Editorial Column: The Cynicism Express

September 2, 2008, St. Paul, MN – Has anyone noticed that Sarah Palin’s central claim to political fame is a fraud? She represents herself as a fiscal conservative who abhors pork-barrel projects and said no thanks to the “Bridge to Nowhere” — a $398 million span that would have linked Ketchikan, Alaska, to its airport across the Tongass Narrows. But as mayor of Wasilla (pop. 9,780), she hired a Washington lobbyist to bring home the bacon. And as a candidate for governor just two years ago, she supported both the Ketchikan bridge and the congressional earmark that would have paid most of its cost.

I know, we’re not supposed to pay attention to such inconvenient details. We’re supposed to be dazzled by how unaffected she is, how plain-spoken, how “genuine.”

Indeed, if you don’t get hung up on her actual record, Palin simply is who she is. It’s not her fault that she’s a former Miss Wasilla with a campy “Northern Exposure” vibe, doctrinaire social-conservative views and no discernible qualifications for being vice president. It’s undeniable that people in Alaska apparently like her well enough, though they seem to have been even more shocked than the rest of us when she was named to the Republican ticket. In any event, she’s not the one who created this farcical situation.

We learned last week that John McCain is not who he is — not, at least, who he claims to be. The steady, straight-talking, country-first statesman his campaign has been selling is a fictional character. The real McCain is either alarmingly cynical or dangerously reckless.

You will recall that McCain gave the same prime criterion for choosing a running mate that every presidential candidate gives: someone who is ready to step in as president if, heaven forbid, the need arises. Barack Obama echoed those words before picking Joe Biden, who is about as prepared as a vice presidential candidate could ever be.

You will also recall that McCain and his supporters have been lecturing us about the grave and urgent dangers our country faces — Islamic fundamentalism, the resurgence of Russia and other geopolitical threats. In a menacing world, McCain says, he will keep America safe.

So, at 72 and with a history of cancer, how could McCain choose a vice presidential nominee who has, let’s face it, zero experience in foreign affairs? Being the nominal commander in chief of the Alaska National Guard doesn’t count, unless you think Vladimir Putin is about to order an invasion across the Bering Strait.

At a time when the nation also confronts enormous challenges at home, Palin has, um, slightly more than zero experience in domestic affairs. The reason most people move to Alaska is that it’s different from the rest of the country. Salmon fishing and snowmobile racing are not front-page news in Ohio, Pennsylvania or Florida.

McCain’s political calculation in choosing Palin is obvious. Social conservatives, who had been unexcited by his candidacy, are ecstatic that he has picked a running mate who staunchly opposes abortion, favors the teaching of “intelligent design” in the public schools and generally embraces the agenda of the religious right.

I have my doubts about the other objective of McCain’s gambit: to win the votes of blue-collar women who supported Hillary Clinton. For one thing, these voters disagree sharply with Palin on most of the issues. For another, initial indications are that many women were insulted at the notion that they would automatically swoon over any candidate who happened to have two “X” chromosomes. Republicans tend to have a comically simplistic view of how “identity politics” works. They should recall how African Americans reacted when Clarence Thomas was named to the Supreme Court.

Whatever the political impact, so much for the John McCain we thought we knew. In choosing Palin, he cynically did the kind of thing that his party is always accusing Democrats of doing: He selected a running mate based on her potential ability to appeal to targeted segments of the electorate rather than for her honestly assessed ability to lead the nation should the occasion arise.

The other thing we learned about McCain is that he is willing to take an enormous gamble based on limited information. He only met Palin once before summoning her for a final interview. He realized he needed to shake up the presidential race, and that’s what he did. But we are reminded, if we did not realize it before, that the three things not to expect from a McCain presidency are caution, prudence and a willingness to always put the nation’s interests above his own.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Editorial Column: The Cynicism Express

Feds Pursue Local Nurse’s Whistleblower Complaint Against Prescott VA

August 30, 2008 – The United States Office of Special Councel has decided to pursue a federal whistleblower complaint filed in May against Prescott’s Northern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System, said James Mitchell, chief of staff and director of communications for the OSC.

Registered nurse Jerri Bedell said she was fired from the Prescott VA’s Community Living Center two days after writing a lengthy letter to a supervisor outlining her concerns about abuse and neglect of veteran patients.

Bedell – who has a master’s degree in nursing with additional certification in geriatric care and more than 20 years experience nursing and teaching – worked at the center for three years.

Mitchell said the OSC assigned an investigator in its San Francisco office to the case on Aug. 25. The OSC investigates cases only that it believes it has adequate evidence of proving, Mitchell explained.

“It’s possible our investigator would go to Prescott in the course of the inquiry,” Mitchell added.

He said the investigation – which is concerned only with whether Bedell was fired in retaliation for complaining about abuse and neglect of veterans at the Prescott VA – could take months to complete, depending on the total case load of the individual investigator and the complexity of the allegations.

Meanwhile, Mitchell said, a second case involving disclosures of neglect and abuse that Bedell made in her whistleblower retaliation case is still developing.

“It may be referred to the Secretary of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs for investigation,” Mitchell said.

“Our first task is to see if we can make a substantial likelihood finding, which means we believe there is a better than even chance that the whistleblower’s disclosures are true,” Mitchell explained.

Because of the information contained in Bedell’s retaliation complaint, the OSC asked her to file a “disclosure” complaint in early June.

Prescott VA’s director, Susan Angell, has declined to speak directly to The Daily Courier. But when a staff member to Sen. John McCain asked Angell about some of Bedell’s charges, Angell – in a letter that The Daily Courier obtained – said that the Prescott VA fully investigated Bedell’s allegations.

“Most of the allegations were unsubstantiated,” Angell wrote. “Several allegations were found to be essentially a difference of opinion … Other allegations were found to be substantiated in part and corrective action was taken.”

Bedell denies that her complaints were fully investigated.

The Daily Courier has been looking into Bedell’s charges of abuse and neglect at the Prescott VA since June, after learning of Bedell’s firing.

During the past three months, The Daily Courier has spoken with four nurses with knowledge of the center’s caregiving practices.

The Daily Courier also spoke to more than two dozen patients, family members and other Prescott VA staff.

In addition, The Daily Courier has examined nearly 100 pages of documents, letters and e-mails, including Bedell’s federal whistleblower prohibited personnel practice complaint as well as the federal whistleblower “disclosure” document that federal officials asked Bedell to file.

Nurses, veteran patients and relatives of veteran patients at the Prescott VA say some of the nursing staff there – mainly at the center – abuse, neglect and overmedicate patients – actions the nurses say have sometimes lead to injury and in some cases may even have hastened death.

Prescott VA officials say the employees making the complaints are “disgruntled” and that family members are misinterpreting what they see.

The officials say every patient at the Prescott VA gets the same high-quality care and they flatly deny any abuse or retaliation is taking place.

