women in assignments to house searches and MP patrols in dangerous neighborhoods were made without proper research into the effects of dangerous deployments on families. “We know what effect sonar has on whales, but we’ve never studied how children react to extended deployments of their mothers,” she observes.

And though the prospect of a draft has been dismissed by President Bush, many fear reaction to the conscription of women, should a call-up ever be necessary. “I don’t see how you could have a draft without women being eligible for it, and there would be a huge outcry,” says Mr. Hanson.

Women’s service is changing the outlook for veterans, too. This week, the Center for Women Veterans outlined a broad plan to study posttraumatic stress syndrome in women, and the Department of Veterans Affairs has designated73 outreach specialists to work with women vets.

Yet at the same time, older groups like the Women’s Auxiliary Corps are losing members, as former men’s organizations, including the American Legion, now admit women.

To Keehn, that’s a price worth paying. “Before, women soldiers were always hidden,” she says. “Today we still don’t know exactly how many women were in Vietnam, but we were there, and performing, and our actions started the integration of women into the mainstream. Today, the whole thing is to try to get over the gender issue, stop looking at men and women, and look at it as a team.”

That notion of unity was exactly the point for the seven Fort Bragg women at yesterday’s wreath-laying ceremony. It was, they said, a small, symbolic way to show solidarity with those who have gone before – and to celebrate their own remarkable role in women’s history.

“A lot of us in this group have broken the mold,” says Captain Boggs.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on For women vets, a battle along with a war

The crushing of Fallujah will not end the war in Iraq

The Crushing of Fallujah Will Not End the War in Iraq

It is likely to be as disappointing in terms of ending the resistance as the capture of Saddam.

    The belligerent trumpetings of the US Marines bode ill for Fallujah. Sgt Major Carlton W Kent, the senior enlisted marine in Iraq, told troops that the battle would be no different from Iwo Jima. In an analogy the Pentagon may not relish, he recalled the Tet offensive in Vietnam in 1968 and added: “This is another Hue city.”

    American voters last week never seemed to take on board the extent of the US military failure in Iraq. The rebel control of Fallujah, half an hour’s drive from Baghdad, was the most evident symbol of this. It was as if a British government in London had been forced to watch as an enemy force occupied Reading for six months.

    The US army ceded control of much of western Iraq during the Sunni uprising last April. Its failure to recover fully from this setback underlines the extent to which the US as a military power has proved itself much weaker than the rest of the world had assumed before the invasion of Iraq last year.

    There is no doubt that the US can recapture Fallujah, if only by blowing most of it up. But this is unlikely to have much of an effect on the guerrilla war in central and northern Iraq which continues to escalate. It is still unclear how far the rebels will stand and fight against the massed firepower of the marines and the US air force. They know they are far more effective in launching pin-prick attacks with roadside bombs and suicide bombers.

    The recapture of Fallujah is likely to be as disappointing in terms of ending the resistance as was the capture of Saddam Hussein last December or the hand-over of sovereignty to an interim Iraqi government at the end of June. Each event was billed as a success which would tip the balance towards the US. Instead the fighting got bloodier and more widespread.

    There should be no mystery about why this is happening. All countries object to being occupied. Foreign invasions provoke nationalist resistance. This has happened with extraordinary speed in Iraq because of the ineptitude of the US civil and military commanders, but in the long term it would have happened anyway.

    The US in Iraq has always behaved as if the resistance was fomented by foreign powers or adherents of Saddam Hussein. A lesson of the ground war last year was that few Iraqis were prepared to get killed for their old leader. Earlier this year I asked American helicopter pilots operating from a base near Fallujah whom they thought they were fighting. They said firmly that they were at war with “FFs” and “FRLs”. These turned out to be Foreign Fighters and Former Regime Loyalists. One of the pilots added nervously that there seemed to be a third somewhat shadowy group “who want us to go home”.

    The US and the British are trying to seize Fallujah and the central Euphrates cities . These may have been the original heartlands of the rebellion, but today there are guerrilla attacks in every Sunni region in Iraq. US and interim government control of Baghdad is limited.

