A Detainnee Speaks: I’m Home, but Still Haunted by Guantanamo

August 17, 2008 – I’ve covered the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, since 2004 as military correspondent for The Post. Jumah al Dossari first caught my attention in October 2005, when I heard the story of his gruesome suicide attempt during a visit from his lawyer. Then known as Detainee #261, Dossari clearly was making a public plea for help. Though the U.S. military has said many times that all detainees at Guantanamo are treated humanely and that Dossari had been getting the help he needed, detention in Guantanamo apparently became more than he could bear. His wish to die humanized the desperation of many detainees held indefinitely at the facility.

U.S. officials maintained for years that Dossari was a dangerous terrorist who had been arrested after going to Afghanistan to fight with the Taliban against U.S. forces. Dossari also spent some time in the United States and allegedly tried to recruit terrorists with fiery sermons, something that obviously raised concerns among his interrogators and jailers. Nevertheless, he was never charged with a crime, never admitted any connection to terrorism and was ultimately released to Saudi Arabia in July 2007.
ad_icon

His return to freedom has been smooth. He is employed, married and doing well. When I talked to him by cellphone from Dammam late last year, he spoke of a hope and a peace and a forgiveness that arose from his “black days” behind bars at Guantanamo.

— Josh White

DAMMAM, Saudi Arabia

It has been a little over a year since I left the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, but I still have trouble sleeping sometimes. On a recent restless night, I found a DVD entitled “United 93” beside the family television set. I had no idea what it was about, but I started watching. When I realized that it was about the hijacked American plane that had crashed in Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001, I began to cry. It reminded me of a very simple question I had asked myself countless times during my 5 1/2 years in Guantanamo: When will humans start treating each other with respect, whatever our religion or color?

I arrived in Guantanamo in January 2002 after Pakistani forces handed me over to the United States, probably, I suspect, for a bounty. I had been in Afghanistan to assess the progress of a mosque-building project there, funded by people in my native Saudi Arabia. I knew that Afghanistan was a dangerous place, but I was paid for the trip and I needed the money, so I went. It is a decision I will always regret. When the U.S. began bombing Afghanistan in November 2001, I fled to Pakistan. At a border checkpoint, I asked Pakistani guards for help getting to the Saudi embassy. Instead, they put me in a prison, where I was kept for days with shackles on my legs.

After several weeks, I was blindfolded and flown with other detainees to a U.S. military base in Kandahar, Afghanistan. Upon our arrival there, we were thrown to the ground. Someone hit my head and forced his boot into my mouth. Despite the freezing Afghan winter, I spent several weeks in an open tent circled with barbed wire. I still have scars from my time in Kandahar. One is from a cigarette that was extinguished on my wrist and the other from the time I was pushed to a floor covered with broken glass.

One night about two weeks after our arrival, some soldiers came and cut off my clothes and put me in an orange suit. They fitted me with very tight goggles so that I could not see and put something over my ears so that I could not hear. I was chained to the floor of a plane for several hours, then again to the floor of another for what seemed like an eternity. When they pulled us off the second plane, we had no idea where we were.

It was Guantanamo.

We were taken to Camp X-Ray, which consists of cages of the sort that would normally hold animals. Imprisoned in these cages, we were forbidden to move and sometimes forbidden to pray. Later, the guards allowed us to pray and even to turn around, but whenever new detainees arrived, we were again prohibited from doing anything but sitting still.

Physical brutality was not uncommon during those first years at Guantanamo. In Camp X-Ray, several soldiers once beat me so badly that I spent three days in intensive care. My face and body were still swollen and covered in bruises when I left the hospital. During one interrogation, my questioner, apparently dissatisfied with my answers, slammed my head against the table. During others, I was shackled to the floor for hours.

In later years, such physical assaults subsided, but they were replaced by something more painful: I was deprived of human contact. For several months, the military held me in solitary confinement after a suicide attempt. I had no clothes other than a pair of shorts and no bed but a dirty plastic mat. The air conditioner was on 24 hours a day; the cell’s cold metal walls made it feel as though I was living inside a freezer. There was no faucet, so I had to use the water in the toilet for drinking and washing.

I was transferred to the maximum-security Camp Five in May 2004. There I lived — if that word can be used — in a cell with cement walls. I was permitted to exercise once or twice a week; otherwise, I was alone in my cell at all times. I had nothing to occupy my mind except a Koran and some censored letters from my family. Interrogators told me that I would live like that for 50 years.

