Religious Groups Seek Swift Ban from Obama on Torture

January 14, 2009 – A broad coalition of religious groups is calling on President-elect Barack Obama to issue an executive order on his first day in office banning the use of torture.

Leaders of the coalition, the National Religious Campaign Against Torture, met with officials from the Obama transition team on Wednesday afternoon and emerged saying they were optimistic about the prospects for such an order.

Linda Gustitus, the group’s president, said the coalition leaders met with Michael Strautmanis, who has been named chief of staff to Valerie Jarrett, a senior Obama adviser.

“He gave every indication that it’s going to happen, not necessarily on Day 1, but that it’s going to happen,” Ms. Gustitus said. “So we’re encouraged. We still believe that it would be a very, very important statement to the nation and the world, were it to take place on Day 1.”

The coalition, which was formed in 2006, includes Roman Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox Christian groups, as well as organizations representing Muslims, Jews, Bahais, Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs. They asked their congregations to recite a prayer to end torture in the 10 days before Mr. Obama takes office.

In a news conference on Wednesday, the Rev. Dr. John Thomas, president and general minister of the United Church of Christ, said, “All over the world, people are looking this week for a clear and strong word that change has come, that religious values are not simply to be pandered to for votes, but are principles that underlie policy.”

Ingrid Mattson, president of the Islamic Society of North America, said, “We have lost the support of allied nations for our polices, and we have lost the good will of ordinary people across the world who now see us as hypocrites.”

The group wants the executive order to include a commitment to close secret prisons around the world where terrorism suspects were held, and to stop the practice of rendition, in which detainees have been transferred to other countries, including some known to use torture.

Officials in Mr. Obama’s transition office declined to comment on whether an executive order would be coming.

The president-elect has been outspoken in condemning the use of torture, saying at a news conference last week, “I was clear throughout this campaign, and have been clear throughout this transition, that under my administration, the United States does not torture, we will abide by the Geneva conventions, that we will uphold our highest values and ideals.”

Mr. Obama added, “I think it is important for us to do that not only because that is who we are, but also ultimately it will make us safer and will help in changing hearts and minds in our struggle against extremists.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Religious Groups Seek Swift Ban from Obama on Torture

Jan 15: U.S. Government Agrees to Pay $350,000 to Parents of Jeffrey Lucey, a Suicidal Iraq War Veteran Denied VA Medical Care

January 15, 2009, Springfield, MA – The United States Government has agreed to pay $350,000 to the parents of a United States Marine who committed suicide in 2004 after returning home from combat duty in the Iraq war.

Within months after returning home from Iraq in June 2003, Corporal Jeffrey Lucey began to show signs of post-traumatic stress disorder caused by his experience in the war.  On June 22, 2004, Jeffrey hung himself in the basement of his parents’ home, two weeks after the Northampton Veterans Medical Center in Leeds, Massachusetts, turned him away.  Jeffrey, who had received an honorable discharge from the US Marine Corps, was 23 years old at the time of his death.  In July 2007, his parents, Kevin and Joyce Lucey filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the United States in federal court in Springfield, Massachusetts — the first such suit to be filed since the beginning of the war in Iraq.

On January 6, 2009, the US Justice Department issued a letter to the Luceys’ attorney, Cristobal Bonifaz, which admitted “that Jeffrey’s suicide while under VA [Department of Veterans Affairs] care was a tragedy for the VA and the individual care providers.”  The letter formally offered $350,000 to settle the case.  Bonifaz today notified the federal court that his clients have accepted this offer.

“The US Government killed my son,” said Kevin Lucey.  “It sent him into an illegal and reckless war and then, when he returned home, it denied him the basic health care he needed.  We hope that this case serves as a wake-up call to the nation that our government must be held accountable for the suffering it has caused thousands of US military families.”

Joyce Lucey added “When Jeffrey went to Iraq, we didn’t realize that the bullets and bombs there didn’t present the only threat to our son’s safety. Our own government’s apathy and indifference are just as great a threat to our troops and veterans.  Until the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) takes the psychological wounds of war seriously, the epidemic of military suicides will continue to grow.”

“Jeffrey Lucey carried to his death the American flag he found in the hands of a dead Iraqi child,”” said Bonifaz.  “Jeffrey never recovered from the horrors he witnessed in Iraq.  When his post-traumatic stress disorder signs became critical, he was turned away at the door of the VA.  Jeffrey Lucey would have lived but for the illegal war in Iraq and the callous and irresponsible treatment handed to him by the US agency charged with providing him health care when he had returned home.”

After their son’s death in 2004, Kevin and Joyce Lucey joined Military Families Speak Out, a national organization of military families opposed to the war in Iraq.   “Jeffrey’s story is a story of too many military families in this country,” said Joyce Lucey.  “We will continue to speak out to demand that our government immediately end this war, bring our troops home now, and provide all the necessary medical care they deserve when they return.”

“And to those military families who have similarly suffered because of the negligence of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs,” added Kevin Lucey, “we hope this case serves as an example that the government can and must be held accountable in a court of law.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Jan 15: U.S. Government Agrees to Pay $350,000 to Parents of Jeffrey Lucey, a Suicidal Iraq War Veteran Denied VA Medical Care

Is the Army Lying About Friendly Fire Deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan Wars?

January 15, 2009 – New statistics obtained by Salon depict a spectacularly low number of U.S. Army deaths from friendly fire in the current conflict in Iraq, a mere fraction of historical rates. According to data released to Salon by the Army’s Combat Readiness/Safety Center, only 24 of the 3,059 U.S. Army soldiers killed in Iraq since the invasion in 2003 died by fratricide.

That is a rate of .78 percent, less than one-tenth of almost every estimate from previous conflicts stretching back to World War II, despite six years of combat in Iraq, often in confusing urban terrain, using intense U.S. firepower. Army officials gave Salon similar statistics for Afghanistan: six out of 484 dead, or a rate of 1.24 percent. By comparison, the Army’s own estimates of the friendly fire rates for every war from World War II to Desert Storm are between 10 and 14 percent, except for a low of 6 percent during the invasion of Panama. During the last U.S. conflict in Iraq, 1991’s Operation Desert Storm, fratricide killed 35 of 298 U.S. service members, or a rate of nearly 12 percent, according to a 1992 report by the Center for Army Lessons Learned.

Army spokesman Paul Boyce said improved technology and better leadership and training contributed to the low fratricide rates in the current Iraq war. Some observers, however, called the new data fishy. “That is almost impossible,” said Geoffrey Wawro, director of the University of North Texas’ Military History Center, who closely followed the Army’s coverup of football star Pat Tillman’s death by friendly fire in April 2004. Wawro says that technology and training can help minimize the friendly fire rate, but “still, the fog of war is such that it has to be higher than .7 percent.”