    One of the strangest justifications for the attack on Fallujah is that it will allow an election to take place. This would only be true if the Sunni rebellion was a mirage and was entirely the work of FFs and FRLs oppressing a local population yearning to break free. A much more likely result of an increase in the fighting is a boycott of the election by the Sunnis. Even if they do vote then there is no reason to suppose that the guerrillas will stop fighting any more than the IRA laid down its arms despite numerous elections in Northern Ireland in the 1970s and 1980s.

    The election will take place in January and voting will be heavy because Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the Shia religious leader, wants the Shia to show at the polls that they are 60 per cent of the population. The Kurds, who total another 20 per cent, will also take part. But Sistani has made clear ever since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein that he is against the occupation and has steadfastly refused to meet American officials. The Sunni, another 20 per cent of the population, have shown that they are strong enough to destabilize Iraq just as long as they want to. (The Kurds, with a similar proportion of the population, were able to destabilize Iraq for almost half a century.)

    It is worth remembering that the elections are taking place largely because of armed resistance. Until guerrilla war started in the summer of last year US officials in Baghdad were speaking airily of an American occupation going on for years. It was only as the military situation deteriorated by the week that the US suddenly decided to appoint an interim government and hold elections. Many Iraqis say quietly that the only way to get concessions from the Americans is to shoot at them.

    The French failed to hold Algeria against a nationalist revolt despite fielding an army of half a million. With similar numbers the US failed in Vietnam. With a much smaller army in Iraq, it will fail again. As in Algeria and Vietnam, the war in Iraq will only cease when an end to the occupation is in sight.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on The crushing of Fallujah will not end the war in Iraq

Veterans Day News: Veterans Return Home from War, Yet Many Lack VA Healthcare


Vets return, but not always with healthcare

As the nation honors its veterans Thursday, some advocates say too many are falling through the cracks.

By Alexandra Marks

Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

November 10, 2004

After serving 410 days in Iraq with the 1st Armored Division, Spc. Stuart Wilf came home to Colorado on Oct. 2. He changed his clothes, borrowed his mother’s car, and went out with friends to celebrate.

On the way home, he fell asleep at the wheel and had a head-on collision with a tree. He survived, but since he was newly discharged, he had no health insurance.

“That was a mind-boggling thing to find out the first day he’s out of the service,” says his mother, Becky Wilf. “His bill was $54,000 just for the hospital. That doesn’t include the surgeon.”

Specialist Wilf is just one of thousands of veterans returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan who advocates contend are falling through the cracks of a federal system unprepared to deal with so many soldiers. After spending months in a war zone, many of the 170,000 soldiers who’ve returned home are struggling with their transition to back to civilian life – from coping with a maze of red tape and contradictory messages on healthcare to finding affordable housing and jobs with adequate incomes to accessing disability payments.

One of the biggest problems, according to advocates and a report by the Government Accountability Office, is a lack of resources to deal with battle fatigue, or posttraumatic stress disorder, as it’s now called. Another is providing support for Reserve and National Guard troops, who make up 45 percent of the troops in Iraq.

“The bottom line is that the VA [Department of Veterans Affairs] wasn’t prepared for the 33,000 troops that have come back and gone to the VA needing care,” says Paul Rieckhoff of Operation Truth, a nonprofit advocacy group for veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan. “They’re definitely not ready for the flood that’s going to come back next year.”

View from the other side

The VA disputes that and says it has ordered its services so that returning veterans will receive top-priority care. Last year, it announced that it would no longer be able to provide health services to veterans who make more than $26,000 a year (on average) and have no service-connected health problems. As a result, VA spokeswoman Cynthia Church says that what were once “unbelievable wait times” have been reduced. That allows the VA to treat returning combat veterans who were wounded or have service-related problems for free for two years.

“No veteran now waits longer than 30 days for their first appointment,” she says. “In terms of access to facilities, we’ve got more than 158 hospitals and more than 800 clinics, and we contract with service providers in communities where there may be a need.”

The VA’s policy are less clear when it comes to vets like Wilf, who sustained injuries after he was discharged. He and his family spoke with four different VA representatives and were told that because his injuries were not combat related, he was ineligible for VA care.