While I was in Camp Five, the military gave me a piece of paper that laid out the allegations against me. I had been in Guantanamo at that point for 2 1/2 years. My lawyer later told me that I had received this paper as a result of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that detainees were to be allowed to have court hearings. We never got the promised hearings; instead, we went through military hearings at Guantanamo in which we were not shown any evidence or allowed to have lawyers. All we got was the piece of paper.

Some of the allegations were silly. One said that I had gone to Afghanistan for military training in 1989. The truth was that I had told an interrogator about a trip I had made to Afghanistan for a weekend as an overweight 16-year old after the war with the Soviet Union there ended. This trip was sponsored by the Saudi government, which had helped fund the Afghan mujaheddin and was celebrating — with the United States — the defeat of the Soviets.
ad_icon

Only one of the allegations seemed to be directly related to what is called the “War on Terror.” It said that I had been “present at Tora Bora.” No other details were provided. I had never heard of Tora Bora (although I later learned that it was Osama bin Laden’s suspected hiding place, where U.S. forces battled the Taliban in December 2001). Later, I learned that a Yemeni detainee had told interrogators that I had been there, along with many others, because he hoped to be released if he was seen as cooperating with the U.S. military.

I know that there have been newspaper stories saying that I recruited people to go to al-Qaeda training camps. But the sheet of paper the military gave me said nothing about recruiting, which is not something I have ever done.

There were many times in Guantanamo when I felt as though I was falling apart, like a sandcastle being washed out by the tide. I lost all hope and faith. The purpose of Guantanamo is to destroy people, and I was destroyed. I decided that I preferred death to life, and I attempted suicide several times.

Once, during a break in a meeting with my attorney, I cut my arm with a razor and tried to hang myself. I do not remember it, but apparently my attorney returned earlier than I had told him to and found me suspended by my neck from the cell wall, unconscious and covered in blood. I broke a vertebra but survived with surgery.

Between suicide attempts, I tried desperately to hold on to the few fleeting moments of light that presented themselves to me. I met every few months with my attorneys and felt better whenever they were in Guantanamo, but my despair would return within a day of their departure. On occasion, I was helped by compassionate guards. After the beating in Camp X-Ray, a young female guard appeared at my cage, looking to make sure that no other guards were watching. “I’m sorry for what happened to you,” she whispered to me. “You’re a human being just like us.” These words were a temporary balm for my bruises and loneliness. Ultimately, though, I believe it was God who did not allow me to die.

In July 2007, a colonel told me that I was going home. He did not explain why I was suddenly no longer too dangerous to live in freedom. Four days later, I was put on a Saudi government plane. When we landed in Riyadh and I saw my family, I was overwhelmed. We all cried and hugged. I said hello to someone I thought was my sister only to hear her say, “Daddy.” I looked at her face again and saw that it was my daughter, who had grown from a 7-year-old child to a 13-year-old young woman while I’d been gone.

In Guantanamo, I was very angry with the people who had decided to hold me thousands of miles from home without charging or trying me. I was very angry with the people who kept me in isolation even when I was at my most desperate. I was very angry about having no rights at all. I was not angry with Americans in general and I even drew comfort from some, such as my lawyers and the kind soldier. But I could scarcely comprehend how U.S. policy had allowed me to be treated as I had been.

On the plane ride home, though, I decided that I would have to forgive to go on with my life. I also know that Sept. 11 was a great tragedy that caused some people to do dark things that they would not otherwise do. This knowledge helped me forget my miserable existence in Guantanamo and open my heart to life again, including to my recent re-marriage.

When I was watching “United 93,” I thought of the soldier who had offered me compassion in Guantanamo. Her words reminded me that we all share common values, and only by holding on to them can we ensure that there is mercy and brotherhood in the world. After more than five years in Guantanamo, I can think of nothing more important.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , | Comments Off on A Detainnee Speaks: I’m Home, but Still Haunted by Guantanamo

Veteran Suicide Update: Man Who Died in Fire Set Blaze Himself, Officials Say

August 16, 2008 – A Waldorf man who died in a fire at his home last Saturday actually set the fire, and he refused to leave the house as it burned, state fire investigators said yesterday.

Fire officials have not officially ruled the death of Dean Lorenzo Turnbull Jr., 28, a suicide, saying they are still unsure about his motives for starting the fire. They said he was receiving treatment for mental-health problems but provided no further details.

Authorities said that about 8 a.m. Aug. 9, Turnbull started a fire among papers in his basement bedroom at the home in the 11000 block of Breezy Point Court. After that, they said, he set another fire in a basement storage room.

