Sep 16, VCS in the News: VA Covers Up Shocking Statistics on Iraq War Soldiers’ Suicides

September 16, 2008, Olean, New York – Here are some alarming numbers you may not remember seeing. 
 
That’s because the current federal government certainly won’t promulgate them unless pushed, and much of the national news media seem more concerned about who’s climbing into bed with whom than with stories that might offend, sadden, or anger viewers and readers. I’m guessing this one will do all three.

Soldiers and U.S. military veterans who commit suicide each day: 18

Soldiers and veterans who commit suicide each year: More than 6,500

Suicide attempts per year among soldiers and veterans: 12,000

And those are just the figures for 2005. They seem to be going up.

The frightening figures come first from CBS News and its televised report last fall by investigative reporter Armen Keteyian, and indirectly from federal court action in California, and from the Department of Veterans Affairs itself, which was caught trying to cover up the shocking statistics.

When CBS News broke the story last November, it drew little reaction from the national press and was not — in my view — adequately “picked up” and further disseminated with attributed-reference stories.

Who knows why? This disregard for hard news among celebrity-entranced outlets is apparent on a daily basis these days.

One outfit that was interested, however, was Veterans for Common Sense (VCS), one of the most activist veterans groups going — run by executive director Paul Sullivan, a man I know personally to be a true patriot, courageous truth-teller and pit-bull advocate for America’s fighting men and women, past or present.

Sullivan once worked for the VA as a project manager for mental health benefits, but grew so frustrated at being stymied by the indifference and jungle of red tape he met in trying to get veterans the help they deserved and needed, he quit a few years back and accepted the top executive post at VCS, a group founded by combat veterans of Bush the Elder’s Persian Gulf War in 1991.

Sullivan lost little time in filing a class-action suit against the VA on behalf of thousands of veterans wounded in Iraq, claiming they have been misled, rebuffed, ignored and needlessly delayed by the VA when they sought disability or medical benefits. (The VA claims it averages six months to complete a claim but a recent Government Accountability Office report shows claims involving mental trauma often take more than a year to process. And the 32,000 veterans who appealed their initial rulings in 2007 face an astounding average wait of 3.5 years for that appeal to be processed.)

As Sullivan told the magazine The Nation in an excellent cover article titled “How the VA Abandons Our Vets” by Joshua Kors in its Sept.15, 2008 issue, “The VA needs more than a few minor changes at the margins. It needs a massive overhaul.”

The huge Cabinet agency — budgeted at $94 billion a year — quickly moved for dismissal, claiming the VCS has no standing and doesn’t actually represent veterans. A San Francisco federal court judge, Samuel Conti, a World War II veteran himself, begged to differ.

In January of this year, he ordered the VA to send top officials to the stand, and to produce relevant records, studies and statistics. These included certain e-mails authored by Dr. Ira Katz, the VA’s top mental health official. Katz had been interviewed in the CBS report, and denied the suicide numbers were that bad.

“There is no epidemic of suicide in the VA,” he said on camera.

Katz also told the House Veterans Affairs Committee last November that the CBS numbers were flat wrong.

“Their number is not, in fact, an accurate reflection of the rate,” he instructed skeptical members of Congress. The VA, in fact, held that only 790 suicide attempts by veterans occurred in 2007, a small fraction of the number claimed by CBS.

When the court action forced the VA to cough up the internal records five months ago, Katz’s e-mails told a totally opposite story. The VCS lawyers knew they had found something incriminating as soon as they read the title of one Katz e-mail to the VA’s media relations chief: “Not for the CBS News Interview Request.”

It began “Shh!” and included the line, “Our suicide prevention coordinators are identifying about 1,000 suicide attempts per month among the veterans we see in our facilities.”

In another internal e-mail to Dr. Michael Kussman, head of the entire VA health department, Katz indicated — just days after his congressional testimony to the opposite — that CBS had hit it right on the button: “There are about 18 suicides per day among America’s 25 million veterans. (This) is supported by the CBS numbers.”

The reaction was strong. When CBS showed the e-mail to House VA Committee chairman Rep. Bob Filner, a California Democrat, his hair almost caught on fire.

“This is disgraceful,” Filner said. “This is a crime against our nation, our nation’s veterans.”

He claimed the VA officials “do not want to come to grips with reality, with the truth.”

And it isn’t just veterans no longer in combat who are in clinical depression. The Pentagon keeps only active duty records of suicide deaths. In 2006, at least 99 members of the Armed Forces — a third of them serving in Iraq or Afghanistan at the time — killed themselves, and 948 others tried to.

Last year, 2007, the active-duty suicide figure was 121 — a 20 percent increase — with 34 of those on duty tour in Iraq and Afghanistan. The attempts rose to an estimated 2,100.

A week ago, the VA — using figures supplied by the Secretary of the Army — released statistics showing 62 soldiers have committed suicide already in Iraq and Afghanistan, with 31 cases of possible suicide still under investigation.

If that trend continues, the military number will surpass the civilian total — now 19.5 suicides per 100,000 — for the first time since the Vietnam War. The trend line shows victims are increasingly younger.

There are various theories, some more believable than others, including increased frequency and duration of deployment, ready access to weapons and daily violence that permeates the consciousness.

One psychiatry consultant to the Army surgeon general, Col. Elspeth Ritchie, said last year that soldiers may act compulsively when they “get a ‘Dear John’ or ‘Dear Jane’ e-mail and then takes his weapon and shoots himself.”

Dr. John M. Grohol, a psychiatrist writing earlier this year about the 2007 figures in the online publication World of Psychology (www.psychcentral.com), complained that the armed services talk a good game when it comes to mental health care and emergency counseling and therapy, and other available treatment, but the military follow-through is counter-productive.

“Making use of it (military mental health care) acts as a black mark on a soldier’s official record,” writes Grohol. “Such a mark will often severely limit the person’s career advancement within the armed services, and may deny them access to the usual lines of promotion and advancement. So what do … soldiers and officers do? They simply don’t seek out mental health care, and deal with their feelings on their own.”

Treating severe depression or hopelessness on one’s own, he warns, “can lead to very bad things. Like suicide.”

