Dec 1, VCS in the News: Struggle with Military Over Care Leaves Airman Feeling Abandoned as He Fights Leukemia

November 30, 2008 – It’s not how Air Force enlistee Joseph Weston pictured either his military service or his country.

Not long after he began basic training May 31 at Lackland Air Force Base in Texas, Weston figured something was wrong. He was weak and dehydrated. His heart rate soared. He collapsed on his way to Sunday morning church service. On June 9, doctors diagnosed the Cadillac native with leukemia. But his battles were just beginning.

From an isolated room in a wing at the base, he is engaged in a bitter fight with the Air Force over his discharge and health care. That comes on top of ongoing chemotherapy aimed at saving his life. The conflict pits Weston, his family and even his military doctor against an Air Force seeking to discharge him without benefits.

“I feel like I am in a never-ending prison. I’m just trying to get through one day at a time right now,” Weston said.  The military’s contention: Weston’s leukemia preceded the start of his service. It is a critical finding, because it means he will not be eligible for medical benefits upon discharge.

An Air Force review board issued that finding on July 21. An appeal board affirmed it in October.

Weston is appealing that ruling, a decision to be made by a Maryland-based board of the Secretary of the Air Force. He is backed by an Air Force doctor who is his primary physician.

In an appeal letter, cancer specialist Della Howell stated that doctors “would not have been able to make the diagnosis” of leukemia when his military service began.

Leukemia is a potentially fatal condition in which the bone marrow overproduces white blood cells and they crowd out normal cells. Howell based her finding on the typical multiplication rate of leukemia cells. She concluded that a marrow test taken the day he arrived for basic training would have been read as normal.

Weston, 21, spends much of his time alone in a spare, windowless room. At times depressed, Weston says the tension of the legal battle is the last thing he needs as he faces cancer.

“It’s made it 10 times harder,” he said.

Air Force officials would not speak to the specifics of his case.  But in an Oct. 29 decision, a three-member board found there is evidence his leukemia “existed prior to his military service.”

It cited his June 9 emergency room admission with a complaint of fatigue, shortness of breath for two weeks and medical history in which Weston reported dizziness for four weeks.

The board concluded “the preponderance of medical evidence indicates (Weston’s) condition manifested prior to” his military service. It rated Weston “unfit” for duty because of physical disability.

Limbo is tough to take

Cadillac resident Jim Weston said his respect for the military is gone, the result of his son’s ordeal.

“I’m as patriotic as the next guy,” he said. “I’m red, white and blue and support the country. But not any more. It is very, very disappointing.”

Should his son lose, Weston is uncertain how the family could afford future medical expenses. He fears they could amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars and wipe out family finances.

“We don’t have those answers,” said Weston, 49, superintendent for a Cadillac casting factory. His wife, JoAnn, 51, is an appointment coordinator in a dental office.

“It would be devastating for all of us,” JoAnn Weston said.

He sought a career

Joseph Weston’s mother recalled his excitement when he signed early enlistment papers in October 2007, months after graduating from Cadillac High School.

In a state where good-paying jobs are hard to find, he saw the Air Force as a chance to serve his country and earn benefits.

“His plan was to remain and make it a career,” she said. “He really, truly, had a passion for it.”

Weston traveled to Lansing to complete his medical testing, undergoing a thorough physical examination.

On May 26, he went to the Air Force recruiting office in Cadillac and was transported to Lansing, given a blood test and transported the following day to Lackland.

He began boot camp on May 31, exercising with other recruits in 90-degree temperatures.

On June 5, he found himself unable to run. He was examined the next day by Air Force medical personnel after he developed a racing heart.

Two days later, he collapsed as he made his way to Sunday church services. He was admitted the day after to the base hospital, Wilford Hall Medical Center. The diagnosis: leukemia.

Experts take his side

A bone marrow test on June 10 found Weston had 90 percent leukemia cells.

Working backward from that date, cancer specialist Howell calculated Weston would have had 2 percent leukemia cells on May 27. A bone marrow test at that level would have judged Weston normal, Howell said.

“Therefore, there is no way that I can support the classification of this illness as a pre-existing condition,” Howell stated in her letter.

An expert in military disability cases said enlistees enjoy a “presumption of soundness” when they join the military, based on the physical examination required for entry.

According to Arizona lawyer Theodore Jarvi, the Air Force must provide “clear and unmistakable” evidence Weston was diagnosed prior to boot camp to prove its case.

Jarvi, 67, has 27 years of experience in the Air Force Guard and Reserves, including 20 years as a judge advocate, charged with the defense and prosecution of military law. He is past president of the National Organization of Veterans Advocates, a nonprofit group that promotes legal representation for veterans claims.

If he loses, Weston could take his case to the Veterans Administration, Jarvi said.