Turnbull’s mother, 54, was home at the time. Her account convinced investigators that Turnbull had intentionally stayed.

“She went downstairs, and he was standing in the basement,” said Joe Zurolo, deputy state fire marshal. “She had a brief conversation with him, but he wasn’t going to come out.”

Zurolo declined to provide more details of that conversation. Turnbull’s mother, whom fire investigators identified as Ceciliae Turnbull, escaped the fire without serious injury. Public records also give her name as Ceciline Turnbull. She could not be located to comment yesterday.
ad_icon

After the fire, Dean Turnbull’s body was found in the basement.

“There is no issue as to who started the fires, but we’d certainly like to be able to come up with a motive as to why he would go to this extreme,” Zurolo said. “It’s kind of bizarre.”

After the fire, investigators said that family members had told them Turnbull was an Iraq war veteran.

Yesterday, spokespeople for the U.S. Army said that Turnbull had served, but not in Iraq. He was a vehicle repair specialist serving on active duty from 2002 to 2005, including a stint in Korea.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Veteran Suicide Update: Man Who Died in Fire Set Blaze Himself, Officials Say

Fargo VA Notifies Patients of Health Risk

August 16, 2008, Fargo, ND – The Fargo Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center is notifying 159 veterans who underwent procedures involving ear, nose and throat endoscopes that they may have been exposed to an infection because the instrument used was not properly cleaned.

A VA inspection team – including Infection Control, Patient Safety and Public Health officials – determined that not all the endoscopes in question received proper disinfection treatment, according to a VA news release.

The inspection team verified that 159 patients faced a small risk of infection and is notifying the patients through phone calls and mailings.

The VA is offering free testing to the 159 patients and will provide them with additional medical care if needed. Patients with inquiries should call toll-free (866) 517-9363.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Fargo VA Notifies Patients of Health Risk

Convention Aims to Aid Veterans Blinded by War

August 16, 2008 – More than 700 people attended the Blind Veterans Association Convention in Phoenix this week and discussions centered on improving the quality of life for those who lose their sight in war.

The Department of Veteran Affairs estimates that there are about 165,000 blinded veterans nationwide.The convention at the Hyatt Regency offered dozens of seminars, exhibits and information designed to inform blind veterans of the many resources available to them.

Steve Beres, of Phoenix, attended the convention with the National Industries for the Blind, a group that works to tell blind veterans of possible employment opportunities.

Beres, 42, who lost his eyesight in 2002 while fighting in the Middle East, said his world changed after the injury.

“I think a lot of us identify ourselves with our job and I know for me personally I had to ask myself, ‘What now? What am I going to do with the rest of my life now?’ And I was afraid I was going to end up sitting on a couch listening to Jerry Springer.”

There was lots of outreach to the newly injured as well.

“We got together a bunch of newly blinded veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan to . . . provide camaraderie,” Beres said. “The majority of those people return back to their communities and they really don’t have anybody with shared experiences.”

Beres heard many conversations about getting on with life after becoming blind.

Matthew Slaydon, 37, of Avondale, lost his sight in October 2007. He has spent this week running his future career goals by other blind veterans. After talking to other veterans who have continued their education, Slaydon plans to pursue a doctorate in clinical psychology next year.

“Coming here has allowed me to see people who have pursued careers and gone on with their lives and really given me a chance to put things in perspective,” he said.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Convention Aims to Aid Veterans Blinded by War

Officials Say Flaws at Polls Will Remain in November

August 15, 2008 – Flaws in voting machines used by millions of people will not be fixed in time for the presidential election because of a government backlog in testing the machines’ hardware and software, officials say.

The flaws, which have cast doubt on the ability of some machines to provide a consistent and reliable vote count, were supposed to be addressed by the Election Assistance Commission, the federal agency that oversees voting. But commission officials say they will not be able to certify that flawed machines are repaired by the November election, or provide software fixes or upgrades, because of a backlog at the testing laboratories the commission uses.

“We simply are not going to sacrifice the integrity of the certification process for expediency,” said Rosemary E. Rodriguez, the chairwoman of the commission.

As a result, machine manufacturers and state election officials say states and local jurisdictions are forgoing important software modifications meant to address security and performance concerns. In some cases, election officials in need of new equipment have no choice but to buy machines that lack the current innovations and upgrades.

