War charges add to Blair Iraq woes

TONY Blair faced further pressure over the Iraq war yesterday as war crime charges were laid against three British soldiers and opinion polls confirmed that British voters believed the war has encouraged terrorism against Britain.
As his “coalition of the willing” ally John Howard arrived in Britain for official talks, the British Prime Minister was once again grappling with more acute political problems over Iraq than his Australian counterpart has faced.

Both men have been comfortably re-elected since the war began in 2003 but Mr Blair has faced more persistent domestic opposition to the war and a series of difficult inquiries and rebellions within his own Labour Party.

In the most serious allegations yet against British officers in Iraq, 11 soldiers have been charged by British army prosecutors over the deaths of two civilians detained in Basra in 2003.

Three of the soldiers face the war crime charge of inhuman treatment of detainees, which might have ended up in the Hague’s International Criminal Court if Britain’s own military prosecutors had not pursued the charges.

The charges came shortly after an independent report found that almost 25,000 Iraqi civilians had been killed in the two years after the launch of the war, meaning a toll of 34 a day – the equivalent of a Bali bombing each week, or a central London bombing every two days.

An opinion poll has suggested that most British voters feel Britain’s role in Iraq was one of the factors behind the July 7 central London bombing, leading to angry denials by Mr Blair and his Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw.

Mr Blair yesterday expressed frustration with arguments that the carnage in Iraq had made it easier for terrorists to recruit young British Muslims by feeding their sense of alienation and resentment towards their own Government.

The terrorists and their supporters would use Iraq as an “excuse” to justify their actions but their hatred of the West pre-dated the Iraq war, he said.

“People can debate these issues about the links and what are the superficial causes and symptoms. The fundamental causes, I’m afraid, I think are a lot deeper and we need to address those,” he said.

“We have got to be very careful that we don’t enter into a situation where we think if we make some compromise on some aspect of foreign policy, these people are going to change.

“They are not going to change. They will just say ‘They are on the run, let’s step it up’,” he said.

“They will use any issue to recruit people,” he said. “They will recruit people over Iraq, they were recruited over Afghanistan, they were recruited over Palestine.

“When people talk about the links between Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine and what has happened, yes it is true these people will use these things as an excuse.

“But let’s be clear. If it wasn’t that, it would be something else, and nothing – but nothing – justifies what they are doing.

“What we have got to be very careful of is getting into their perverted logic, which says even if people abhor the bombings in London, nonetheless we understand what has happened because of what has happened in Iraq.

“No, what is happening in Iraq and Afghanistan is that ordinary Muslim people are trying to make democracy work and these people, instead of helping them, are trying to destroy the prospects of that democracy.”

Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who met Mr Blair yesterday to discuss the situation in Afghanistan, backed the British leader by denying that the London bombings were in any way linked to Britain’s military activities in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Mr Straw later rejected claims in a leaked British intelligence document that the Iraq war had increased the danger of terror attacks in Britain.

The Joint Terrorist Analysis Centre paper, leaked to The New York Times, said the Government was warned before the July 7 attacks that the presence of British troops in Iraq would stimulate “terrorist- related activity in the UK”.

“It may be a comfortable thought by some people to think all this follows the military action in Iraq. It does not,” Mr Straw said.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on War charges add to Blair Iraq woes

Landstuhl Army Hospital Treats 25,000th War Casualty

Landstuhl treats its 25,000th patient in war on terror

Hospital in Germany is first stop for many wounded soldiers

By Steve Mraz, Stars and Stripes
European edition, Tuesday, July 19, 2005


S&S photo
A combination of more than 25,000 troops, civilians and coalition members from 37 countries involved in the global war on terrorism has received treatment at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany.
By the numbers

Total number of combat and noncombat injuries:

OEF OIFInpatient 634 6,524Outpatient 2,159 15,836TOTAL: 2,793 22,360

Source: Landstuhl Regional Medical Center

LANDSTUHL, Germany — Landstuhl Regional Medical Center recently surpassed a hallmark number in its treatment of patients injured in operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom.

A combination of more than 25,000 troops, civilians and coalition members from 37 countries involved in the global war on terrorism has received treatment at Landstuhl.

The medical center, which treated its first patient from OEF in fall 2001, reached the 25,000 patient mark this July Fourth.

“As we fight for our freedom, it’s on the day of our independence that we hit that milestone patient here,” said Col. James M. Francis, Landstuhl commander. “For the staff here at Landstuhl, that was one more workday as usual.”

As best as hospital officials can determine, their 25,000th patient was a female member of the Army National Guard serving in Iraq. She received treatment on July 4 for an orthopedic problem.

“We were able to return her to duty,” Francis said. “It just goes to show the mix and the breadth of what all that we’ve received from the active, reserve and guard components.”

Since its first global war on terrorism-related patient nearly four years ago, Landstuhl has been responsible for treating patients from such notable events as Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan during March 2002; the November 2004 offensive on Fallujah, Iraq; and the female Marines injured this June in Iraq during a suicide bombing attack on their convoy.

The hospital received 152 patients on the day a truck bomb exploded outside the United Nations Headquarters in Baghdad in August 2003.

From brain surgeries to sport injuries, the Landstuhl staff has performed just about every treatment possible. As of July 15, the official tally stood at 25,153 patients treated.

Opened in 1953, Landstuhl is the largest American hospital outside the United States. On average, the 145-bed medical center receives about 30 patients a day. Troops normally stay at Landstuhl between four and seven days. Then, they either return to their units downrange or are flown to the United States for additional treatment.

