Lock and Load: Veterans Group Goes After Musgrave

September 4, 2008 – A new campaign ad targeting U.S. Rep. Marilyn Musgrave represents a new tack for independent political action committees seeking to dethrone the three-term congresswoman.

It features Colorado Iraq war veterans, cutting to the heart of an issue dear to Musgrave, R-Fort Morgan, and other Republicans: support for the troops and their efforts overseas.

Other ads against Musgrave in this and previous election cycles have been led by what can more easily be defined as liberal causes, including those championed by Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund or Fort Collins billionaire Pat Stryker, who is committed to gay rights issues.

But the ad with Iraq veterans, from a group that has also donated to Republican candidates, is meant to cut closer to the bone, the group said, because military issues have been a core topic for the GOP.

Musgrave’s campaign decried the ad by VoteVets.org Action Fund, which includes three Colorado veterans taking Musgrave to task for voting against a troop pay increase while members of Congress got raises.

Members of Congress get automatic cost-of-living pay increases each year. Musgrave’s campaign said that on three occasions, she voted against a procedural move that allowed the pay-raise vote to go forward.

She did vote against a $1,500 bonus for service members in 2004, a measure that would have taken money from Iraq reconstruction and given it to service members. The vote fell largely along party lines.

The commercial features veterans talking about the rising prices of food and energy, including Milliken veteran Stephanie Driessel, and ends with Colorado Springs veteran Mike Lemke saying, “I expected the worst in Iraq. I expected better from Marilyn Musgrave.”

Musgrave’s campaign manager, Jason Thielman, said the group has a partisan agenda.

“If folks would understand the fact that Marilyn is a mother, too, with a son and daughter-in-law in the military. And she’s one of the few in Congress who has their children enlisted in the military in these times,” he said. “For this group, who unfortunately has a very partisan agenda, and is affiliated with the most extreme left elements of the political spectrum, to suggest that a mother of active enlisted military does not have their interests closest to her heart is reprehensible.”

Jon Soltz, an Iraq war veteran who directs the Vote Vets group, said Musgrave has been wrong on veterans’ issues and on focusing efforts in Iraq and not Afghanistan.
“I’m sorry that you jumped off the cliff with George Bush,” he said. “But there’s consequences. She listened more to the White House than most politicians. So it’s irrelevant to me that her son is in the military. She was wrong on the core issues.”

Founded in 2006, the group’s primary mission is to elect veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan to Congress, but it also targets candidates whom the group believes have poor marks on veterans’ issues, Soltz said.

“The war is one issue, but the veterans issue is a whole other one,” he said.
The Disabled American Veterans, a nonpartisan advocacy group, tracks congressional votes on veterans issues and said Musgrave voted with veterans six times and against them eight times since 2003.

The ad cost $370,000 and is part of a $1 million campaign against Republicans Musgrave, former U.S. Rep. and Senate candidate Bob Schaffer of Fort Collins, and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine.

Despite the anti-GOP ads, the group has given money to members of both parties.
In 2008, it made contributions on behalf of Rep. Wayne Gilchrest, R-Md., who lost his primary earlier this year, and Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb.

“We’ve given money to Republicans. We’re not tied to Democrats, per se. It’s not partisan,” Soltz said.

Thielman countered that the group is closely affiliated with MoveOn.org, a liberal group funded by a wealthy New York donor George Soros.

MoveOn did contribute $4,000 to VoteVets.org in August 2006, according to Federal Election Commission records. And so far in the 2008 cycle, 89 percent of VoteVets’ donations have gone to Democrats, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a non-partisan Web site that tracks political money.

Soltz said he isn’t sure whether the group will air any other ads after this week but was curious about how Musgrave’s campaign was reacting to the ad.

“We don’t pull any punches,” he said. “There’s no punches being pulled in Iraq.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Lock and Load: Veterans Group Goes After Musgrave

The Failed Surge, as Iraq Lives Without Electricity

September 2, 2008 – U.S. policy makers and American consumers in the past few months have been immersed in concerns about soaring oil prices and how to lower them. Fuel prices are also expected to be a focal issue when American voters cast their ballots in the upcoming presidential elections.