VA CONFIRMS SOME PATIENT CARE PROBLEMS

However, during a recent interview with The Daily Courier, the same officials – Associate Director for Patient Care Services Marianne Locke and the center’s medical director, Dr. Jyoti Walavalkar, with Prescott VA spokesman Frank Cimorelli present – confirmed at least some of the accusations.

For example, Bedell in her whistleblower complaint says that a nursing staff member shoved a wheelchair-bound patient’s injured foot into a wall so hard that doctors had to reset the pins in the patient’s foot.

The term “nursing staff” at the Prescott VA refers to registered nurses, licensed practical nurses and certified nursing assistants.

Two other employees that The Daily Courier interviewed backed up Bedell’s charge.

Locke confirmed that the incident took place but said the employee responsible for the incident no longer works there. When told that nurses say the man is still there, Locke said she would find out the man’s status and get back to The Daily Courier. But VA officials later declined to comment further about that specific incident.

Officials did say that the Prescott VA takes situations like these “very seriously” and reviews them to assess and fix any personnel and training issues involving patient safety.

Bedell and the other nurses also said three veterans were overmedicated so badly for constipation that they were found laying in liquid pools of their own excrement from their armpits to their knees. Their explosive diarrhea continued until the medicine wore off.

Locke and Walavalker also confirmed that these incidents took place. They said a pharmacist and several nurses were retrained as a result. They also said that nurses should use their own judgment in determining how much medication to give.

The nurses who spoke with The Daily Courier also said some nursing staff members refuse to help patients.

“We’ve had issues with (some of the nursing staff) and we’ve addressed that appropriately,” Locke said.

NURSES SAY NEGLECT CONTINUES

But the nurses The Daily Courier has spoken with say problems with patient care continue. They said a few of the nursing staff deliberately treat patients badly while low staffing levels and poor communication among staff members lead to the kind of benign neglect from other staff members that endangers patients.

Examples of their concerns over the past few years – which are also alleged in Bedell’s whistleblower complaints – include:

• Patients left sitting in urine and feces for so long that they are found with their private areas sore and reddened or with crusted urine in their pelvic area.

• Nursing staff who sometimes handle patients roughly and openly mock them.

• Nursing staff who falsify medication and treatment records to show that treatments have been applied to patients or medicine given to them when it hasn’t been. This includes charting – verifying that a staff member has completed a patient care task – as long as two days ahead of time.

A Sept. 5, 2007, memo from supervisor Karen Martin to Bedell, which is included in Bedell’s whistleblower complaint, asked Bedell to document her witnessing of “staff pre-pouring meds and doing other work-arounds.”

“We want this documented so that we may start corrective measures,” Martin wrote.

• Patients found with pills scattered in their bed sheets or left laying on their nightstands.

• Missing medications.

• Staff overmedicating patients, sometimes without their knowledge, for the convenience of the staff – a practice known in the medical community as “chemical restraint.” In one case such overmedication resulted in a patient’s inability to eat or drink because of excessive sedation, Bedell said.

• Too frequent use of foley catheters in patients who don’t need or want them, leading to bloody, overflowing catheters that cause infection, pain and needless use of patient restraints. A foley catheter is a thin tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine.

• A nurse who accidentally left a cap on a foley catheter when she inserted it so no urine drained for several hours until the next shift discovered the problem.

• Two nurses who accidentally gave forced air instead of oxygen to a patient who had just returned from surgery.

• A patient who slept on a blanket because his sheets were dirty from not being changed.

• Nursing staff who put patients to bed after dinner without taking their clothes off, who hang up on patients when they put their call lights on and who take excessive time to answer call lights because they are chatting or surfing the Internet.

• A nurse who initially ignored a patient with a painful herpes chest wound saying, “What does it matter. He’s dying anyway.”

• An Aug. 19, 2007, memo – which also is part of Bedell’s whistleblower complaint – to housekeeping supervisor Steven Peterson, complaining about filthy rooms: “I just can’t tell you how disgusting some of the patients’ rooms are when I come in to work … especially the floors, sinks, bathrooms, toilets. We find things under the beds that have been there for days. Some of the sinks and mirrors look (like) they haven’t been washed in days. The floors are sticky around the patients’ beds. Bedside tables are never cleaned except by nursing staff.”

Peterson replied in a memo to Bedell the next day that “this will be checked into immediately.”

VA officials, in responding to questions about patient care at the center, declined to answer specific questions about employees or patients.

However, Cimorelli explained that when anyone reports an incident, the Prescott VA investigates it thoroughly.

He also said the center’s nursing staff “maintains appropriate standards of care.”

Locke also said the Prescott VA is not abusing or neglecting patients.

“These things are not happening here,” Locke said. “We have people who would like to see us in a bad light.”

Cimorelli said that when “adverse” events do happen at the center, staff reviews them carefully so they can learn from them.

He also said all medication errors, including medications not being given to patients, are “tracked and trended” and spot observations of staff passing medications also are conducted.

“Identified concerns are addressed immediately,” Cimorelli said, and staff always looks for opportunities for improvement. He said the Prescott VA’s medication error rate for the second quarter of fiscal year 2008 was “very low.”

DIFFERING VIEWS ON TERMINATION

Bedell’s termination notice, signed by Angell and obtained by The Daily Courier, said Bedell was fired “because on several occasions you have removed foley catheters from patients without orders to do so.”

However, Locke – an RN herself – and Dr. Walavalker emphatically stated in a July 3 interview with The Daily Courier that a nurse should immediately remove a bloody, overflowing catheter from a patient and does not need “orders” to do so.

“We have told the nurses to use their judgment,” Walavalker said.

One of the two patients that Bedell removed bloody catheters from wrote a letter to Bedell thanking her for her actions, which the patient says were done at his insistence. The patient’s letter is part of Bedell’s whistleblower complaint.

But Locke said, “That situation was investigated and found not to be as the nurse described it.” Locke declined to elaborate.

Bedell said she carefully monitored both patients after removing their catheters.

She says the last time she removed a catheter was on Jan. 28 and the issue never came up again until she was fired in April – two days after writing a lengthy email to Locke alleging patient mistreatment and that staff often falsifies records.

Prescott VA officials deny that they retaliate against anyone.

One VA employee, who asked that her name not be used, said Angell recently held a staff meeting during which she told employees that if they didn’t like the conditions at the Prescott VA, they should leave.

Cimorelli said Angell often meets with groups of employees.

“One of the areas she discusses is the privilege of serving veterans,” Cimorelli wrote in an email. “This privilege requires a high degree of commitment and compassion by employees. If this level of expectation is not comfortable for an employee, she asks them to think about making choices that fit their own individual needs.”

STAFFING SHORTAGE

Many of the center’s problems stem from an overworked and exhausted staff pushed to the limit by too many patients with increasingly serious health issues, the nurses told The Daily Courier.

They say morale at the center has plummeted, turnover has risen, and a tense climate of fear has taken hold.

Locke agrees that the center is struggling with a serious nursing staff shortage. An internal VA management memo that The Daily Courier obtained called the shortage a “crisis.”