The federal government does not require that states use machines that the commission certifies, but most states depend on the commission to approve new machines and software, and at least 10 states have rules or laws requiring federal certification.

In Ohio, for example, which requires federal certification, election officials found that in this year’s presidential primary the touch-screen machines used in 43 counties, or by more than three million voters, dropped at least 1,000 votes as memory cards sent data to the central server in each county. The discrepancy was caught and corrected before final tallies were calculated, but election officials say the risk is too high. The newer software being provided by manufacturers fixes the problem, but it has not been certified, and so the state cannot use it.

Cuyahoga County, the most populous county in Ohio, plans to use a type of optical scan machine that lacks safeguards to prevent election officials from tampering with the ballots and affecting tallies, said the Ohio secretary of state, Jennifer L. Brunner. Those safeguards do exist on a later model, she said, but it remains uncertified.

“We need the federal oversight to create consistent standards and to hold the manufacturers to a certain level of quality, but we also have to be able to get the equipment when we need it,” Ms. Brunner said. “Right now, that equipment is not coming, and we’re left making contingency plans.”

Election officials in Illinois, Iowa, North Dakota, Washington and Wisconsin told of similar frustrations.

The slowdown began in February 2007 when the commission took over the certification process that was previously performed by a volunteer program operated by the National Association of State Election Directors. Until then, the association had arranged for private testing labs to scrutinize the machines, using standards set in 1990 and 2002 by the Federal Election Commission. That process was widely criticized as being inconsistent and rife with conflicts of interest.

“The problem is that the pace of innovation is outstripping the pace of regulation,” said Doug Chapin, director of the Web site set up by Pew Center on the States, electionline.org. “Federal certification is intended to help election officials manage voting technology, but right now it’s getting in the way instead.”

Since the commission took over the certification process, no new equipment or software has been certified.

Advocates for better election systems say one reason for the delay is that the machines are fraught with problems that should have been detected earlier, giving manufacturers more time to make improvements. Had there been stronger standards before the commission took over, they say, the current level of scrutiny would not be necessary.

“The E.A.C., to its credit, has decided to dig their collective heels in and insist that the software and hardware be rigorously tested by professional testing labs,” said Warren Stewart, a technology expert with Vote Trust USA, a voting rights watchdog group.

Either way, said Chris Nelson, the secretary of state in South Dakota, which requires federal certification of voting-machine changes, he is tired of waiting.

In 2006 the ballot-marking devices used by disabled voters incorrectly marked 50 to 100 ballots, Mr. Nelson said. The machine maker says it has fixed the problem but the state cannot install the fix without certification, said Mr. Nelson, who added that he had also not decided how to proceed.

In Chicago, election officials say they are frustrated that they cannot upgrade the software that runs their optical scan machines so that it will perform more smoothly for disabled voters. The software change will also more accurately count ballots cast in voting precincts that sit on the fault line between two Congressional or judicial districts.

Part of the reason for the slowdown has been that the commission chose to certify systems from top to bottom, including software and hardware, rather than simply certifying modifications to noncertified machines.

Many states have begun to consider moving away from requiring federal certification. In Washington, Pierce County received a state exemption from the certification requirement after it decided to give voters the ability to rank candidates running for county office in order of preference, thus avoiding a primary. The new voting method required a software change that would have otherwise required certification, said Pat McCarthy, the county elections director.

In Wisconsin, election officials have to use calculators to add machine tallies individually in about 1,500 polling places. Kevin Kennedy, director of the state elections board, said the upgrade needed to make the state’s touch-screen machines communicate properly with its optical scan machines was not certified.

“It is slow, insecure and opens up room for error,” Mr. Kennedy said. He added that the state had been using the same optical scan machines since the mid-1980s and would like to buy new hardware but would not until new machines were federally certified.

Machine manufacturers are also becoming frustrated.

In June, the Election Technology Council, the trade association that represents most major voting machine makers, issued a report highly critical of the commission that said the certification delays were squelching innovation and raising the industry’s costs.

A draft report out this month by the Government Accountability Office, the Congressional watchdog, said the current system left states on their own to discover voting machine problems. The report calls for Congress to revise the Help America Vote Act and provide the commission with the authority and resources it needs to resolve problems with machines that were certified before the commission took over the process.

Posted in VA Claims Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Officials Say Flaws at Polls Will Remain in November

Green Beret Leader Shot, Mutilated Afghan Man

August 13, 2008, Fort Bragg, NC – The leader of an Army special forces team “grinned” as he held the ear of an Afghan man he suspected of being an insurgent after he shot him and left his body in the desert, a Green Beret testified Tuesday.