But while I can understand Americans’ fears about fuel prices and availability, I have a harder time understanding why Iraqis — with their oases of crude oil reserves and untapped oilfields in the south and the north — have had to put up with high oil prices and severe shortages of gasoline, diesel and cooking gas.

A report issued recently by the U.S. Government Accountability Office estimated that Iraq’s government could generate between $73.5 billion and $86.2 billion in total revenue for 2008, with oil exports accounting for $66.5 billion to $79.2 billion.

And yet ordinary Iraqis still face fuel shortage and high rates. These days, there are three-hour lines of cars queued up for gas, according to one friend of mine in Baghdad. He said officially the government blames this problem on the lack of power that gas pumps need to operate. In Baghdad, he said, people are only getting two hours of electricity a day. The government says the nearly total absence of power in the capital is due to the lack of new power projects.

My friend said his family paid as much as 30,000 Iraqi dinars, or over $25, for a cooking gas cylinder last winter. That’s roughly 15 times the highest price before the war started, and extortionate given a cylinder doesn’t usually last more than one week. When I asked my friend why people don’t protest the situation, he said they don’t dare to open their mouths for fear of getting into trouble with the government.

Since the U.S. invasion in 2003, the Iraqi government has time and again ascribed the fuel crisis in the country to insurgents’ attacks on oil and gas pipelines, outmoded and in some cases moribund refineries, as well as mismanagement and corruption among Iraqi oil officials. Some of those officials, according to many media reports, siphoned off oil to sell at a profit.

In Saddam’s era, there were times like these too, when Iraqis had to contend with finding enough fuel at relatively reasonable rates. I recall war times were especially hard.

Right before the first Gulf War, families in my neighborhood and elsewhere in Baghdad scurried to stash not just staple foods such as rice and flour, but also fuel, in anticipation of a U.S.-led military attack.

During the attack, which occurred in the winter of 1991, Iraqis were in dire need of heating and cooking fuel. My family and my uncle’s family went to stay with relatives in Baqouba, 30 miles northeast of Baghdad. There was no electricity in the two-story house where we stayed, so we spent a month or so on dated kerosene-operated lanterns. view more for understanding more information related to electric engineering and job related post.  The longer the war lasted, the more worried we grew about our depleting fuel. At one point, we lived on bread; we had only one cooking gas cylinder left and used it only for making bread, because we were afraid it would drain.

We started to get used to living in complete darkness. Every night before we went to sleep, we would snuff out the lanterns in the house. That was not only to avoid being hit by American pilots who might mistake the light for an anti-aircraft artillery spot, but also because we wanted to save kerosene. Nobody knew how long the war would last.

My family went back to Baghdad while the war was still going on. The first day, we had to borrow kerosene from our neighbor to start a fire to make bread. We stood in line the next day and got some kerosene ourselves, but then that ran out, too. Sometimes the gas stations were closed or would run out of gas; sometimes you could wait all day and still not get it. On those days we lived on the raw vegetables and fruits we could afford to buy. There was no canned food where I lived, so we could not just buy cooked, canned food and eat it cold. If it existed elsewhere, I’m sure it was too expensive.

Even when the war ended, we still had to spend a few months with no power at all or with regular outages, as power plants were usually early targets. Different neighborhoods had different outage schedules and we soon came to know intuitively when to expect a power cut. Frustrated, people started to joke about how Baghdad looked at night like a flickering tree from atop the Saddam Tower.

There was always a post-war fuel crisis in Iraq. After the first Gulf War, two friends and I used to load a wooden cart with empty kerosene jugs and empty gas cylinders once a week at dawn and push it a couple of miles to get to a gas station where rumor had it that there was fuel. When we got there, there usually were crowds of people already lined up. We would wait for hours and often get back home when it was dark. On the days we went looking for gas, we didn’t eat lunch because we didn’t want to give up our spot in line.

In the ensuing years, there were times when the situation went from bad to worse. When Iraq was cordoned off by the international community, Saddam’s regime subsisted by funneling Iraq’s oil and power resources to neighboring countries. Jordan was a prime destination. In return, the Iraqis were able to get some food and medical aid via Jordan despite the sanctions. Rumors abounded among Iraqis about Saddam giving the Jordanians our oil at nominal rates or free of charge while we had to put up with long waits at gas stations and frequent power outages. People were furious but couldn’t do anything to change things.