“He would probably have to fight with the VA five years,” Jarvi said.

Broken bureaucracy?

Paul Sullivan, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense, a veterans advocacy group, says the military faces ongoing pressure to keep down the cost of medical cases.

“It has a lot to do with the money. The military is essentially broke,” Sullivan said.

“The (military) doctors are doing great work. It’s the bureaucracy behind the medicine that is not working.”

But Sullivan said he also is concerned the military has shunned Weston while it contests his case.

“The military should be stepping up to the plate to see that he gets good care,” he said. “It sounds like this person is being railroaded out.”

Encouraging signs

Weston is in the fourth round of treatment that began the day after he was diagnosed, under the direction of cancer specialist Howell.

“He has had a great response to chemotherapy so far,” Howell said.

She expects treatments to continue for three years.

Based on Weston’s age at the onset of leukemia, Howell placed his long-term survival rate at about 65 percent.

Once a week, he enters the hospital for outpatient treatment in which medication is put into a catheter in his chest, with a line that moves it directly to the top of his heart.

His family is encouraged by his response to treatment.

But as he fights a disease for which stress can be one more handicap, they worry his isolated routine is hardly the medicine he needs. He is housed in a wing of the base dedicated to recruits who flunk their drug tests or develop medical issues during training.

He ‘feels like he’s the enemy’

Weston is expected to awake at 4:45 a.m., dress and remain in his room. He is allowed to leave three times a day for meals. He gets one hour a day to use the phone and shower. Lights out at 9 p.m.

Air Force spokesman Kirk Frady said trainees such as Weston “are expected to maintain professionalism” and live by Air Force “core values.”

“Trainees are allowed bed rest if prescribed by the trainee’s doctor,” Frady said.

Asked about the possible physical toll of his predicament, physician Howell said: “I would much prefer to have somebody in an environment where they have family and support around him.”

The National Cancer Institute points to studies that show stress can increase tumor growth and psychological factors like feelings of helplessness can help spread cancer.

“All I can do is provide the best medical treatment possible,” Howell said. “We do what we can for him here.”

His father worries that is not enough.

“The cancer battle has now become almost secondary to winning this fight. My son feels like he’s the enemy within the boundaries of a U.S. military base.”

Added his mother: “We keep telling him to be strong. This kid needs to be around people who love him.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Dec 1, VCS in the News: Struggle with Military Over Care Leaves Airman Feeling Abandoned as He Fights Leukemia

Dec 1: More than Two Thirds of Americans Unaware of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder – PTSD

December 1, 2008 – In a survey conducted Oct. 24-27, most of the 1,008 respondents said they had never even heard of the acronym PTSD, or post-traumatic stress disorder. 

Of the respondents, 9{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} answered “Yes, I have heard of it but am not sure what it stands for.”

24{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} said “yes, I have heard of it and know what it stands for,” and a whopping 68{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} of respondents stated “no, I have never heard of it.”

* Veterans for Common Sense note: We need your help to get the word out that PTSD is real, that one-in-five (or more) of our Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans may return home with PTSD, that it is OK for veterans to seek care for PTSD, and that DoD and VA need to hire more doctors to meet the tidal wave of demand for PTSD treatment and recovery.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Dec 1: More than Two Thirds of Americans Unaware of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder – PTSD

Editorial Column: Fixing VA Health Care

December 1, 2008 – As a physician who proudly serves our veterans of war, I was deeply saddened by the recent revelation of deceptive practices at the Department of Veterans Affairs in New York.

A Newsday article reported that hundreds of veterans’ benefit claims were misdated by the VA to make it appear that they were processed on time. This latest affront to integrity comes at the heels of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee roundtable discussion on Nov. 19 regarding the VA’s shredding of hundreds of claims at other sites. These are metastatic manifestations of a systemic illness – failures of leadership and a cultural decay at the VA.

The VA bureaucratic remedy? Plans for the VA shredding debacle include having three persons perform an inspection of a document before shredding in the future.

Yet the root problem is not the paper but the prize on productivity. As one House roundtable participant emphasized, “The VA needs to change how it measures work. … [I]t creates incentives for shortcuts for credit.” Performance based on quantity, an easily measured unit, appears to be the driving force for recognition and reward. The dishonest practice of changing dates of processing of claims illustrates how a cultural emphasis on quantity trumps quality and integrity.

Quality of care is more elusive to quantify and characterize. But therein lies what ought to be at the core of our pledge and commitment to those who, as Lincoln said, have “borne the battle,” taken great risks, suffered great wounds or given their lives for us.

How to fix the mess? It begins with leadership.

Failures in integrity and leadership are evidenced when Dr. Ira Katz, VA official for mental health, sent an e-mail in February to “Shhh” others about 1,000 suicide attempts monthly by veterans at VA facilities. Closer to my home in Texas, the closing of a Dallas VA psychiatric ward in April after four suicides in four months also begs the question of leadership and quality.