After inquiries from reporters, the VA in Washington said that if Wilf had been enrolled in the VA system, he would have been eligible for treatment for noncombat problems because he had just returned from combat duty. But he would have to pay for a percentage of the cost if he were able, and he would not be a priority case. “Part of the problem is the way the law reads. It says it’s mandatory to provide care for a condition possibly related to service, but doesn’t really address treatment of an unrelated condition,” says Gary Baker, head of the Eligibility Center at the VA.

Wilf has since filled out the application to enroll but is still waiting for it to be processed. In the meantime, the hospital where he was treated has forgiven most of the $54,000 bill because he was technically indigent. But he still has another $24,000 in related bills to pay.

Wilf was active duty, but some returning troops in the National Guard and Reserves have also found themselves without healthcare. When they were activated, they were eligible for Tricare, the Defense Department’s health-insurance program, but they lost coverage when they returned home.

Last summer, however, Congress voted to extend Tricare coverage for 180 days after deactivation. And last month, it voted to extend the coverage again, this time allowing Guard and Reserve troops to receive a year of Tricare coverage for every 90 consecutive days they serve.

Mr. Rieckhoff of Operation Truth lauds Congress for the move, but he contends it’s still not enough. He points to his own situation. He was on active duty and served as an infantry platoon leader in central Baghdad for 11 months. But now he finds himself in a job with no insurance. He was also told that the VA would treat only service-related injuries.

“The ironic part is that I’m drilling in the National Guard. It’s not like I’m completely out of the military,” he says.

Harvard’s numbers

A study done at Harvard University has found that almost 1.7 million veterans of all wars lack health insurance, an increase of 13 percent since 2000. More than one in three vets under the age of 25, like Wilf, have no health insurance.

“It’s particularly offensive to send people off to war and not take care of them when they come home,” says Dr. Steffie Woolhandler, a professor at Harvard Medical School and coauthor of the study.

The VA contends the number of veterans without healthcare coverage is far smaller. Ms. Church says 60 percent of those uninsured veterans would be eligible for care if they enrolled in the VA. The study’s authors dispute that, noting that many have incomes higher than $26,000, live in areas where there are no VA services, or were unable to receive care due to long waiting lists.

Church charges that the study’s authors are using the issue of uninsured vets to further a political agenda of creating a national health-insurance system.

Veteran activists discount that. “This is not a political issue; it’s a soldier issue,” says Steve Robinson of the National Gulf War Resource Center.

A Gulf War veteran, he retired from active duty in October 2001, applied for benefits in 2002, and has yet to be enrolled in the VA healthcare system. “What happens in Washington is that these important things get turned into political footballs to get kicked around,” he says. “Then the issue doesn’t get the attention it deserves.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Veterans Day News: Veterans Return Home from War, Yet Many Lack VA Healthcare

Judge Says Detainees’ Trials Are Unlawful

Judge Says Detainees’ Trials Are Unlawful

Ruling Is Setback For Bush Policy

By Carol D. Leonnig and John MintzWashington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, November 9, 2004; Page A01

The special trials established to determine the guilt or innocence of prisoners at the U.S. military prison in Cuba are unlawful and cannot continue in their current form, a federal judge ruled yesterday.

In a setback for the Bush administration, U.S. District Judge James Robertson found that detainees at the Navy base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, may be prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions and therefore entitled to the protections of international and military law — which the government has declined to grant them.

The decision came in a lawsuit filed by the first alleged al Qaeda member facing trial before what the government calls “military commissions.” The decision upends — for now — the administration’s strategy for prosecuting hundreds of alleged al Qaeda and Taliban detainees accused of terrorist crimes.

Human rights advocates, foreign governments and the detainees’ attorneys have contended that the rules governing military commissions are unfairly stacked against the defendants. But Robertson’s ruling is the first by a federal judge to assert that the commissions, which took nearly two years to get underway, are invalid.

The Bush administration denounced the ruling as wrongly giving special rights to terrorists and announced that it will ask a higher court for an emergency stay and reversal of Robertson’s decision. Military officers at Guantanamo immediately halted commission proceedings in light of the ruling.