Saddam’s propaganda machines were feeding us the usual: We had fuel shortages because the imperialist U.S. had bombed our pipelines and refineries.

Compounding the problem, Iraqi cab drivers seized the opportunity for a profit, and began smuggling gas and diesel in their extra tanks to sell in oil hungry countries such as Jordan. I knew a truck driver who used to tell stories about how most drivers like him who worked on the Baghdad-Amman route made most of their income by smuggling fuel in their tanks, which they sold when they got to Jordan.

And while the average household income for many Iraqis has at least quintupled in the aftermath of the U.S. invasion, Iraqis’ quest for cheaply accessible fuel has just gotten harder. Iraqis imported such an insane number of cars to Baghdad right after Saddam’s fall that it became impossible to drive in the congested streets. Overnight, the lines at the pump got impossibly longer, and black market fuel dealers became ubiquitous.

When I left Iraq in 2004, fuel prices and availability weren’t as bad as they are now. Given the global race for fuel, and Iraqi leaders’ indecision about sharing the country’s resources — oil among them — fuel prices are unlikely to abate anytime soon for Iraqis.

Posted in Gulf War Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on The Failed Surge, as Iraq Lives Without Electricity

WWII Vet Says Bush Administration Policy Disgusts Veterans

September 4, 2008, Minneapolis, MN – World War II veteran Don Holden said Wednesday that the sacrifices made by World War II soldiers which helped establish the U.S. as one of the most admired countries in the world was squandered by the Bush administration and would continue to be squandered under the leadership of presidential candidate John McCain (R-Ariz.).

“The thing that disgusts us veterans is that we left things in pretty good shape after World War II, but now the U.S. and the Bush administration have alienated people around the world,” Holden, who lives in Portland, said over the phone. “If I were the family of those troops, I would have to ask, ‘Why? Why after five years?'”

Holden may be asking that question himself. His grandson, who is a member of the National Guard, served for a year in Iraq. It moved Holden, who calls himself an “Eisenhower Republican,” to support Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.

“Obama understands that the National Guard was never meant to be used as a foreign occupier,” Holden said. “And McCain wants to keep us at war.”

McCain will officially accept his nomination for president when he addresses the Republican National Convention Thursday night.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on WWII Vet Says Bush Administration Policy Disgusts Veterans

Sep 5, Suicide News: Official Army Report Finds Soldiers’ Suicides Rate on Pace to Set Record

September 5, 2008 – Suicides among active-duty soldiers this year are on pace to exceed both last year’s all-time record and, for the first time since the Vietnam War, the rate among the general U.S. population, Army officials said yesterday.

Ninety-three active-duty soldiers had killed themselves through the end of August, the latest data show. A third of those cases are under investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner’s Office. In 2007, 115 soldiers committed suicide.

Failed relationships, legal and financial troubles, and the high stress of wartime operations in Iraq and Afghanistan are the leading factors linked to the suicides, Army officials said.

The officials voiced concern that an array of Army programs aimed at suicide prevention has not checked a years-long rise in the suicide rate. Still, they said, the number of deaths probably would have climbed even more without such efforts.

“What does success look like? Frankly, we do not know,” said Col. Eddie Stephens, deputy director for human resources under the Army’s personnel division.

The Army’s suicide rate has increased from 12.4 per 100,000 in 2003, when the Iraq war started, to 18.1 per 100,000 last year. Suicide attempts by soldiers have also increased since 2003, Stephens said.

This year the death rate is likely to exceed that of a demographically similar segment of the U.S. population — 19.5 per 100,000, Stephens said. According to service officials, the last time that occurred was in the late 1960s during the Vietnam War, when the United States had a draft Army that suffered from serious discipline problems. In 1973, the nation created an all-volunteer force that has generally enjoyed an above-average level of mental health, a condition contradicted by the recent rise in suicides.

The latest Army prevention efforts include the hiring of hundreds of new mental health providers, the production of an interactive video on the subject, to be released this fall, and the introduction of an intervention program aimed at teaching junior Army leaders not only suicidal symptoms but actions that can prevent suicides.

The ACE program includes handing out laminated cards decorated with the ace of hearts that advise three steps — “ask,” “care” and “escort” — that spell “ACE”: Ask your buddy direct questions such as “Are you thinking of killing yourself?”; care for your buddy by taking away weapons; and escort your buddy to a military chaplain or health provider.