Also in Texas, misguided priorities in a culture are reflected when a psychologist team leader at Central Texas Veterans Health Care System (CTVHCS) sent e-mails to other mental-health specialists in May, arguing, “Given that we are having more and more compensation seeking veterans, I’d like to suggest that you refrain from giving a diagnosis of PTSD straight out.” Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a serious mental-health condition, is estimated by the Rand Corp. to affect nearly one out of five soldiers returning from the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. CTVHCS also serves as a poster child of bad behavior in another case study, when leadership suppressed and failed to act on disclosures of suspected fraud, waste, mismanagement and funding of scientifically invalid work in humans. (See the VA inspector general report “Healthcare Inspection: Alleged Research Funding Irregularities at the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple Texas” at www.va.gov/oig.)

A cultural problem? An insulated bureaucracy that overly relies on internal monitoring sets the stage for stagnancy and resistance to reform of systemic problems. Alas, when disclosures of wrongdoing are made internally within the VA, suppression and inaction can occur. Beware to the potential whistle-blower, as the internal policing of the VA may “have ears to hear, and hear not.”

How can we tackle veterans’ doubts of integrity and transparency of the system? A new system of regional, independent oversight to provide early, proactive opportunities for central oversight by Congress could replace the reactive options left after the media unearth problems.

These advisory bodies could also serve as better, truly independent safe havens of refuge, above and beyond those offered by the VA’s own inspector-general, for those fearing reprisals for speaking out. As we enter a historic, new administration and new VA leadership, let the message of reform permeate the VA as well so that we can better serve our returning soldiers and the nation’s brave veterans.

Dr. Robert W. Van Boven, a VA physician, is director of a traumatic brain-injury-imaging research program in Texas.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , | Comments Off on Editorial Column: Fixing VA Health Care

Newspaper Editorial: Another Report Confirms Existence of Gulf War Illnesses

Another report confirms the existence of Gulf War Syndrome; America owes the veterans suffering from it adequate care and treatment for their illnesses

THE ISSUE: Another report confirms the existence of Gulf War Syndrome.

November 21, 2008 – Birmingham News staff writer Dave Parks didn’t just report about Gulf War Syndrome. He owned that issue.  A decade and a half ago, Parks listened to Alabama veterans of the 1991 Persian Gulf conflict who believed their illnesses were caused by toxic exposures during their time in Iraq: chemical warfare agents, pesticides and smoke from oil well fires, along with shots, pills and vaccines administered by the military. Parks talked to researchers who believed the veterans and conducted studies validating the veterans’ claims. And Parks wrote about a Department of Defense that, to put it politely, was indifferent to the plight of the veterans. In fact, the Pentagon for years denied the existence of veterans’ problems, and then tried to blame their maladies on stress.

This week, a report to Congress confirmed what many Gulf War veterans already knew: Gulf War Syndrome is real, and still afflicts nearly one-fourth of the 700,000 U.S. troops who served. The neurological symptoms include memory loss, problems concentrating, rashes and widespread pain. Gulf War veterans also have higher rates of brain cancer and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig’s disease, the report noted.

“The extensive body of scientific research now available consistently indicates that Gulf War illness is real, that it is a result of neurotoxic exposures during Gulf War deployment, and that few veterans have recovered or substantially improved with time,” said the 450-page report, drafted by a congressionally mandated scientific panel and given to Secretary of Veterans Affairs James Peake.

The report, unlike many earlier studies, concluded two chemical exposures were direct causes of the disorder. Gulf War troops received pyridostigmine bromide to protect against nerve gas, and widely used pesticides were sprayed in living and dining areas and on tents and uniforms to protect against sand flies and other pests.

This isn’t the first time medical experts have concluded there is, in fact, such a thing as Gulf War Syndrome. In 1997, for example, a team of top medical researchers from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center tied chemical exposures during the war to three varieties of the syndrome. Yet many other reports, including several by the prestigious Institute of Medicine, blamed stress and other unknown causes for the soldiers’ symptoms.

By 2002, it was clear to some members of Congress that veterans were not receiving adequate care, leading to the creation of the Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses, a 15-member committee of scientists and veterans, which six years later, released Monday’s report.

“The tragedy here is that there are currently no treatments,” said James H. Binns, a former principal deputy assistant secretary of Defense and the panel’s chairman. “The importance … lies in what is done with it (the report) in the future. It’s a blueprint for the new administration.”

It is a blueprint the new administration must follow. Through the 17 years since U.S. and allied soldiers put their lives on the line in Iraq’s first Gulf War, thousands of them have struggled to have their problems recognized by the government.