Locke said that between the center and the acute care facility, which is in a different building, 10 nursing staff positions are unfilled.

She says they are working to fill the shortage by hiring temporary nurses and by asking staff to work overtime as well as by not operating at full capacity. The center has a total of 85 beds, Locke said, but fills only 60 to 65 beds.

Locke said the center typically has one nurse – either a registered nurse or a licensed practical nurse – and one to two certified nursing assistants on each of five wings. But, Locke said, sometimes supervisors have to send even those nurses and CNAs elsewhere to help out.

A memo, entitled “Staffing Issues and Patient Safety” that Locke sent to staff this past spring said officials had decided to divert admissions to the center as much as possible and to share staffing between units.

“But this is not reliable, as all units are experiencing staffing issues…,” Locke wrote.

NOT OUR FIRST RODEO

Cimorelli, the Prescott VA’s spokesman, said the Prescott VA would weather any investigation that any reports of abuse may prompt.

“This isn’t our first rodeo,” Cimorelli said. “We know what it is to deal with Congressionals,” he continued, referring to members of Congress.

Prescott VA director Angell does, too.

She was the associate director at Bay Pines VA Medical Center in Florida in 2004 when several Congressional committees and the VA Inspector General’s office conducted investigations there.

That round of investigations turned up mismanagement by senior staff at Bay Pines and lead to an upper management shake-up there.

Before the VA Inspector General’s investigation of Bay Pines concluded, Angell volunteered for a temporary assignment in Afghanistan.

According to the Aug. 11, 2004, final report on Bay Pines by the Office of Inspector General, “In many areas of (the facility), a culture of safety and accountability was not evident. Communication that was important for patient safety was not discussed out of fear of adverse consequences.”

The report also said that, “Senior leadership needed to better manage and administer facility operations … Factors such as … employee mistrust in leadership’s ability to manage and treat them fairly, morale challenges, and a growing workload demand generated by a rapidly expanding veteran community contributed to lapses in providing timely care and ensuring administrative accountability.”

The report about Bay Pines, where Angell was second in command, stressed that, “One important tenet of a culture of safety is the ability for an employee at any level to feel empowered to express a view against the authority gradient without fear of adverse consequences.” The Bay Pines report did not specifically name Angell although it did refer to an interview officials had with the associate director.

The Prescott VA employees who The Daily Courier spoke with say the same mismanagement that investigators found at Bay Pines is happening in Prescott.

Mary Garrison, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 2401 at the Prescott VA, says management there wouldn’t have so many problems if it would accept responsibility for its poor supervisors.

“They don’t even want (people to file) reports,” Garrison said. “And they badger the employees that (do) file the complaints.”

She says most employees with complaints simply give up after awhile.

Many of the people The Daily Courier spoke with for this article said the Prescott VA has plenty of good employees. But there are problems, they say, and the VA needs to fix them.

“There are good staff there and basically the care is good,” Bedell told The Daily Courier. “The staff that are bad are few in number; the staff that are overworked and stressed are many and (they are) making mistakes.”

VA spokesman Cimorelli said the Prescott VA would deal with any problems it has.

“If there’s problems here, then we are going to address it,” Cimorelli said. “If there’s sensitivity issues, then we’re going to address that, too.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Feds Pursue Local Nurse’s Whistleblower Complaint Against Prescott VA

President Bush Extols Senator McCain to Republican Delegates in St. Paul

September 2, 2008 – President Bush promised Tuesday that the nation would be safer with John McCain as president, saying his impressive life story and sound judgment make the Arizona senator the man Americans need to follow him in the White House.

“I’ve sat at the Resolute desk and received the daily intelligence briefings, the threat assessments and the reports from our commanders on the front lines,” Bush told delegates to the Republican National Convention in Minnesota via video hookup from the White House. “I know the hard choices that fall solely to a president. John McCain’s life has prepared him to make those choices.”

Bush added: “He is ready to lead this nation.”

Inside the hall, the Bush family legacy was on display. Bush’s father, former President George H.W. Bush, drew a standing ovation when he entered the arena with his wife, Barbara, and other relatives.

And first lady Laura Bush took the podium to introduce the president’s address.

She was the voice of defense on her husband’s eight-year record in the Oval Office, tossing out statistics on everything from education gains to fighting AIDS across the globe. She said that when Bush became president, fewer than 50,000 Africans suffering from AIDS were getting the medicine they needed to survive, and that the number now is nearly 2 million.

“You might call that change you can really believe in,” the first lady said, a clear poke at the slogan of McCain’s opponent, Sen. Barack Obama.

She also praised McCain’s choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin for his running mate, saying: “I’m proud that America’s first female vice president will be a Republican woman.”

The image of Bush standing alone before a television camera in the White House’s majestic Cross Hall was beamed onto giant video screens 1,100 miles away in the Xcel Energy Center.

His eight-minute address was a far cry from earlier plans, sidelined by Hurricane Gustav’s landfall, for the president to make a dramatic, celebratory appearance Monday in person as the final speaker on the convention’s opening night.

Execution of the alternate plan was a bit awkward.

The crowd rose to its feet to applaud Laura Bush’s introductory remarks just as the president – apparently unaware of the clamor in the hall – had started speaking. As a result, his opening words were drowned out. On several other occasions, his words were lost when he continued talking over cheers in the hall.

Bush didn’t mention his own record. Nor did he explicitly speak of Obama.

But his message was clear: From someone who knows what he’s talking about, McCain is the one with the goods to be president.

The president put McCain’s full-throated support of the Iraq war front and center in his pitch for the GOP senator to succeed him. Though that is a message well-received by partisan delegates, it only served to remind a more skeptical broader public TV audience about the war, and of McCain’s link to it.

The president referred to McCain as the “one senator above all” who backed the U.S. campaign in Iraq – and Bush’s decision to send more U.S. troops into the fight – even as violence spiraled out of control.

Bush offered McCain’s consistency in the face of doubts and criticism as a reason to support him.

“That is the kind of courage and vision we need in our next commander in chief,” he said.

The president said that only McCain understands the lessons of the Sept. 11 attacks in a way that makes him qualified to be commander in chief.

“We live in a dangerous world,” Bush said. “The man we need is John McCain.”

The president also emphasized McCain’s life story – as a former Vietnam prisoner of war and a politician with a maverick streak – as preparing him well. Recounting McCain’s tortuous time as a prisoner of war, Bush said the war hero’s arms were broken during the torture he suffered, but not his honor.

This led to the most partisan barb of the president’s short speech.

“Fellow citizens,” Bush said, “if the Hanoi Hilton could not break John McCain’s resolve to do what is best for our country, you can be sure the angry left never will.”