Military suicide data falls between the federal cracks. The Pentagon keeps only active duty suicide numbers. You can see above what the VA does. And the Centers for Disease Control — through its National Violent Death Reporting System started five years ago — does not monitor veteran status and still has only spotty regional data, mostly non-military.

CBS got most of its numbers state-by-state, where vital statistics tend to be much more precise.

Even worse, in President Dubya’s godforsaken administration, Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans now have to prove their wounds came from “service-connected” action, usually actual combat, before they get benefits. And I mean prove as with actual evidence in a court of law, even if they are one of the myriad with limbs missing.

They need witness statements, after-battle combat assessments, proof their medals were earned, folders with medical evaluations from the war field, officer assessments, statements from buddies in the same unit, sworn statements from commanders, precise dates and times of wounding, circumstances surrounding the injury — there are people on Death Row put there with less evidence.

The Nation article followed a discharged sergeant who ironically was protecting some of Dubya’s show-boating officials touring Baghdad streets, where they shouldn’t have been, when he was injured by a roadside bomb — and then six months later, another.

He was injured badly enough to receive two Purple Hearts and a lifetime load of shrapnel in his face and right arm. His brain was damaged. His right ear rings. He has nightmares, sleep apnea and other sleep disorders. He has acid-reflux disease and constant heartburn. He has seizures and convulsions. His marriage dissolved.

The sergeant has X-rays showing the actual shrapnel in his body. He has all the field data, signed by officers. When he went to the VA upon returning home — according to the thorough reporting of Joshua Kors in The Nation — they gave him Prozac for his depression, Bupropion for his sleep, and Prazosin for nightmares.

Then they refused his disability claim, suggesting his problems — even with the evidence of shrapnel — may have come instead from a car accident more than two decades ago in which he bumped his head on the steering wheel.

Oh, and when the VA discovered he drinks Red Bull, they further diagnosed his problems as resulting from too much caffeine. The sergeant has appealed. See ya in 3.5 years, sergeant. Good luck.

Oh, and the sergeant is prohibited by VA policy dating back to the Civil War from hiring a lawyer to present his case — a fundamental right you and I enjoy. This, the VA contends, levels the playing field for vets who can’t afford a lawyer.

What a beauty that lame excuse is. I read it three nights ago and I’m still laughing, then crying.

Oh, and the VA now will make the sergeant and others like him fill out a 26-page disability application loaded with essay demands, charts and enough legal jargon to make it resemble a law school application. That ought to make the process smoother and more efficient, right?

Oh, and while the incredible VA claims backlog grew 50 percent just since 2006, the VA handed out $3.8 million in cash bonuses to top political leaders of the Cabinet agency. Public service, as Paul Sullivan has noted, “is an honor, not an ATM machine.”

This is only a tiny fraction of this vast VA problem and Dubya’s execrable attack on the 1.6 million true patriots he sent into harm’s way.

Last year, Sullivan also testified in front of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs. He delivered lengthy, biting testimony in which he described “the many unconscionable, outrageous, and intentional actions taken by the Department of Veterans Affairs and by the Administration to prevent our Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans from receiving prompt medical care and disability compensation.”

I’ll try to give you more of what he revealed in future columns.

John Hanchette, a professor of journalism at St. Bonaventure University, is a former editor of the Niagara Gazette and a Pulitzer Prize-winning national correspondent. He was a founding editor of USA Today and was recently named by Gannett as one of the Top 10 reporters of the past 25 years. He can be contacted via e-mail at Hanchette6@aol.com.

Posted in Gulf War Updates, VA Claims Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Sep 16, VCS in the News: VA Covers Up Shocking Statistics on Iraq War Soldiers’ Suicides

Female Soldiers More Likely to be Raped Than Killed in Action, Says Rep. Jane Harman

September 10, 2008 – A House subcommittee is set to shed new light on the problem of sexual assault in the military today, when it will hear testimony on sexual assault numbers, prevention and response as part of its ongoing investigation into the issue.

“A woman who signs up to protect her country is more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire,” said Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA), who introduced a bill this summer to increase and encourage the investigation of prosecution of sexual assault and rape cases in the military and is attending today’s hearing.

It will be the second such hearing this summer but is highly anticipated because Dr. Kaye Whitley, the director of the defense department’s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office, will testify. Whitley was a no-show at the session July 31, even though the committee had subpoenaed her to attend.

Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Michael Dominguez prohibited Whitley from attending that hearing, saying that his decision was based upon consultation with the assistant secretary of defense for legislative affairs and the general counsel of the DOD.

“It is inappropriate to question Dr. Whitley about the program when Mr. Dominguez, the decision maker responsible for the program and for the program’s results, is available to answer those questions,” said Cynthia O. Smith, a DOD spokeswoman, adding that while Whitley is responsible for implementing policy, Dominguez has “full accountability and responsibility.”

The decision outraged the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform’s Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA), who sent a letter to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates Aug. 12 demanding the department’s staff cooperate with the investigation into sexual assault in the armed forces. He said Whitley’s testimony was vital because the office she leads “serves as the single point of accountability for the Department of Defense sexual assault policy.”

At the hearing, Waxman questioned what the DOD was “trying to cover up” and said it has “a history of covering up sexual offense problems.” He announced Aug. 13 that the DOD had agreed to cooperate and that Whitley would be made available.

The DOD announced last month that it will implement a new strategy in Oct. 2009 to help troops protect their fellow servicemembers from sexual assault, but Rep. Harman says it’s not addressing the problem now.

“We don’t have 13 months to wait,” Harman said.

She also said “bright red lines” need to be drawn about personal behavior in the military and that the prosecution of these crimes needs to increase to combat the “epidemic.”

“There are a lot of questions I want answered,” said retired Colonel Ann Wright, a 29-year veteran of the Army and Army Reserves who is advocating for an investigation into sexual assault and “suspicious” suicides in the military.

“The warnings to women should begin above the doors of the military recruiting stations, as that is where assaults on women in the military begins before they are even recruited,” Wright wrote recently on her website.