America owes those veterans adequate care and treatment for their illnesses. After the release of the latest report confirming Gulf War Syndrome, they deserve so much more than just another chance to say “I told you so.”

Posted in Gulf War Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Newspaper Editorial: Another Report Confirms Existence of Gulf War Illnesses

Afghan Leader Criticizes U.S. on Taliban

November 28, 2008, New Delhi – Afghan President Hamid Karzai blasted the U.S. and its NATO allies for failing to defeat the Taliban, insisting for the first time that Afghans need a firm deadline to end the war.

Setting such a deadline seems unlikely with President-elect Barack Obama seeking to boost the number of U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan. But without one, Mr. Karzai said, his government had no choice but to explore a negotiated settlement with the Taliban.

“This war has gone on for seven years; the Afghans don’t understand any more how come a little force like the Taliban can continue to exist, can continue to flourish, can continue to launch attacks,” Mr. Karzai told a visiting United Nations delegation Tuesday. His office released a transcript Wednesday.

After the Taliban fell from power in Afghanistan in late 2001, the U.S. backed Mr. Karzai’s rise to power, and he has enjoyed Washington’s support since then. But with elections set for next year, Mr. Karzai has stepped up his criticism of the international role in Afghanistan in an apparent bid to shore up his support among conservative — and increasingly disaffected — Afghan tribes, and to deflect mounting criticism at home and abroad from people who say his government is weak and corrupt.

Neither the U.S. Embassy nor spokesmen for North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces in Afghanistan responded to requests for comment about Mr. Karzai’s remarks.

Mr. Karzai’s strident tone adds another layer to the challenges facing Mr. Obama, who has said Afghanistan will be among his top foreign-policy priorities. Among plans being considered by Mr. Obama is one to send as many as 20,000 U.S. soldiers to Afghanistan next year to reinforce the 32,000 already there.

In his remarks, Mr. Karzai said for the first time that Afghans needed a clear timeline for the war and couldn’t tolerate an open-ended campaign. “If there is no deadline we have the right to another solution for peace and security, which is negotiations,” he said.

The Afghan president has repeatedly called for negotiations, last week going so far as to offer Taliban leader Mullah Omar safe passage to attend talks — an offer that was promptly rejected by the Taliban.

U.S. and other Western policy makers have said that talks with some elements of the Taliban are needed. But they are looking to engage relatively moderate Pashtun tribes that form the Taliban’s grassroots support. Few in the U.S. or Europe want to make any sort of deal with the group’s leadership, or believe such an agreement can be struck.

To the U.N. group, Mr. Karzai criticized everything from what he called a “parallel” government being created by foreign security and aid agencies to the number of civilians killed by U.S. and NATO forces. He said those forces have taken the fight “to the villages of Afghanistan where there were no terrorists.”

U.S. and NATO commanders say the Taliban is using villagers as human shields.

Mr. Karzai also blamed Afghanistan’s endemic corruption in part on foreign contractors who “contract, then subcontract, and then another subcontract and then perhaps another subcontract.” The process “means immense possibilities of major corruption.”

In one of the few positive notes, Mr. Karzai said relations with Pakistan, where the Taliban and al Qaeda have taken over wide swaths of territory in Pakistan’s Northwest, have improved considerably since President Asif Ali Zardari took office in September.

Mr. Zardari’s predecessor, Pervez Musharraf, a former general who came to power in a 1999 coup, won Washington’s backing after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks but was frequently accused by Afghanistan and Western governments of not doing enough to combat Islamic militants.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Afghan Leader Criticizes U.S. on Taliban

U.S. Military Expects Surges in Stress Disorders

November 26, 2008, Fort Campbell, KY – Some 15,000 U.S. soldiers are heading home to this sprawling base after spending more than a year at war in Iraq and Afghanistan, and military health officials are bracing for a surge in brain injuries and psychological problems among those troops.

Facing prospects that one in five of the 101st Airborne Division soldiers will suffer from stress-related disorders, the base has nearly doubled its psychological health staff. Army leaders are hoping to use the base’s experiences to assess the long-term impact of repeated deployments.

The three 101st Airborne combat brigades, which have begun arriving home, have gone through at least three tours in Iraq. The 3rd Brigade also served seven months in Afghanistan, early in the war. Next spring, the 4th Brigade will return from a 15-month tour in Afghanistan. So far, roughly 10,000 soldiers have come back; the remainder are expected by the end of January.

Army leaders say they will closely watch Fort Campbell to determine the proper medical staffing levels needed to aid soldiers who have endured repeated rotations in the two war zones.

“I don’t know what to expect. I don’t think anybody knows,” said Gen. Peter Chiarelli, vice chief of staff of the Army, as he flew back to Washington from a recent tour of the base’s medical facilities. “That’s why I want to see numbers from the 101st’s third deployment.”