Said Colorado delegate Alan Duff: “He knows what it takes to be president and he told us why John McCain’s up to the job. You can’t get a better recommendation than that.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , | Comments Off on President Bush Extols Senator McCain to Republican Delegates in St. Paul

‘Broken’ is First Novel to Address the Epidemic of Returning Iraq and Afghanistan War Veterans with PTSD

September 3, 2008 – Broken: One Soldier’s Unexpected Journey Home is an intimate portrayal of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder from Author and PTSD survivor W.C. Turck. The book describes the physical and psychological trauma faced by returning Iraq and Afghan War Veterans, and its brutal effects on families and relationships. These are the silent casualties of war, suffered by perhaps as high as 70{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} of returning vets. They are scars not easily seen, but as real and debilitating as any physical wound. The book is currently available at barnesandnoble.com, and at Amazon.com.

The USA TODAY reported in August that the Army treated 75,000 veterans for PTSD with another 35,000 on permanent disability. The Army’s own figures show 121 service-related suicides, and 2100 attempts in 2007, a 20{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} rise over 2006. Inspired by a true story, Broken: One Soldier’s Unexpected Journey Home is the first novel about the psychological scars of war faced by returning Iraq War veterans. Set in a small Midwestern town, Broken bares the complex nature of PTSD, and how it weaves itself like a cancer in the lives victims as well as families and friends. PTSD causes physical changes to victim’s brains. Dr. J. Douglas Bremner, psychiatrist for Veteran’s Affairs in Atlanta found the Hippocampus, the region of the brain responsible for processing memory, was damaged in all of the Vietnam-era veterans studied. Traumatic events, such as war, quite literally rewire the brain.

Walter Reed Hospital reported that one in eight returning Iraq and Afghan War veterans reported PTSD symptoms. Some experts believe that number is far higher. Since many veterans may be reluctant to report symptoms the effects may not become apparent for years. Broken: One Soldier’s Unexpected Journey Home, by W.C. Turck, 193 pages published by iUniverse, intimately portrays the complex nature of PTSD like no other novel before.

PTSD Survivor, author William Turck witnessed the genocide in Bosnia and the siege of Sarajevo. He organized relief into Rwanda during the 1994 genocide. His wife, Ana, survived the Bosnian War. FOX NEWS, ABC and CBS News, the Chicago Tribune and The Joliet Herald covered their reunion after the war. Turck has been a guest on WLS-AM radio in Chicago, National Public Radio and has spoken frequently on Human Rights, Genocide and Nationalism.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , | Comments Off on ‘Broken’ is First Novel to Address the Epidemic of Returning Iraq and Afghanistan War Veterans with PTSD

Lexington Resident, in Navy, Dies in War Zone

September 2, 2008 – A Navy SEAL from Lexington was killed in Afghanistan on Saturday, the Navy said yesterday.

Petty Officer Josh Harris, 36, drowned after he was swept away during a nighttime river-crossing, according to a Navy news release and Harris’ brother.

“My brother was defending our country the best way he knew how,” the brother, Ranchor Harris III, said in an interview.

Harris said that his brother loved being a SEAL and accepted the risk involved.

“When you fight for freedom, that’s the end of the deal,” he said. “Every day there’s a person like my brother out there who’s keeping this country safe.”

The Navy did not provide further details about the incident.

Family members told WGHP/FOX8 that Harris’ safety harness came undone. His body was later found downstream.

SEALs take their name from being trained for missions involving sea, air and land.

Harris had worked his way through various SEAL assignments to the Naval Special Warfare Tactical Development and Evaluation Squadron Two, an elite team within the SEALs based near Virginia Beach, Va.

Harris graduated in 1990 from Lexington Senior High School, where he was a standout football player. His family said he went to Davidson College, graduating in 1994 with a degree in studio art. He then went to UNC Charlotte to study for a master’s in architecture.

Ranchor Harris said that his brother decided to try to serve as a SEAL in 2000, a few months before he turned 29, which is the Navy’s cutoff for acceptance into the SEALs.

Harris had been deployed to Iraq several times and earned several awards, including the Bronze Star medal.

He never talked about any of his awards, Harris said.

“He was an understated, reserved and very humble individual,” Harris said. “He would say, ‘It was the team.'”

Harris is survived by his parents, Sam and Evelyn Harris, twin sister, Kiki Harris, his brother, and aunts and uncles.

Funeral arrangements were incomplete.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Lexington Resident, in Navy, Dies in War Zone

The Shameful Neglect of Mentally-Wounded Veterans

August 29, 2008 – Sgt. Daniel Fanning, an Iraq war veteran, spoke passionately at the Minnesota Capitol recently, about the medical care veterans receive. Fanning served in the 1158th Transportation Company, driving trucks in Iraq. Because of the constant threat of IEDs, military transport jobs are highly stressful, and many people involved suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

The sergeant showed a picture of himself with three of his buddies in Iraq. Upon return home, each of them faced some mental or physical health problems. Although veterans don’t talk much about mental health issues, Fanning believes two of them were suffering from PTSD. Both of them sought care from the VA. Both were put on a waiting list.

Now, both are dead.

Neither of Daniel Fanning’s buddies are listed as suicide victims. Technically they are dead from an auto accident and a motorcycle accident, at least one was alcohol-related. But Sgt. Fanning believes that both were casualties of untreated PTSD and the resultant use of alcohol in an attempt to numb the pain.

Daniel Fanning’s friends risked their lives for our country. They came back with serious mental health wounds. They were denied the medical care that they needed. They died. That’s wrong.

The key to getting the federal government to support our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan might be political embarrassment. Daniel Fanning pointed out that the Iraq war had been going on for over a year before the administration took seriously the need for better armor for American troops. It wasn’t until after a National Guard soldier asked Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, while TV cameras were filming, why soldiers had to “dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal” to improve the armor on their vehicles, that the Pentagon responded. This story may be old news, but the impact of such neglect is deadly, and is still occurring.

If access to help from the VA has improved in any way for veterans who in are a mental health crisis, it is only because of a tragedy and the political embarrassment that it caused. In January 2007, when Jonathan Schulze, a Minnesota Marine back from Iraq committed suicide after being turned away from a Veterans Administration Medical Center despite his suicide threats, it made national news. The administration was forced to admit that veterans’ health care was tragically inadequate.

Not only are some veterans turned away when asking for help, but many of those suffering from debilitating combat stress, depression, nightmares, fear, or anger, don’t even ask for help. Military culture discourages soldiers from admitting mental wounds. Veterans need to be helped even if they are not yet able to ask for it.

At the VA, it is not just a failure to increase funding to the level needed; there have been actual budget cuts in some areas. Even though there are thousands of veterans returning with traumatic brain injuries, in 2006 Congress and the Bush administration cut VA brain injury research by half – to save money. They needed to get rid of “wasteful government spending.”

These are not minor issues. To put it into perspective, the American death toll from the Iraq war is now just over 4000 men and women. A VA mental health expert estimates that there are 75 times that number – at least 300,000 – Iraq veterans with PTSD or other mental health problems!

Sgt. Fanning’s buddies did not get the help they desperately needed. Even if the VA was accurate when it claims that there has never been a waiting list for veterans in a crisis, they clearly do not do the necessary outreach to all veterans to appropriately respond to those who need mental health care and chemical dependency treatment.