Prior to the war on terrorism, a day when Landstuhl would receive 30 to 40 patients was considered a mass casualty event. Now, such pace is the norm, and the hospital takes in stride what was once a logistical nightmare.

“We have adapted our way of doing business so that we just absorb those people,” Francis said.

“Their health care is planned from the moment we receive notification that they are coming. They’re triaged to the inpatient or outpatient appropriate location. If it appears that they may need to have surgery, their surgery is already being planned before the plane hits the ground.”

Official DoD Casualty Web Site, updated daily: http://www.defenselink.mil/news/casualty.pdf

Article confirming 103,000 OEF/OIF veterans sought medical care: http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/index.cfm?Page=Article&ID=3777

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Landstuhl Army Hospital Treats 25,000th War Casualty

U.S. a Battlefield, Solicitor General Tells Judges

RICHMOND, July 19 — A top government attorney declared Tuesday that, in the war on terror, the United States is a battlefield, and therefore President Bush has the authority to detain enemy combatants indefinitely in this country.

Solicitor General Paul D. Clement’s comments came as a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit is considering whether to overturn a lower court ruling that Jose Padilla should be charged with a crime or released. In 2002, Padilla, a former Chicago gang member and Muslim convert, was taken into custody by the military and has been held without trial since.

The government alleges that Padilla, a U.S. citizen, trained with al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan and arrived in this country in May 2002 with the intent of blowing up apartment buildings.

The panel assigned to hear the arguments was Judge J. Michael Luttig of Alexandria, an appointee of President George H.W. Bush, and two appointees of President Bill Clinton: Judge M. Blane Michael of Charleston, W.Va., and Judge William B. Traxler Jr. of Greenville, S.C.

The judges were most concerned with how to handle Padilla in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling last year on Yaser Esam Hamdi. Hamdi, also a U.S. citizen, was captured by the military with Taliban forces in Afghanistan and placed in a Navy brig in Norfolk. The Supreme Court ruled that his detention was lawful but that he was entitled to a hearing to challenge the allegations against him.

But moments after Clement began his oral argument, Luttig interrupted to say that “arguably, Judge [Sandra Day] O’Connor in ‘Hamdi’ limited that law to the battlefield detention, did she not?” Padilla was picked up at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport on a warrant from a federal court in New York and only later was turned over to the military.

“That’s not how I would read the case,” Clement responded.

Luttig repeatedly pressed Clement, even after the solicitor general noted that Padilla’s alleged intentions as a soldier of al Qaeda — to target civilians — constituted “unlawful combatantcy” even if he were on a battlefield in uniform.

“Those accusations don’t get you very far,” Luttig replied, “unless you’re prepared to boldly say the United States is a battlefield in the war on terror.”

Clement answered, “I can say that, and I can say it boldly.”

But Michael said Padilla wasn’t captured anywhere near a battlefield. “You captured Padilla in a Manhattan jail cell,” Michael said. “What, in the laws of war, allows you to undertake a non-battlefield capture and hold them for the duration? I don’t think you cite anything.”

Michael, addressing Clement’s claim that the United States is a battlefield, then asked: “To call the United States a battlefield, wouldn’t you have needed a specific authorization from Congress? It’s not up to us as a court to develop laws of war.”

Andrew G. Patel argued the case for Padilla, who has been held in a South Carolina brig for three years and only last year was granted the right to meet with his attorneys. “I may be the first lawyer to stand here and say I’m asking for my client to be indicted by a federal grand jury,” Patel told the panel.

Padilla’s attorneys believe that neither the Hamdi decision, nor a congressional authorization of military powers to the president in September 2001, negates a U.S. citizen’s right to challenge the government’s accusations at trial.

Michael said, “If we were to rule in your favor, we’d be saying you get a free pass to go back to the battle.”

Patel responded, “What you’d get a free pass to is a federal indictment and trial.”

Luttig posed a hypothetical in which the president learned that a terrorist was about to bomb a building in Manhattan. “Does he have to call a U.S. attorney and wait for the man to be picked up by civilian law enforcement? If the president sends the military, it’s illegal?” Luttig asked.

“If the military picks him up, he must be surrendered to civilian authorities,” Patel said.

“We might as well not have a president of the United States,” Luttig said, “if his hands are tied behind his back to protect the citizens of the United States. . . . This is a failure to appreciate the real world circumstances that can confront a president of the United States.”

Traxler spoke only once during the hour-long arguments, to ask if Luttig’s hypothetical situation would be different if the terrorist were a foreign citizen, or in uniform. Patel said it would not, unless Congress specifically authorized the military to take such action.

“There is absolutely no emergency authority resident with the president of the United States,” Luttig said. “That’s the argument you’re making, and it’s a fine argument.” But moments later, he added, “It seems to me that after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Hamdi” and the congressional authorization for use of military force, “on the extant law, it’s exceedingly difficult to maintain the position you have.”

No date was set for when the panel might rule. The losing side could then ask that the entire 4th Circuit rehear the case, after which the case would probably head to the Supreme Court.

After the hearing, Donna Newman, another of Padilla’s attorneys, said, “We are quite confident that we will prevail because there simply is no authority for the president to detain an American citizen on American soil.

“If the traditional sense of what the battlefield is has changed, then we need Congress to come in,” she added. “We do not let a president determine ad hoc what a battlefield is.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on U.S. a Battlefield, Solicitor General Tells Judges

3 British Soldiers Face Abuse Trials

The British attorney general announced Tuesday that three British soldiers would be tried on war crimes charges for the abuse of Iraqi detainees, one of whom died.