The testimony by Sgt. 1st Class Ricky Derring came at a military hearing for his team leader, Master Sgt. Joseph D. Newell, who could face court martial on a murder charge in the March 5 killing of the Afghan civilian.

Derring said Newell returned to the spot where he left the man’s body and “made a stabbing motion and I could see his arms cutting.” Newell then walked back to the team’s vehicle with the man’s ear in his hand, Derring said.

“He shook the ear and grinned,” Derring said.

Under cross examination by Newell’s civilian attorney Todd Conormon, Derring said he didn’t actually see Newell cut off the man’s ear.

The Article 32 hearing that is expected to last two days is similar to a civilian grand jury. It is not used to decide guilt, only whether there’s enough evidence to court martial Newell, who was assigned to the Fort Bragg-based 3rd Special Forces Group. The Army has not released details about Newell such as his age, hometown and how long he has served.

Derring said his team was escorting a convoy of supplies in Helmand province, when they spotted two civilian cars in the distance. The soldiers fired a warning shot and went to investigate.

Derring, a 50-caliber machine gunner on the team, said Newell asked the man through an interpreter whether he was an insurgent or had improvised explosive devices. He questioned him about a photo of a weapon on his cell phone.

“Joe was asking him questions: Where did he get the phone, was he placing IEDs, was he Taliban,” Derring testified during a hearing at Fort Bragg, a sprawling Army base near Fayetteville.

Derring said the man answered no. But Derring said he, Newell and the interpreter believed the man was an insurgent because Taliban forces often use cell phones to communicate and call in their locations.

Newell drew his gun and shot him, left him in the desert, then returned and cut off his ear, Derring testified. Newell took the body to another place in the desert, “and kicked and over his face a little bit,” Derring said.

Derring responded to Conormon’s questions about hard feelings between Newell and other team members. Derring said they would argue about tactics and other matters, adding that Newell had to assert himself because he was a newer member of the team.

Derring said he was upset about the shooting and later told another sergeant what had happened.

“He basically said Master Sgt. Newell had a screw loose,” Derring said.

Newell later talked to Derring about the killing, during which Derring told Newell he never wanted to be in that kind of situation, Derring said.

“He told me, ‘Don’t worry, nothing will come of it.’ He said, ‘if it does, I’ll just say I was attacked,'” Derring testified.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Green Beret Leader Shot, Mutilated Afghan Man

Kremlin Dusts Off Cold War Lexicon to Make US Villian in Georgia

August 15, 2008 – Russians were told over breakfast yesterday what really happened in Georgia: the conflict in South Ossetia was part of a plot by Dick Cheney, the Vice-President, to stop Barack Obama being elected president of the United States.

The line came on the main news of Vesti FM, a state radio station that – like the Government and much of Russia’s media – has reverted to the old habits of Soviet years, in which a sinister American hand was held to lie behind every conflict, especially those embarrassing to Moscow. Modern Russia may be plugged into the internet and the global marketplace but in the battle for world opinion the Kremlin is replaying the old black-and-white movie.

The Obama angle is getting wide play. It was aired on Wednesday by Sergei Markov, a senior political scientist who is close to Vladimir Putin, the Prime Minister and power behind President Medvedev.

“George Bush’s Administration is promoting interests of candidate John McCain,” said Dr Markov. “Defeated by Barak Obama on all fronts, McCain has one last card to play yet – the creation of a virtual Cold War with Russia . . . Bush himself did not want a war in South Ossetia but his Republican Party did not leave him any choice.” The Americans were now engineering an armed conflict between Ukraine and Russia, Dr Markov added.

The Establishment and its media supporters are dusting off favourites from the Cold War shelf. Sergei Lavrov, the Foreign Minister, accused Washington of playing dangerous games. The West was guilty of “adventurism”, supporting aggression against peace-loving Russian forces who are engaged on a humanitarian mission to protect human life. Yesterday’s headline in Commersant, a generally admired newspaper, announced with old-style sarcasm the imminent American “Military Humanitarian Landing” in Georgia.

A classic of Soviet-speak also came from Vasili Lickhachev, a former Russian Ambassador to the EU. “The West has spent a lot of time, energy and money to teach Georgia the tricks of the trade . . . to make the country look like a democracy,” he said.

“We and many other nations see through this deceit. We understand that the seditious tactics of the so-called colour revolutions are a real threat to international law and the source of global legal nihilism.”