Fanning, who served in the National Guard, pointed out that in addition to these problems, members of the National Guard and Reserve have a five year limit on eligibility for beginning care at the VA. Even though they faced IEDs, even though they were engaged in combat, even though they risked death for our country, just like other soldiers, if their medical problems come to light after five years, we deny them any care.

Because the Bush Administration and the federal government are unwilling to properly meet the medical needs of Minnesota veterans, including members of the Guard and Reserve, shouldn’t the state ensure that they receive the medical care they need, even if it is costly?

Such a bold move might embarrass the administration in Washington enough to stop their shameful neglect of disabled veterans. More than any lofty political rhetoric, doing so would be truly supporting our troops.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Shameful Neglect of Mentally-Wounded Veterans

Evidence of Extremist Infiltration of Military Grows

August 27, 2008 – The racist skinhead logged on with exciting news: He’d just enlisted in the United States Army.

“Sieg Heil, I will do us proud,” he wrote. It was a June 3 post to AryanWear Forum 14, a neo-Nazi online forum to which “Sobibor’s SS,” who identified himself as a skinhead living in Plantersville, Ala., had belonged since early 2004. (Sobibor was a Nazi death camp in Poland during World War II).

About a month after he announced his enlistment, Sobibor’s SS bragged in another post to Forum 14 that he’d specifically requested and been assigned to MOS, or Military Occupational Specialty, 98D. MOS98D soldiers are in high demand right now. That’s because they’re specially trained in disarming Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) like the infamous roadside bombs that are killing and maiming so many U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Presumably, a part of learning how to disarm an IED is learning how to make one.

“I have my own reasons for wanting this training but in fear of the government tracing me and me loosing [sic] my clearance I can’t share them here,” Sobibor’s SS informed his fellow neo-Nazis.

One of his earlier posts indicated his reasons serve a darker purpose than defending America: “Once all the Jews are gone the world will start fixing itself.”

Sobibor’s SS included enough biographical details in his various posts to Forum 14 over the years, including that he’s a single father from the small town in southern Alabama, that a military investigator with access to enlistment records for recent months should have little trouble discerning whether the Army is actually teaching a skinhead with genocide on his mind how to be a tactical bomb maker.

But there’s little reason to expect that will happen.

Two years ago, the Intelligence Report revealed that alarming numbers of neo-Nazi skinheads and other white supremacist extremists were taking advantage of lowered armed services recruiting standards and lax enforcement of anti-extremist military regulations by infiltrating the U.S. armed forces in order to receive combat training and gain access to weapons and explosives.

Forty members of Congress urged then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to launch a full-scale investigation and implement a zero-tolerance policy toward white supremacists in the military. “Military extremists present an elevated threat to both their fellow service members and the public,” U.S. Senator Richard Shelby, an Alabama Republican, wrote in a separate open letter to Rumsfeld. “We witnessed with Timothy McVeigh that today’s racist extremist may become tomorrow’s domestic terrorist.”

But neither Rumsfeld nor his successor, Robert Gates, enacted any sort of systemic investigation or crackdown. Military and Defense Department officials seem to have made no sustained effort to prevent active white supremacists from joining the armed forces, or to weed out those already in uniform.

Furthermore, new evidence is emerging that not only supports the Intelligence Report’s findings, but also indicates the problem may have worsened since the summer of 2006, as enlistment rates continued to plummet, and the military accepted an ever-lower quality of soldier in a time of unpopular war.

First of all, a new FBI report (PDF) confirms that white supremacist leaders are making a concerted effort to recruit active-duty soldiers and recent combat veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. According to the unclassified FBI Intelligence Assessment, “White Supremacist Recruitment of Military Personnel Since 9/11,” which was released to law enforcement agencies nationwide: “Sensitive and reliable source reporting indicates supremacist leaders are encouraging followers who lack documented histories of neo-Nazi activity and overt racist insignia such as tattoos to infiltrate the military as ‘ghost skins,’ in order to recruit and receive training for the benefit of the extremist movement.”

The FBI report details more than a dozen investigative findings and criminal cases involving Iraq and Afghanistan veterans as well as active-duty personnel engaging in extremist activity in recent years. For example, in September 2006, the leader of the Celtic Knights, a central Texas splinter faction of the Hammerskins, a national racist skinhead organization, planned to obtain firearms and explosives from an active duty Army soldier in Fort Hood, Texas. That soldier, who served in Iraq in 2006 and 2007, was a member of the National Alliance, a neo-Nazi group.

“Looking ahead, current and former military personnel belonging to white supremacist extremist organizations who experience frustration at the inability of these organizations to achieve their goals may choose to found new, more operationally minded and operationally capable groups,” the report concludes. “The military training veterans bring to the movement and their potential to pass this training on to others can increase the ability of lone offenders to carry out violence from the movement’s fringes.”

Currently, 46 members of the white supremacist social networking website Newsaxon.com identity themselves as active-duty military personnel. Six of these individuals are members of “White Military Men,” a New Saxon sub-group.

Earlier this year, the founder of White Military Men identified himself in his New Saxon account as “Lance Corporal Burton” of the 2nd Battalion Fox Company Pit 2097, from Florida, according to a master’s thesis by graduate student Matthew Kennard. Under his “About Me” section, Burton writes: “Love to shoot my M16A2 service rifle effectively at the Hachies (Iraqis),” and, “Love to watch things blow up (Hachies House).”

As part of his thesis research, Kennard, at the time a student at Columbia University’s Toni Stabile Center for Investigative Journalism, also monitored claims of active-duty military service earlier this year on the neo-Nazi online forum Blood and Honour, where “88Soldier88” posted this message on Feb. 18: “I am in the ARMY right now. I work in the Detainee Holding Area [in Iraq]. – I am in this until 2013. I am in the infantry but want to go to SF [Special Forces]. Hopefully the training will prepare me for what I hope is to come.”

One of the Blood and Honour members claiming to be an active-duty soldier taking part in combat operations in Iraq identified himself to Kennard as Jacob Berg. He did not disclose his rank or branch of service. “There are actually a lot more ‘skinheads,’ ‘nazis,’ white supremacists now [in the military] than there has been in a long time,” Berg wrote in an E-mail exchange with Kennard. “Us racists are actually getting into the military a lot now because if we don’t every one who already is [in the military] will take pity on killing sand niggers. Yes I have killed women, yes I have killed children and yes I have killed older people. But the biggest reason I’m so proud of my kills is because by killing a brown many white people will live to see a new dawn.”

The Army is currently investigating war crimes allegations leveled against Iraq combat veteran and active-duty Army soldier Kenneth Eastridge, 24, who is facing trial for the December 2007 murder of a fellow serviceman. After Eastridge was arrested for that killing, National Public Radio publicized his MySpace page, which showed Eastridge displaying a tattoo of SS lightning bolts, a common neo-Nazi insignia.