The retired Army colonel and West Point graduate Andrew Bacevich, now a history professor at Boston University and a prominent Iraq war critic, was just as emphatic.

“To say we have suddenly stopped all these problems that have been a part of warfare since the beginning of time? I don’t believe it … To claim that this Army is somehow uniquely disciplined in that regard? It is a great army, but they are still human beings. They are still scared shitless.”

Those unusually small numbers, along with anecdotal reports from soldiers and a string of coverup allegations, raise the possibility that the Army has routinely swept fratricide incidents under the rug in Iraq and Afghanistan. Salon detailed just such a case last fall, in which battle video and testimony from soldiers contradicted the official version of events. Army casualty officers, therefore, might have provided incorrect information to an unknown number of parents about the death of their son or daughter in Iraq or Afghanistan. The Army might also have missed a similar number of opportunities to learn from friendly fire incidents and avoid knocking on more parents’ doors with the same bad news.

As Bacevich notes, many of the problems that create friendly fire incidents have existed “since the beginning of time.” In an e-mail to Salon, the Army’s Paul Boyce listed the “leading causes of fratricide throughout military history”: “chaos and confusion of warfare; inadequate situational awareness; inadequate employment of, and adherence to, fire control measures; and combat identification failures.”

Expressed another way, the fog of war and human error cause soldiers to misidentify friends as foes. A more easily quantifiable factor that Boyce does not cite is the collision between different branches of the military or between different units in the same branch. A 1992 Army study says that fratricide is most likely to occur “along shared unit boundaries,” or when different units fight side by side supporting each other. This can mean, as in Grenada in 1983, a Navy jet mistakenly attacking Army troops, or as in the incident first reported last fall in Salon, members of an Army tank unit in Iraq in 2006 allegedly firing on Army infantry.

The military still employs mixed units, and it cannot eliminate human error or the fog of war. The consistency of the numbers from World War II to Desert Storm 50 years later is remarkable. The Army’s figures for World War II are 12 to 14 percent; for Vietnam, 10 to 14 percent; for Grenada, 13 percent; for Panama, 6 percent; and for Desert Storm, 12 percent. (Figures for Korea were not provided.)

Those numbers are consistent despite leaps in technology. Though Boyce says that “warfighter training and leadership are the principal determinants,” he says that “technology also contributes to the avoidance of fratricide” in the current conflict. “Fire-control systems sights and computers are far more capable than in the past. Weapons and ammunition are able to achieve high probabilities of hits and kills at greater ranges.” Technological improvements since the first Gulf War have greatly improved the Army’s ability to track friendly forces on the battlefield.

Yet Wawro notes that technology can also increase the lethality of friendly fire incidents. The extremely powerful weaponry the United States now brings to the battlefield means that “one tiny mistake results in heavy casualties.”

The Army’s official stats for the current Iraq war suggest that fewer soldiers were killed by fratricide over the past six years than the total number of service members killed by fratricide during Operation Desert Storm, which lasted 42 days. The statistics from Desert Storm come from well-documented events, though it isn’t hard to find Gulf War veterans who claim even those numbers are low.

Why should numbers from the current Iraq conflict be so different from numbers from the last one? Army officials say that Iraq and Desert Storm don’t provide an apples-to-apples comparison. Desert Storm was a brief, extremely violent conflict fought in the open desert and marked by some costly fratricide mistakes. On Feb. 27, 1991, for example, one group of American tanks opened fire on another already firing at an Iraqi unit, killing six U.S. soldiers and wounding 25.

Or there is the possibility that something has changed about the way the military reports such incidents. Studies done by both Congress and the military suggest that officers have an incentive to cover up fratricide, which is particularly corrosive to morale.

According to a study prepared by the Office of Technology Assessment for the House Armed Services Committee in June 1993, after the first Gulf War, a “15 to 20 percent fratricide rate may be the norm, not the exception,” as “past rates of fratricide have been systematically and substantially underestimated.” It notes that the “psychological effects of friendly fire are always greater than from similar, enemy fire.”

A decade earlier, a 1982 report by Army Lt. Col. Charles Shrader called “Amicide: The Problem of Friendly Fire in Modern Warfare,” which put the friendly fire rate far lower – perhaps as 2 percent – had reached the same conclusion about the temptation to hide friendly fire incidents. “Commanders at various levels,” wrote Shrader, “may be reluctant to report instances of casualties due to friendly fire either because they are afraid of damaging unit or personal reputations, because they have a misplaced concern for the morale of surviving troops or the benefits and honors due the dead and wounded, or simply because of a desire to avoid unprofitable conflicts with the personnel of supporting or adjacent units.”

The 1992 report from the Center for Army Lessons Learned, cited earlier, says that friendly fire can be “devastating and spread deeply within a unit.” Friendy fire, it says, also results in “loss of confidence in the unit’s leadership.”

“Nobody wants to talk about this,” says Wawro. “It is a disincentive to recruitment and everything. There is real incentive to cover it up.”

These latest fratricide statistics from the Army already include incidents initially blamed on the enemy. There was Pat Tillman. Another example was Lt. Kenneth Ballard. The Army told his family he died in Najaf from enemy fire in May 2004. By December of that year, the family was asking for more information. The Army admitted to friendly fire as the culprit in September 2005.

On Oct. 14 of last year, Salon began a series of stories about the deaths of two infantry soldiers, Pfc. Albert Nelson and Pfc. Roger Suarez-Gonzalez on the rooftop of a building in Ramadi, Iraq on Dec. 4, 2006. Soldiers there said a nearby U.S. tank fired at the building, blowing Suarez off the roof and killing him instantly. Nelson died later that day.

Salon also released footage from a helmet-mounted camera from that day. The video shows an explosion at that building, soldiers claiming they watched the tank shoot at them and a sergeant attempting to report what he though was a friendly fire incident over a radio. A superior officer then apparently overrules the sergeant. The Army says two enemy mortars landed simultaneously on Nelson and Suarez.

During several visits to Nelson and Suarez’s old unit at Fort Carson late last year and in interviews since then, scores of veterans from Iraq have described non-lethal friendly fire incidents as surprisingly routine. In the same neighborhood, tanks blast clean through house walls, the air wobbles with hits from massive 2,000-pound bombs dropped from U.S. aircraft, and infantry shoot from dusty house to dusty house. It gets confusing.