A recent Government Accountability Office report found that the DOD does not adequately provide guidance on implementing sexual assault policies and programs in deployment areas, that not all commanders support such programs, that prevention and response training is not consistently effective, and that a shortage of mental health care providers affects victims’ access to mental health services.

“Left unchecked, these challenges can discourage or prevent some servicemembers from using the programs when needed,” the GAO said. It based its findings on surveys conducted with 3,750 servicemembers at domestic and deployed units and a 2006 DOD survey. 103 servicemembers reported being sexually assaulted within the previous year, and 52 did not report the assault.

The GAO identified additional factors in non-reporting, including: “the belief that nothing would be done; fear of ostracism, harassment, or ridicule; and concern that peers would gossip.”

The Associated Press reported in July that of all the women who have visited a VA facility after serving in Iraq or Afghanistan, 15 percent of them screened positive for military sexual trauma.

“That means they indicated that while on active duty they were sexually assaulted, raped, or were sexually harassed, receiving repeated unsolicited verbal or physical contact of a sexual nature,” the report said.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Female Soldiers More Likely to be Raped Than Killed in Action, Says Rep. Jane Harman

Senator McCain’s Campaign Downplays Governor Palin’s Remarks Falsely Linking Iraq with 9/11

September 13, 2008, Fairbanks, AK – The John McCain campaign rejected suggestions Friday that Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin was linking the Sept. 11 terror attacks to the current conflict in Iraq as part of her remarks at Fort Wainwright.

“You’ll be there to defend the innocent from the enemies who planned and carried out and rejoiced in the deaths of thousands of Americans,” Palin told the 1st Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry and their families at Thursday’s deployment ceremony. “You’ll be there because America can never go back to that false sense of security that came before Sept. 11, 2001.”

The governor’s oldest son, Track, is part of the brigade, and she had been scheduled to speak at the ceremony weeks before accepting the No. 2 spot on the Republican ticket.

But within hours of the News-Miner posting video of the speech on YouTube, commenters began questioning if Palin was asserting the attacks on New York and Washington D.C. were a primary reason for invading Iraq. The Washington Post also highlighted the comments on a story posted on its Web site.

“The folksy Republican hockey mom VP candidate just linked the 9/11 tragedy to the Iraq war,” posted the YouTube user known as unapimper. “How can anyone so clueless and ignorant be a heartbeat away from the presidency?”

“I get the feeling some people believe they can vote for an alternative reality,” wrote YouTube user SpitFireOFatJ. “It’s as if they believe if McCain wins that means history will record that they were right all along and Saddam was behind 9/11.”

The Bush administration once promoted the view that Iraq may have had something to do with the Sept. 11 attacks, but has since backed off such claims due to lack of evidence. It is, however, widely believed that al-Qaeda has an active presence in Iraq post-invasion.

McCain-Palin spokesman Ben Porritt, however, said it was ridiculous to think Palin was insinuating a direct connection between Sept. 11 and the Iraq war.

“In her praise of the brave men and women heading overseas Gov. Palin was clearly stating that our troops are going to Iraq to defend Iraqis and continue the efforts on the ground.” he said. “Drawing conclusions that she was saying anything else is an overreach.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Senator McCain’s Campaign Downplays Governor Palin’s Remarks Falsely Linking Iraq with 9/11

Editorial Column: Does Killing Afghan Civilians Keep Us Safe?

September 12, 2008 – This week, as we remember the nearly 3,000 American citizens who died in the rubble of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or in a remote field in Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001, we also should think about the civilians who are still dying in Afghanistan.

Consider, for instance, the recent American airstrikes on Azizabad, a village in western Afghanistan, on Aug. 22. The United Nations, Afghan government officials and independent witnesses all say that the United States killed about 90 civilians in these strikes, most of them women and children. Cellphone videos of the scene show motionless children lying under checkered shawls and veiled women shrieking alongside them.

According to a report by Carlotta Gall of the New York Times, dozens of freshly dug graves are scattered in the village’s cemeteries, some so small they could fit only children. The U.S. initially said that many fewer civilians had died, but it has now promised a thorough investigation.

It’s a grisly story but hardly an isolated one. The month before the Azizabad incident, Afghan officials say that American airstrikes near Kabul killed 27 civilians at a wedding party — including the bride. In another incident, on March 4, 2007, nine civilians died when their mud home north of Kabul was hit by two 2,000-pound bombs dropped by U.S. aircraft. American officials said they were aiming for two insurgents seen entering the house after firing a rocket at a U.S. military outpost, according to Human Rights Watch.

Not surprisingly, civilian casualties infuriate Afghans. This was brought home clearly in May 2006 after an American military convoy on a road north of Kabul lost control and plowed into a group of Afghans, killing five. In the days that followed, mobs of Afghans attacked businesses and hotels owned by foreigners; at least 14 died and more than 90 were injured.

Areport last September from the United Nations concluded that Western airstrikes were among the chief inspirations for suicide attackers within the country and that they engendered resentment against both the Afghan government and Western forces. The number of suicide attacks in Afghanistan went up six times from 2005 to 2006, to 136, and Taliban insurgents carried out more than 140 suicide bombings in Afghanistan in 2007.

Civilian casualties also seem to be a key factor in the marked erosion of support by Afghans for the American presence in their country. In 2005, 68{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} of Afghans rated U.S. efforts in Afghanistan positively, but that number dropped abruptly to 57{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} in 2006 and to 42{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} in 2007.

The casualty numbers remain high even seven years into the war. According to a Human Rights Watch report released this week, in 2006, 230 civilians died as a result of U.S. or NATO attacks, 116 of them during airstrikes. In 2007, at least 321 Afghan civilians were killed by Western airstrikes. So far in 2008, at least 119 have been killed by U.S. or NATO airstrikes.

The 2008 estimate does not include the airstrike near Azizabad because the U.S. military has maintained that only five to seven Afghan civilians were killed in that incident. Cellphone videos of the carnage don’t conclusively prove this wrong, but they do raise enough questions that Gen. David D. McKiernan, the senior NATO commander in Afghanistan, has ordered a high-level investigation.