Another member of Eastridge’s company recently told Army investigators that Eastridge used a stolen AK-47 to fire indiscriminately at Iraqi civilians from his moving Humvee on the streets of Baghdad. “The military is to some extent desperate to get people to fight, soldiers who are not fit, mentally and physically sick, but they continue to send them,” Eastridge’s attorney told Kennard. “Having a tattoo was the least [Eastridge’s] concerns.”

As part of the research for his thesis, “The New Nazi Army: How the U.S. military is allowing the far right to join its ranks,” Kennard used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain from the Army’s Criminal Investigative Division investigative reports concerning white supremacist activity in 2006 and 2007. They show that Army commanders repeatedly terminated investigations of suspected extremist activity in the military despite strong evidence it was occurring. This evidence was often provided by regional Joint Terrorism Task Forces, which are made up of FBI and state and local law enforcement officials.

For example, one CID report details a 2006 investigation of a suspected member of the Hammerskins, a multi-state racist skinhead gang, who was stationed at Fort Hood, a large Army base in central Texas. According to the report, there was “probable cause” to believe that the soldier “had participated in a white extremist meeting and also provided a military technical manual 31-210, Improvised Munitions Handbook, to the leader of a white extremist group in order to assist in the planning and execution of future attacks on various targets.”

The report shows that agents only interviewed the subject once, in November 2006, before Fort Hood higher-ups called off the investigation that December.

Another report, also from 2006, covers an investigation of another Fort Hood soldier who was posting messages on Stormfront.org, a major white supremacist website. One CID investigator expresses his frustration at the muddled process for dealing with extremists. “We need to discuss the review process,” he writes. “I’m not doing my job here. Needs to get fixed.”

A third CID report, regarding a 2007 investigation, notes the termination of an investigation of a soldier at Fort Richardson, Alaska, who was reportedly the leader and chief recruiter for the Alaska Front, a white supremacist group. According to the report, the investigation was halted because the solider was “mobilized to Camp Shelby, MS in preparation for deployment to Iraq.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Evidence of Extremist Infiltration of Military Grows

Tense Veterans March in Denver Ends Peacefully

August 27, 2008 – A standoff between Iraq war veterans and police ended after representatives of Barack Obama’s campaign finally emerged from the Pepsi Center to hear the group’s grievances.

The veterans were arrayed in formation and in uniform, marching slowly toward a line of police, who had warned them they could be pepper sprayed and arrested. They were being watched by a crowd estimated by police at more than 5,000, many of whom had marched with the veterans from the Denver Coliseum.

As the vets got within a few yards of the police, the cavalry arrived in the form of two white-shirted Obama staffers who asked a representative of the veterans to be escorted inside the security zone.

After a brief conversation, a veteran’s representative said they had been promised a meeting with Obama’s liason for veteran’s affairs. A cheer went up, the veterans did an about face, and the Democrats appear to have avoided providing John McCain with some very unflattering video footage of veteran’s being pepper-sprayed hogtied and handcuffed outside their convention.

The veterans first approached the southwest entrance of the Pepsi Center and tried to ask the Democrats to allow a representative to read an open letter to nominee Barack Obama from the podium. But no one from the party or the Obama campaign emerged from the arena to speak to the group.

Jeff Key, who served in Iraq as a Marine master sergeant, said he wants to go into the convention, play taps for the fallen on his bugle and read the letter from Iraq Veterans Against the War.

“I’m not leaving until I get to read that letter,” he said, as protesters gathered behind him in a fenced zone outside the Pepsi Center. “I intend to read that letter from the podium. If they say no we’re going to tell the world they turned away the veterans.”

As Key spoke, delegates inside the arena were watching a performance by Melissa Etheridge. A spokeswoman for the DNC said she was unaware of the veterans demands or even that they were outside.

“The veterans have fought too hard to come back here and be ignored as we have for the past seven years by the administration,” said Liam Madden, a Marine sergeant.

A representative of the Barack Obama campaign did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

Moments later, and after police warned the veterans that they could be pepper sprayed and arrested, they turned and began walking back toward Speer, but stopped at the Pepsi Center entrance on that side, near Market. Dozens of police in riot gear were waiting, but did not immediately intervene.

“We want to thank you for your service,” one of the veterans shouted to police over a bullhorn at 7:15 p.m. “We are non-violent. We don’t want to hurt you. We don’t want you to hurt us.”

The veterans were aligned in formation, marching, two steps at a time toward police.

The march of as many as 3,500 people from the Denver Coliseum to the Pepsi Center by Iraq Veterans Against the War reached the fenced protest zone on the grounds of the Democratic convention hall about 5:30. But while they were next to the zone, they refused to enter.

The march, led by the members of the band Rage Against the Machine and the veterans, and followed by an array of protesters including anti-war groups, supporters of medical marijuana and some anarchists with gas masks, started at close to 4 p.m.

As the head of the march reached the 16th Street Mall about 5 p.m., they stopped, and one of the veterans read the letter intended for Democratic nominee Barack Obama, who arrived this afternoon at the nearby Westin Hotel.

“Sen. Obama, millions of people are looking to you to restore our reputation around the world,” the letter read. “…In this ominous time, you symbolize the hope for a better America .”

The group read out its three aims: Removing U.S. troops from Iraq immediately, providing full health care benefits to returning veterans, and paying reparations to Iraqis for the damage done during the war.

Marchers expressed disappointment that Obama had not responded to their letter by 3 p.m. today after they had delivered it to his campaign earlier.

“We are here to hold the Democrats accountable,” said an IVAW spokesman shouting into a bullhorn. “We as Americans voted them into office in 2006, and they have not done their job.”

The protesters, who had divided themselves into groups based on who was willing to be arrested, were led on the march by a police SUV with a flashing sign saying, “Welcome to Denver, Follow Us.”

Police estimated that 3,000 to 3,500 people were taking part, making it by far the largest march of the convention week.

Organizers have been talking with officers along the route, and, while there is a heavy police presence around the marchers, there have been no confrontations. Some of the protesters have a phone number written on their arms for legal assistance in case of arrest.

The march followed an energetic, and at times emotional Rage Against the Machine concert at the Coliseum.

The concert opened with a stirring speech from Vietnam veteran Ron Kovic.

“I have been in this wheelchair for 40 years because of war, and I have been arrested in this wheelchair 12 times protesting this war,” said Kovic, whose story was told in the film “Born on the Fourth of July.”

“This is our country. They are not going to shut us up or shut us down,” he said. “We are going to end this war and bring the troops home.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Tense Veterans March in Denver Ends Peacefully

POW Imprisoned with McCain Goes on TV: McCain ‘Not Cut Out to be President’

September 2, 2008, Los Angeles, CA – Dr. Philip Butler on McCain: “I think I can say with authority that the Prisoner Of War experience is not a good prerequisite for President.  John McCain is not somebody I would like to see with his finger near the red button.  Dr. Philip Butler, a highly decorated combat veteran who was imprisoned alongside John McCain at the infamous ‘Hanoi Hilton’ prison in Vietnam, has gone on record with his opinion of the GOP presidential candidate in a short video interview with Brave New PAC.