The three were among 11 soldiers charged with mistreating prisoners in Basra in two incidents in May and September 2003. Basra is the headquarters of the 8,500 British troops still deployed as the closest allies of the United States.

The charges were said to be the first against British troops in Iraq on war crimes offenses, defined under the legislation approved here in 2001, committing Britain to joining the International Criminal Court.

The most serious charges were brought against a 34-year-old corporal, Donald Payne, accused of abusing and killing Baha Daoud Salim Musa, an Iraqi taken prisoner in a military operation in September 2003. Corporal Payne faces charges of manslaughter, inhumane treatment and perverting the course of justice, said the attorney general, Lord Goldsmith.

Two other soldiers, Lance Cpl. Wayne Crowcroft, 21, and Pvt. Darren Fallon, 22, are also accused of offenses including inhumane treatment of detainees. It was not immediately clear what sentence they could face. The charges will all be heard at military courts in Britain and not at the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

In a separate charge announced Tuesday, four soldiers are accused of manslaughter in the death of another Iraqi detainee on May 8, 2003. The soldiers detained four Iraqis they believed were looters and forced them into a canal. One of the detainees, Ahmed Kareem, could not swim and drowned.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on 3 British Soldiers Face Abuse Trials

Iraqis Press Donors for Billions More in Reconstruction Aid

As fresh violence engulfs Iraq, the officials in charge of its government pressed a major meeting of donor nations here on Monday for billions of dollars in new financing to repair a country that remains in a state of physical and economic collapse.

But in a finely balanced argument, the Iraqi officials also said their country and its fledgling financial institutions were stable and secure enough to manage the influx of that much money.

In fact, those officials said, now is the time for local Iraqi governments to take the lead in setting priorities for rebuilding out of the hands of foreign nations, and for Iraqi contractors to carry out virtually all of the work with local labor.

Some of those pleas were answered when Japan reached what the Iraqi planning minister, Barham Salih, said were the outlines of an agreement to provide $3.5 billion in low-interest loans for water, sewage, road and other projects. The World Bank also announced that it had offered Iraq up to $500 million in similar loans over the next two years.

Mr. Salih, whose ministry functions as a kind of switchyard for rebuilding funds, made it clear that he was disappointed in major portions of the American rebuilding program, which he said had failed to produce quick results despite the expenditure of about $9 billion, according to Pentagon figures.

After formulaic declarations by officials at the United Nations and the World Bank that the first day of the conference had been a success, Mr. Salih gave a blunter assessment.

“I want to hold judgment and claim success once we see these pledges turned into realities on the ground,” Mr. Salih said, adding that the rebuilding effort had roughly six months to show results before Iraqis began giving up hope that it would ever improve their lives.

“This is the time to make the difference,” he said. “It is now or it will be too late. Iraq’s people have grown numb to many statements of support.”

Staffan de Mistura, a United Nations representative at the gathering, held at a conference center next to the Dead Sea, agreed that “we are facing six crucial months” but argued that some programs had quietly been successful. For example, he said, water chlorination programs carried out by Iraqis have prevented major outbreaks of cholera amid the chaos of the insurgency.

“We cannot be, outside of this room, too loud about it, for reasons that you know,” Mr. Mistura said, referring to the danger that any project faces in Iraq if it is understood to be directed or financed by foreigners.

That concession captured what often seemed to be a paradox of the meeting: although the Iraqis were trying to persuade other countries that Iraq was safe and secure enough to carry out rebuilding projects, the meeting took place in the safety of Jordan rather than in Baghdad.

Much of the conference focused on $1.1 billion already placed in trust funds for Iraqi reconstruction by a number of countries around the world, led by Japan, the European Union and Canada. Japan’s contribution to those funds is the largest, about $350 million, said Michael Bell, chairman of the International Reconstruction Fund Facility for Iraq, which oversees the money.

Most of the fund’s money has already been committed to specific projects, and Iraqi officials have been saying for weeks that they hoped to reel in more pledges here. But while 59 countries registered for the meeting by an official count, actual attendance seemed sparse, and a number of those countries did not send representatives.

Before his formal speech, Mr. Salih addressed the issue on the minds of many in attendance and asked for a moment of silence for victims of a suicide bomber who killed 71 people on Saturday in the town of Musayyib, south of Baghdad. He asked that the moment also commemorate the victims of the London bombings last week.

Referring to the American rebuilding program, Mr. Salih said in prepared remarks that its “large-scale, capital-intensive” focus had been inevitable because of the crumbling infrastructure inherited from Saddam Hussein’s government.

But he added, “It is now clear that that these megaprojects, though essential, have not succeeded in providing quickly enough for Iraqis’ basic needs like electricity, water and sanitation.”

American officials had little to say about the repeated criticism of their rebuilding programs. “We think this was a successful day,” said one American official who asked not to be identified because he wanted attention to remain on the Iraqis.

Mr. Salih tried to ease a major concern of some potential donor countries by saying Iraq was making new efforts to root out corrupt officials in the government ranks.

Christiaan Poortman, a World Bank official, acknowledged those concerns. “At this point in time, the push is to get the money out,” Mr. Poortman said. “Six months from now the talk will be about ‘where did the money go?’ “

He added, “And we are not going to get burned on this one.”

24 Killed in String of Attacks

BAGHDAD, Iraq, July 18 (AP) – Gunmen killed at least 24 police officers, soldiers and government workers in attacks across Iraq on Monday, and an Iraqi general said about 50 suspected insurgents had been captured in the first days of a new security operation in Baghdad.