These grooves from the Cold War grave are shrugged off by many Russians but they strike a chord in a nation ready once again to see itself as the victim of outside conspiracy. Blogs everywhere attract conspiracy lovers but Russian blogs have been exceptionally rich this week in theories of Western skulduggery over Georgia.

The old thinking finds more fertile ground now because, in the view of disillusioned Russians, President Bush relaunched the ideological war through a compliant American media, especially at the time of the invasion of Iraq.

“In the old days under Soviet rule we didn’t believe a word of our own propaganda but we thought that information was free in the West and we longed for it,” said Katya, a middle-aged Muscovite. “But we have learnt since that the West has its own propaganda and in some ways it is more powerful because people believe it.”

Moscow is using novel methods to spread a very unsubtle, Cold War version of the Caucasian conflict to the world. Chief among them is Russia Today, a state 24-hour news channel that is fronted much of the time by cheery British and other English-speaking television professionals.

The smiles and studio banter could come from BBC World or CNN but the story is unrelentingly the Kremlin version. Banners flash along at the bottom of the screen saying such things as “genocide” and “aggression” or “city turns into human hell, many people still trapped under rubble”. Recapping the conflict yesterday RT’s presenter said that Georgia’s “brutal assault” had killed 1,600 civilians in its breakaway province in a campaign that destroyed 70 per cent of the buildings in Tskhinvali, its capital. Russian forces had moved in only to bring peace as Georgian forces killed women and children who were trying to flee, it said. Throughout its rolling cover of alleged Georgian atrocities, there was no mention of the heavy Russian military offensive.

The coverage goes down well in developing countries that want an alternative to CNN and BBC World Service, a Russian official said. “We have learnt from Western TV how to simplify the narrative.”

The Soviet crackdown

– In January 1968 Alexander Dubcek became First Secretary of the Czechoslovak Communist Party, instituting the “Prague Spring” liberalising reforms

– In August the Soviet-led Warsaw Pact invaded, below, claiming that its assistance had been requested by Communist Party leaders. Dubcek was arrested

– Lyndon Johnson, the US President, declared the invasion in violation of the United Nations Charter, but America was in the middle of a presidential election campaign and a war in Vietnam. The West took no action

– In 1988 mass demonstrations marked the anniversary

– The Communists were finally ousted in 1989 and Václav Havel was elected President in what became known as the Velvet Revolution. Soviet forces withdrew in 1991

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Kremlin Dusts Off Cold War Lexicon to Make US Villian in Georgia

Editorial Column: Crusade for War Veterans Continues

August 9, 2008 – For years, Lawrence T. Hess had helped William S. Burton Sr. research cases of military personnel who may have been exposed to asbestos while serving.

But in mid-2000, Hess, a World War II Navy veteran who also served as a Secret Service agent, was diagnosed with asbestos-related pleural disease. Burton encouraged him to file a military compensation claim.

“When he was dying in the hospital, I told him, ‘George, sign this so you can file for disability,’ ” Burton told me. “I told him it would help his wife out.”

Hess of Snellville died in Nov. 2006. He was 79. Today, his wife Suesan Hess receives “dependency and indemnity compensation” for his years of service, Dec. 1944 to July 1946.

When I met Burton three years ago, he’d just self-published the second edition of a book, “Asbestos ” The Silent Killer of Navy Veterans.” The book explains the disease, its causes, the difficulty in correctly diagnosing it, and steps veterans should take to prove their compensation claims for war-related illnesses.

It took Burton several years to prove his own claim ” that asbestos exposure while in the Navy had caused him to contract a lung disease. So he wrote the book to help veterans navigate the maze.

“I printed this book to get the help out to the people,” the Lilburn resident said. “It doesn’t matter who you are or what you did, you have to work through the system.”

Burton admits he’s toned down his combativeness and criticism of the Veterans Administration. He had to, if he wanted to succeed in his crusade to help as many veterans as possible get disability compensation. He also has learned to collaborate, notably with the Georgia Department of Veterans Service.

“Bill Burton is a true veterans advocate,” wrote George Langford, the state director of claims, in an e-mail. “His book is informative and useful to veterans service officers. The Claims Division has won asbestos-related cases before the Department of Veterans Affairs using the information learned from Mr. Burton and his book.”

Asbestos-related diseases, Langford told me, are difficult to prove. Veterans needs to have a “military occupational speciality” that’s been approved for claims by the Department of Veterans Affairs. They also must show specific symptoms and a diagnosis to file a successful claim.