“We vigorously disagree. . . . The judge has put terrorism on the same legal footing as legitimate methods of waging war,” said Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo. “The Constitution entrusts to the president the responsibility to safeguard the nation’s security. The Department of Justice will continue to defend the president’s ability and authority under the Constitution to fulfill that duty.”

Robertson ruled that the military commissions, which Bush authorized the Pentagon to revive after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, are neither lawful nor proper. Under commission rules, the government could, for example, exclude people accused of terrorist acts from some commission sessions and deny them access to evidence, which the judge said would violate basic military law.

Robertson said the government should have held special hearings for detainees to determine whether they qualified for prisoner-of-war protections when they were captured, as required by the Geneva Conventions. Instead, the administration declared the captives “enemy combatants” and decided to afford them some of the protections spelled out by the Geneva accords.

Robertson ordered that until the government provides the hearing, it can prosecute the detainees only in courts-martial, under long-established military law.

Robertson issued his decision in the case of Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a detainee captured in Afghanistan in late 2001 and accused of being a member of al Qaeda. Robertson’s opinion is expected to set the standard for treatment of other detainees before military commissions. So far, four Guantanamo Bay detainees have been ordered to stand trial.

The unusual coalition of defense lawyers and conservative military law experts who banded together to challenge the commissions hailed the decision as a major victory in efforts to level the playing field for the detainees, some of whom have been held for nearly three years.

“We are thrilled by this ruling,” said Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, a New York-based group that represents the families of some Guantanamo Bay prisoners. “Military commissions were a bad idea and an embarrassment. The refusal of the Bush administration to apply the Geneva Conventions was a legal and moral outrage.”

Kevin Barry, a retired Coast Guard judge who is critical of the Pentagon’s legal justifications for the Guantanamo Bay detentions, called Robertson’s ruling a “remarkable” decision that “will give heart to all who think the rule of law should apply in the Afghanistan conflict.” Barry said the war on terrorism is the first U.S. war since the Geneva Conventions’ adoption in 1949 in which the government has not accorded POW status to enemy fighters.

“Even the Viet Cong, who were farmers by day and fighters at night, were accorded that status,” he said. “The judge got these issues right.”

The government has been under pressure since June to revise other facets of its strategy for handling the cases of the more than 500 Guantanamo Bay detainees. In a landmark ruling that month, the Supreme Court rejected the government’s argument that the president may indefinitely hold and interrogate alleged al Qaeda and Taliban members captured on the battlefield without filing charges or providing them lawyers.

The court ruled that the detainees were entitled to hear the charges against them and challenge their imprisonment in U.S. federal courts. Nearly 70 have filed such challenges, called habeas corpus petitions, in federal courts here.

Since the Supreme Court ruling, the government has begun holding “combatant status review tribunals” at Guantanamo Bay for each detainee to determine whether he should continue to be held. The detainees do not have legal representation at those hearings. So far 317 hearings have been held and 131 cases have been adjudicated, all but one in favor of continued detention.

Douglass Cassel, director of the Center for International Human Rights at the Northwestern University School of Law, said he hopes the Bush administration reconsiders its overall strategy in light of the Supreme Court’s June decision and Robertson’s ruling yesterday.

“I hope the government sits back and says, ‘This is a chance to regain the high ground in the court of public opinion,’ ” he said. “This decision is of enormous importance to the perceived commitment of the United States to the rule of law.”

But Douglas W. Kmiec, a Pepperdine University law professor, called Robertson “sadly mistaken” for intervening in the case at this point. He said the judge should have postponed any ruling until the military commissions had completed their work.

Eugene R. Fidell, a Washington lawyer specializing in military justice, said it will be difficult for military commissions and status review panels to decide fairly whether a detainee is a prisoner of war, after top executive branch and military leaders have declared all of them enemy combatants, not POWs.

“That’s where they got into trouble,” Fidell said. “The people driving the train were not people familiar with the military justice system.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , | Comments Off on Judge Says Detainees’ Trials Are Unlawful

Editorial: We can hate the battle while loving the soldier

EDITORIAL

We can hate the battle while loving the soldier

Veterans Day is an appropriate time for us to focus on a lesson we should have learned during the Vietnam War. We can embrace the soldier while disdaining the war.