For the first time in several days, Baghdad was not hit by suicide bombers. But a car bomb went off near American and Iraqi troops in Rawah, 175 miles northwest of Baghdad, witnesses reported. At least one person, believed to have been a civilian, was killed, the witnesses said.

The latest bloodshed occurred in a series of small-scale ambushes and shootings. The deadliest attack on Monday was in the western Baghdad district of Khadra, where eight policemen died in a gun battle with insurgents, the police said. It was unclear whether the insurgents suffered casualties. There were other attacks in Baghdad, Taji, Samarra and Mosul as well.

The military said an American marine died in what was termed a non-hostile incident on Sunday at a base in Ramadi.

Iraqi forces reported a new offensive against the insurgents in Baghdad. An Iraqi general, who spoke Monday on condition of anonymity for security reasons, said the operation began last week on the west side of the Tigris, which divides the city. He said about 50 suspected insurgents, including two Syrians, had been captured in the opening days of the operation, which would be expanded in the next few days.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Iraqis Press Donors for Billions More in Reconstruction Aid

Far right and football gangs plot ‘revenge’

Plans by an alliance of rightwing extremists and football hooligans to exact “revenge” on Muslims after last week’s bomb attacks are being monitored by police.

The Guardian has learned that extremists are keen to cause widespread fear and injury with attacks on mosques and high-profile “anti-Muslim” events in the capital.

Football hooligans communicating over the internet have spoken of the need to put aside partisan support for teams and unite against Muslims. Hooligans from West Ham, Millwall, Crystal Palace and Arsenal are among those seeking to establish common cause.

As part of wider plans to generate a backlash, rightwing groups such as the Nationalist Alliance and the National Front are said to be planning marches. Extremists hope to hold a march along Victoria Embankment in London tomorrow.

It is also known that many mosques have received bomb threats since the attacks.

Attempts by the right to make capital out of the tragedy have created a powderkeg. Already extremist Islamist websites have told Muslims to be ready to retaliate.

The BNP sought to capitalise on last week’s atrocities in its byelection literature in Barking, Essex, by reproducing a picture of the bombed No 30 bus with the headline Maybe Now it’s Time to Listen to the BNP.

But the tactic backfired last night when Labour trounced the BNP, winning the Becontree byelection with 1,171 votes. The BNP received 378.

The BNP’s tactic prompted cross-party condemnation. Though it was designed to increase support for the far-right, many believe the message may have been too crass and too badly timed to work. The party does, however, enjoy some support in the area.

Gerry Gable, of the anti- fascist organisation Searchlight, said: “There is no doubt that the far-right are playing this for all they think it is worth.

“If you look at the BNP website there’s Nick Griffin saying ‘be calm’ and other material saying ‘don’t get angry, get even!'”

He added: “These things should be taken seriously. One site, Blood and Honour, had a posting about a mosque in the Wirral and soon after the mosque was hit. Soon after, the posting was taken down.”

The police have pledged to crack down on any attempts to provoke division in the aftermath of the bombs. Members of Scotland Yard’s independent advisory group have been asked to liaise with borough commanders in the capital to reassure the public and make sure the police carry out their pledges.

The Met has said from the outset that the bombs were an attack on all communities and that none should be scapegoated.

The synergy between rightwing extremists and football hooligans is not new. Throughout the 1980s, some of the biggest clubs in Britain were plagued by notoriously violent and racist followers.

Though virtually all clubs have since challenged the behaviour of extremist fans, and almost all now belong to the Kick Racism Out of Football initiative, violent followers continue to communicate with each other and supporters from other clubs to engineer confrontations.

The prospect of the opening day Championship fixture between Leeds and Millwall in August is already causing concern.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Far right and football gangs plot ‘revenge’

U.S. bomber gets life in prison for 1998 blast

Convicted Olympic bomber Eric Rudolph was sentenced to life in prison without parole on Monday for the 1998 bombing of an Alabama abortion clinic, which killed a police officer and maimed a nurse.

The 38-year-old abortion foe pleaded guilty in April to the clinic bombing in a federal plea bargain that spared him the death penalty. As part of the same deal, Rudolph confessed to the 1996 bombing of the Summer Olympics in Atlanta and blasts at an abortion clinic and gay bar in and around the Georgia capital.

He will be sentenced to life in prison without parole on Aug. 22 for the Atlanta attacks, which killed one person and injured more than 100 others.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on U.S. bomber gets life in prison for 1998 blast

National Security Watch: 60 right-wing terror plots foiled

In the 10 years since the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing killed 168 people, roughly 60 right-wing terrorist plots have been uncovered in the United States, according to an upcoming report by the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Project. The plots, all foiled by law enforcement, reportedly included violent plans by antigovernment militia groups, racist skinhead organizations, and Ku Klux Klan members to use various types of chemical bombs and other weapons.

The plots demonstrate that the Department of Homeland Security still needs to closely monitor right-wing groups, says Heidi Beirich, with the Intelligence Project. The DHS was criticized by hate-group experts in April when an internal planning document on domestic terrorist threats was leaked to the press. The DHS report listed radical leftist groups, such as the Animal Liberation Front and the Earth Liberation Front, which have been involved in numerous arson cases, but not violent right-wing militia and skinhead groups.

Rep. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi, the ranking Democrat on the House Committee on Homeland Security, is calling for the DHS to do more to fight right-wing domestic terror groups and to work more closely with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. “The FBI has a considerably more thorough view of domestic terrorism than DHS,” says Thompson. The DHS has said that the internal document was never intended to be made public and does not represent all its assessments on domestic terrorism.