“Take away the weapon if someone is playing Russian roulette with it. . . . Unfortunately, people have not always done that,” said Brig. Gen. Rhonda Cornum, the Army’s assistant surgeon general for force protection. Army prevention programs to this point have not trained soldiers adequately in what to do after they learn a comrade is in crisis, she added.

Another measure that Cornum said has proven effective is for Army commanders in combat zones to take a more “humanistic” approach and to return soldiers home so they can deal with personal crises and thereby “live another day to keep serving.”

Col. Scott McBride, commander of the 1st Brigade of the 101st Airborne Division, said such measures have helped him prevent any suicides among his 4,000 soldiers, who have been deployed in northern Iraq for the past year.

“If they’re having a problem at home and we can keep a family together, reduce stress by sending a soldier home so he can take care of that problem, we’re doing that,” McBride said yesterday by video link from Iraq.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Sep 5, Suicide News: Official Army Report Finds Soldiers’ Suicides Rate on Pace to Set Record

U.S. Military Reviewing Friendly-Fire Incident Where Six Iraqi Army Soldiers Killed

September 3, 2008, Baghdad – U.S. troops mistakenly killed six members of Iraq’s security forces Monday, Iraqi officials said, further straining relations between the U.S. military and the Iraqis they are paying to secure the country.

The pre-dawn confusion in Mizrafa, a stretch of farmland along the Tigris River north of Baghdad, claimed the lives of two Iraqi police officers and four members of the Awakening, a group of mostly Sunni fighters who work with the U.S. military, said Iraqi Army Maj. Mohammed Younis.

A U.S. military spokeswoman said the shooting was under review. “It is always regrettable when incidents of mistaken fire occur on the battlefield,” Staff Sgt. Stephanie Boy wrote in an e-mail.

The incident took place when U.S. troops aboard a boat on the Tigris approached a patrol of Awakening fighters, who were already on alert because a suicide bomber had attacked the leader of the local group in nearby Tarmiyah, killing one person and wounding four.

“They heard a rumor that al-Qaida was going to stage an offensive against their town from the river,” Younis said, referring to the Sunni insurgent group al-Qaida in Iraq. “They deployed themselves along the river waiting to ambush al-Qaida if they started to attack.”

Warning shots

When the boat approached, the Awakening fighters fired warning shots because they could not determine whether the vessel was manned by Americans, Younis said. He said the troops on the boat did not shoot back but an Apache helicopter later opened fire on the Iraqi forces, killing the police officers and Awakening members and wounding 10 Iraqis.

The U.S. forces were in the area conducting operations against al-Qaida in Iraq, Boy said. She confirmed that the operations involved aircraft but declined to specify the number of Iraqi casualties.

The incident is the latest in a string of accidental attacks by U.S. forces on the Awakening fighters, who are widely credited with helping to reduce violence over the past year. The incident in Mizrafa enraged Awakening members and caused at least 10 of them to quit.

“We don’t feel safe working with the Awakening anymore because of the American forces,” said Ali Younis, 18, who quit and turned in his weapon Wednesday.

Seeking immunity

The shooting comes at a delicate time in negotiations between Iraq and the U.S. over a security pact governing the presence of U.S. troops in the country. Iraqi officials say both sides have agreed that American forces will withdraw by end of 2011, with the key disagreement centering on whether the U.S. troops will be immune from prosecution under Iraqi law.

The U.S. negotiators have demanded that the troops have complete immunity; the Iraqis counter that the immunity should only apply on American bases and on missions approved by the Iraqi government, according to Sami al-Askari, a prominent Shiite lawmaker.

In other developments, the Iraqi Cabinet voted to reopen Abu Ghraib prison as a facility for holding criminals, with part of it set aside as “a museum of the former regime’s crimes,” according to a statement from government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh.

The facility was once used to torture and execute enemies of Saddam Hussein and then became the site of the U.S. prisoner abuse scandal.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on U.S. Military Reviewing Friendly-Fire Incident Where Six Iraqi Army Soldiers Killed

Senator McCain Seen to Have an Edge with Military Members

September 4, 2008, St. Paul, MN – Paul Galanti won’t be in the Xcel Energy Center tonight to witness his longtime friend accept the Republican nomination for president.