What happens with the 101st Airborne, he said, will let the Army help other bases ready for similar homecomings in the next year or two, when multiple brigades from the 4th Infantry Division and the 1st Cavalry Division return.

Noting that some soldiers in the 101st Airborne units have been to war four or five times, Chiarelli said he is most worried the military will not be able to find enough health care providers to deal effectively with the troops needing assistance.

Many of the military bases are near small or remote communities that do not have access to the number of health professionals who might be needed as a great many soldiers return home.

More than 63,600 active duty Army soldiers have done three or more tours in Iraq or Afghanistan. That is nearly 12 per cent of the total number of soldiers who have deployed at least once. Roughly four in 10 soldiers who have gone to war have served more than one deployment – and that number is growing steadily.

One solution under discussion is the formation of mobile medical and psychological teams that can go to Army bases when they are expecting a surge in activity from returning units.

At Fort Campbell, the director of health services, Col. Richard Thomas, has roughly doubled his authorized staff of psychologists and behavioural specialists to 55 and is trying to hire a few more.

“I think we have enough staff to meet the demands of the soldiers here, but I could use more, and I’ll hire more if I can,” said Thomas. “I’ll hire them until they tell me to stop.”

He said he expects the increased staffing levels to last at least through next year.

For the first time, Thomas said, every soldier returning home will have an individual meeting with a behavioural health specialist and then go through a second such session 90 days to 120 days later.

The second one is generally the time when indications of stress surface, after the initial euphoria of the homecoming wears off and sleeplessness, nightmares, and other symptoms show up.

“We’re seeing a lot of soldiers with stress-related issues,” he said. “They’re not bipolar or schizophrenic. But they’re deploying three and four times and the stress is tremendous. They’re having relationship issues, financial issues, marital problems – all stress-related.”

According to Dr. Bret Logan, deputy commander for managed care at the base, extended war zone stints that have lasted as long as 38 months over the course of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have taken a severe toll.

More than 3,000 of the 15,000 troops returning home, Logan estimated, probably will experience headaches, sleep disorders, irritability, memory loss, relationship strains or other symptoms linked to stress disorders.

Medical staff at Fort Campbell say they also worry that there will be a new surge of suicides – an escalating problem in recent years, largely related to the stresses of war.

Jon Soltz, an Iraq war veteran and chair of VoteVets.org, said more soldiers will have stress-related problems, and the military must be vigilant in diagnosing and treating post-traumatic stress disorder to head off more serious issues.

“The longer you are there (at war), the more PTSD you’re going to see. You wonder when it’s going to be your time,” he said.

Each returning soldier is evaluated through a seven-day reintegration program. It includes medical checkups, tests, lectures on suicide prevention and relationships, and other sessions to help them transition back into life at the base and with their families.

During his visit to Campbell, Chiarelli took a spin on one of the base’s simulators, which are used for soldiers having neurological or stress problems. The simulator can be used to test soldiers’ reflexes or as a way to work someone back into everyday situations.

With occupational therapist Eileen Hayes watching over his shoulder, Chiarelli adeptly negotiated the city streets, sudden turns and other obstacles moving at him on the small screen.

The simulators, said Logan, put patients in high stress scenarios to test their decision-making ability while under duress.

While soldiers have been routinely deploying for 15-month tours, most Marines serve about seven months and pilots deploy for about four months, although some may serve for tours of six months or longer.

Late this past summer, Pentagon leaders ordered a change, saying any soldier who deployed in August or after would serve 12-month tours. Army leaders say they want to reduce that to nine months, but doing so will be difficult considering the strains of fighting two wars at once.

Logan said that some 85 per cent of those soldiers with stress disorder symptoms will recover with the help of some treatment or medication. But the other 15 per cent will require more intensive help.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on U.S. Military Expects Surges in Stress Disorders

Not Everything is Peachy at Gates’ Pentagon

November 25, 2008 – Defense Secretary Robert Gates has won plaudits all around for his stewardship of the Pentagon, enough so that (as Alex just noted) President-elect Barack Obama is reportedly likely to ask Gates to stick around for at least a year. But there is one thing the Pentagon has been up to lately that seems about as politically radioactive — and appalling — as it gets.

The Los Angeles Times reports that the Pentagon has narrowed its definition of a combat-related disability. The new rule construes January’s “wounded warriors” law to authorize denial of benefits to, say, Marine Cpl. James Dixon, who had trauma from both a roadside bomb and a mine. He suffered brain injury, a concussion and  hearing loss, and now he’s been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. Dixon eventually won his fight with the Pentagon, and the accompanying $16,000 in benefits. He told the Times, “I was blown up twice in Iraq, and my injuries weren’t combat-related? It’s the most imbecile thing I’ve ever seen.”