In the military, patriotism must be revealed through obedience. A disobedient soldier places his comrades at risk. The social contract that binds civilians and their leaders allows for dissent. The pact between soldier and military leader does not, and should not, allow for protest.

For a civilian, war protests at times signal patriotism, not betrayal. Civilian patriotism in a democracy is measured not by blind obedience to the reigning political power but by obedience to America’s set of beliefs and ideals. When those ideals conflict with U.S. conduct, civilians should feel no shame for their dissent.

A soldier, however, can have no such privilege.

Our military presence in Iraq, as was our military presence in Vietnam, is the source of great turmoil within this nation. Some see the Iraq war as a critical step in protecting our homeland from terrorists. Others see the war as a horrible mistake wrought by careless leaders. Some even believe the war to be a consequence of corporate greed.

This nation’s experience with large-scale wartime controversy was born in Vietnam. A tacit understanding between Americans and their elected officials had, before Vietnam, kept a muzzle on most protest.

Our lack of experience showed; many who protested that war did so badly. Advocates for peace too often used violence and hate as their tools. War supporters too often labeled democratic dissent as treason.

The most dramatic failure during Vietnam was our nation’s inability to separate policy from soldier. We too often condemned those whose sacrifice was greatest when our protest should have targeted only those who made policy. We killed the pawn to spite the king.

Today, Veterans Day, is a good time for a gut-check. Our democratic political system is designed to function even when protests are loud and dissension is great. We can protest the war without betraying our country.

What we cannot do, however, is blame those whose patriotism exposes them to horror every day. As we sit in our armchairs, getting no closer to combat than the evening news, we have no standing to fault those who face death and violence in a hostile land. We can change the channel. They cannot.

We hate war because we love its victims. Today, let us focus on that love.

THE DECATUR DAILY
201 1st Ave. SE
P.O. Box 2213
Decatur, Ala. 35609
(256) 353-4612
webmaster@decaturdaily.com

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Editorial: We can hate the battle while loving the soldier

Colorado High School Students Stage Sit-In to Protest Iraq War

Boulder High students end post-election protest

By P. Solomon Banda
The Associated Press
Friday, November 05, 2004

Boulder, Colorado (AP) – At least 70 students worried about war, a return of the draft and the future of the environment staged an overnight protest in the Boulder High School library before leaving peacefully this morning.

The students said they wanted assurances from political leaders about the direction of the country.

Rep. Mark Udall, D-Colo., met with some of the students for about an hour after they left the library at 7 a.m.

“We’re worried that in four years we’re going to be at war with five countries and we’re going to have no trees,” senior Cameron Ely-Murdock said. “I know that’s an extreme position, but I’m really worried about the draft.”

President Bush and other administration officials have repeatedly said they have no plans to reinstate a draft, despite concerns about the number of troops needed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Principal Ron Cabrera agreed to let the students spend the night in the library if they would leave in time for Friday morning classes, which they did. A handful of teachers and parents stayed with them.

“It’s become a really large learning event about civics and having a political voice. And you can’t beat that,” Cabrera said.

The sit-in began after school Thursday. The students, who brought sleeping bags and food, said they were not protesting Bush’s re-election but were worried about the national debt, Iraq and other issues.

“People are deciding stuff that’s going to affect us, and we didn’t have a say in it,” said Maisie Salinger, 15, a freshman with a peace sign painted on her face.

The students said they wanted to talk to representatives of GOP Gov. Bill Owens and U.S. Rep. Marilyn Musgrave, R-Colo. Musgrave sponsored the failed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.

It was not clear whether either received a request or responded, but Boulder County Republican Party vice chairman Bill Eckert met with some students.

“They have every right to have their voices heard,” he said.