Aware of how politically sensitive the issue is, Afghan President Hamid Karzai has been calling for years for Western forces to show greater restraint in carrying out airstrikes in civilian areas. Indeed, shortly after the Azizabad strikes, he ordered a review of whether U.S. and NATO forces should be allowed to use airstrikes in or around villages.

Why are U.S. and NATO forces causing so many civilian casualties? One explanation may be that there are too few Western boots on the ground. Afghanistan, which is 1 1/2 times the size of Iraq and has a larger population, only has about 70,000 American and NATO soldiers stationed there. In Iraq, by contrast, there are about 145,000 American troops on the ground. This translates to heavier Western reliance on airstrikes in Afghanistan and the inevitably higher cost in civilian casualties those produce.

According to the U.S. Air Force’s Central Combined Air and Space Operations Center, between January and August there were almost 2,400 airstrikes in Afghanistan — three times as many as in Iraq.

Another factor is the Taliban’s execrable tactic of using civilians as human shields. Because the Taliban operates in and around settled residential areas, it is inevitable that operations by the U.S. against the group will involve civilian casualties.

Civilians in Afghanistan have been caught in the crossfire for too long. Over-reliance on airstrikes is counterproductive in the battle for Afghan hearts and minds. President Bush’s announcement this week that he will send nearly 5,000 additional troops to Afghanistan is a good way to start ameliorating this situation, but it is not enough.

The overall rules of engagement in Afghanistan need to change, as was promised by NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, who said in July that the alliance would start using smaller bombs in Afghanistan in an attempt to decrease civilian casualties.

Limits on the size of bombs dropped were indeed imposed, but civilian casualties have continued at a level that is unacceptable. In a welcome development, McKiernan announced this week that NATO troops will focus more on house searches led by Afghan forces, with the permission of the homeowner sought first, and he also has reminded his top commanders of the importance of proportionality and restraint.

Hopefully, more coalition boots on the ground and revised rules of engagement will lessen the continued Western reliance on bombing from the air. After all, American civilians are not the only innocents to have suffered the results of the horrific Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Peter Bergen is a senior fellow at the New America Foundation, and Katherine Tiedemann is a program associate there.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Editorial Column: Does Killing Afghan Civilians Keep Us Safe?

Newspaper Editorial: Veterans Clinic Long Overdue

September 13, 2008 – Thursday was a great day for veterans in the U.S. House of Representatives, nationally and especially locally.

Not only did the House pass a cost-of-living increase for disabled veterans and dependents of deceased veterans, it authorized $131 million for the construction of a VA outpatient clinic in Cape Coral.

Rep. Connie Mack IV, R-Fort Myers, deserves credit for dogged pursuit of the project over the last few years.

Besides serving a major part of Mack’s constituency – the district has 124,000 retired and active service members, the country’s fourth-largest veterans population – the new clinic should stimulate economic growth by drawing health care services and health-related companies to the area.

“This is a critical project for Southwest Florida,” Mack said. “It is a fitting tribute to the tens of thousands of veterans in Southwest Florida who courageously served our country.”

The building could open as early as 2011. Mack urged the Senate to pass the bill quickly and we join him in that call.

Our veterans have waited long enough. And our area needs a shot in the arm.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Newspaper Editorial: Veterans Clinic Long Overdue

Editorial Column: The Government, the Media, and Afghanistan

September 11, 2008 – On the night of August 22, the U.S. committed what Chris Floyd, in a richly detailed and amply documented piece, calls an “atrocity” in the Afghan village of Azizabad, near the western city of Herat. The U.S. conducted a massive midnight airstrike on the village, killing scores of unarmed civilians, including large numbers of women and children. That was preceded just weeks earlier by another U.S. airstrike in Eastern Afghanistan which “killed 27 people in a wedding party — most of them women and children, including the bride.”

What makes the Azizabad attack particularly notable is the blatant and now clearly demonstrated lying engaged in by the U.S. Government regarding this incident, with the eager propagandistic assistance of what we are constantly told is the “legitimate news arm” of Fox News — namely, Brit Hume’s show and his stable of “legitimate news reporters.” Working in unison, Fox and the Pentagon continuously denied claims that large numbers of civilians had been killed in the airstrike, accusing the villagers of lying and U.N. investigators of having been “duped.” But a mountain of documentary evidence and independent investigations have now conclusively confirmed that it was the U.S. Government that was lying and the villagers’ claims which were true all along, forcing the military to “reinvestigate” its own conclusions.

While local villagers, the Afghan government, U.N. investigators, and independent journalists all insisted that the U.S. air attack resulted in the slaughter of 95 civilians, including 50 children, and killed no Taliban fighters, the U.S. military repeatedly issued vehement denials of those claims, insisting for weeks “that only 5 to 7 civilians, and 30 to 35 militants, were killed in what it [said] was a successful operation against the Taliban.” The Bush administration even “accused the villagers of spreading Taliban propaganda” and claimed “that the villagers fabricated such evidence as grave sites,” even though those “villagers have connections to the Afghan police, NATO or the Americans through reconstruction projects, and they say they oppose the Taliban.”

But a gruesome video has now surfaced clearly documenting the huge number of civilians that were killed. A very thorough, independent, on-the-scene investigation by the New York Times’ Carlotta Gall — who Floyd, a former colleague of Gall at The Moscow Times, rightly hailed as a truly intrepid war reporter — resulted in the discovery of mountains of new documentary evidence and highly credible and pro-U.S. witnesses confirming not only that at least 90 civilians were killed, but also casting serious doubt on the U.S.’s claim that there were even any Taliban in the village at all.

There are numerous vital issues raised by this episode relating both to the bombing and particularly how the U.S. Government so frequently issues false claims, but in light of all the recent uproar over what is and is not “appropriate journalism,” I want to focus for the moment on Fox News’ role in this. When the U.S. military originally was denying the villagers’ claim, the Pentagon claimed it had had conducted an investigation and that an unnamed “independent journalist” who happened to be with them confirmed their account that large numbers of Taliban were among the dead and only very few unarmed civilians were. But then this was revealed:

    The US military said that its findings were corroborated by an independent journalist embedded with the US force. He was named as the Fox News correspondent Oliver North, who came to prominence in the 1980s Iran-Contra affair, when he was a[ Marine] colonel.

