Editorial Column: Cheney Throws Down Gauntlet, Defies Prosecution for War Crimes

December 19, 2008 – Dick Cheney has publicly confessed to ordering war crimes. Asked about waterboarding in an ABC News interview, Cheney replied, “I was aware of the program, certainly, and involved in helping get the process cleared.” He also said he still believes waterboarding was an appropriate method to use on terrorism suspects. CIA Director Michael Hayden confirmed that the agency waterboarded three al-Qaeda suspects in 2002 and 2003.

    US courts have long held that waterboarding, where water is poured into someone’s nose and mouth until he nearly drowns, constitutes torture. Our federal War Crimes Act defines torture as a war crime punishable by life imprisonment or even the death penalty if the victim dies.

    Under the doctrine of command responsibility, enshrined in US law, commanders all the way up the chain of command to the commander in chief can be held liable for war crimes if they knew or should have known their subordinates would commit them and they did nothing to stop or prevent it.

    Why is Cheney so sanguine about admitting he is a war criminal? Because he’s confident that either President Bush will preemptively pardon him or President-elect Obama won’t prosecute him.

    Both of those courses of action would be illegal.

    First, a president cannot immunize himself or his subordinates for committing crimes that he himself authorized. On February 7, 2002, Bush signed a memo erroneously stating that the Geneva Conventions, which require humane treatment, did not apply to al-Qaeda and the Taliban. But the Supreme Court made clear that Geneva protects all prisoners. Bush also admitted that he approved of high-level meetings where waterboarding was authorized by Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, John Ashcroft, Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld and George Tenet.

    Attorney General Michael Mukasey says there’s no need for Bush to issue blanket pardons since there is no evidence that anyone developed the policies for any reason other than to protect the security in the country and in the belief that he or she was doing something lawful. But noble motives are not defenses to the commission of crimes.

    Lt. Gen. Antonio Taguba, who investigated the Abu Ghraib scandal, said, “There is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account.”

    Second, the Constitution will require President Obama to faithfully execute the laws. That means prosecuting lawbreakers. When the United States ratified the Geneva Conventions and the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, thereby making them part of US law, we agreed to prosecute those who violate their prohibitions.

    The bipartisan December 11 report of the Senate Armed Services Committee concluded that “senior officials in the United States government solicited information on how to use aggressive techniques, redefined the law to create the appearance of their legality, and authorized their use against detainees.”

    Lawyers who wrote the memos that purported to immunize government officials from war crimes liability include John Yoo, Jay Bybee, William Haynes, David Addington and Alberto Gonzales. There is precedent in our law for holding lawyers criminally liable for participating in a common plan to violate the law.

    Committee Chairman Senator Carl Levin told Rachel Maddow that you couldn’t legalize what’s illegal by having a lawyer write an opinion.

    The committee’s report also found that Rumsfeld’s authorization of aggressive interrogation techniques for use at Guantanamo Bay was a direct cause of detainee abuse there. Those techniques migrated to Iraq and Afghanistan, where prisoners in US custody were also tortured.

    Pardons or failures to prosecute the officials who planned and authorized torture would also be immoral. Former Navy General Counsel Alberto Mora testified to the Senate Armed Services Committee in June 2008 that “there are serving US flag-rank officers who maintain that the first and second identifiable causes of US combat deaths in Iraq – as judged by their effectiveness in recruiting insurgent fighters into combat – are, respectively the symbols of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo.”

    During the campaign, Obama promised to promptly review actions by Bush officials to determine whether “genuine crimes” were committed. He said, “If crimes have been committed, they should be investigated,” but “I would not want my first term consumed by what was perceived on the part of the Republicans as a partisan witch hunt, because I think we’ve got too many problems we’ve got to solve.”

    Two Obama advisers told the Associated Press that “there’s little – if any – chance that the incoming president’s Justice Department will go after anyone involved in authorizing or carrying out interrogations that provoked worldwide outrage.”

    When he takes office, Obama should order his new attorney general to appoint an independent prosecutor to investigate and prosecute those who ordered and authorized the commission of war crimes.

    Obama has promised to bring real change. This must be legal and moral change, where those at the highest levels of government are held accountable for their heinous crimes. The new president should move swiftly to set an important precedent that you can’t authorize war crimes and get away with it.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Editorial Column: Cheney Throws Down Gauntlet, Defies Prosecution for War Crimes

Dec 19: Dr. Phil Show Highlights CBS Investigation with VCS into VA’s Failures on PTSD and Suicide

December 19, 2008 – On Friday, the Dr. Phil television program became the first national mainstream talk show to devote an entire hour to the plight of veterans featuring an investigative report by CBS Chief Investigative Correspondent Armen Keteyian that exposed an epidemic of suicide among those who have served in the military.  * VCS Note: CBS News worked with VCS for several months on this investigation. Please see links below. *

Dr. Phil Show Dec 19, 2008 “Beyond the Front Lines”

“They come home and have no help, no voice,” said the show’s host, Dr. Phil McGraw, of veterans who often feel mistreated and neglected when they return to the U.S. after serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. “The system is broken,” he added.