Click here to watch the video of Philip Butler.

Dr. Butler was shot down over North Vietnam in April, 1965 and was brought to the Hanoi Hilton prison, two and a half years prior to McCain’s arrival. He spent eight years in captivity. Butler is critical of McCain’s habitual use of his P.O.W. story to advance his presidential campaign. “John has allowed I think the media to make him out to be the P.O.W., the hero, and in fact there were over 600 just like him who performed just as well.” Echoing a similar assertion from General Wesley Clark two months ago, Butler continues, “I think I can say with authority that the Prisoner Of War experience is not a good prerequisite for President of the United States.”

Having lived across the hall from John McCain at the U.S. Naval Academy prior to combat, Butler was a close witness to McCain’s famously volatile temperament. “He was very sensitive and touchy and just easy to anger,” says Dr. Butler. “John McCain is not somebody I would like to see with his finger near the red button.” Butler continues, “John McCain’s temperament makes it clear that he is not cut out to be President of the United States.”

Butler points to the health risks faced by former Prisoners Of War as another cause for concern about a McCain presidency – a concern publicly heightened in recent days by McCain’s selection of a political novice as a running mate. “The data show that the Prisoner Of War group are dying at an earlier age and that we suffer lots of residual things that non-P.O.W. group really doesn’t have to deal with. And it’s imperative that we have someone who is healthy and can stand the rigors of that job.”

Other military veterans agree with Butler’s criticism of McCain’s exploitation of his P.O.W. story. Writes Brandon Friedman, a veteran of both Iraq and Afghanistan and author of ‘The War I Always Wanted’: “To see McCain resort to playing the POW card when answering legitimate questions, in my mind, cheapens that experience. And by cheapening his own experience in war, he degrades all of our experiences in war. He turns the horrific incidents we’ve all seen, touched, smelled, and felt into a lame excuse to earn political points. And it dishonors us all.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on POW Imprisoned with McCain Goes on TV: McCain ‘Not Cut Out to be President’

Labor Day News: DAV and IAVA Decry ‘Betrayal’ of Veterans by Department of Defense

August 29, 2008 – In a letter going out to members of Congress next week, the directors of two major veterans’ groups say the Pentagon’s personnel chief has intentionally withheld benefits from wounded service members.

“We need your immediate assistance to help end the Defense Department’s deliberate, systemic betrayal of every brave American who [dons] the uniform and stands in harm’s way,” states the letter, signed by David Gorman, executive director of Disabled American Veterans, and Paul Rieckhoff, executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America.

Veterans for Common Sense note: VCS supports the letter written by DAV and IAVA.  Please see the end of this article for the full text of the DAV – IAVA letter to Congress.  

“Sadly, the 2007 Walter Reed scandal, which resulted mostly from poor oversight and inadequate leadership, pales in comparison to what we view as the deliberate manipulation of the law” by David S.C. Chu, undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, and his deputies, the letter states.

Kerry Baker, legislative director for Disabled American Veterans, said Chu sent out a memorandum in March redefining which injuries qualify as “combat-related.”

The definition is important because Section 1646 of the 2008 Defense Authorization Act said service members with combat-related disabilities no longer must pay back any disability retirement severance they receive from the Defense Department before they become eligible for disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs, as has been the case under longstanding policy.

The policy affects service members who receive a disability rating of 20 percent or less from the Defense Department, and thus receive a severance payment rather than lifetime disability retirement pay.

Baker said he has seen cases in which, for example, a veteran receives a $30,000 severance payment from the Pentagon, uses it for medical care or education, and then, even if subsequently awarded a full 100 percent disability rating by VA, must pay the $30,000 back first before he can draw any VA compensation.

Baker said this leaves many veterans who may not be able to work in a quagmire of debt. DAV and IAVA think no veteran should have to pay back money he or she earned before becoming eligible for VA benefits, but they still see the new law extending such waivers to veterans with combat-related disabilities as a step forward.

Under a separate program called Combat Related Special Compensation, which eliminates the offset in retired pay required of some retirees who also receive VA disability compensation, “combat related” is defined as any injury or illness incurred in a combat zone or performing tasks related to combat, such as training for deployment or hazardous assignments like jumping out of airplanes.

But according to Chu’s memo, the definition of “combat related” for the purposes of the new severance pay waiver is limited only to those injured in a combat zone in the line of duty or as a direct result of armed conflict.

In June, Defense Department spokeswoman Eileen Lainez told Military Times that Chu did not remake the definition to save money, as Baker has charged.

“Saving money was not the driver in the implementation,” she said in an e-mail. “The statutory intent of [the law] clearly and appropriately focuses the ‘enhanced disability severance’ to those service members where the unfitting condition is a result of direct participation and participation of duty in the war effort.”

She also noted that the law on repaying severance money left it to the secretary of defense to define “combat related.”

But three lawmakers have told Military Times that their interpretation puts Baker in the right and Chu in the wrong — that they expected the Defense Department to adopt the existing definition used for the CRSC program.

“The Department of Defense appears to be interpreting this law in the most narrow and tightfisted way possible,” said Rep. Timothy Walz, D-Minn., a House Veterans Affairs Committee member. “I am disappointed that [the department] is implementing this policy in a way that makes as few veterans as possible eligible for the benefit.”

After Walz weighed in, DAV sent a letter to Chu asking for an explanation. William Carr, one of Chu’s senior deputies, responded in a letter dated Aug. 14 by saying the intent “was to direct the enhanced benefit to those hurt in combat.”

“Such an approach is consistent with our strong belief that there must be a special distinction for those who incur disabilities while participating in the risk of combat, in contrast with those injured otherwise,” Carr wrote.

But Baker, and the authors of the new letter, continue to insist that congressional intent was not to make a special distinction that leaves out service members hurt in activities defined as “combat related” under other programs.

“The law defines such disabilities as those caused by armed conflict, instrumentalities of war, hazardous service and conditions simulating war,” Gorman and Rieckhoff wrote. “The [Defense Authorization Act] did not change these definitions; in fact, it reinforced them, and it added disabilities incurred ‘in the line of duty in a combat zone.’ ”

The letter states that Chu “lacks the authority to change the will of Congress.”

In an interview with Military Times, Baker laid out cases of veterans already affected by the new memo. A female soldier in her 30s, who asked that her name not be used, dove for cover into a pile of rocks in Iraq during a mortar attack wearing full battle rattle — Kevlar and body armor that can weigh 20 pounds.

Afterwards, she suffered a fused spine and had to have her hips replaced, all of which her doctors said was directly attributable to her dive to safety.

“The rating was good, but they said it was not combat-related,” Baker said. “You can see Chu’s memo confusing the issue. This is a disease process that began in Iraq in the line of duty.”