Here’s what troubles Burton, 83; Many veterans don’ even know about the dangers of asbestos exposure, much less what’s required of them to seek compensation. That’s one reason he decided to self-publish his tome again. About 600 boxed copies sit in the garage of his home in Lilburn.

“The VA just can’t pass out money to people who don’t qualify for it,” he said. “With the help of Langford, we’ve gotten over $7 million in claims. I’m looking to help the veterans and their wives.”

Wives like Suesan Hess, whom I met one recent morning at Burton’s home. She is Taiwanese and speaks several languages, but admits English isn’t her best.

“He knows everything,” said Hess, patting Burton on the shoulder. “He’s my hero. I can’t say enough.”

For information about “Asbestos – The Silent Killer of Navy Veterans,” visit asbestos-silentkiller.com or call William S. Burton Sr. at 770-381-5395.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Editorial Column: Crusade for War Veterans Continues

Pakistani President Expected to Resign

August 15, 2008, Islamabad, Pakistan – Faced with mounting pressure from former political allies and dwindling support from his international backers, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, once a top U.S. ally, is expected to resign in the next few days, according to Pakistani officials.

A week after leaders of the ruling coalition said they planned to impeach Musharraf, the capital was abuzz with speculation that he would step down before formal impeachment charges are filed in Parliament on Monday. Musharraf, who seized power in a military coup nine years ago, has survived at least two assassination attempts. But his opponents said Thursday that he was unlikely to withstand the current challenge to his presidency.

Musharraf has said he has no plans to leave Pakistan, although some analysts and political associates have suggested he could take up residence in Turkey, where he spent several years of his childhood. One senior Pakistani official said Musharraf’s opening position in preliminary talks about his future was a demand for “indemnity and immunity” from prosecution.

“He has indicated he is not a rich man and can’t live abroad,” the official said.

Musharraf’s possible departure has raised fears that it could further destabilize Pakistan, a nuclear-armed nation, and hamper the multibillion-dollar U.S. effort to fight al-Qaeda and Taliban insurgents in the region. In the event of Musharraf’s ouster, the chairman of the 100-seat Senate would become the de facto head of state, and Parliament would have 30 days to take up a vote for the president’s replacement.

Bush administration officials said they believed Musharraf had maintained hopes until late last week that some senior commanders of Pakistan’s powerful military would support his continuation in office. Rumors briefly spread through the administration that Musharraf, who rose to power through the military before seizing control in a 1999 coup, was trying to organize a return to non-democratic emergency rule.

But the senior Pakistani official said that “the head count is over” and that army corps commanders had informed the government in Islamabad last Friday that they had no desire to be involved. Pakistan’s newly appointed chief of army staff, Gen. Ashfaq Kiyani, has remained aloof from the impeachment debate while dozens of retired military officers have called publicly for Musharraf’s removal.

Still unknown is whether Musharraf will reach out to the White House and seek to revive his once-close relationship with President Bush. U.S. officials said there had been no high-level contact with Musharraf for some time. They said that Bush’s top national security advisers had counseled him “not to take the call” if Musharraf telephoned but that Bush had not yet communicated a decision on the matter.

Farah Ispahani, a top member of the Pakistan People’s Party, part of the ruling coalition, said Musharraf is expected to resign within two to three days. Ispahani, a member of Parliament and the wife of Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States, said that details of Musharraf’s resignation plan remain under negotiation but that it was clear his support was shrinking rapidly.

“We hope that in the interest of the good of Pakistan, and for the good of the country, that Mr. Musharraf takes the right course and resigns before the impeachment process begins,” Ispahani said.

The senior Pakistani official, who said he was not authorized to discuss the issue publicly, said a game of “psychological warfare” was underway between Pakistani politicians and Musharraf’s backers. “The truth is that he will resign,” the official said, but “official action has to be taken by him, and he has not yet taken the action.”

Dozens of members of Musharraf’s Pakistan Muslim League-Q abandoned him this week after three provincial assemblies voted overwhelmingly in favor of his impeachment. On Friday, the provincial assembly in the southern province of Baluchistan is expected to deliver a similar vote, according to Pakistani politicians and analysts.

Leaders of the ruling coalition, which also includes former prime minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-N party, called for Musharraf’s impeachment Aug. 7. The coalition has at times appeared on the brink of collapse since the two parties swept Parliamentary elections in February. But last week, Sharif and the co-chairman of the Pakistan People’s Party, Asif Ali Zardari, presented a united front in calling for the president to step down.