Congressman Bob Filner, Chairman of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, appeared on the show along with the director of the Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs, Tammy Duckworth, and Paul Rieckhoff, the executive director and founder of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA).

Filner said the U.S. government was not prepared for the aftermath of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. He said the current crisis in the Middle East has generated almost a million veterans and the federal agency charged with taking care of them, the Department of Veterans Affairs, is struggling to keep up with physical and mental wounds. He said there have been cases where suicidal veterans have been turned away from the VA and then kill themselves. And, he said the VA currently has a backlog of approximately 800,000 benefits claims that need to be processed.

During the show, a clip was also shown of the CBS News story that aired in November of 2007. The report, done by Keteyian, exposed for the first time just how widespread the issue of suicide is among vets. CBS News discovered that young veterans in their twenties commit suicide at a rate that is up to four times what it is for civilians the same age. Keteyian was shown questioning the VA’s head of mental health, Dr. Ira Katz, who was, at the time, downplaying the risk.

Dr. Phil said the VA declined his invitation to appear on the show. He ended the program by telling veterans: “you are not forgotten.”

Play VideoVideo:
Struggle Of Soldier Suicides

The pain of losing a loved one to suicide: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=3498262n


Play VideoVideo:
Eye To Eye: Veteran Health

Paul Sullivan, a former VA analyst who is now the executive director of the advocate group Veterans For Common Sense, shares his insight. http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=3498254n


Play VideoVideo:
Veterans Families Speak Out

The families of veterans speak out. http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=3504148n

Posted in VA Claims Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Dec 19: Dr. Phil Show Highlights CBS Investigation with VCS into VA’s Failures on PTSD and Suicide

VA to Pay Surviving Spouses for Under Payment Error

A Maui widow’s plight highlights a computer error that wrongfully denied certain benefits.

December 20, 2008 – The Department of Veterans Affairs will begin issuing retroactive payments this month to eligible surviving spouses of war veterans who have been wrongfully denied up to millions of dollars in government benefits over the past 12 years.

The problem was pointed out to VA director James Peake last week by Sen. Daniel Akaka, chairman of the Veterans Affairs Committee, after the Hawaii Democrat received a complaint from Ruby Sasaoka of Kula, Maui, who was told by the VA that she wasn’t entitled to her husband’s last pension and disability check of $2,669.

Her husband, Raymond Sasaoka, died last December and she had used his last VA check to pay for funeral expenses. He had served in the Korean War as an Army corporal and suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and hearing loss.

In January, the VA told Ruby Sasaoka to return the money and nine months later the U.S. Treasury took the money out of her checking account.

However, Congress passed a law in 1996 giving veterans’ spouses the right to keep their spouses’ final month of benefits.

But the VA never updated its automated computer systems, which sends out checks and notification letters. As a result, spouses were either denied the final month of payment or asked to send the checks back. If the checks were already deposited or spent, the U.S. Treasury moved to seize the money directly from their accounts.

“This flawed practice has caused serious hardship for many widows,” Akaka said last week. “Now that this problem has been brought to light, I trust that surviving spouses will receive the benefits they are due.”

Based on Akaka’s inquiry, Peake established a special task force to identify and pay the beneficiaries who never received the benefit or were inadvertently required to repay the money issued for the month of a veteran’s death.

The task force is reviewing VA’s payment records for veterans who died after Dec. 31, 1996, and who are survived by a spouse. The review will identify those to whom VA owes retroactive benefits for the month of the veteran’s death.

Because there are deceased veterans for whom VA does not have marital status information, a special Survivors’ Call Center has been established for spouses who believe they may be entitled to this retroactive month-of-death benefit.

Surviving spouses are encouraged to contact the Survivors’ Call Center at (800) 749-8387, Mondays through Fridays. Inquiries may also be submitted through online at www.vba.va.gov/survivorsbenefit.htm.

Akaka’s committee estimates that 50,000 surviving spouses each year since 1996 could be affected, based on VA numbers. Out of that 50,000, some spouses might have received the payments they were due if they called the VA at the time to inquire about their rights.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on VA to Pay Surviving Spouses for Under Payment Error

Editorial Column: 8 Years on the Dark Side

December 20, 2008 – Vice President Dick Cheney said this week that he directly approved waterboarding to torture terror suspects. “I was aware of the program, certainly, and involved in helping get the process cleared,” Cheney told “ABC News.” Asked if he believes the simulating of drowning is an appropriate technique, he said, “I do.”

Last week, a bipartisan Senate Armed Services Committee report concluded that the 2003 Abu Ghraib detainee abuse was not just the result of a few rogue soldiers. It said: “Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld’s authorization of aggressive interrogation techniques and subsequent interrogation policies and plans approved by senior military and civilian officials conveyed the message that physical pressures and degradation were appropriate treatment for detainees in US military custody. What followed was an erosion in standards dictating that detainees be treated humanely.”