In a second case, Marine Cpl. James Dixon incurred a traumatic brain injury from a roadside bomb on his third tour in Iraq. He has headaches, insomnia, short-term memory loss, hearing loss and post-traumatic stress disorder.

According to the Pentagon, “the disability did not result from a combat-related injury,” Baker said.

Dixon’s ruling was changed on appeal, but Baker said there should have been no question to begin with about whether his injuries were combat-related.

Army Sgt. Richard Manoukian served two combat tours, but when he was diagnosed with PTSD and bipolar disorder after he tried to commit suicide — as well as suffering a spine disability after a hard helicopter landing in Kuwait — the Defense Department called his injuries “not combat related,” Baker said.

“The list of cases like this is reprehensible and growing every day,” Gorman and Rieckhoff wrote in their letter. “Moreover, if cases like these are ruled not combat-related, then one can only imagine how many other less obvious cases are suffering the same fate.”

They asked Congress to look into how many cases have been ruled not combat-related under Chu’s memo and have them reviewed by a group independent of the Pentagon.

“Congress should then take immediate action to ensure DoD upholds the plain and unambiguous language of the law,” they wrote. “Most of these service members have no representation in the military disability evaluation system and are therefore unaware of the benefits stolen from them — they are depending on you.”

*** Text of Joint DAV / IAVA Letter to All Senators and Representatives ***

August 28, 2008

TO: Every Member of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate

Dear Representative/Senator:

On behalf of the Disabled American Veterans, nation’s largest organization of wartime-disabled veterans, and the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, comprised of the nation’s newest generation of veterans, we are writing you with grave concerns for the livelihood of thousands of brave service men and women.  To put this bluntly, we need your immediate assistance to help end the Defense Department’s deliberate, systematic betrayal of every brave American who dawns the uniform and stands in harm’s way. 

When Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act of 2008 (NDAA), it included provisions important to military personnel separated or retired from service due to disability incurred “in line of duty in a combat zone or incurred during performance of duty in combat-related operations.”  Those found unfit for service due to such disabilities may receive additional severance pay and are not required to repay those benefits from compensation subsequently awarded by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).  Those medically retired instead of medically discharged are entitled to concurrent VA disability compensation and combat-related special compensation under title 10, United States Code.

These benefits were decades too late for many veterans.  However, the global war on terror highlighted the overwhelming obstacles faced by countless disabled veterans during the transition back to civilian life.  Congress therefore acted on behalf of these brave Americans.  The events of 2007 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center brought these and other unfair practices to the public’s attention.  Sadly, the 2007 Walter Reed scandal, which resulted mostly from poor oversight and inadequate leadership, pales in comparison to what we view as the deliberate manipulation of the law by the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (the “Secretary”) and his Deputy Under Secretaries.

Shortly after Congress passed the groundbreaking wounded warrior legislation contained in the NDAA, the Secretary shocked the military and veteran community by literally mutilating the statutory definition of disabilities determined to be “combat related.”  The law defines such disabilities as those caused by armed conflict, instrumentalities of war, hazardous service, and conditions simulating war.  The NDAA did not change these definitions; in fact, it reinforced them, and it added disabilities incurred “in the line of duty in a combat zone.”  Under the Secretary’s new, and we believe, unlawful definition, such disabilities are limited only to those incurred during “armed conflict.”  The Secretary lacks the authority to change the will of Congress.  The alternate provision, “or incurred during the performance of duty in combat-related operations,” has intentionally and unlawfully been read out of the law buy the Secretary.  He must not be allowed to continue thumbing his nose at the will of Congress and the American people. 

Hoping this was a mere oversight, the DAV wrote to the Secretary in April 2008 concerning this gross injustice.  His response portrayed a shocking level of disrespect for those who stood in harm’s way.  Not only did the Secretary attempt to defend his position, but he also invoked the President’s Commission on Care for America’s returning Wounded Warriors (PCCWW), better known as the Dole/Shalala Commission, as support.  However, the PCCWW did not advocate for a shift in the longstanding statutory definition of “combat-related” disabilities.  The PCCWW simply recommended special benefits for those with combat-related disabilities, such as the ones passed in the NDAA.  Although, to digress, the PCCWW also advocated for changes in VA benefits designed solely for those with combat-related disabilities.  The DAV, united with many other organizations, stood vehemently against such changes.  In hindsight, imagine the results had we not done so.  The DoD has undermined congressional authority by manipulating the definition of such disabilities.  The result is unimaginable, yet reality nonetheless.

In order to understand the gravity of this situation, one must look no further than the lives of a minute number of combat veterans recently found unfit for service due to disabilities that the law defines as “combat-related.”  For example:  Corporal James Dixon suffered a traumatic brain injury from an improvised explosive device during his third tour in Iraq, resulting in headaches; insomnia; cognitive changes; hearing loss and tinnitus; and PTSD.  The military initially ruled his injuries “not combat related.”  Sgt. Richard Manoukian completed two combat tours, was exposed to numerous combat events, and diagnosed with PTSD and bipolar disorder following a suicide attempt.  The military disregarded the PTSD.  He also suffered a cervical spine disability following a hard helicopter landing in Kuwait during protection duty (flight duty is considered “hazardous service” and helicopters are an “instrumentality of war”).  The military found his disabilities “not combat related.”  One female soldier currently pending discharge was injured in Iraq while diving for cover during a mortar attack.  Her disabilities were severe enough to require a major joint replacement and four fused spinal vertebra.  The military ruled her disabilities “not combat related.”

The list of cases like these is reprehensible in length and growing every day.  Moreover, if cases like these are ruled not combat related, then one can only imagine how many other less obvious cases are suffering the same fate.  In every such case, our brave men and women in uniform are going without the benefits in which Congress mandated the government provide. 

These men and women stood up for all of us.  We are asking you now to stand up for them and put an end to this disgrace.  Their livelihood depends on their leaders following the law, not making it up as they go in order to balance the bottom line.  We call on Congress to use the full power of its oversight authority to determine exactly how many servicemembers have been adjudicated as unfit for service because of noncombat-related disabilities.  Those disabilities should then be readjudicated under the correct standard of law with oversight provided by an independent body, one not comprised of DoD employees.  Congress should then take immediate action to ensure the DoD uphold the plain and unambiguous language of the law. 

The only way to prevent DoD continuing its pattern of abuse is to remove the limitation to combat-related disabilities for benefits provided in the NDAA; rather, those benefits must go to all servicemembers found unfit for service due to disabilities incurred in the line of duty.  Most of these servicemembers have no representation in the military disability evaluation system and are therefore unaware of the benefits stolen from them—they are depending on you.

The legacy of this war is fast approaching.  Let it not be that their civilian leaders turned against them in their greatest hour of need.  Nothing could be more shameful.
 
Sincerely,

DAVID W. GORMAN, Executive Director, Disabled American Veterans

PAUL RIECKHOFF, Executive Director and Founder, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Labor Day News: DAV and IAVA Decry ‘Betrayal’ of Veterans by Department of Defense