“But their views are based on a lack of information and knowledge, and I think we owe it to them to help alleviate their fears.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Colorado High School Students Stage Sit-In to Protest Iraq War

More Details on Kauai Veteran Ordered to Active Duty

Soldier sues over his recall to service

A Kauai man gets a 30-day delay
as he challenges Iraq duty

By Gregg K. Kakesako
November 7, 2004
gkakesako@starbulletin.com

A Kauai resident who was discharged from the Army in 1996 but recalled recently has been granted a 30-day exemption from reporting for active duty after he filed a federal lawsuit charging that the Army’s mobilization order was illegal.

David M. Miyasato, who served in the 1991 Gulf War, said he was surprised on Sept. 18 when he received orders to report to Fort Jackson, S.C. on Nov. 9.

Miyasato, 34, said he believed he had completed his eight-year obligation with the Army in 1996.

“It was really a shock,” Miyasato told reporters yesterday. “My family took it really hard for the first week. They were really confused over what was happening.”

He and his wife, Estelle, have a 7-month-old daughter, Abigail.

Miyasato said he never re-enlisted, signed up for any bonuses or was told that he had been transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve or any other Army Reserve unit.

Miyasato, who started an auto-tinting shop in Lihue two years ago, said he wrote to the Army pointing out that his enlistment had ended in 1996 after he served three years on active duty and another additional five in the inactive reserve.

When he received no answer from the Army, Miyasato turned to U.S. Rep. Ed Case and Sens. Daniel Inouye and Daniel Akaka to help him.

Miyasato said Akaka and Case were told by the Army that it would take 60 days to conduct an investigation.

Miyasato said going AWOL was not an option, so instead he hired attorney Eric Seitz, who requested a restraining order from the federal courts.

Seitz said he “wanted to fight the matter here” and didn’t want Miyasato shipped to any Army post where he wouldn’t be able to communicate with him.

Within hours after Miyasato filed his suit yesterday morning, the Army responded saying that his “exemption from active duty had not been finalized at this time” and he was given an administrative delay for up to 30 days.

An Army spokeswoman at the Pentagon told the Star-Bulletin last night that the military wasn’t ready to comment on the matter.

Miyasato enlisted in the Army in October 1987 before he graduated from Kauai High School in 1988. He was assigned to the 3rd Armor Division in Germany and was sent to 4th Squadron, 7th Cavalry. Before Christmas in 1990, his unit was deployed first to Saudi Arabia. It then joined the ground war in Iraq and was sent to Kuwait for a month. He served as an Army petroleum supply specialist and a truck driver during the war.

Miyasato said that on Aug. 15, 1991, he received an honorable discharge.

He said he tried calling and writing to U.S. Army Human Resources Command in St. Louis, but never received a response until yesterday.

Miyasato surmised that he may have been picked because he was trained as a truck driver and refueler — both skills that are in high demand in Iraq.

He told reporters his job is the same as that done by 18 Army Reserve soldiers who last month defied an order to go out on a convoy, in part out of concern about a lack of armor.

Seitz noted that the Army has no claims to Miyasato because he served as a soldier whose enlistment ended in 1996. Unlike officers who serve indefinitely until they resign their commission, Miyasato has finished his commitment, Seitz said.

After 1991 and while he was in the inactive reserve for five years, Miyasato said he would have been willing to serve if he had been recalled then.

“Being out 13 years now and eight since my obligation ended,” Miyasato added, “it was something I never thought of.”

Miyasato said he also believes he shouldn’t have been placed in the Individual Ready Reserve where 4,166 soldiers received mobilization orders in July nationwide. Of those, 843 have neither reported nor asked for a delay or exemption, according to the Army.

Members of the Individual Ready Reserve are rarely called to active duty. The last time was 1990, when nearly 20,000 were mobilized. They are people who were honorably discharged after finishing their active-duty tours, usually four to six years, but remained for the rest of the eight-year commitment they made when they joined the Army.

Seitz added: “As a legal matter, he served his enlistment commitment. It was an eight-year contract. It’s done.”

As for his feelings on the Iraqi war, Miyasato said: “The Iraqis are having a hard time with their leadership and their government. We got Saddam, but now they have no foundation … Now we might have to be responsible to get them back on their feet.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on More Details on Kauai Veteran Ordered to Active Duty