Some of the more recent right-wing terror plots listed in the Intelligence Project report include:

• May 20, 2005: Two New Jersey men, Craig Orler and Gabriel Garafa, who allegedly belong to neo-Nazi and skinhead groups, were charged with illegally selling to police informants guns and 60 pounds of urea to use in a bomb.
• Oct. 25, 2004: FBI agents in Tennessee arrested Demetrius “Van” Crocker after he allegedly tried to purchase ingredients for deadly sarin nerve gas and C-4 plastic explosives from an undercover agent. Crocker, who was involved with white supremacist groups, was charged with trying to get explosives to destroy a building and faces more than 20 years in prison.
• April 10, 2003: The FBI raided the home of William Krar, of Noonday, Texas, and discovered an arsenal of more than 500,000 rounds of ammunition, 65 pipe bombs and remote control briefcase bombs, and almost 2 pounds of sodium cyanide, enough to make a bomb that could kill everyone in a large building. Krar, reportedly associated with white supremacist groups, was sentenced to 11 years in prison for possession of a chemical weapon.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on National Security Watch: 60 right-wing terror plots foiled

Reporter Says He First Learned of C.I.A. Operative From Rove

Matthew Cooper, a reporter for Time magazine, said the White House senior adviser Karl Rove was the first person to tell him that the wife of former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV was a C.I.A. officer, according to a first-person account in this week’s issue of the magazine.

The account also stated that Mr. Rove said Mr. Wilson’s wife had played a role in sending Mr. Wilson to Africa to investigate possible uranium sales to Iraq.

The article, a description of Mr. Cooper’s testimony last Wednesday to a federal grand jury trying to determine whether White House officials illegally disclosed the identity of a covert intelligence officer, offered the most detailed account yet of how a White House official purportedly did not merely confirm what a journalist knew but supplied that information.

Mr. Cooper said in his article that Mr. Rove did not mention the name of Mr. Wilson’s wife, Valerie Wilson, or say that she was a covert officer. But, he wrote: “Was it through my conversation with Rove that I learned for the first time that Wilson’s wife worked at the C.I.A. and may have been responsible for sending him? Yes. Did Rove say that she worked at the ‘agency’ on ‘W.M.D.’? Yes.

“Is any of this a crime? Beats me.”

The details in Mr. Cooper’s article about his conversation with Mr. Rove are largely consistent with the broad outlines of Mr. Rove’s grand jury testimony about the conversation as portrayed in news accounts.

But Mr. Cooper’s article, a rare look inside the deliberations from a prime participant in this political and journalistic drama, is likely to add fuel to a political firestorm over whether there was a White House effort to disclose Ms. Wilson’s identity as payback for her husband’s criticism of the administration.

Mr. Rove’s allies have said that he did not initiate any conversations with reporters and that he was merely warning them off what he said was faulty information. But White House statements over the past two years have left the impression that administration officials were not involved in identifying Ms. Wilson.

Mr. Cooper also wrote about a conversation he initiated with I. Lewis Libby, chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney. Although it has been known that reporters spoke to Mr. Libby, what he said was not known. His conversation with Mr. Cooper is the first indication that Mr. Libby was aware of Ms. Wilson’s role in her husband’s trip to Africa. When Mr. Cooper asked if Mr. Libby knew of that, Mr. Libby said he had heard that as well, the article said.

Both Mr. Libby and Mr. Rove sought to dispel speculation that Mr. Cheney had played a role in dispatching Mr. Wilson on his mission.

Mr. Cooper’s article was the fulcrum for a day of partisan bickering on the television news talk programs, cable news channels and the Web. Some Democrats, saying Mr. Rove’s credibility was in tatters, again called for his dismissal, while Republicans continued to defend him, saying Democrats were prejudging a continuing investigation and were trying to injure Mr. Rove’s reputation with information that actually vindicated him.

“It’s wrong, it’s outrageous, and folks involved in this, frankly, owe Karl Rove an apology,” Ken Mehlman, chairman of the Republican National Committee, said yesterday on “Meet the Press” on NBC.

Mr. Rove’s lawyer, Robert D. Luskin, declined to comment yesterday on the details in Mr. Cooper’s article. He has said previously that prosecutors advised Mr. Rove that he was not a target in the case. Mr. Libby and his lawyer, Joseph A. Tate, have said in the past that they will not discuss the matter. Efforts to reach Mr. Tate yesterday were unsuccessful.

Mr. Cooper found himself in front of the grand jury on Wednesday morning, a week after a receiving “an express personal release from my source,” sparing him a jail sentence for civil contempt of court. Another reporter facing the same punishment that day, Judith Miller of The New York Times, was jailed after refusing to disclose her source for an article she never wrote.

Mr. Cooper had refused to testify about what a confidential source, now known to be Mr. Rove, had told him for an article that appeared on Time magazine’s Web site on July 17, 2003, about administration officials “having taken public and private whacks” at Mr. Wilson.

It can be a crime to knowingly name a covert officer for the Central Intelligence Agency. Mr. Rove’s supporters have argued that he did not know of her history as a covert operative and questioned whether she remained one under the statute.

The Justice Department opened a criminal investigation into the leak in September 2003. But with pressure mounting on the administration to appoint an independent counsel, Attorney General John Ashcroft that December recused himself from the inquiry, and Patrick J. Fitzgerald, a federal prosecutor in Chicago, was chosen as special counsel.