That “independent journalist” is the same person who, in 1986, proudly went before Congress and boasted: “I will tell you right now, counsel, and to all the members here gathered, that I misled the Congress,” and then justified that lying — and to this day still justifies it — on the ground that it was for a greater good. That behavior — which led to multiple felony convictions that were ultimately overturned because he had received immunity in connection with his testimony — hasn’t prevented North from being employed as a “reporter” by the serious, legitimate news arm of Fox News, nor from appearing regularly on Brit Hume’s Serious News Show as a journalist, nor being cited as an “independent journalist” by the U.S. military to confirm its claims and accuse Afghan villagers of lying about the number of their dead.

That it was Oliver North who turned out to be the U.S. military’s vaunted “independent journalist” verifying its claims about the Azizabad raids was revealed by Fox on the September 8 edition of “Special Report with Brit Hume,” which was guest-anchored by “journalist” Jim Angle. At the top of the show, this is what Angle “reported”:

    In Afghanistan, FOX has exclusive pictures of what happened in a U.S. raid which some locals claim killed civilians. A FOX crew tells a different story.

Nobody — other than Brit Hume’s news show — ever denied that civilians were killed in this airstrike. The only “debate” — prior to the emergence of documentary evidence — was over how many were killed. Yet Fox began by telling its pitifully misled viewers that while “some locals claim [the airstrike] killed civilians,” “a Fox crew” had a “different story.”

Later in the show, Angle introduced the segment this way:

    The U.S. military is reopening an investigation into an operation led by American forces that some now say resulted in the deaths of dozens of Afghan civilians. Video allegedly taken at the scene appears to show images of dead children, but a FOX crew went along on that mission and has exclusive pictures that tell a different story.

Angle then introduced Fox News “national security correspondent” Jennifer Griffin, and this is what Fox viewers heard:

    GRIFFIN: So what did happen during the 2:00 a.m. raid into Azizabad? The Special Forces teams involved have been muzzled pending the new investigation, but FOX News cameramen Chris Jackson and Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North happened to be embedded with the Marine Special Forces Unit involved in the raid. This is their video exclusive to FOX News. They witnessed the entire operation firsthand.

    CHRIS JACKSON, FOX NEWS CAMERAMAN: I had the freedom to rein all over the objective, go to anywhere I wanted to go, and I saw the dead combatants. And they were wearing bandoleers and holding AK-47s.

    GRIFFIN: Special military investigators showed the FOX team satellite photos of the graveyards near Azizabad taken before and after the raid. Quote, “Though only about 15 new graves were evident in nearby cemeteries and no local civilians had sought medical treatment for wounds,” North wrote in his blog on August 29th, “the number of noncombatant casualties allegedly inflicted in the raid continued to rise.”

    JACKSON: I’ve worked in war zones and disaster areas for a long time, so I’m used to seeing large numbers of dead people. I did not see this in Azizabad. I went through the rubble, I went through the buildings, the main objectives. And what I saw was primarily enemy combatants. What I saw matched is the number of the U.S. Army figure of how many people were killed.

    GRIFFIN: A press release from the original military investigation concluded, “Investigators discovered firm evidence that the militants planned to attack a nearby coalition forces base. Other evidence collected included weapons, explosives, intelligence materials, and an access badge to a nearby base as well as photographs from inside and outside of the base.

    (END VIDEOTAPE)

Fox’s news show — not Bill O’Reilly, but Brit Hume’s “legitimate news program” — continued to insist, based upon the “reporting” of “journalist” Oliver North and his cameraman, that the U.S. military’s original claims were true, and the villagers and the U.N. were lying, even as the U.S. military itself was, in light of the ample evidence, severely backtracking on its story:

    The U.S. decision to again probe the Aug. 21 attack in Azizabad, near the western city of Herat, came at the urging of Gen. David D. McKiernan, the top NATO commander in Afghanistan. McKiernan said he was prompted by “emerging evidence” that threw into question the finding of a U.S. investigation that five to seven civilians died. McKiernan had earlier said he concurred with that finding. . . .

    “The footage that is there on this shows horrendous pictures of these bodies and clearly identifies women and children. In some cases, the bodies are not in one piece,” a U.N. official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. “Whether you say it was 76 or 82 or even 92 — it was clearly not seven who were killed there.”

    Said a senior U.S. military official: “Whatever information McKiernan got that was shared by Afghan and U.N. representatives led him to believe there was good cause to want to look at all of this more deeply.”

It is hardly uncommon for claims by the U.S. Government regarding the multiple countries in which our “War on Terror” is being waged to be vehemently disputed by a whole array of people. The only difference here is that video, other documentary evidence, and independent investigations have all emerged confirming the falsity of the U.S. Government’s claims.

This is what I found so deeply bothersome and inane about this week’s hand-wringing over the oh-so-“undignified” spats between various MSNBC personalities during the Convention and the Threat to the Integrity of American Journalism posed by such squabbling, or by the oh-so-inappropriate placement of “blatant liberals” in the sacred anchor chair. There is an entire cable “news” outlet, the highest-rated one in the country, which exists for little reason other than to amplify and certify false government claims — it’s literally nothing more than an outlet for state-issued propaganda — and our leading news critics and even other “journalists” praise and treat its “news” anchors as legitimate and credible sources of news (and for those who want to claim that Brit Hume is something other than a nakedly partisan right-wing propagandist, see here, here, and here, just for starters).

Way beyond Fox, this is the same thing that our media generally (and with some important exceptions) has been doing for years, at least — mindlessly repeating and confirming false Government claims. That’s what makes Carlotta Gall’s on-scene actual investigation of the Pentagon’s Afghanistan claims so notable — it’s so unusual. From Jessica Lynch’s heroic Rambo-like firefight to Pat Tillman’s murder by Al Qaeda monsters to pre-war claims of the Iraqi menace to post-war claims of Glorious Progress to current claims of the Grave Russian and Iranian Threats to the concealment and then justification of virtually every act of government radicalism over the last eight years, our media has, by and large, done what Fox News did in the Azizabad case — offer itself up as an uncritical conduit for state propaganda.