Some soldiers present during the battle on Dec. 4, 2006 say Nelson and Suarez’s death wasn’t the only exchange of friendly fire that day. It was only exceptional because of the firepower involved and the resulting deaths.

Several expressed anger – but also, some understanding – at the tank that allegedly fired on Nelson and Suarez. The resentment toward the chain of command for the alleged cover-up was unmitigated. “A bunch of guys with fucking rags on their heads weren’t good enough to kill those guys,” one soldier in the building with Nelson and Suarez said about the two men. “I lost more respect for (my platoon sergeant) because we knew he knew.”

Late last year, Rep. Dean Heller (R-Nev.) and Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Penn.) sent letters to the Pentagon requesting a new investigation into Nelson and Suarez’s deaths. In early December, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) asked his staff to take a new look into the incident.

The Army has so far declined to open a new investigation, offering only to review any “new specific evidence” about the incident, according to Army spokesman Paul Boyce.

The Army did conduct an initial investigation into the deaths. Army officials say it included 170 photographs, dozens of interviews and hundreds of pages of ballistic analysis. Since July, Salon has repeatedly requested this material through the Freedom of Information Act, to no avail. So far, the Army has only released a heavily redacted, 10-page summary of that investigation.

The tragedy of burying friendly fire incidents is that the opportunity to study and prevent future, similar incidents dies along with the truth. The Center for Army Lessons Learned, in fact, studies fratricide events and develops techniques to avoid similar tragedies in the future. “If you make a mistake, you have to learn from it,” explained Ralph Nichols, a senior military analyst at the center who helped craft new Army guidance last September on avoiding fratricide. “If you know what causes it, you can plan and train to avoid it.”

In early 2007, Pvt. Matthew Zeimer, 18 and Spc. Alan McPeek, 20 took cover on a rooftop in Ramadi during a firefight with insurgents. It was Feb. 2, two months after Nelson and Suarez’s death in the same town. During the battle in February, a tank mistakenly fired on Zimmer and McPeek’s position. McPeek died instantly. Zeimer was blown to the other side of the roof. He died a short time later. The families of the two men were originally told their sons were killed by enemy fire.

The Army says Nelson and Suarez did not die from friendly tank fire. If the Army is wrong, there is no way of knowing if admitting it would have saved the next two young men just two months later.

Posted in Gulf War Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , | Comments Off on Is the Army Lying About Friendly Fire Deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan Wars?

Bush/Cheney: ‘Most Impeachable’

January 14, 2009 – House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers says President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney committed impeachment-worthy offenses which must be thoroughly investigated even after the two men leave office as a means of reaffirming U.S. constitutional principles.

“The Bush Administration’s approach to power is, at its core, little more than a restatement of Mr. Nixon’s famous rationalization of presidential misdeeds:  ‘When the President does it, that means it’s not illegal,'” Conyers said in a foreword to a 487-page report entitled “Reining in the Imperial Presidency: Lessons and Recommendations Relating to the Presidency of George W. Bush.”

“Under this view, laws that forbid torturing or degrading prisoners cannot constrain the President because, if the President ordered such acts as Commander in Chief, ‘that means it’s not illegal.'” Conyers continued. “Under this view, it is not the courts that decide the reach of the law – it is the President – and neither the Judiciary nor Congress can constrain him.”

Conyers also seemed to acknowledge what many Bush critics had long suspected, that the Michigan Democrat evaded an impeachment battle the past two years out of concern that the political repercussions might have kept the Democrats from winning larger congressional majorities and the White House in Election 2008.

Noting that “some ardent advocates of impeachment have labeled me a traitor – or worse – for declining to begin a formal impeachment inquiry in the House Judiciary Committee,” Conyers said he disagreed with some of their political judgments but concurred with their assessments of the seriousness of Bush-Cheney misconduct.

“Many think these acts rise to the level of impeachable conduct.  I agree,” Conyers said. “I have never wavered in my belief that this President and Vice-President are among the most impeachable officials in our Nation’s history, and the more we learn the truer that becomes.”

Conyers also praised the many citizens who petitioned him for action on impeaching Bush and Cheney.

“I want to make clear how much I respect those who have given so much time and energy to the cause of fighting for the impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney,” Conyers said. “While we may not agree on the best path forward, I know they are acting on the basis of our shared love of this country.  These citizens are not fringe radicals. –

“They are individuals who care deeply about our Constitution and our Nation, and who have stood up to fight for the democracy they love, often at great personal cost.  However, as I have said, while President Bush and Vice President Cheney have earned the dishonorable eligibility to be impeached, I do not believe that would have been the appropriate step at this time in our history.”

Documenting Abuses

The 487-page report, released  Tuesday, documents what Conyers called Bush’s excessive claims of executive power and illegal acts. It is the clearest sign yet that the 111th Congress plans to probe the depths of the Bush administration’s most controversial policies.

The report contains 47 separate recommendations, including calls for a blue-ribbon commission and independent criminal probes. Conyers said the recommendations are not intended as political “payback or revenge,” rather the goal is to “restore the traditional checks and balances of our constitutional system – and to set an appropriate baseline of conduct for future administrations.”

Conyers noted that earlier investigations failed to get to the bottom of many “questions left in the wake of Bush’s Imperial Presidency,” including allegations of torture, “extraordinary rendition” (shipping prisoners to countries known to torture), warrantless domestic surveillance, leaking the CIA identity of Valerie Plame Wilson, and the firing of nine U.S. Attorneys.

Last week, Conyers proposed legislation to create a blue-ribbon panel of outside experts to probe the “broad range” of policies pursued by the Bush administration “under claims of unreviewable war powers,” including torture and warrantless wiretaps.

Tuesday’s report sought to arm lawmakers with the documentary evidence to support action on the bill, which currently has 10 sponsors

Last year, Conyers called on Attorney General Michael Mukasey to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate whether the Bush administration committed war crimes, a proposal that Mukasey rebuffed.

Conyers came under criticism from impeachment advocates last year when he refused to allow his committee to vote on articles of impeachment against Bush proposed by Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio. Instead, Conyers’ committee held an impeachment substitute of sorts; a one-day hearing devoted to testimony by Bush’s critics about the administration’s alleged abuses of power.

The new report suggests that Conyers is not inclined to immediately “move forward” now that Barack Obama has been elected President. In fact, Conyers said he firmly rejects “the notion that we should move on from these matters simply because a new administration is set to take office.”