Under federal law, prosecutors and grand jurors are sworn to secrecy. And while witnesses are free to discuss their testimony, Mr. Fitzgerald has asked that the witnesses not comment. Administration officials have heeded the request.

Mr. Cooper did not, instead providing a glimpse inside an inquiry engulfing Mr. Rove, the quintessential Bush insider who is on the cover of Time and Newsweek this week.

Mr. Cooper estimated that he spent about a third of his two and a half hours of testimony responding to jurors’ questions, rather than to the prosecutor’s, although Mr. Fitzgerald asked questions on their behalf.

“Virtually all the questions centered on the week of July 6, 2003,” Mr. Cooper wrote. Mr. Wilson wrote an Op-Ed article that appeared in The New York Times that day challenging the veracity of 16 words in Mr. Bush’s 2003 State of the Union speech, which claimed that British intelligence believed that Saddam Hussein had sought nuclear fuel in Africa.

Mr. Cooper, who had just a few weeks earlier become a White House correspondent after serving as deputy bureau chief in Washington, wrote that he called Mr. Rove the next Friday, July 11. He said he told the grand jury he was interested in “an ancillary question” to whoever had vetted the president’s State of the Union address: “why government officials, publicly and privately, seemed to be disparaging Mr. Wilson” after the White House had said the claim about nuclear fuel should not have been in the speech.

But the Bush White House is not known for backing down from challenges, and Mr. Wilson had asserted that the administration had “twisted” intelligence about the threat posed by Iraq and was becoming increasingly public about his views after the Op-Ed article appeared.

Mr. Cooper said he spoke to Mr. Rove on “deep background,” saying the sourcing description of “double super secret background” he used in his e-mail message to his boss was “not a journalistic term of art” but a reference to the film “Animal House,” where the Delta House fraternity was placed on “double secret probation.”

“The notes, and my subsequent e-mails, go on to indicate that Rove told me material was going to be declassified in the coming days that would cast doubt on Wilson’s mission and his findings,” Mr. Cooper wrote.

Mr. Cooper also wrote that he told the grand jury he was certain Mr. Rove never mentioned Ms. Wilson by name, and that he did not learn of her identity until several days later, when he either read it in a column by the syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who referred to her by her maiden name, Valerie Plame, or found it through a Google search.

“Rove did, however, clearly indicate that she worked at the ‘agency’ – by that, I told the grand jury, I inferred he obviously meant the C.I.A. and not, say, the Environmental Protection Agency. Rove added that that she worked on W.M.D. (the abbreviation for weapons of mass destruction) issues and that she was responsible for sending Wilson. This was the first time I had heard anything about Wilson’s wife.”

The Senate Intelligence Committee, in its report, said interviews and documents provided by the C.I.A.’s counterproliferation division indicate that Ms. Wilson suggested her husband for the trip. Ms. Wilson portrayed her role as minimal to the committee and said she attended a meeting involving Mr. Wilson, intelligence analysts and other C.I.A. officials only to introduce her husband.

In his article, Mr. Cooper also shared a memory that was not in his notes or e-mail messages: Mr. Rove’s ending the phone call by saying, “I’ve already said too much.”

“This could have meant he was worried about being indiscreet, or it could have meant he was late for a meeting or something else,” he wrote. “I don’t know, but that sign-off has been in my memory for two years.”

In the article, Mr. Cooper writes only of his dealings with Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby, but under questioning by Tim Russert on “Meet the Press” yesterday, Mr. Cooper hinted that he might have had more sources for the original article.

“Did Fitzgerald’s questions give me a sense of where the investigation is heading? Perhaps,” Mr. Cooper added. “He asked me several different ways if Rove indicated how he had heard that Plame worked at the C.I.A. (He did not, I told the grand jury.) Maybe Fitzgerald is interested in whether Rove knew her C.I.A. ties through a person or through a document.”

Novak’s CNN Job Is Safe for Now

BEVERLY HILLS, Calif., July 17 (AP) – Mr. Novak’s status as a CNN contributor will remain unaffected during a federal investigation into the revelation of a C.I.A. officer’s identity, executives at the news channel said Sunday.

“I think we’re all aware that no one really knows what’s going on in the investigation of the Valerie Plame incident,” said Jonathan Klein, president of CNN/U.S. “So it would be awfully presumptuous of us to take steps against a guy in his career based on second-, third-, fourth-hand reporting.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Reporter Says He First Learned of C.I.A. Operative From Rove

Suicide Bombs Potent Tools of Terrorists

Unheard of only a few decades ago, suicide bombings have rapidly evolved into perhaps the most common method of terrorism in the world, moving west from the civil war in Sri Lanka in the 1980s to the Palestinian intifada of recent years to Iraq today. Since the Sept. 11, 2001, suicide attacks in the United States, suicide bombers have struck from Indonesia to India, from Russia to Morocco.

Now governments throughout the West — including the United States — are bracing to cope with similar challenges in the wake of the deadly July 7 subway bombings in London, which marked the first time that suicide bombers had successfully mounted an attack in Western Europe.

The pace of such attacks is quickening. According to data compiled by the Rand Corp., about three-quarters of all suicide bombings have occurred since the Sept. 11 attacks.

The numbers in Iraq alone are breathtaking: About 400 suicide bombings have shaken Iraq since the U.S. invasion in 2003, and suicide now plays a role in two out of every three insurgent bombings. In May, an estimated 90 suicide bombings were carried out in the war-torn country — nearly as many as the Israeli government has documented in the conflict with Palestinians since 1993.

Yesterday, a suicide bomber detonated explosives strapped to his body inside a Shiite mosque south of Baghdad, triggering a huge fuel-tanker explosion that killed at least 54 people, according to police.