And that’s to say nothing of their more overt propagandistic activities — the still-extraordinary fact that for the last seven years, virtually every American news program has employed as “independent analysts” people who were part of a formal, coordinated and likely illegal U.S. Government propaganda program run out of the Pentagon, a program which resulted in countless false stories broadcast by these networks to boost Government lies. And even after all of that was revealed and documented on the front page of the NYT, these media outlets — all 3 networks, plus CNN and others — continue to employ the propagandists, and worse, refuse even to tell their viewers about what happened, or even to disclose to their viewers the existence of the story, and then — at best — actually defend it all when forced on their obscure blogs to mention it.

Keith Olbermann may be more overtly opinionated and devoted to a particular presidential candidate than a classical Brokawian “anchor” should be, and it’s certainly reasonable to say that he, Chris Matthews, Joe Scarborough and David Schuster have acted like adolescent clowns on television, but spending time focusing on that as some sort of grave threat to American journalism is like taking a patient whose vital organs are drowning in Stage 4 cancer and obsessing about his hangnail.

* * * * *

Independent of the Government lying and Fox News propaganda, the massacre of Azizabad civilians highlights the massive yet largely ignored questions about what we are doing in Afghanistan and whether — regardless of one’s views of the original invasion — we are achieving any good at all. As Floyd wrote yesterday:

    The mass death visited upon the sleeping, defenseless citizens of Azizabad encapsulates many of the essential elements of this global campaign of “unipolar domination” and war profiteering: the callous application of high-tech weaponry against unarmed civilians; the witless attack that alienates local supporters and empowers an ever-more violent and radical insurgency; and perhaps the most quintessential element of all — the knowing lies and deliberate deceits that Washington employs to hide the obscene reality of its Terror War.

Over at Nieman Watchdog, The Washington Post’s Dan Froomkin interviewed experts in the region who cite numerous questions that ought to be asked about the wisdom of our continuing occupation of Afghanistan, including “Are we bombing our way to disaster in Afghanistan?” And as Froomkin himself put it yesterday in his Post chat:

    Civilian deaths — which the civilians may well consider murder — tend to turn people against us.

    I was kind of amazed that Bush raised the issue at all in yesterday’s speech, but he did. I was really amazed, however, at how cavalier he sounded: “Regrettably, there will be times when our pursuit of the enemy will result in accidental civilian deaths. This has been the case throughout the history of warfare. Our nation mourns the loss of every innocent life. Every grieving family has the sympathy of the American people.”

    I mean, c’mon. It’s a bit hard to convince people that our nation mourns the loss of every innocent life when we don’t even acknowledge them.

Most striking of all is that the “issues” of least significance, of zero import, are the ones which receive the most attention in the “political debates” conducted by our media — pigs and lipstick and bowling scores and lapel pins and windsurfing tights — while the ones of greatest significance are virtually ignored. And that is highly unlikely to change between now and November. To know why, just compare these two statements — first, from McCain campaign manager Rick Davis (“This election is not about issues. This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates”) and this one from MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough (media will talk about “[w]hatever the McCain campaign wants us to talk about”). When Tom Brokaw expresses concern about any of that, then his profound concerns over undignified journalism can be taken seriously.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Editorial Column: The Government, the Media, and Afghanistan

Scottsdale Marine Unable to Find Peace After War

September 3, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ – Police identified Michael Murray, 22, of Scottsdale, as the motorcyclist who died Monday evening after crashing his 2008 Honda into a pole near the 4300 block of Hayden Road.”

The report does not mention that Murray, a former member of the 3rd Marine Division and a two-tour combat veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq, was a casualty of war.

“That isn’t what the official records say, but there is a lot of truth to that,” said his mother, Silvana Smith. “A lot of these kids come back from the war and they have such burdens in their hearts, like Michael did, that they can’t quite readjust.”

The director of a local U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) program aimed at helping returning soldiers with post-traumatic stress disorder told me recently that many Iraq war vets show signs of PTSD. They have trouble concentrating, difficulty with anger management, survivor guilt and controlling what they know to be reckless impulses. For example, driving a motorcycle a little too fast at night on a city street.

“Michael was the jewel of our family,” his mother told me. “But it wasn’t the military part of his life that made him so. It was his heart. He was a mediator. A peacemaker. He was our heart and soul. Sounds strange for a boy who was in the Marines, doesn’t it?”

She said that Michael joined the service out of high school because he was looking for a challenge. During a tour in Afghanistan he pestered his mother to send candy and over-the-counter medicines for impoverished civilians.

“Iraq was different,” she said. “We found out just recently that he had to put one of his best friends in a body bag. He didn’t talk to us about that.”

Michael returned from his final combat tour in May. From the beginning, his family noticed changes.

“He would have to compose himself to stop from reacting angrily when people thanked him for his service,” his mother said. “He was burdened by the death that he saw, I guess. He felt guilty for surviving. He couldn’t appreciate the good things happening to him. It was as if he felt that he didn’t deserve them.”

Michael went to the VA. His large Italian family wrapped him in a blanket of support.

“But that’s not always enough,” Silvana said. “Michael’s father made a good point. He said that in the Marines you’re trained to be tough and independent and not to ask for help. That helps you survive in a war. But back home, that can kill you.”

Michael was enrolled in community college, with thoughts of becoming an emergency medical technician. He had a girlfriend. He volunteered at an animal shelter. He was a gardener. His future was filled with bright possibilities; his past with dark memories.

“I think that every returning soldier or Marine should be forced to go to therapy,” Silvana said. “As it is, they have to ask, and I know that Michael felt like he didn’t want to take up space when someone else might need it more. I believe that a lot of these kids think that way and it keeps them from getting help.”

The former Marine was on his way home from his grandmother’s house when he lost control of his motorcycle, struck a curb and crashed. An accident like that could happen to anyone. His family knows this. They also know that the location of the tragedy, though reported accurately in the newspaper, can be misleading.