On Sunday, Obama signaled in an interview on ABC’s “This Week With George Stephanopoulus,” that he will not likely recommend that his Justice Department launch a criminal probe into the Bush administration’s past practices, particularly policies that authorized torture.

Obama said prosecution would be possible if someone were found to have “blatantly broken the law,” but the President-elect expressed “a belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backward.”

Also, on Tuesday, a federal judge ruled that the Bush administration must turn over to President-elect Obama’s staff documents Bush has been withholding from Congress related to the White House’s role in the firing of the nine U.S. Attorneys.

Conyers’s committee has been pursuing testimony and documents from White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and former White House Counsel Harriet Miers about their involvement in the decision to fire the federal prosecutors, a move that a senior Justice Department official said was designed to remove U.S. Attorneys who were deemed not “loyal Bushies.”

President Bush has asserted executive privilege in blocking Bolten and Miers from testifying before Congress. Last week, a new set of House rules was passed reviving subpoenas issued during the 110th Congress. In addition to Miers, Conyers’s committee subpoenaed former White House political adviser Karl Rove.

Conyers also said he wants to find out “to what extent were President Bush and Vice President Cheney involved in the outing of Valerie Plame Wilson and its aftermath.”

Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Cheney’s chief of staff, was convicted of obstruction of justice and perjury in the Plame case, but his prison sentence was commuted by Bush. “There is considerable evidence that culpability for the outing of Valerie Plame Wilson and subsequent obstruction goes above and beyond Scooter Libby,” Conyers said.

Conyers subpoenaed documents last year related to the Plame leak, including closed-door testimony that Bush and Cheney gave to special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald. But the Justice Department refused to turn over the materials.
 
“Given that so many significant questions remain unanswered relating to these core constitutional and legal matters, many of which implicate basic premises of our national honor, it seems clear that our country cannot simply move on,” Conyers said.

“As easy or convenient as it would be to turn the page, our Nation’s respect for the rule of law and its role as a moral leader in the world demand that we finally and without obstruction conduct and complete these inquiries. This can and should be done without rancor or partisanship.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , | Comments Off on Bush/Cheney: ‘Most Impeachable’

Secretary of State-Designate Hillary Clinton Says She Will Sound Alarm on Darfur Genocide

January 13, 2009 –  Sen. Hillary Clinton said on Tuesday she would focus on the Darfur crisis as top U.S. diplomat and the Obama administration was looking at options including the creation of no-fly zones.

“There is a great need for us to sound the alarm again about Darfur. It is a terrible humanitarian crisis compounded by a corrupt and very cruel regime in Khartoum,” Clinton said at a Senate hearing to confirm her nomination as secretary of state.

She said the incoming Obama administration was reviewing U.S. policy toward Darfur and the UN/African Union force must be fully deployed.

“We have spoken about other options, no-fly zones, other sanctions and sanctuaries, looking to deploy the UN/AU force to try to protect the refugees but also to repel the militias,” she said.

“There is a lot under consideration,” she added.

Foreign policy experts say 200,000 people have died and 2.5 million driven from their homes in five years of fighting between rebels and the army and government-backed militias. Khartoum accuses the Western media of exaggerating the death toll.

The deployment of a joint UN/AU peacekeeping force is behind schedule and Darfur activists have been pushing the new administration to do more to get those troops on the ground and look at fresh ideas to stop the violence.

Clinton has said on several occasions she wanted to see a NATO “no-fly” zone over Darfur to support peacekeepers against militias.

Jerry Fowler, president of the Save Darfur Coalition, an advocacy group, said there was no time to spare in acting to end the violence in western Sudan and facilitate a lasting peace there.

“Secretary-designate Clinton and the new administration must be prepared to lead on ending the genocide starting next Tuesday and not a day later,” said Fowler.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Secretary of State-Designate Hillary Clinton Says She Will Sound Alarm on Darfur Genocide

Shinseki to Enter Veterans Affairs with Daunting Task of Job Creation for Soldiers

January 13, 2009 – Retired four-star Gen. Eric K. Shinseki will face a daunting task if he is confirmed as the next secretary of the Veterans Affairs Department: getting soldiers returning from war into the workforce in a very troublesome employment climate.

Nearly 900,000 troops have served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and they could have a hard time finding or keeping a job. Many have been in and out of the workforce because of multiple deployments, and others face the prospect of being deployed overseas again.

“The unemployment rate among veterans is high and dramatically increasing,” said Paul Rieckhoff, an Iraq war veteran and head of the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, which President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team has consulted informally. “We need to hear about job creation, and how we are going to get veterans out and to work.”

Shinseki, whose confirmation hearing will be held Wednesday before the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, will be expected to engage in a government-wide job creation strategy. The challenge will be especially daunting because of the numbers of military members who have returned recently from Iraq and Afghanistan, and the even greater number expected to return as America withdraws its fighting troops from Iraq.

Obama has instructed each of his Cabinet nominees to begin charting out job-creation strategies as part of his overall vision of generating more than 3 million jobs through a proposed $775 billion economic recovery package. In his weekly radio address on Saturday, Obama said 90 percent of the jobs would be created in the private sector.

His remarks came one day after the Labor Department announced the nation’s unemployment rate rose to 7.2 percent in December, a loss of 524,000 jobs in a month. For all of 2008, the country lost a total of 2.6 million jobs.

Veterans’ advocates like Rieckhoff say recent veterans between 18 and 35 years old — the majority of Iraq and Afghanistan vets — are a distinct disadvantage. Of the 1.6 million men and women who have served since 2001, hundreds of thousands have deployed for more than one tour. Many came from the National Guard and Reserves, and despite laws protecting their jobs when they were deployed, they came back to find their jobs gone, or they were told they could not return to their positions.

Many of these men and women now “have to keep up with their peers, who have been networking (for) years while they’ve been fighting in Fallujah,” Rieckhoff said, explaining that they don’t have the same kind of connections and amount of uninterrupted time in the workforce as their counterparts who didn’t serve.

He said there have been reports that employers are skittish about hiring part-time soldiers who may be sent back overseas, and hesitant to hire veterans, for which a behavioral and mental stigma — however unfounded — exists.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Redeployment Rights Act says that all employers — public and private — must take returning soldiers back to their positions, and at the same pay, as when they left for war.

But, according to reports, thousands of veterans have complained over the last few years that their employers haven’t been adhering to the law. In November, it was reported that over 10 percent of all National Guard and Reservists who came home had encountered problems returning to work, particularly in the corporate sector. Lawsuits have been filed against some of the country’s biggest employers — UPS, American Airlines and Wal-Mart.