In a letter to the group Disabled American Veterans, William J. Carr, deputy undersecretary of Defense, wrote that the new, narrowly construed definition of “combat-related” was needed to preserve the “special distinction for those who incur disabilities while participating in the risk of combat, in contrast with those injured otherwise.”

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Armed Forces Committee, denies that this was the intention of the law. “When the disability is the same, the impact on the service member should be the same no matter whether the disability was incurred while training for combat at Ft. Hood or participating in actual combat in Iraq or Afghanistan,” Levin says.

The group Disabled American Veterans accuses the Pentagon of purposefully cutting corners to save money. Whether that’s the case or not, it’s hard to think of anything more politically tone-deaf — and that’s just the start of what’s wrong with this.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Not Everything is Peachy at Gates’ Pentagon

KY Widow Settles Lawsuit Against VA for $975,000

November 29, 2008, East St. Louis, IL – A widow whose husband died at a Veterans Affairs hospital under fire for substandard care has agreed to settle her lawsuit against the government for $975,000, her attorney said.

Katrina Shank had sought $12 million in her federal wrongful-death lawsuit. Her husband, 50-year-old Robert Shank III of Murray, Ky., bled to death in August 2007, a day after undergoing gallbladder surgery at the VA hospital in Marion, Ill.

Shank’s widow claimed the government failed to sufficiently check the background of her husband’s surgeon, Dr. Jose Veizaga-Mendez, before hiring him in January 2006.

Veizaga-Mendez resigned three days after Robert Shank’s death, and major surgeries were ordered halted there after inspectors attributed several patient deaths to questionable surgical care.

Terms involving Katrina Shank’s settlement were not disclosed in court documents, but one of her attorneys, Stan Heller, put the amount at $975,000. He said the sum amounts to an admission of responsibility, because “the government doesn’t toss money like that around easily.”

A VA spokesman, Paul Sherbo, said only that “the VA has no information to offer on this case, pending a review by the court.” According to the order by U.S. District Judge J. Phil Gilbert, the settlement becomes final after 90 days unless it hits a snag.

The VA found at least nine deaths between October 2006 and March 2007 were “directly attributable” to substandard care at the hospital. Those deaths did not include Robert Shank, who died months later.

The VA’s findings do not put the sole blame on Veizaga-Mendez, but Shank’s lawsuit said many or all of those who died were his patients.

At least one other lawsuit involving care by Veizaga-Mendez at the hospital is pending. James Marshall, 61, of Benton, Ky., died of a blood infection in July 2007, six days after Veizaga-Mendez performed a lymph node biopsy. His widow, Darla Marshall, is seeking $10 million in damages.

Veizaga-Mendez, who is not listed as a defendant in the lawsuits, has no listed telephone number and has not responded to repeated messages left by the AP at a Massachusetts home listed as an address for his wife.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on KY Widow Settles Lawsuit Against VA for $975,000

Post-Combat Coping Methods Vary, Troops Say

November 24, 2008 – Methods of coping with combat and its after effects vary as greatly as the effects themselves, six warriors participating in a conference panel here said. The Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury hosted the “Warrior Resilience Conference: Partnership with the Line.” Combat veterans who spoke at the conference described a range of effects and needs in becoming resilient.

Army Maj. Stephen Williams was the head nurse with an outpatient unit of the 3rd Medical Command’s 28th Combat Support Hospital in Baghdad when the base was hit with mortars July 10.

Since then, Williams has dwelled not on what he saw or did that day, but on what he couldn’t do — save his battle partner, Army Capt. Maria Ortiz.

“I couldn’t provide assistance to my comrade who was actually lying next to me and ended up passing away,” said Williams, who was seriously wounded in his leg with a severed femoral artery.

Dealing with the reality that he couldn’t help Ortiz was just one piece of a larger puzzle for Williams. He also had to face how his injuries would affect him and his family. When he returned home to convalesce, he said, his young children wouldn’t touch him, for fear they would hurt him.

“In hindsight, I didn’t know enough to say, ‘Hey, we need to talk to them more [deeply] on this,” he said. “So, I think there’s something more that we could do for the families out there [to] let them come to grips with these situations.”

An Army couple at the conference, the Blackledges, also know how crucial it is to have family support during the healing process and just how important it is to come to grips with what’s happened.

Army Maj. Gen. David Blackledge, a West Point graduate, has served for 32 years and was serving with the 352nd Civil Affairs Command in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom in January 2003. He was on his last mission outside the wire before heading home when his convoy was ambushed. The vehicle he was riding in rolled and, among other injuries, he suffered a crushed vertebra.

It took nearly two years for him to fully recover and return to full duty. During this time his wife, Army Lt. Colonel-select Iwona E. Blackledge, learned how spouses cope with the effects of war.

She had attended family readiness group briefings. It was a good start, but there’s really no preparing for what she endured.