The bombings in London, which killed 55 people, illustrate the profound difficulty of preventing such attacks, experts say. Intelligence officials believe the bombers, in a common pattern, were foot soldiers recruited for the occasion, young men of Pakistani and Jamaican backgrounds reared in Britain who had recently converted to radical Islam. The four bombings required no exit strategy and were pulled off with devices that apparently were made in a bathtub and were small enough to fit in backpacks.

“With the exception of weapons of mass destruction, there is no other type of attack that is more effective than suicide terrorism,” said Bruce Hoffman, a terrorism expert who heads the Washington office of Rand, a California think tank. “The perception is that it’s impossible to guard against.”

The motives behind suicide bombings are often mixed. Terrorism experts and intelligence officials disagree on the extent to which political strategy and religious fervor have led to the rising frequency of such attacks. But in addition to the death toll, a key objective of such bombings is clearly to sow terror by violating deeply held cultural and religious taboos against suicide, experts say.

Daniel Benjamin, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a former Clinton administration counterterrorism official, points to the frequent glorification of death and martyrdom by the leaders of al Qaeda and other extremist groups. In his famous fatwa , or declaration of war, against the United States in 1996, al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden told U.S. officials: “These youth love death as you love life.”

“This is their way of saying they are much more determined than we are,” said Benjamin, who co-wrote the 2002 book “The Age of Sacred Terror.”

“They realize we are very unnerved by this. . . . I see the spread of it as a tactic as an indication of the strength of the ideology for Muslim radicals,” Benjamin said.

History of Suicide Attacks

The use of suicide attacks is not new. Japanese kamikaze pilots in World War II tried to cause maximum damage by crashing their fighter planes into U.S. ships. Walter Laqueur, an expert in the history of terrorism, also says that, for centuries, any attack on military or political leaders was a form of suicide because the act usually occurred at close quarters and brought swift and certain death for the killer.

One watershed came in 1983, when a Hezbollah operative drove his truck into the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, killing 241 U.S. service members in an attack that remains the deadliest terrorist strike on Americans overseas. Hezbollah would later carry out several dozen more suicide attacks.

Most experts agree that the modern style of suicide bombings first gained its greatest prominence outside the Middle East, in the island nation of Sri Lanka.

The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, popularly known as the Tamil Tigers, is an avowedly secular rebel movement of the country’s Tamil ethnic minority. It carried out scores of suicide bombings from the late 1980s until a cease-fire in 2002. The conflict between the Tigers and the government, which is dominated by members of the Sinhalese majority, began in 1983 and claimed an estimated 65,000 lives.

Though dominated by Hindus, the Tigers are predominantly ethnic and nationalist in outlook, with religion not playing a significant role in their actions. The Tigers’ early and aggressive use of suicide attacks, analysts say, reflected a pragmatic calculation of the need to level the military playing field against a larger and better-equipped foe.

The group created an elite force to carry out such attacks, the Black Tigers, whose members underwent rigorous training and were reportedly treated to dinner with rebel leader Velupillai Prabhakaran before being sent on their missions.

The rebels carried out their first suicide bombing in 1987, when a captain blew himself up along with 40 government troops at an army camp in the northern part of the country. Tamil Tiger spokesmen emphasize the use of suicide attackers against military targets, but the group has also used them against political and economic targets in strikes that have cost hundreds of civilian lives.

In 1991, a suspected Tamil Tiger assassinated former Indian prime minister Rajiv Gandhi. Two years later, a suicide bomber killed Sri Lankan President Ranasinghe Premadasa and 23 others in Colombo. Tamil Tiger suicide attackers also staged devastating strikes on the country’s central bank, its holiest Buddhist shrine and its international airport.

Robert A. Pape, an associate professor of political science at the University of Chicago, calls the group the world’s “leading instigator” of suicide attacks. In his recent book “Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism,” Pape says that the group accounted for 76 of 315 suicide attacks carried out around the world from 1980 through 2003, compared with 54 for the Islamic Resistance Movement, or Hamas, and 27 for Islamic Jihad.

Some analysts say the group’s strategy, though reprehensible, was effective in pushing the government toward a negotiated settlement.

“The suicide bombings in civilian areas, especially outside the conflict zones of the northeast, brought to the people outside the horror of the war and the vulnerability of society, ” Jehan Perera of the National Peace Council, an advocacy group in Colombo, said in a telephone interview.

Laqueur, the author of “A History of Terrorism” and other books, disagrees, noting that the Tigers’ primary goal — to gain power — has not been achieved after more than two decades of bloodshed. But he said Sri Lanka does illustrate how religious extremism has not always been central to the tactic. “It’s not purely a religious thing; it’s fanaticism,” Laqueur said in an interview from London. “It just happens that, now, we are seeing the fanaticism primarily with Islam.”

Iraq Is Now the Focus

Even as the Tigers have abandoned suicide attacks, others have adopted the tactic as their own. In Russia, Chechen Muslim radicals have mounted at least 19 suicide operations, according to Pape’s statistics, including those in one terribly deadly week last year when hundreds died in a fiery siege at a school, a bombing at a Moscow train station and the downing of two airliners.

Al Qaeda has also favored suicide plots on more than 20 occasions since 1996 against the United States and its allies, including the unprecedented Sept. 11, 2001, hijackings that killed nearly 3,000 people.