Those items help cement this White House as among the most cancerous in American history. Cheney told us after 9/11 that the administration would protect us by working on “the dark side . . . in the shadows in the intelligence world.” Cheney, Rumsfeld, and President Bush turned the dark side into a blind eye, the shadows into a shroud, and obliterated intelligent discourse on terrorism with raw fear. That was only the warm-up for twisting intelligence to invade Iraq for weapons of mass destruction that did not exist.

For eight years the administration never feared trampling truth and justice, even as Rumsfeld told the Senate Armed Services Committee in 2004 about Abu Ghraib, “Anyone who recommended that kind of behavior that I have seen depicted in those photos needs to be brought to justice.” At the moment, the administration faces no serious repercussions for decisions that resulted in many times more deaths in Iraq than here on Sept. 11, 2001. Rumsfeld went from disgrace to a visiting fellowship at the Hoover Institution. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz went from miscalculating the need for hundreds of thousands of troops in Iraq as “wildly off the mark” to counting the planet’s dollars at the World Bank – until corruption ended his presidency there.

Bush is sure to regale us about compassionate conservatism in his sugar-coated presidential library and Cheney will mumble from some undisclosed bunker about being the great liberator. All they currently face is the judgment of history.

It was something of a consolation for history that President-elect Barack Obama named Eric Shinseki to be the next secretary of Veterans Affairs. Shinseki was the general who made the Iraq troop estimate that Wolfowitz criticized.

And at least we have some facts to go with the fiction. The Senate report released jointly by Democrat Carl Levin of Michigan and John McCain of Arizona said Rumsfeld’s authorization of techniques “was a direct cause of detainee abuse.” It also said that Bush’s presidential order saying the Geneva Convention for humane treatment of prisoners of war did not apply to al Qaeda “impacted the treatment of detainees.”

Cheney and the report give us fresh clarity on their obfuscations. For instance, two years ago, Cheney was asked on a conservative radio talk show, “Would you agree a dunk in water is a no-brainer if it can save lives?” Cheney responded, “Well it’s a no-brainer for me.” The White House immediately trotted out the late White House spokesman Tony Snow and vice-presidential spokeswoman Lee Anne McBride to convince the press that Cheney was not referring to waterboarding.

McBride said, “The vice president does not discuss any techniques or methods that may or may not have been used in questioning.” Snow was challenged by reporters that it defied common sense to deny that a “dunk in water” was waterboarding. Snow still asserted, “he wasn’t referring to waterboarding. He was referring to using a program of questioning, not talking about waterboarding.” Pummeled by the press over this parsing, an exasperated Snow said, “I’m telling you what the vice president’s view is, which is it wasn’t about waterboarding. Period.”

The not-so-funny thing is that Cheney’s “no-brainer” remark was an honest window into his brain. True to the eight years of this administration, even the truth must be covered with a lie.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Editorial Column: 8 Years on the Dark Side

Pentagon Report: Gitmo Guard Admitted to Abuse of Prisoner

Critics say military probe that cleared 2 men was a sham.

December 18, 2008, San Juan, Puerto Rico – The allegations were explosive: Two guards at Guantanamo had bragged about abusing detainees and described the mistreatment as routine. The Pentagon quickly ordered an investigation, which cleared the men after they denied making the statements.

Last year’s investigation seemed to end the controversy, but a copy of the investigator’s report obtained by The Associated Press reveals that one of the guards had previously told military officials he abused detainees, while the other had attacked a man posing as a detainee in a training exercise before being deployed to Cuba.

Guantanamo critics say both revelations are further evidence the probe was a sham.

Ben Wizner, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney, said the military’s narrow investigation into alleged wrongdoing by its own personnel underscores the need for a “top to bottom” independent review of Guantanamo Bay’s military prison.

“As a country, we need to have a formal reckoning with the crimes that occurred at Guantanamo,” said Wizner, who has visited Guantanamo Bay’s prison. President-elect Barack Obama has vowed to close it.

Truth and consequences
Retired Marine Lt. Col. Colby Vokey, whose complaint with the Pentagon Inspector General initiated the investigation, said the report shows the military ignored statements that undermined the sailors’ denials.

Army Col. William Costello, spokesman for the Miami-based Southern Command, refused to comment, saying it would be inappropriate to say anything more than “what we announced publicly almost two years ago.”

That Feb. 7, 2007, announcement said there was insufficient evidence to substantiate that guards had bragged about beating up detainees.

The military’s investigation was launched after Marine Sgt. Heather Cerveny told Vokey, her boss, that she had heard guards at a club at Guantanamo discussing beating detainees and laughing about it on Sept. 23, 2006. After learning about it from Vokey, the Pentagon Inspector General’s office ordered the military’s U.S. Southern Command to investigate.

At the time, Vokey was the military defense lawyer for Canadian detainee Omar Khadr and Cerveny was his paralegal.

The two Navy guards, interviewed over two days by Army Col. Richard Bassett, “vehemently” denied they boasted about abusing detainees, the investigator wrote. The guards’ names are blacked out in the report that AP obtained from the Inspector General’s office through the Freedom of Information Act.