Dave Miller, vice president of Con-Way freight, said his trucking company goes “beyond the call of duty” not only by upholding the Uniformed Services employment law but by making sure employees make the same hourly wage even when they are deployed. For example, if a trucker makes $58,000 a year under Con-Way, then only $28,000 under the Guard overseas, Con-way pays the difference.

The company also maintains the employee’s health benefits and health care for his family, Miller said. He said 28 employees were deployed in 2008, costing the company $500,000 for the year. A total of seven are deployed now.

But Miller said Con-Way has been hindered by the ongoing use of National Guard and reservists in multiple deployments abroad. Because they are part-time soldiers, they do not get the job security and benefits given to an active-duty soldier, sailor or Marine.

“So many businesses are retracting — vets have no place to go,” he said. “They’re coming out of a very high energy situation … the worst thing we can do is to have these warriors come home to no job.”

Meanwhile, Shinseki, a popular pick with veterans’ organizations, has vowed to make veteran employment and education a priority. He says he wants to work with the new administration to fast-track the implementation of the new veterans’ GI Bill, passed in 2008 to give returning vets more money for college tuition.

VA officials said they are taking a two-pronged approach — working with the veterans in the VA system to transition into employment through a wide range of vocational and educational support services, as well as reaching out to veterans to place them into VA jobs across the country.

“Not only is it the right thing to do, but we’re taking advantage of these highly skilled, educated folks. It seems like the perfect match,” said Dennis May, director of the Veterans Employment Coordination Service for the VA in Washington. He said his department has reached out to 2,600 “severely injured” veterans to see if they are interested in applying for VA positions.

Veterans are given hiring preferences at both the federal and state levels.

Overall, May’s group has reached out to 28,000 veterans, provided services to 11,000 and placed 64 in VA jobs.

Maryland Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown, an Iraq war veteran, is also working with the Obama transition team on VA issues. Although he declined to talk specifically about the administration’s plans for the department regarding jobs, he said that officials in his own state have embarked on a multi-level effort to help vets transition back into civilian life, including vocational support.

For example, veterans trained in battlefield trauma and in medical assistance but who are not certified to practice it in civilian life may soon find the hurdles lowered, Brown said.

“Many, when they come home, they want to apply those skills (in the health field) and there are obstacles like licensing and certification. No one is saying there should not be any quality control,” Brown said, but some of the steps are “overly burdensome” and could be relaxed.

Jack Scharrett, an Army reservist who served in Iraq, has launched the Veterans Initiative Center and Research Institute to help entrepreneurial veterans build businesses and create jobs for other veterans across his state of Minnesota.

“It’s been proven year after year that veterans hire other veterans,” Scharrett said. “Being a small business owner — and I’ve been there — can be a very daunting exercise, with everyone constantly telling you ‘no.’ … We’re struggling ourselves to get the capital we need. We are having to look at our strategy hard and be very austere.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Shinseki to Enter Veterans Affairs with Daunting Task of Job Creation for Soldiers

Jan 14: Shinseki Testifies About Transforming VA; Opening Statement Released

General Shinseki, Act II, Scene 1 

January 14, 2009 – As Gen. Eric K. Shinseki entered the hushed chamber of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs Wednesday, he proved F. Scott Fitzgerald wrong to say that American lives have no second acts.

With his own about to begin, General Shinseki told his confirmation hearing to be head of the Department of Veterans Affairs how he will be dealing with some of the costliest aftermath of a war that he famously predicted, just before the curtain fell on his first act, would bog down hundreds of thousands of troops for years. With the invasion of Iraq looming, his Pentagon bosses rebuked him for saying that, and he retired a few months later as Army Chief of Staff.

So there was great anticipation Wednesday for what would be the general’s longest public discussion in more than five years.

In written answers provided to committee members in advance of the hearing, General Shinseki said his priorities would be post-traumatic stress and traumatic brain injuries suffered by troops who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as finding jobs for vets, examining and dealing with the problem of homeless vets, and helping all wounded vets make the difficult transition from military health care to VA facilities.

In his written answers to committee members, the general said his that the “over-arching challenge that the VA faces is its own transformation into a 21st century organization.” It was an echo of the transformation theme that dominated his time as the Army’s top general.

This transformation, he wrote, would include streamlining the disability claims system, ensuring adequate resources and facilities to meet the health care needs of all veterans and using new information technologies to improve the delivery of benefits and services.

He pledged to spend his early weeks in office spending significant time visiting VA facilities, and pledged that combating homelessness among veterans will be a priority.

Among those scheduled to introduce the general was Bob Dole, a onetime Senate majority leader and the Republican presidential nominee in 1996, who lost the use of his right arm in World War II. More recently, Mr. Dole served as co-leader of a bipartisan commission that invested problems at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and throughout the military’s health care system.

When he retired in June 2003 after 38 years as a soldier, General Shinseki was the highest-ranking Asian-American in United States military history. He received two Purple Hearts for life-threatening injuries in Vietnam, one in which he lost so much of his foot that the Army wanted to discharge him.

While he rose through the ranks as a commander of armored units during the cold war era, he was the Army’s expert on peacekeeping operations, leading the first forces that imposed an armistice in Bosnia.

Associates say it was that experience pacifying a bloody Balkan battlefield that led him to electrify Washington less than a month before the invasion of Iraq in 2003, when he issued a blunt warning during a Senate hearing that securing Iraq would require more troops than were being deployed for the invasion.

“Something on the order of several hundred thousand soldiers are probably, you know, a figure that would be required” to stabilize Iraq after an invasion, he said.

“We’re talking about post-hostilities control over a piece of geography that’s fairly significant, with the kinds of ethnic tensions that could lead to other problems,” he added. “And so it takes a significant ground force presence to maintain a safe and secure environment, to ensure that people are fed, that water is distributed, all the normal responsibilities that go along with administering a situation like this.”

He immediately was scolded by the Pentagon leadership, in particular Donald H. Rumsfeld, then secretary of defense, and his deputy, Paul D. Wolfowitz. In remarks Mr. Wolfowitz later acknowledged he regretted, the deputy defense secretary dismissed General Shinseki as “wildly off the mark.”

General Shinseki was not fired for his comments, but was marginalized by the Pentagon’s civilian leadership, and his influence as a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certainly was never the same. He retired as scheduled in the summer of 2003.