“It is very hard to prepare someone for that 5 o’clock call in the morning,” she said. “What helped was that it was my husband who called, so I knew he was OK. Once he hung up, I was all alone and that’s when the stress started.”

Talking to a psychiatrist at Walter Reed Army Medical Center here after her husband arrived gave her an idea of what to expect and how to deal with what might come up, she said.

Blackledge returned to theater after his recovery only to be injured again – much less severely — in a bombing.

Blackledge’s resiliency after combat, he said, came from family support and belief in the mission. Also, talking about it was a big help, he said.

“When I got to Walter Reed, they immediately assigned a psychologist to me,” as is protocol for all traumatic cases returning to the facility, Blackledge said. “He was really helpful because I was going through the dreams and all that stuff. He talked me through it, gave me some tips on how to deal with that [and] … what I would expect to deal with over the preceding weeks and months.”

Retired Army Capt. Dawn Halfaker said, for her, recovery was a three-part process that began in the hospital. That phase focuses on physically rebuilding the body. She lost an arm when her vehicle was ambushed with small-arms and rocket-propelled-grenade fire while she was serving in Baqouba, Iraq, in February 2004.

“I really, really would not be, I don’t think, here today or the person I am today without the physical therapy and occupational therapy that I received,” Halfaker said. “Although I wasn’t certainly busting out pushups or maxing my [physical test] … I was working toward a goal of getting better.

“That was really, I think, a positive and powerful phase for me,” she added.

Then, the West Point graduate entered the reintegration phase and realized it’s a journey that never ends.

“Every day something comes up that is difficult or challenging, or socially awkward or, I guess, psychologically challenging,” Halfaker said. “I feel like the support I had at Walter Reed and my family support and just sort of my ability through my work … to regain that sense of purpose is so critical to get through all those little frustrations.”

One thing that really helped, Halfaker said, was when she received a call from Army Lt. Gen. Martin Dempsey, former acting commander of U.S. Central Command, from Iraq. Halfaker had played on the West Point basketball team with Dempsey’s daughter.

“That was just huge. I can’t even explain how powerful that was,” she said of the call.

Retired Army Master Sgt. Christopher Scheuerman reiterated suggestions that leaders throughout the chain of command need to be involved with their troops, even before injuries occur.

After a disciplinary action and corrective training for being what the Army labeled a “malingerer,” Scheuerman’s son, Jason, assigned to the 3rd Infantry Division at the time, killed himself, Scheuerman told the audience.

“We have a foundation of support, that foundation being our chain of command, the chaplaincy and medical,” Scheuerman said. “Very seldom do all three of those foundations of support fail.

“In this case, all three did,” he added.

Realizing he was suffering from post traumatic stress disorder, Scheuerman, who trains medics at Fort Bragg, N.C., began seeing a therapist and never failed to mention it to his students.

“Just by telling them that, almost every class, three of four of them would come to me later and say, ‘How did you start that? I need to do that, too,'” he said. “We have to err on the side of soldiers’ safety, because if we make a mistake, resiliency breaks down [and] we lose a soldier.

“It’s horrible to lose the soldiers we have to, [but] it’s an absolute tragedy to lose a soldier we shouldn’t.”

Retired Marine Sgt. Andrew Brandi, who works with veterans returning from combat, is working to prevent losing any more servicemembers to what he described as the “norm” for his generation.

“I was sitting down with three of my good Marine Corps buddies, all [diagnosed as] 100 [percent PTSD disabled] … not too long ago. Relationships came up,'” Brandi said. “Between the four of us … we had 23 wives. I’ve had 65 jobs, five major career changes and three wives, so I was by no means the record holder in this group.”

But one of his buddies piped up to say that’s “normal” for what they’d been through.

“He was right. For my generation that’s normal,” Brandi said. “We do not want this generation to go through what we have for the last 40 years.”

Veterans have the strength to overcome, but it won’t be easy, Brandi said.

“I want these young folks to know they have the strength as warriors to get through the [Veterans Affairs] programs and face it,” he said. “Is it easy? Hell, no. But is it worth it? Absolutely.

“Life can be excellent, but it takes a lot of guts … to get through it,” he added. “We have the strength to do this.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Post-Combat Coping Methods Vary, Troops Say

Injured Veterans Engaged in New Combat

November 25, 2008 – Marine Cpl. James Dixon was wounded twice in Iraq — by a roadside bomb and a land mine. He suffered a traumatic brain injury, a concussion, a dislocated hip and hearing loss. He was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Army Sgt. Lori Meshell shattered a hip and crushed her back and knees while diving for cover during a mortar attack in Iraq. She has undergone a hip replacement and knee reconstruction and needs at least three more surgeries.

In each case, the Pentagon ruled that their disabilities were not combat-related.