But for sheer volume, Iraq is now the global center of suicide terrorism. In the days before yesterday’s bombing, 27 people, mostly children, died in a suicide attack staged as soldiers handed out treats, and at least 25 others were killed when 10 suicide bombers targeted vehicles in coordinated attacks in Baghdad.

Though sporadic ambushes and roadside bombings began to plague U.S.-led occupation troops almost immediately after the fall of Saddam Hussein’s dictatorship in April 2003, the beginning of a full-fledged insurgency is generally traced to the suicide car bombing of the Jordanian Embassy in Baghdad on Aug. 7 of that year. The attack, which killed 14, was followed two weeks later by a suicide truck-bomb attack that destroyed the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad and killed at least 20 people.

Delivered primarily in vehicles but also by individuals wearing rigged belts or vests, suicide bombs have killed and injured thousands. Vehicular suicide bombs, in particular, are “very lethal precision weapons that . . . have significant effect wherever they’re employed,” said the U.S. military’s chief spokesman in Iraq, Air Force Brig. Gen. Donald Alston.

“If we look at what it takes to drive a bomb-laden vehicle into a crowd of people, it is not that challenging to perform that function — especially if you’re willing to give your life,” Alston said.

Who the suicide bombers are, and what motivates them, remains much less clear in Iraq than in Israel and the occupied territories, where the attackers’ identities are quickly and widely disseminated by Palestinian factions and Israeli authorities.

Neither side in the Iraqi conflict has been willing or able to release detailed information on suicide bombers. U.S. and Iraqi authorities say they are certain that the vast majority of suicide bombers come from outside Iraq. But gathering forensic evidence is often impossible because of the continuing danger at bombing sites.

Pape says that attacks in Iraq and elsewhere show that “the connection between Islamic fundamentalism and suicide bombing is misleading.”

“The logic driving these attacks is mainly a strategic goal: to compel the U.S. and other countries to remove their forces from the Arabian peninsula,” Pape said. “The London attacks are simply the next step in al Qaeda executing its strategic logic.”

Others disagree, arguing that even if terrorist leaders have strategic reasons for choosing suicide attacks, the bombers and their families are often motivated by religious belief. Hoffman calculates that 31 of 35 groups that have used suicide bombings are Islamic.

“To try to reduce it to an agenda that is purely political is to misunderstand religion,” Benjamin said. “The reason that bin Laden and his followers want the U.S. out of the Middle East has religious roots.”

The Cult of Glorification

The boys all know the way to Ahmed Abu Khalil’s house, tucked along an alley in a neighborhood of the West Bank town of Atil known as Two Martyrs. Abu Khalil, 18, became its third after he blew himself up Tuesday near a shopping mall in the Israeli city of Netanya.

It is safe to say Abu Khalil knew how he would be remembered here for his twilight attack outside the HaSharon Mall, which killed five Israelis, including two 16-year-old girls who were lifelong best friends. Scores more were injured in Israel’s third suicide bombing this year.

The neighborhood is named for two local members of Islamic Jihad, the radical Palestinian group, who died fighting in the West Bank city of Jenin in 2003. The stylized posters of young men, posing with assault rifles and draped with ammunition belts, wallpaper the city. Graffiti urges uprising.

“This has given us a lot of pride, what he has done in Netanya,” said Ibrahim Shoukri, 14, who used to follow Abu Khalil to prayer at the mosque. “We hope all of us will be like him.”

The cult of glorification — a mix of nationalist, personal and religious fervor — that surrounds suicide bombers has long been one of the most difficult challenges facing Israeli security officials. Religious justification taught in the more radical West Bank mosques and intense familial pride — at least in the days immediately after the attacks — often outweigh the Israeli deterrent measures designed to make would-be suicide bombers think twice.

Judging by statistics, Israeli officials have made significant progress against suicide attacks since the start of the intifada in September 2000. At the height of the uprising in 2002, 42 suicide bombings killed 228 people. Two years later, the number had dropped to 12 bombings and 55 deaths.

Israeli officials say the construction of a concrete barrier that rises 24 feet high in some places and the intensive military operations in the West Bank have helped keep suicide bombers out of Israel. In addition, the Israeli military destroys the family homes of suicide bombers, a practice human rights groups have condemned as an illegal exercise of collective punishment.

Dore Gold, an adviser to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, said the tactic is designed in part to counter the financial incentives offered by enemy governments — and some nongovernmental groups in Arab countries — which encourage the bombings. Hussein’s Baath Party, for example, sent $15,000 checks to bombers’ families, a lot of money in poor West Bank towns.

“If you know your family will be impoverished as a result of your act, then that may affect the calculus,” Gold said.

In Atil on Tuesday morning, Abu Khalil left his house at 7 a.m., telling his family he was on his way to check his test scores. He never returned. The family found out about his attack from the television news.

Within hours, Israeli soldiers arrived at the family home. They arrested Khalil’s father, who is now in an Israeli military prison outside the northern West Bank. Why and how Abu Khalil carried out the bombing remains a mystery. “God knows how he got through the wall,” said an uncle, Burhan Abu Khalil. “The Islamic Jihad organizes those things.”

One recent morning, Palestinian television crews filled the family courtyard. As more than a dozen teenage boys looked on, the reporters posed 14-year-old Mahmoud and 4-year-old Othman with their brother’s picture, seeking their impressions. They put a black Islamic Jihad cap on Mahmoud’s head.

“Put the picture here on your chest,” the leader of a crew instructed Othman, the videotape rolling. “What did he tell you, what did he tell you?”

The boys looked nervous, confused. Finally, Mahmoud said, “He told me to pray.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Suicide Bombs Potent Tools of Terrorists