Bassett then went to Camp Pendleton, Calif., to interview Cerveny, but spoke with her for only about five minutes and treated her like someone accused of a crime instead of a person who reported a possible outrage, Vokey told AP.

“It was definitely confrontational, like a cross-examination,” Vokey said. “He read her her rights and accused her of making a false claim. It scared Sgt. Cerveny pretty badly. She was shaking afterward.”

Troubling incident
As to what, if any, investigation Bassett conducted on the guard who had previously admitted abusing detainees, his report doesn’t say. Bassett wrote that the guard had made his confessions to a Combat Stress Control Unit at Guantanamo but they had already been discarded as false after they could not be substantiated.

Bassett added, with no further explanation, that the claims “were attributed to the fact that he was pending disciplinary action at the time he made the statements.”

The report classified another guard as a “good sailor” but referred to a troubling incident.

Navy personnel posted as guards to Guantanamo receive training at Fort Lewis, Wash., before their deployment. Bassett said the second guard, during one of the exercises, “kicked a detainee role player for calling him a racial slur.”

  Click for related content
Former Gitmo prisoner says he was abused

Guards at Guantanamo face taunts from detainees, including racial epithets.

Joseph Piek, a Fort Lewis spokesman, said trainees are put “through a lot of pretty tough situations, as realistic as possible to prepare them for their mission at Guantanamo. We push their buttons.”

But Piek said it is rare for a trainee to retaliate physically.

The guard was removed from the exercise, given counseling and retraining, and accompanied his unit to Guantanamo, Bassett wrote.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Pentagon Report: Gitmo Guard Admitted to Abuse of Prisoner

Helicopter Pilot: War Hero Faces New Adversary

December 15, 2008 – With a Silver Star medal clipped to his Air Force jacket, 1st Lt. Thomas Cahill spoke humbly about his efforts to pilot a rescue helicopter through enemy fire while flying low over eastern Afghanistan’s snow-capped mountains.

His “uncanny skills,” his citation read, for keeping the Pave Hawk airborne in thin air at low rotor speed with mortar rounds whizzing by, resulted in saving three men during that mission on March 3, 2002.

“As dark as it was, impacting the terrain was my first enemy,” he said five years ago after his award ceremony at Nellis Air Force Base. “I would say it was probably luck.”

In the years since Operation Anaconda, Cahill’s enemy changed. So did his luck.

His enemy became post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD, an anxiety condition that stirs nightmarish memories of terrifying ordeals from the battlefield. It can cause sleep loss and erratic, impulsive behavior and make a person short-tempered.

As for his fortunes, he became a court-martialed captain this year. He was confined in the brig at Nellis until his release a month early in September for good behavior.

Cahill’s attorneys argued that his PTSD caused him to lose focus in his job with the 561st Joint Tactics Squadron and do things out of character.

“It was one of those cases where the hero has feet of clay,” one of his attorneys, Craig Mueller, said days after Cahill’s case concluded.

“Who rescues the rescuer?” Mueller asked. “The Air Force admitted they didn’t recognize his PTSD and change of behavior until the end of his tour. There are eight or nine people today who wouldn’t be alive if it wasn’t for him.”

In the general courts-martial, Cahill pleaded guilty May 27 to charges related to off-base thefts after his arrest by Las Vegas police in 2006 for stealing a car-haul trailer in the southern Las Vegas Valley.

He also was charged with stealing an all-terrain vehicle, a race boat, making a false official statement, conspiracy to commit larceny, conduct unbecoming an officer, receiving stolen property and obstructing justice. The race boat and all-terrain vehicle theft charges were dropped from his guilty plea, but the other charges stood.

Cahill was sentenced to five months’ confinement. In lieu of a $10,000 fine, he paid $8,000 in restitution to cover the thefts, a Nellis spokeswoman said Friday.

Part of his sentence entailed counseling for post-traumatic stress disorder. It’s called “cognitive behavioral therapy,” or changing thoughts to change behavior.

For his plea, Cahill’s attorneys said, he will be allowed to retire honorably from the Air Force as a captain, enabling him to pursue veterans benefits and continued counseling for PTSD through the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Cahill declined to be interviewed but offered an apology in a handwritten statement that went on to state, “My decision is based on my fear of any retaliation that could come from my speaking out about the lack of proper treatment for my PTSD.”

His mother, Susan Peek, also declined interview requests. She testified on Cahill’s behalf, as did his brother.

Air Force officials at Nellis wouldn’t comment about Cahill’s case but confirmed he has returned to duty with the 99th Mission Support Group.

They said they don’t have a specific program to deal with post-traumatic stress disorder among active duty troops but focus on awareness and hope that those with PTSD voluntarily seek help through the base’s mental health program.

“What we do in the Air Force is a lot of prevention education,” said Lt. Col. Kevin McCal, a Nellis psychologist, who served in Afghanistan and commands the 99th Medical Operations Squadron.

“Awareness is a big piece of this, and the second piece, of course, is because there’s awareness we’re getting support and resources” for preventive education.

An airman, soldier, sailor or Marine deployed for extended periods in the war zone “can come back a different person,” McCal said.