In a little-noticed regulation change in March, the military’s definition of combat-related disabilities was narrowed, costing some injured veterans thousands of dollars in lost benefits — and triggering outrage from veterans’ advocacy groups.

The Pentagon said the change was consistent with Congress’ intent when it passed a “wounded warrior” law in January. Narrowing the combat-related definition was necessary to preserve the “special distinction for those who incur disabilities while participating in the risk of combat, in contrast with those injured otherwise,” William J. Carr, deputy undersecretary of Defense, wrote in a letter to the 1.3-million-member Disabled American Veterans.

The group, which has called the policy revision a “shocking level of disrespect for those who stood in harm’s way,” is lobbying to have the change rescinded.

Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said the Pentagon’s “more conservative definition” limited benefits for some veterans. “That was not our intent,” Levin said in a statement.

He added: “When the disability is the same, the impact on the service member should be the same no matter whether the disability was incurred while training for combat at Ft. Hood or participating in actual combat in Iraq or Afghanistan.”

Pentagon officials argue that benefits should be greater for veterans wounded in combat than for “members with disabilities incurred in other situations (e.g., simulation of war, instrumentality of war, or participation in hazardous duties, not related to combat),” Carr wrote.

But veterans like Dixon and Meshell said their disabilities were a direct result of wounds suffered in combat.

Dixon said he was denied at least $16,000 in benefits before he fought the Pentagon and won a reversal of his noncombat-related designation.

“I was blown up twice in Iraq, and my injuries weren’t combat-related?” Dixon said. “It’s the most imbecile thing I’ve ever seen.”

Meshell, who is appealing her status, estimates she is losing at least $1,200 a month in benefits. Despite being injured in a combat zone during an enemy mortar attack, she said, her wounds would be considered combat-related only if she had been struck by shrapnel.

Meshell said the military had suggested that at least some of her disability was caused by preexisting joint deterioration. “Before I went over there, I was fine — I was perfectly healthy,” Meshell said. “This whole thing is causing me a lot of heartache.”

Kerry Baker, associate legislative director of Disabled American Veterans, has accused the Pentagon of narrowing the definition of combat-related disabilities to save money. He said the change would reduce payments for tens of thousands of veterans — those already wounded and those injured in the future.

“This is going to hurt a lot of people,” Baker said. “It’s one of those things that when you first look at it, you think: ‘Wow. How can this be?’ “

In a letter to members of Congress, the Disabled American Veterans accused the Pentagon of “mutilating” the statutory definitions of combat-related disabilities as part of a “deliberate manipulation of the law.”

The January legislation was aimed at allowing troops wounded in combat and combat-related operations to collect disability severance from the military and disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Disability severance is based on past service. Disability compensation is based on future loss of earning potential. Previously, veterans with combat-related disabilities received reduced monthly VA compensation until their severance money was recouped. That is still the case for those whose injuries are not deemed combat-related.

Years ago, Congress adopted a detailed definition of combat-related disabilities. It included such criteria as hazardous service, conditions simulating war and disability caused by an “instrumentality of war.” Those criteria were not altered in the January legislation.

The Pentagon, in establishing an internal policy based on the legislation, in March unlawfully stripped those criteria from the legislation, the Disabled American Veterans said.

“We do not view this as an oversight,” Baker testified before Congress in June. “We view this as an intentional effort to conserve monetary resources at the expense of disabled veterans.”

The Pentagon changes focused on “tip of the spear” fighters, or those “in the line of duty in a combat zone,” said Eileen Lainez, a Pentagon spokeswoman. They comprise “a very special, yet limited, subset of those who matriculate through the Disability Evaluation System,” Lainez wrote in an e-mail response to a request for comment.

In many cases, veterans say, they are not told why their disabilities are not considered combat-related.

Dixon said he did not realize he had been put in a noncombat-related category until he began questioning his disability payments. It took more than six months of phone calls, letters and appeals — plus help from the Disabled American Veterans and a member of Congress — to overturn his designation.

Navigating the Pentagon’s bureaucracy was made more difficult because Dixon’s brain injury resulted in short-term memory loss. He had to write everything down in notebooks and calendars.

“It was a nightmare,” Dixon said. “Most veterans don’t know how the system works, or how to fight it. They don’t realize all the obstacles they put in your way to keep you from getting what you deserve.”

Meshell said the military disability system was so complex that few veterans were equipped to navigate it.

“I’m a college graduate. I’m not a dumb person. But honestly, I can’t begin to explain some of this stuff,” she said.

After five years of active duty, a combat tour in Iraq and 12 years in the National Guard and Reserves, she thinks she deserves the full disability benefits authorized by Congress for veterans injured in combat.

“I earned them,” she said. “I went to Iraq. I was in combat. I got injured.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Injured Veterans Engaged in New Combat