A two-thirds majority in both the National Assembly and the Senate are required to oust Musharraf from office.

Although the United States imposed sanctions on Pakistan after Musharraf overthrew Sharif in 1999, the Bush administration became a vocal backer of his government when he declared allegiance to Washington following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. His government has provided unprecedented U.S. access to Pakistani territory, including operational support to fight an Islamist insurgency that has spread from Afghanistan to Pakistan’s remote tribal areas along the 1,500-mile-long Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

But while the administration supported Pakistan’s return to democracy this spring, it was reluctant to sever ties with Musharraf, who remained president. Concerns over the coalition government’s determination to continue the counterterrorism fight have increased measurably in recent weeks. U.S. officials have charged that Pakistan’s powerful intelligence agencies — long under military control — have been aiding the Taliban in Afghanistan, and that the government lacks the ability, and perhaps the desire, to control them.

The coalition reached its decision to impeach Musharraf only days after Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani visited the White House and weeks after a top CIA official confronted Pakistan’s civilian government with evidence that the country’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency had helped coordinate a deadly suicide bombing in Afghanistan last month.
ad_icon

The White House is thought to be split on how strongly to back Musharraf, especially since the call for his impeachment. But while Vice President Cheney is often cited as Musharraf’s principal backer in Washington, officials there said that Cheney now agrees that the president should be cut off. They said that it was Bush who had not committed to a final break with someone he still considers a counterterrorism ally.

“The vast majority of the U.S. government has moved beyond their original attachment to Musharraf,” one official said.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Pakistani President Expected to Resign

Iowa Soldier Commits Suicide in Ex-Girlfriend’s Holmen Home

August 14, 2008 – In a sad echo of a national problem facing the military, a 21-year-old Army National Guardsman from Iowa was on the phone with his former girlfriend when he fatally shot himself in the basement of her Holmen home late Friday, officials said.

The woman told police she had ended her shift at The Company Store at 11:30 p.m. and found she’d missed a cell phone call. The voicemail was from the sister of her former boyfriend, asking if she knew where Jake Clements was, according to Holmen police reports.

The woman learned from his sister that Clements, of Boone, Iowa, had failed to report for drills and had not been seen.

The Holmen woman then went home, where she and a friend walked through the house, turning on lights and checking each room on the main floor, according to the reports.

She tried to call Clements, and he picked up but hung up before responding. When she called again, he answered and when pressed admitted he was in the basement, according to the police report.

He said he wanted to see her one last time, he was sorry and he loved her. When she asked what he was talking about, she heard a loud bang, according to the report.

The friend called 911 about 11:57 p.m. after hearing the noise and both went to a neighbor’s home to wait for police.

Police found Clements’ body in the basement, with an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head. A .45-caliber Springfield gun was still in his hand, loaded with five live rounds of ammunition, including one in the chamber, according to the report. A partially consumed bottle of wine also was found, but no suicide note.

Holmen police Chief Mike McHugh said his department was working with the military to investigate the incident. Clements is thought to have returned from Iraq a few months ago, he said, and speculation was he might soon be headed back.

There was no forced entry into the home and it was presumed Clements still had a key to the home, officials said.

Clements’ former girlfriend declined to speak with the media.

According to the Veteran’s Administration, the suicide hotline that was established in July 2007 has received 55,000 calls, 22,000 from veterans and the rest from concerned family members or friends.

The VA Mental Health director Ira Katz said, in an e-mail that was part of a court proceeding, that an average of 18 veterans commit suicide every day.

Suicide prevention summit planned

EAU CLAIRE – “Changing Attitudes, Saving Lives” is the theme of the first Suicide Prevention Summit to be held from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Sept. 22 at The Florian Gardens in Eau Claire.

The program is designed for health care and human service professionals; mental health, senior, youth and public services providers; educators; law enforcement personnel; faith communities; post-secondary students; and parents, survivors and anyone with an interest in suicide prevention.

The summit will focus on:

# Saving lives through intervention and awareness.

# Understanding the full scope of the suicide problem.

# Becoming aware of available resources.

# The QPR (questions, persuade and refer) process of three simple steps to help save a life from suicide.

Cost is $30. Those interested in attending the summit can register online at www.uwec.edu/ce/humanSer/suicide_prevention/index.htm. For more information, call 866-893-2423 or e-mail ce@uwec.edu.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Iowa Soldier Commits Suicide in Ex-Girlfriend’s Holmen Home