Shinseki Opening Statement:

Opening Statement of
Eric K. Shinseki
Secretary-designate of Veterans Affairs
Before the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
United States Senate
January 14, 2009

Chairman Akaka, Senator Burr, Distinguished Members of the Committee on Veterans Affairs: Thank you for scheduling this hearing so expeditiously. I am honored to be before you today seeking your endorsement to become the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. Over the last several weeks, I have had the opportunity to meet with many of you individually and deeply appreciate the committee’s concern for and unwavering support for our Veterans and for the mission of the Department of Veterans Affairs. I’ve listened carefully to your concerns and advice, and have benefited from your counsel I deeply appreciate the confidence of President-elect Obama in this nomination and am fully committed to fulfilling his charge to me — that is, transform the Department of Veterans Affairs into a 21st Century Organization.

I am acutely aware that transformation is a challenging task — particularly in an organization as complex and as steeped in tradition as is the Department of Veterans Affairs. We faced similar challenges nearly 10 years ago in beginning the transformation of the United States Army. Leadership, commitment and teamwork enable the challenges of transformation to become opportunities to innovate and better serve our Veterans. With your support, I am confident we will succeed.

If confirmed, I will quickly finalize and articulate a concise strategy for pursuing a transformed Department of Veterans Affairs, reflecting the vision of President-elect Obama. I have much to learn about the organization and look forward to gaining valuable input and insights from its civilian workforce as well as from the Veterans Service Organizations. However, three fundamental attributes mark the starting point for framing a 21st Century Organization: people-centric, results-driven, forward-looking.

First, Veterans will be the centerpiece of our organization – our client, as we design, implement, and sustain programs. Our support to veterans and their enrolled family members must go beyond that of servicing customers to a relationship based on trust and positive results over a lifetime. Through their service in uniform, Veterans have sacrificed greatly, investing of themselves in the security, safety, and well-being of our Nation. They are clients, whom we represent and whose best interests are our sole reason for existence. It is our charge to address their changing needs over time and across the full range of support that our Government has committed to provide to them. Equally essential, the Department’s workforce will be leaders and standard-setters in their fields. From delivering cutting-edge medical treatment to answering the most basic inquiries, we will grow and retain a skilled, motivated, and client oriented workforce. Training and development, communications and teambuilding, and continuous learning will be key components of our workforce culture.

Second, at the end of each day, our true measure of success is the timeliness and excellence of services and support provided to Veterans. Thus, we will continuously strive to set and meet sound performance benchmarks in these areas. Workforce leaders and providers alike will know the standards and perform to them. Our processes will remain accessible, responsive, and transparent to ensure that the many needs of a diverse Veterans population are met. An integral part of measuring success includes assessing cost effectiveness. As stewards of taxpayer funds, this issue will be central to our quality and management processes.

Third, to optimize our opportunities for delivering best services with available resources, we must continually challenge ourselves to look for ways to do things smarter and more effectively. We will aggressively leverage the world’s best practices, knowledge, and technology, which are providing ever-increasing capabilities in health care, information management, service delivery, and other areas. We already know that a portion of today’s youth will be tomorrow’s servicemen and women, and the next day’s Veterans. Thus, we will seek to identify and embed transformational initiatives as part of our culture as we care for Veterans, present and future.

While developing a strategy for transforming the VA into a 21st Century Organization, we will address immediately a set of complex, near-term challenges that face us, as well:

1. Successfully implement the New GI Bill (Post 9/11 Veterans’ Educational Assistance Act).

2. Streamline the disability claims system, increase quality, timeliness and consistency of claims processing, and update the Disability Rating Schedule, while maintaining veterans’ rights.

3. Ensure adequate resources and access points to meet the health care needs of all enrolled Veterans, as well as those OEF/OIF Veterans and Priority Group 8 Veterans, who will be joining the system.

4. Leverage the power of Information Technology to accelerate and modernize the delivery of benefits and services.

If confirmed, I will focus on these issues and the development of a credible and adequate 2010 budget request during my first 90 days in office. The overriding challenge, which I will begin to address on my first day in office, will be to make the Department of Veterans Affairs a 21st Century Organization focused on the Nation’s Veterans as its clients.

I thank this committee for its long history of unwavering commitment to Veterans. If confirmed, I look forward to working closely with you in fulfilling that commitment.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Jan 14: Shinseki Testifies About Transforming VA; Opening Statement Released

VA Apologies for Denial of Benefits to Arizona Widow

January 11, 2009 – Inseparable from the moment they met, Judi Luby of Apache Junction said she and her husband Bob were soul mates.

Click here to watch the video.

“When he died, the last words I heard was, ‘Love you. Perfect.’ Can’t beat that,” Luby said. “46 years, we were still on the honeymoon.”

Bob, an Air Force veteran, died in 2007.

“He suffered and I would not want to see him suffering anymore,” Luby said.

Bob’s battles were done, but Judi’s were just getting started.

She applied to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for survivor death benefits not once, not twice, but four times.

“I’m trying to be very calm and nice about it,” Luby said.

Over and over, Judi said the VA kept asking for copies of her marriage license and death certificate, so she sent them yet again, this time certified mail.

Her envelope was received and signed for at the VA’s Phoenix benefits office, but still she was denied.

“This little old soldier just refuses to go away,” Luby said.

The ABC15 Investigators filed records requests, asking the VA for all similar claims to see how many others were being denied.

The VA claims the records do not exist.

We got Judi in contact with the American Legion.

“The stress level that has been put on me has been tremendous, and this has gone on for 16 months,” Luby told Art Brest, American Legion service officer.

“It causes me grief to think about that,” Brest said.

48 hours later, Judi’s claim was approved.

“Dear Mrs. Luby, we made a decision on your claim for dependency and indemnity compensation,” the paperwork read.

Judi will now receive $1,400 a month plus more than $20,000 in owed back-pay.

“If Channel 15 had not gotten involved, I would have never seen this paperwork, I can guarantee it,” Luby said.

The VA refused to talk on camera, agreeing only to answer questions by phone.

“I would say we have lessons learned,” said VA Phoenix Regional Office Director Sandra Flint. “I apologize to Mrs. Luby for the time that it did take us to process her claim and I appreciate Channel 15’s help in helping us get that done.”

The VA said its staff may have failed to follow proper procedure, resulting in Judi’s case being denied.

Click here to watch the video.

 RESOLVING A BENEFITS CLAIM WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs:
Veterans Benefits Administration
Local Office: 3333 N. Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85012
Phone: 1-800-827-1000

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on VA Apologies for Denial of Benefits to Arizona Widow

Army Statistics Show Soldier Suicides Rise as Time Spent in Combat Increases

January 12, 2009, Fort Lewis, WA – Josh Barber, former combat soldier, parked outside the Army hospital here one morning last August armed for war.