Michael Murray was on American soil when he died, but he had not left Iraq.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Scottsdale Marine Unable to Find Peace After War

Governor Palin Would Support War Against Russia Over Georgia

September 12, 2008 – Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, emerging from media silence for her first serious interview as the GOP vice presidential pick, said Thursday that the United States might have to go to war if Russia were to invade Georgia again.

And on the seventh anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, she appeared entirely unfamiliar with the Bush Doctrine, the central foreign policy tenet of the current administration, which asserts the right to wage preventive strikes in the aftermath of such terrorist attacks.

Palin made her statements during an interview with ABC “World News” anchor Charles Gibson in which she was pressed on her foreign policy credentials and knowledge. Additional Gibson interviews with Palin will be broadcast today on ABC.

Palin said she favors admitting Georgia and Ukraine to NATO. Asked if the United States would have to go to war if Russia again invaded Georgia when it was a NATO member, Palin said, “Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you’re going to be expected to be called upon and help.

“And we’ve got to keep an eye on Russia. For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable,” she told Gibson. Russia invaded Georgia after the ex-Soviet republic invaded the separatist region of South Ossetia.

Palin said she had insights into U.S. relations with Russia because “they’re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska … from an island in Alaska.”

During the interview in Fairbanks, Alaska, Palin acknowledged that she had never met a leader of a foreign country and that she had visited only Canada and Mexico before a trip to Kuwait and Germany to visit U.S. troops last year.

“But, Charlie, again, we’ve got to remember what the desire is in this nation at this time. It is for no more politics as usual, and somebody’s big fat resume that shows decades and decades in that Washington establishment, where, yes, they’ve had opportunities to meet heads of state.”
‘Ready’ to serve

But she insisted she was ready to be Sen. John McCain’s vice president – and, if necessary, president of the United States.

“I answered (McCain) ‘yes’ because I have the confidence in that readiness and knowing that you can’t blink, you have to be wired in a way of being so committed to the mission, the mission that we’re on, reform of this country and victory in the war, you can’t blink,” she said.

Throughout the interview, Palin appeared prepared, though she stuck to carefully constructed talking points. In one segment, asked to explain what the country should do if Israel struck Iranian nuclear facilities, she repeated three times that the United States cannot “second-guess” what Israel must do to defend itself.

But she seemed off-balance when asked about the Bush Doctrine – which includes preventive war, spreading democracy to eliminate terrorism and brandishing power to force other countries into line.

Asked if she agreed with the Bush Doctrine, she asked, “In what respect, Charlie?”

Said Gibson: “What do you interpret it to be?”

Palin: “His worldview.”

Gibson: “No, the Bush Doctrine, enunciated September 2002, before the Iraq war.”

Palin answered that she believed the president “has attempted … to rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists who are hell-bent on destroying our nation.”

After Gibson informed her of the doctrine’s definition of “anticipatory self-defense” against any country that might attack the United States, she replied: “If there is legitimate and enough intelligence that tells us that a strike is imminent against American people, we have every right to defend our country. In fact, the president has the obligation, the duty to defend.”

Asked if that meant a right to go to conduct cross-border attacks from Afghanistan without the approval of the Pakistani government, Palin said, “We have got to have all options out here on the table.”

Palin – who has spoken in her church about U.S. troops being “on a task that is from God,” was asked if she believed the United States is fighting a “holy war.”
Quoting Abe Lincoln

She deflected the question and said she was merely quoting Abraham Lincoln, adding, “I would never presume to know God’s will.”

On other issues, Palin appeared to do a sharp turn on the issue of man-made global warming in a part of her interview broadcast on “Nightline.”

In an August interview with the conservative Web site Newsmax.com, Palin said, “I’m not one, though, who would attribute (global warming) to being man-made.”

But asked Thursday whether she believed man had a role in it, Palin said:

“I believe that man’s activities certainly can be contributing to the issue of global warming, climate change. … Regardless of the reason for climate change, whether it’s entirely, wholly caused by man’s activities or is part of the cyclical nature of our planet – the warming and the cooling trends – regardless of that, John McCain and I agree that we gotta do something about it, and we have to make sure that we’re doing all we can to cut down on pollution.”

The interview will be broadcast in three parts over the next two days. ABC’s “World News,” “Good Morning, America,” “Nightline” and “20/20” will all feature the interview.

The broadcasts will include biographical footage of Palin and coverage of her 19-year-old son, Track, who is scheduled to be deployed to Iraq this week.

Prior to Thursday, the GOP governor was virtually inaccessible to reporters on critical issues like national security, terrorism and the economy.

In the week since she accepted the nomination at the Republican National Convention, Palin has stuck mostly to the script reprising her widely praised speech – and has not taken media questions when appearing at the side of her running mate.

The protective cocoon surrounding her has provided a sharp contrast to GOP presidential candidate McCain, who has had a generally warm relationship with media at his events, where he has welcomed their questions.

The McCain team has created a “truth squad” to protect her from charges in the media. And it has surrounded her with seasoned Bush operatives and media handlers to prepare her for Gibson and the coming debate with Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Joe Biden.

— To read excerpts of the interview, go to links.sfgate.com/ZEUT.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Governor Palin Would Support War Against Russia Over Georgia

On Morning of 9/11 Attacks, Senator McCain Immediately Began Making the Case for Iraq War

September 11, 2008 – On the morning of the 9/11, just moments after the World Trade Center collapsed from the terrorist strikes, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) went on television and immediately began focusing the nation’s attention on Iraq. In an interview with CBS’ Dan Rather on 9/11, McCain said:

    To be honest with you, Dan, I never thought that an operation of this sophistication and size would take place. I just never did. But I don’t think there’s any doubt that there are countries – Iraq, Iran, Libya, North Korea and others – who we know engage in proliferation of – of capabilities and, from time to time, involve themselves in state-sponsored terrorism. But never did we imagine on a scale such as this.

The next day, on 9/12, McCain reiterated the point in an interview with Chris Matthews. “It isn’t just Afghanistan,” he said, “we’re talking about Syria, Iraq, Iran, perhaps North Korea, Libya and others.”