“When you come back, will your morals have changed, and will your beliefs change? It’s possible that … some of those things might be challenged,” McCal said.

“It’s unlikely you’ll come back and say something like, ‘It’s OK to beat my wife,’ when it wasn’t before. Or, ‘I think I want this in the store, so I’ll just take it.’ You’ll still recognize right from wrong.”

Still, he said, there may be an inability to adjust to life away from the battlefield. “You’re blowing off whatever you thought was important, rules, morals, whatever it was.”

“You could come back an individual that has a shorter temper because your patience is not what it used to be. You could come back and be an individual that doesn’t sleep so well for whatever reason. And that could be directly because of symptoms of nightmares and so forth.”

Some who suffer from PTSD don’t seek help because “in their eyes, they’re like, ‘Oh. I’m strong enough I should be able to handle this.’ And therefore they stop talking, and the symptoms get worse.”

Among the symptoms are forgetfulness, fatigue and family problems.

“Mental health has always been a tough thing to deal with, because there is no blood test. There’s no black-and-white answers to what we have or what they’re dealing with,” he said.

McCal said although numbers of active-duty PTSD cases at the base have increased since the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, some cases will fall through the cracks.

“All you can do is keep getting those cracks smaller. There’s always going to be someone out there that won’t come forward.”

And few of those who check in for help are pilots.

“I won’t say they’re scared of mental health, but they don’t like to go anywhere which may risk their flying status. … That’s their bread and butter. That’s who they are,” McCal said.

Helicopter rescue pilots, he noted, have a more close-up view of the battlefield than, say, a fighter jet pilot.

“Rescue pilots have to land usually under hot fire, pick up somebody who is hurt or injured, more likely severely if they’re called in. So, they have a higher degree of danger.

“I don’t think the public needs to be scared that the military is getting wiped out by PTSD, or that parents have to worry that all kids that go to war are going to come back with some kind of four-letter disorder, because they won’t, all of them,” McCal said. “But they do need to know that if their kids come back and they’re not the same somehow and different to see if they can get them some help. Again, it’s all about education.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Helicopter Pilot: War Hero Faces New Adversary

NATO and US War Supplies for Afghanistan War Threatened in Pakistan

Taliban attacks on goods for Afghanistan mission viewed with growing concern.

December 19, 2008, Peshawar, Pakistan – A recent increase in Taliban attacks on a crucial NATO transportation route from Pakistan to Afghanistan could imperil efforts to bolster the flagging, seven-year U.S.-led military campaign in Afghanistan, U.S. and Pakistani officials say.

Attacks on NATO supply lines have become a regular occurrence in parts of northwestern Pakistan, including the country’s inhospitable tribal areas near the Afghan border. In the past two weeks, Taliban fighters have mounted at least six assaults on NATO supply depots near the Pakistani city of Peshawar, setting fire to more than 300 armored Humvees, military vehicles and other supply containers.

The attacks come as Pakistanis are increasingly calling for Western forces to stop using their territory for transport: Thousands of people rallied here Thursday to demand that the government cut off U.S. and NATO access to the main transit route.

Senior American military leaders have acknowledged the potential for supply problems as additional U.S. troops are brought into Afghanistan. Gen. David H. Petraeus, the head of U.S. Central Command, said in a recent speech that there was a “new urgency” to find alternative routes into Afghanistan. “The supply-line issues in Pakistan are quite serious,” Petraeus said.

Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters this month that he recognized the supply lines were vulnerable and that he has been “increasingly concerned” that the latest attacks could have a troubling impact. “I’ve had a concern about this for months. . . . Even without incidents, it’s a single point of failure for us,” Mullen said.

He said the United States has been working with Pakistan to increase protection for the convoys. But he also said the American military was developing other options.

Efforts to find routes through Central Asia or even the Far East were made public this summer when the U.S. Transportation Command solicited a bid from contractors to move goods along different routes in those regions.

Supplying troops has consistently been a major challenge for U.S. forces in Iraq, with the need for heavily armed private security contractors to guard convoys dramatically inflating costs.

But in many ways, the challenge is even trickier in landlocked Afghanistan, where 70 to 80 percent of supplies have to be trucked in from Pakistan. Supply issues have historically been the Achilles’ heel of foreign armies in Afghanistan: During the Soviet occupation in the 1980s, rebel Afghans made attacking Soviet convoys — and stealing the goods — a centerpiece of their strategy.

Pakistani officials and local Pakistani transporters say lax security along the NATO supply route from the southern port city of Karachi through the Khyber Pass to the Afghan border has made the convoys particularly vulnerable to attack. Fear of Taliban assaults prompted a leading Pakistani transport association to say this week that it will no longer carry goods for NATO through the pass.

Provincial police officials, meanwhile, have threatened to close key NATO transport depots in Peshawar within about a week if private transport companies fail to beef up security. And on Thursday, thousands joined a protest in Peshawar led by the Islamist Pakistani political party Jamaat-e-Islami, whose leaders called for an end to the use of Pakistani roads to supply NATO troops in Afghanistan.