A cook at the dining facility, Barber sat in his truck wearing battle fatigues, earplugs and a camouflage hood on his head. He had an arsenal: seven loaded guns, nearly 1,000 rounds of ammunition, knives in his pockets. On the front seat, an AK-47 had a bullet in the chamber.

The “smell of death” he experienced in Iraq continued to haunt him, his wife says. He was embittered about the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that crippled him, the Army’s failure to treat it, and the strains the disorder put on his marriage.

Despite the firepower he brought with him, Barber, 31, took only one life that day. He killed himself with a shot to the head.

“He went to Fort Lewis to kill himself to prove a point,” Kelly Barber says. ” ‘Here I am. I was a soldier. You guys didn’t help me.’ “

For two days, a surveillance camera recorded the truck sitting in the Madigan Army Medical Center parking lot. Inside the truck, the body lay undisturbed.

If Josh Barber wanted his suicide to make a statement, no one seemed to notice.

Barber’s suicide is part of a larger story — the record number of soldiers, Marines and combat veterans who have killed themselves in recent years, at a time when the Pentagon has stretched deployments for combat troops to meet President Bush’s security plans in Iraq. The Marine Corps reported 41 actual or suspected suicides in 2008, a 20{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} increase over 33 in 2007. In 2007, the Army counted 115 suicides, the most since tracking began in 1980. By October 2008, that record had been surpassed with 117 soldier suicides. Final numbers for 2008 have not been released.

Suicides among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans doubled from 52 in 2004 to 110 in 2006, the latest statistics available, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

And the suicide rate among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans is outpacing the rate among civilians, a disturbing trend because the military screens troops for mental health issues and servicemembers typically are healthier than civilians, says Han Kang, a VA epidemiologist.

“Cases like Sgt. Barber’s are heartbreaking and my thoughts and prayers are with his family at this difficult time,” says Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., who has focused on military suicides as an issue and whose staff assisted Kelly Barber through her ordeal.

She says a cultural shift is needed in mental health care to expand outreach and de-stigmatize treatment for servicemembers and veterans.

“These problems can’t be solved overnight,” Murray says. “There is much more that needs to be done.”

Josh Barber’s wife shared his medical records with USA TODAY to provide a cautionary story about a soldier forced out of the service despite psychological illnesses caused by war.

“My husband fell through the cracks,” Kelly Barber says, adding that she also is haunted by the idea that she could have done more to save him. “My husband’s death shouldn’t go in vain.”

From cook to gunner

A large, jovial man who loved food and the outdoors, Josh Barber grew up in Traverse City, Mich. The youngest of two children, his parents divorced when he was in grade school.

Barber became engaged to Kelly Watson, the sister of his best friend, in 1997. He earned a high school equivalency degree before enlisting in the Army in 1999, and considered a career in the Army. But he changed his mind after serving in Iraq.He and Kelly married after his Army basic training and before he began attending cook school.

Barber had no history of mental health problems before enlisting, says his VA doctor, Lisa Olsen. His biggest problem was keeping his weight to service standards.

The Army’s assignment to cook school led Barber to a job in which he excelled. His grill work was second to none — whipping up omelets and burgers to taste, always recalling a customer’s favorite style of eggs, according to comments on his memorial page.

He took a job, Olsen notes, that was devoted to serving and feeding other soldiers. “He probably never suspected that he would be called on to serve in a combat role,” she wrote in a letter to Kelly Barber, now 40, after his death.

But then, in 2003, the United States invaded Iraq.

When he arrived in Iraq in October 2004, contractors did the cooking. Barber was made a gunner on a Humvee. He stenciled a skull insignia from his favorite punk rock band, Misfits, onto his .50-caliber machine gun, and ran convoys. He worked base security along the Syrian border and manned an observation post near Fallujah during fighting there.

His only joy, Olsen says, were the care packages from Kelly Barber stuffed with beef jerky and jars of Jif peanut butter.

On Dec. 21, 2004, in Mosul, a suicide bomber detonated explosives in a mess tent, killing 22, including 14 soldiers. Barber stood guard over the carnage. He would never forget the “smell of death,” he later told Kelly.

The shock of the blast affected others, including Army Gen. Carter Ham, who arrived at the scene 20 minutes after the attack. Ham told USA TODAY the incident contributed to the combat stress he developed afterward.

“There’s things that go on over there you’d never believe,” Barber told one of his best friends, Justin Haelle, during a trip home in 2005, “things I’ll never be able to tell Kelly about.”

Diagnosed with depression

Barber earned a combat action badge for fighting in Iraq. When he rotated home in September 2005, he filled out a health survey saying he had seen Americans and insurgents killed and wounded, had fired his weapon in combat and feared for his life. He admitted feeling numb and detached from others.

Barber left active duty in 2006 for the Army Reserve. Now a civilian, he got a job as a temporary cook in the dining facility at Madigan Army Medical Center here at Fort Lewis, about 40 miles south of Seattle.

Shortly after coming home, he went deer hunting in Michigan with his father, Dennis, something both had happily anticipated after Josh Barber’s long absence.

But the son didn’t kill anything that day. Later he told friends that he never even loaded his rifle while walking the brush.

One night during that hunting trip, the sound of gunfire woke Dennis Barber. He found his son, who had been drinking, blasting away at a paper target out in the darkness.

“What the hell are you doing?” he says he asked. Josh Barber stopped shooting and eventually went to bed.

Dennis Barber now wonders about that night.

“The armed forces can train you to do things you normally wouldn’t do,” he says of his son’s experience. “But they’ve never been able to train people how to forget.”

Barber’s military records show he was forced out of the Reserve after a diagnosis of depression that was listed as “non-duty related.” The Army provided no clarification on this issue. His plea to be retained and transferred into one of the newly created Warrior Transition Units for psychological care went unanswered, Kelly Barber says.

“The once smiling, happy man I knew is now quiet and depressed, reliving the events he experienced in Iraq today and full of guilt,” she wrote in a 2006 letter to the VA. “He has had to face many demons.”

About that same time, VA counselors diagnosed him with combat-related PTSD.

Classic symptoms were emerging, according to his medical records. Barber suffered nightmares filled with combat and explosions. He had flashbacks marked by moments when he simply seemed to be deep in thought, often while drinking vodka.

“He feels quieter and more isolated and feels somewhat less of a nice guy than he did before he deployed,” counseling notes say.

Life was unraveling in different ways. It took more than seven months for the VA to re-evaluate his wartime disability and grant him benefits. At work, he struggled to be retained as a permanent employee and promoted. He was reprimanded for his anger, according to his records.