Just a few weeks later – on Oct. 9, 2001 – McCain narrowed his focus, arguing that Iraq was “obviously” next:

    PAULA ZAHN: And as you know, Senator, the U.S. and Great Britain notified the U.N. Security Council yesterday that they reserve the right to strike against other countries in this campaign. What countries are we looking at?

    MCCAIN: Well, I think very obviously Iraq is the first country, but there are others – Syria, Iran, the Sudan, who have continued to harbor terrorist organizations and actually assist them.

On Oct. 18, 2001, McCain told David Letterman, “the second phase is Iraq” while linking Iraq to the anthrax attacks.

In Jan. 2002, McCain visited a crowd of soldiers aboard the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt and yelled: “Next up, Baghdad!”

The New York Times’ David Kirkpatrick recently noted that McCain “began making his case for invading Iraq to the public more than six months before the White House began to do the same.” The Times reported:

    While pushing to take on Saddam Hussein, Mr. McCain also made arguments and statements that he may no longer wish to recall. He lauded the war planners he would later criticize, including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney. (Mr. McCain even volunteered that he would have given the same job to Mr. Cheney.) He urged support for the later-discredited Iraqi exile Ahmad Chalabi’s opposition group, the Iraqi National Congress, and echoed some of its suspect accusations in the national media. And he advanced misleading assertions not only about Mr. Hussein’s supposed weapons programs but also about his possible ties to international terrorists, Al Qaeda and the Sept. 11 attacks.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on On Morning of 9/11 Attacks, Senator McCain Immediately Began Making the Case for Iraq War

Editorial Column: Suicide Attempts for Vets Jump 500{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} in Five Years, and Government Ignores It

September 11, 2008 – This year, in recognition of National Suicide Prevention Week (Sept. 7-13), the Army chose the theme “Shoulder-to-Shoulder: No Soldier Stands Alone,” “to emphasize the strength of the Army Family when it works together to tackle tough problems.”

It has not been a good week for the Army Family in spite of the special attention.

On Sept. 8, an altercation between a 22-year-old Fort Hood soldier and his commanding officer, a 24-year-old lieutenant, ended when the soldier first shot and killed his officer and then turned his gun on himself. Both were assigned to the 1st Cavalry Division, which had returned from a 15-month tour in Iraq in December. The division is currently in training to redeploy back to Iraq this winter for another 12 months — which in all probability will turn out to be the as good an explanation as any for the tragedy.

Then on Sept. 9, a VA report acknowledged that suicide rates for young male Iraq- and Afghanistan-era veterans hit a record high in 2006, the last year for which official records are available. Last week, the Portland Tribune reported that in 2005, the last year for which complete Oregon data has been compiled, 19 Oregon soldiers died in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan. That same year, 153 Oregon veterans of all ages, serving in various wars, committed suicide.

After five years of war in Iraq, Marine suicides doubled between 2006 and 2007, and Army suicides are at the highest level since records were first kept in 1980. Reported suicide attempts jumped 500 percent between 2002 and 2007.

The Defense Department says the numbers may be partly attributable to better compliance with reporting requirements.

Every year since 2004, when the Army sent its first Mental Health Advisory Team to Iraq to study the distressing rash of soldier suicides, and insisted in its final report that “relationship problems” were the root cause, I have tried to find sympathy for Col. Elspeth Ritchie, the Army psychiatrist who always seems to get stuck with the impossible task of announcing that the Army is sticking with that absurdity. For the first time this year, Ritchie has been allowed to add the screamingly obvious qualifier: “Lengthy and multiple combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan cause relationship problems, a leading factor in suicides.” Albeit indirectly, the role of war in suicides has officially been acknowledged.

Last May, House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Bob Filner, D-Calif., provided the following reaction to VA Secretary James B. Peake’s announcement that he was prepared to take on the issue of military suicides:

    … Secretary of Veterans Affairs Dr. Peake announced the creation of two panels with a handful of members appointed to recommend improvements to the Department concerning suicide prevention, suicide research and suicide education.

    The VA can set up five commissions — yet the real problem goes unresolved. We all know that convening meetings to study an issue in order to formulate a report to offer recommendations IS NOT ACTION. I strongly encourage the VA to proactively reach out to all our returning veterans now. Veterans cannot wait — and should not have to wait — for a blue ribbon panel to come out yet again with another report.

    We KNOW what needs to be done. Each and every service member, Reservist and Guardsman must be given a thorough and mandatory medical evaluation by competent medical personnel when they separate from military service for PTSD and TBI. The VA Secretary was asked to do this weeks ago.

    The time for panels has passed. I expect immediate action to address the immediate needs of our veterans.

Yesterday, in a prepared statement (which avoided the risk of being laughed at by any reporters who might have been paying attention), Peake announced his blue ribbon panel’s recommendations.

The VA will:

    * Design a study that identifies suicide risks among veterans … within 30 days.
    * Improve VA’s screening for suicide veterans with depression or post-traumatic stress disorder … with pilot test … beginning Oct. 1, 2008.

    * Ensure that evidence-based research is used to determine the appropriateness of medications for depression, PTSD and suicidal behavior.

So, the VA will continue to study and prepare and try to weed out the other-than-evidence-based research it has been relying on, while sanctimoniously asking us to keep believing that “every human life is precious, none more than the men and women who serve this nation in the military.”

Precious to whom?

When Veterans for Common Sense (unsuccessfully) sued the VA for delays in benefits, lost records, long waits for doctors’ appointments, insufficient oversight, and veterans turned away from hospitals in spite of suicidal thoughts, one of the most revealing moments was the testimony of Associate Deputy Under Secretary for Field Operations Michael Walcoff. Confronted with the shameful backlog of veterans’ claims for health benefits, Walcoff admitted that the VA improved the appearance of timeliness by counting every suicide as a resolved claim. This lowers the official average processing time.

It’s also a precious lot of money saved.

Posted in VA Claims Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Editorial Column: Suicide Attempts for Vets Jump 500{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} in Five Years, and Government Ignores It