“We will no longer let arms and ammunition pass through . . . and reach the hands of American and NATO forces in Afghanistan,” Sirajul Haq, the provincial head of Jamaat-e-Islami, told the crowd. “They are using the same against our innocent brothers, sisters and children.”

Meanwhile, Taliban leaders in Pakistan have vowed to step up their campaign to disrupt the flow of NATO supplies to Afghanistan, saying the recent attacks on NATO transport depots are a direct response to an increase in suspected U.S. missile strikes on insurgent havens in Pakistan’s remote tribal areas.

“We will attack every vehicle transporting weapons, food and medicine to foreign troops in Afghanistan and will not allow them to cross the border,” said Maulvi Omar, a spokesman for the Pakistani Taliban group headed by commander Baitullah Mehsud.

The targeting of supply routes has exposed a major strategic vulnerability that experts say could have wide-reaching effects on the U.S.-led war effort in neighboring Afghanistan. With more than 3,000 more American troops expected to arrive in Afghanistan in January and February, Western military planners face the additional logistical challenge of securing NATO supply routes in northwestern Pakistan, an area that has become a Taliban stronghold.

Anthony H. Cordesman, a former Defense Department analyst and current national security expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the recent attacks may be “just a warning of what’s to come.”

“Remember, they don’t have to get every convoy. Delays will force a larger line of trucks waiting to cross,” Cordesman said.

The Khyber Transport Association, a trade group representing about 3,500 truck drivers, cited the recent surge in attacks in its decision this week to drop deliveries of NATO goods to Afghanistan.

Shakir Ullah Afridi, president of the association, acknowledged that Pakistani government efforts to improve security along the route have been noticeable. But he said many owners of small transport companies still fear that their trucks will be destroyed and their drivers killed. Afridi, who said his association facilitates 60 to 70 percent of NATO transports through the Khyber Pass, said truck traffic has dwindled from about 300 vehicles a day to 30 to 40 near the pass. “The situation is getting worse and worse. It is now totally out of control,” Afridi said.

Pressure on the transport companies to improve security at the 17 depots in Peshawar increased after arson attacks on NATO supply containers. For the city’s underequipped and undermanned police force of 1,000 officers, the attacks have become a public safety issue that threatens to further erode the government’s precarious hold on stability.

Malik Naveed Khan, inspector general of police in the North-West Frontier Province, said in an interview this week that the transport companies share much of the blame for the attacks because of their inadequate security. Despite claims by NATO transporters that they provide private security for their convoys, Khan said only a handful of the companies have trained, armed guards.

“One to two companies have retired army forces as guards. But the rest of them, they have employed just people from the street,” Khan said. Recently, he delivered an ultimatum to transporters: Improve security at the depots within a week or face closure. Failure to install extra barrier walls and security lighting, and to hire more guards at the depots will bring the NATO transport business to a halt in the region, he said.

“We have told them we will cancel their licenses. We will take action against them. We will not allow them to take their containers here,” Khan said. “We will be harsh with them.”

In July, the Army Contracting Agency issued a proposal seeking private contractors to provide daily armed escorts for the convoys. The contractors would be required to provide at least 10 escort teams at a time and be able to generate up to 20 teams if needed and even more on 90-days’ notice.

The teams are slated to operate from three points — the port of Karachi, and Bagram air base and Kandahar in Afghanistan.

Small steps have already been taken, meanwhile, to secure the routes near Peshawar, a city of more than 3 million. Early this week, provincial authorities began to establish checkpoints and patrolling teams to ward off Taliban attacks. Additionally, about 1,200 officers with the paramilitary Frontier Constabulary, including several anti-terrorism squads, have been deployed along the route near Peshawar.

“Even then you cannot rule out the attacks,” Khan said. “If they’re determined, they will hit them.”

Pincus reported from Washington. Special correspondents Haq Nawaz Khan in Peshawar and Shaiq Hussain in Islamabad, Pakistan, contributed to this report.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , | Comments Off on NATO and US War Supplies for Afghanistan War Threatened in Pakistan

Dec 19, VCS Special Update: Fighting for Our Veterans in 2009

On December 14, 2008, the Houston Chronicle published a scathing editorial, “Since the start of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and all of the resulting harms to soldiers, civilians, economies and constitutional principles, no segment of society has been more abused and neglected than returning U.S. military veterans.”

With your support, here are examples of how Veterans for Common Sense is turning the tide to change the culture at the Department of Veterans Affairs and assisting all our veterans.

Our advocacy saves lives. In July 2007, VCS sued VA after VA turned away several suicidal veterans, including Iraq War veteran Jonathan Schulze, who earned two Purple Heart Medals. In response to our lawsuit, VA established a toll-free suicide prevention hotline. In its first 15 months the hotline received 85,000 calls and performed more than 2,100 rescues.

We need your financial support of $50 to $100 today so we can keep the pressure on Washington so our service members and veterans receive prompt and high-quality mental healthcare.