By this spring, Kelly Barber was working 52 hours a week at two hospital clerical jobs.

Josh Barber was drinking more, an increasing area of friction. The strain on the marriage was evident. Kelly Barber would find her husband crying in his sleep. He awoke from nightmares covered in sweat, his heart racing. His moods would alternate between feelings of apathy and moments of tearful reactions to small things, medical records show.

It was unclear whether Barber continued to take his anti-depression medication.

During one conversation about his drinking, Barber blurted out that he was afraid of going to hell for killing an innocent Iraqi in the war. Barber told his wife that if it wasn’t for her, he would have committed suicide long ago.

Kelly Barber says she told him they would work through his problems.

When she awoke early on Aug. 24, Josh Barber was drinking vodka in front of the TV. Kelly Barber said she yelled at him for the first time.

“I said, ‘If you continue to drink like this, I don’t know how much more I can take,’ ” she recalls.

She now agonizes over that memory every day. “Did I give him an ultimatum?”

He vanished that night with his guns and ammunition in the Ford F-150 that Kelly Barber gave him as a coming-home gift from Iraq.

He left a note: “I love you. Please do not blame yourself. Sorry.”

The search for answers

Army Col. Ronald Place, acting hospital director on the day Josh died, said “the whole family at Madigan Army Medical Center has suffered a lot with Mr. Barber’s suicide.”

Place said identifying and treating psychologically wounded soldiers has improved since Barber left the Army, but more needs to be done.

“This young man served honorably in combat for 12 months,” Place says. “We’re still looking at how could we have potentially helped this civilian employee.”

One problem is a failure to seek help, Place says. Barber showed signs of anxiety, anger and detachment from others in a Fort Lewis questionnaire filled out in November 2005. But he did not request any counseling, according to the document provided to USA TODAY.

A leading suspect in the rise of suicides are the long and multiple combat deployments — not as a direct cause, but as a leading factor behind the stresses and family divisions that result, says Col. Carl Castro, an Army psychologist and suicide researcher.

The historic causes of suicide are hopelessness borne of stress, failed relationships and legal and financial problems, he says.

Soldiers have been required to serve multiple 12- to 15-month combat tours, with short periods of rest in between. More than 60{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} of soldiers who killed themselves in 2008 were, or had been, deployed, figures show.

“So the question becomes, ‘Well, what could be affecting those factors in making them higher? And that’s really where we then start looking at frequent and long deployments,” Castro says.

Surveys of troops reveal that mental health can fray after six or seven months of war, Castro says. “You start seeing huge differences in terms of depression scores, PTSD rates, all sorts of mental health issues,” he says. “And I think it has to do with the separation from family and friends and that social support network.”

To find answers, the Army joined with the National Institute of Mental Health in October seeking proposals for a $50 million study. It will track a cross-section of soldiers over years, sifting for clues about signs of self-destruction and also evidence of resilience, says Robert Heinssen, project officer.

The hope is for initial results in a year, he said. “We’re trying to work it so we get as fast a start-up as possible because soldiers are dying. We feel that urgency.”

Still reeling from twin blows of Josh Barber’s suicide and his heavily armed appearance at Fort Lewis, his family and friends struggle to make sense of it. “Every time he turned around, he felt like he was getting slapped in the face,” his friend Haelle says.

A memorial service with military honors will be held for Barber on March 6, at Sarasota National Cemetery in Sarasota, Fla.

“Everybody wants to know why,” his father Dennis Barber says. “Why did you have all that ammunition? What was he going to do out there, have a stand-off? I don’t think so. But then again, when people snap, you never know what you’re going to do.

“Josh took that (answer) with him,” Dennis Barber says.

To get more information follow millsriversdaschool .

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Army Statistics Show Soldier Suicides Rise as Time Spent in Combat Increases

Editorial Column: Streamline VA Policy for Disabled

January 13, 2009 – President-elect Barack Obama should make it easier for disabled veterans to get their benefits. The Department of Veterans Affairs routinely delays wounded soldiers’ disability claims for months and years, often shunting them into poverty and homelessness.

Retired Gen. Eric Shinseki, Obama’s pick for Veterans Affairs secretary, is scheduled to testify before the Senate tomorrow. Senators should press him to change this policy.

Former Lance Cpl. Bob O’Daniel’s story is far too common. The proud Navajo has been fighting for more than 17 years to receive the veteran’s benefits he earned.

During the 1991 Gulf War, O’Daniel worked on board the USS Nassau, which was stationed in the Persian Gulf. Even before he came home, O’Daniel knew something wasn’t right. He was always tired, and he couldn’t see or sleep properly. He experienced sexual dysfunction and “just a lot of things that a young man shouldn’t have,” he told me.

Many symptoms
O’Daniel suffers from Gulf War syndrome. This comes with a range of symptoms, including but not limited to rashes, stomach distress, brain lesions, fatigue, severely swollen muscles, and memory loss.

“Memories are what all people cherish,” O’Daniel said. “Good times, bad times – whatever. But I was missing a lot of those things.”

Pentagon doctors now believe Gulf War syndrome affects more than 175,000 veterans of the 1991 conflict. A government report released in November said the condition was most likely due to exposure to toxic pesticides and pills that were given to soldiers to protect them against nerve gas.

But even though O’Daniel’s VA doctors tell him he has the syndrome, department bureaucrats refuse to grant him the benefits he earned in combat. O’Daniel lives in his wife’s parents’ home in North Carolina, subsisting on their charity with his wife and two children while they wait for the VA to begin paying his claim.

Across the country, more than 600,000 wounded veterans find themselves in the same position, twisting in the wind as they wait for the government to keep its promise to care for them.

Descent into poverty
   Many descend into poverty during the months and years of waiting.

Others are simply unable to outlast the bureaucracy. In the six months leading up to March 31 of last year, 1,500 veterans died while they waited for the VA’s response.

There is a better way to handle military disability claims: Trust the vets.

In her exhaustive study of the long-term costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Linda Bilmes, who teaches management, budgeting and public finance at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, notes that almost all veterans tell the truth in their disability claims, with the VA ultimately approving nearly 90 percent of them. Given that reality, Bilmes suggests scrapping the lengthy process described above and replacing it with “something closer to the way the IRS deals with tax returns.” Britain, Australia and New Zealand all use similar systems to compensate their injured veterans.

Obama and Shinseki should streamline the benefits process. Our disabled vets have waited too long already.

Posted in Gulf War Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Editorial Column: Streamline VA Policy for Disabled