Our advocacy publicizes VA problems. In November 2008, VCS worked with the PBS News Hour on an investigative report about suicides. On camera, VA Secretary James Peake denied there was a link between combat and suicides. Our landmark lawsuit also uncovered a scandalous e-mail by a VA psychologist supervisor in Texas discouraging PTSD diagnoses, treatment, and benefits.

VCS needs your financial help so we can begin 2009 with an aggressive mental health campaign for our service members and veterans.

January means change in Washington.  VCS sent our “Vision for a Vibrant VA in 2009” to the Presidential Transition Team for President-Elect Barack Obama. 

Here’s a summary of what we want to do for our veterans next year, with a heavy focus on mental health conditions, including post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI):

—> Publicity. VCS will continue our publicity efforts to encourage our veterans to seek mental healthcare. This helps de-stigmatize PTSD so more veterans will seek treatment earlier when it is more effective.

—> Policies. VCS urges Congress and VA to work together more closely so that VA has enough facilities and staff so that our veterans do not wait for mental healthcare or benefits.

—> Legislation. VCS will press hard for a presumption of service connection for PTSD so that combat veterans diagnosed with PTSD by VA also receive disability benefits for PTSD.

—> Using FOIA. Our Freedom of Information Act campaign forced VA to reveal that VA diagnosed 83,000 Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans with PTSD, yet VA only provided PTSD disability benefits to 42,000.

—> Mental Health. VCS will fight for the prompt and full implementation of VA’s Mental Health Strategic Plan so that there are national policies and procedures in place so VA stops turning away veterans with mental health conditions.

—> Mandatory Medical Exams. VCS continues urging the military to implement the 1997 Force Health Protection law and provide pre- and post-deployment medical exams that include exams for both PTSD and TBI. Discrimination against veterans with mental health conditions will decrease when the military examines all combat veterans.

Please be generous with your year-end gift giving. We want you to know that Veterans for Common Sense works tirelessly for our service members and veterans. We file lawsuits, we testify before Congress, and we work with reporters in an effort to change VA’s culture and put our veterans first.

Please consider fitting VCS into your holiday season with a tax-deductible donation of $50 to $100.

Thank you,

Paul Sullivan
Executive Director
Veterans for Common Sense

VCS provides advocacy and publicity for issues related to veterans, national security, and civil liberties. VCS is registered with the IRS as a non-profit 501(c)(3) charity, and donations are tax deductible.

Whether it’s $50 or $100, every dollar raised is another dollar to fight for our veterans.

There are Five Easy Ways to Support Veterans for Common Sense

1. GroundSpring: Give by credit card through Groundspring.org

2. PayPal: Make a donation to VCS through PayPal

3. DonationLine: Donate your car to VCS through DonationLine

4. eBay: Designate VCS to benefit from your eBay.com auction

5. Send a check to:
Veterans for Common Sense
P.O. Box 15514
Washington, DC 20003

 

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Dec 19, VCS Special Update: Fighting for Our Veterans in 2009

Editorial Blog: Hard Lessons: -The Iraq Reconstruction Experience

December 17, 2008 –  Now for your reading pleasure, Hard Lessons: The Iraq Reconstruction Experience, a 500-plus page tome that comprises interviews with “hundreds of individuals” and a “review of thousands of documents.”

It is an official history that essentially offers the perspective of Stuart Bowen, chief of the Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR), on efforts by the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA).

In short, the whole thing turned into a vast money hole into which the Pentagon poured billions.

It’s absolutely fascinating stuff. The results it documents seem, in retrospect, almost predictable. And yet. In a time of war, the president and his advisers almost always get the benefit of the doubt. Now we know the price of that generosity.

From The Post’s Karen DeYoung:

“As the United States prepares for a major expansion of its development and reconstruction programs in Afghanistan and Pakistan, government investigators have described the U.S. reconstruction effort in Iraq as a failure that wasted billions.”

From James Glanz and T. Christian Miller at the New York Times:

“An unpublished 513-page federal history of the American-led reconstruction of Iraq depicts an effort crippled before the invasion by Pentagon planners who were hostile to the idea of rebuilding a foreign country, and then molded into a $100 billion failure by bureaucratic turf wars, spiraling violence and ignorance of the basic elements of Iraqi society and infrastructure.”

Here’s an excerpt that Government Inc. finds particularly interesting:

“After briefly considering asking the Congress for $5 billion, [Dave] Nash [a retired Rear Admiral serving as an advisor] and his planners decided to request a massive increase in reconstruction funding for Iraq. Nash, working with CPA’s senior advisors, pulled together a long list of infrastructure projects with a cost equaling $27 billion. They then whittled it down to $20.3 billion. Bremer approved this request and sent it to Washington in early August 2003.

“On August 15, 2003, Joshua Bolten, Director of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget, wrote Secretary Rumsfeld, objecting to the size of CPA’s request. The White House had already told the Congress that it would not ask for more money for Iraq and Afghanistan in 2003. Bolten said the CPA would have to provide a fully-detailed justification before the Administration would go back to the Congress for more money for Iraq. In May, the CPA had hired Tom Korologos, a veteran lobbyist, as its congressional liaison. He addressed Bolten’s concerns in a memo to Bremer on August 17, 2003.

“‘To delay getting our funds will be a political disaster for the President,’ he wrote. ‘His election will hang for a large part on show of progress in Iraq and without the funding this year, progress will grind to a halt.’ Korologos added that he did not believe that the Congress would turn down the supplemental request because “the faster the Iraq CPA succeeds, the quicker ‘our 150,000 boys over there’ will start coming home.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Editorial Blog: Hard Lessons: -The Iraq Reconstruction Experience

Dec 18, VCS in the News: VA May Cut Brain-Injury Research at University of Texas Facility

“Closure of the (lab) would amount to a terrible injustice for our veterans,” according to a letter to congressional offices from Rick Weidman, director of government relations for Vietnam Veterans of America, and Paul Sullivan, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense. “Conventional brain imaging is not sufficient to detect subtle injuries,” the letter says. 

Decision on program housed at University of Texas in Austin expected in January.

December 18, 2008 – An Austin-based, multimillion-dollar program studying brain injuries among veterans might be canceled next month.

U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison , R-Texas, and Department of Veterans Affairs officials confirmed this week that there is talk of shutting down the Brain Imaging and Recovery Laboratory. Diana Struski, a VA spokeswoman in Fort Worth, said a VA deputy secretary in Washington will make the final decision.

The program, started by the VA in 2006, is housed at the University of Texas’ J.J. Pickle Research Campus, where the VA rents a state-of-the-art brain scanner. The program was looking for ways to treat traumatic brain injury, which has become the signature wound of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But the program has been on ice since early this year during a fight between the program director, Robert Van Boven, and his bosses.

Shortly after taking over the program in June 2007, Van Boven said his bosses had authorized the misuse of program dollars before he arrived and then ignored his complaints and began engaging in petty retribution. He has asked for several investigations.

One has been finished, and four are under way that should be finished by January, Struski said. She said Dr. Michael Kussman, a VA undersecretary in charge of the organization’s health care system, will then decide the brain-imaging lab’s fate, probably in January.

“We can’t speculate” on the likelihood the program will be canceled, Struski said.

The possibility of the lab’s closure has angered two veterans groups, whose leaders have written to members of Congress demanding that the program not be shut down.

Matt Mackowiak, a spokesman for Hutchison, said a regional VA director called an aide to Hutchison a few weeks ago and raised the possibility of ending Van Boven’s program. Mackowiak said Hutchison will get copies of the reports when they are finished and will withhold judgment until then.

Hutchison is the ranking Republican on the Senate subcommittee that deals with veterans affairs. She requested the money for the program.

Van Boven is still being paid but has been suspended from VA work. He says shutting down the program while leaving his bosses unpunished amounts to “throwing out the baby and keeping the dirty bath water.”

One of the reports Van Boven requested is finished. Conducted by the VA’s Office of the Inspector General, it partially confirmed Van Boven’s complaints. It concluded that VA officials wasted some money, mainly by misreading the contract with UT. But the dollar amounts it talked about were in the hundreds of thousands, not the millions that Van Boven alleged. The report found no evidence of the widespread cronyism Van Boven says took place. It did find that Van Boven’s bosses did not respond to his complaints.

Struski confirmed that four other investigations are ongoing. Struski said the VA investigators could recommend closing the lab, but she would not say what they are looking into or on what grounds they could conclude the program should be canceled.

Van Boven says one investigation is addressing his claim that the VA improperly and unsafely tried to restart his brain research in his absence. He says Central Texas VA administrators are trying in the meantime to stick him with trumped-up charges, such as insubordination for organizing a fun run to raise awareness of brain injuries. He said he did it on his own time after a VA lawyer said doing so was within Van Boven’s rights as an employee.

If the brain-imaging laboratory is closed, the remaining millions of dollars will be distributed to other VA programs in Texas, Struski said. She said a likely possibility would be to spend it on post-traumatic stress disorder research at the VA hospital in Waco.

Two veterans advocacy groups called for Congress to intervene and ensure that the program’s money is not used for other types of research.

“Closure of the (lab) would amount to a terrible injustice for our veterans,” according to a letter to congressional offices from Rick Weidman, director of government relations for Vietnam Veterans of America, and Paul Sullivan, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense.

“Conventional brain imaging is not sufficient to detect subtle injuries,” the letter says.

This is at least the second time Van Boven has been involved in a bitter fight with an employer. In 2003, he established a private practice in Virginia, Minn., a town of about 9,000 that owns its own medical center. Less than two years after arriving, Van Boven began claiming that the facility was providing inadequate care and safety for its patients.

Medical center officials denied the allegations, according to news reports at the time. The fight ended with a settlement that paid Van Boven hundreds of thousands of dollars that the medical center had guaranteed he would be making. The medical center also paid his legal fees.

The settlement prohibited both sides from divulging specifics of the disagreement. But Van Boven later sued on the charge the medical center had defamed him. The medical center paid a $150,000 settlement.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Dec 18, VCS in the News: VA May Cut Brain-Injury Research at University of Texas Facility