He was invited, but he chose instead to continue his work in Richmond recruiting veterans to vote for his “guy,” U.S. Sen. John McCain.

“Everyone I know who’s ever worn a uniform will vote for McCain ” and each of them controls two or three other votes, said Galanti, who leads the presumptive GOP nominee’s veteran outreach effort in Virginia.

He is certain that many of the state’s 807,000 veterans favor McCain’s brand of stiff-jawed fortitude and experience to lead the country as a wartime president.

But political analysts warn there are reasons to believe those votes may not be as assured as they have been for past Republicans.

One is the “general frustration with the war in Iraq,” which could dampen enthusiasm among a voting bloc that is GOP-leaning, said Quentin Kidd, a political science professor at Christopher Newport University in Newport News.

“The military vote is more in play than it has been in recent elections,” Kidd said.

Perhaps sensing that, Democratic Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign has established its own veteran-outreach network to court voters in Virginia and beyond.

Still, McCain is viewed as the favorite among that group, and experts give the Arizona senator an advantage in vote-rich Hampton Roads, home to 110,000 military personnel.

Galanti, who like McCain was a prisoner of war in Vietnam, believes that veterans and active-duty men and women will relate to McCain’s narrative and that their votes will help deliver Virginia for him.

McCain, a naval aviator, was held as a POW for more than five years after his aircraft was shot down over North Vietnam in October 1967. His captors did not provide proper medical care to treat the injuries he suffered escaping the plane. Both his arms and one leg were broken. They also repeatedly beat him and kept him in solitary confinement most of the time.

After his release, he continued his Navy career, retiring in 1981. His honors include the Silver Star, Bronze Star, Legion of Merit, Purple Heart and Distinguished Flying Cross.

Galanti, a retired naval commander who spent 30 years in the military, including nearly seven years as a POW, predicted McCain will win a decisive victory over Obama.

“I don’t think it’s going to be close,” he said.

The large population of veterans and active-duty military seems to favor McCain.

America has 24 million veterans, and as many as 70 million citizens may be eligible for some type of veterans benefits. Another 2.3 million people are active-duty military members or their voting-age family members living in the United States or abroad.

Those voters are hardly monolithic, however.

“Veterans are a diverse lot, and you have to look at them and their situations in many different ways,” said University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato.

Individual veterans will likely factor their gender, race and era of service into how they vote, Sabato said, mentioning that black veterans “admire” McCain but will be “strongly in Obama’s corner.”

But blacks account for only about one-tenth of the nation’s veteran population and one-fifth of the active-duty ranks.

By comparison, whites are fourth-fifths of all living veterans and make up three-quarters of the total active-duty population.

Those numbers reflect overall population trends. While polling shows Obama with a strong lead among blacks, McCain remains ahead among whites, who are a larger share of the electorate.

Likewise, the candidates’ ages seem to provide a boost to McCain, 72, among veterans and a boost to Obama, 47, among active-duty personnel, if primary voting trends and polling hold true.

Roughly 40 percent of veterans are over 65, while the average age of active-duty men and women is 28. Almost half of all active-duty personnel are between 22 and 30.

For Mary Frances “Francie” Golden, a Navy veteran from Virginia Beach, McCain’s military background makes him the right choice.

“Where the rubber meets the road, I need someone to make the hard decisions that has experience and expertise in the military,” said Golden, who served under McCain in 1977.

She said that McCain’s presence in the Senate when her husband and daughter were deployed to Iraq in 2002 gave her some reassurance they would return safely.

Obama, who has never served in the military, had not yet been elected to his U.S. Senate seat from Illinois when Congress in 2002 passed a resolution authorizing military action in the Middle East.

A candidate’s military service, or lack thereof, isn’t always an indicator of how veterans and active-duty personnel will vote.

Military voters favored President Bush, who served in the Air National Guard, over U.S. Sen. John Kerry, a Vietnam veteran, by a margin of 57 percent to 41 percent, according to 2004 exit polls.

This time, voters with military backgrounds favor McCain over Obama by a 56-37 margin, according to a recent Rasmussen Reports poll.

By contrast, troops stationed overseas have contributed more money while out of the country to Obama than to McCain this election cycle, according to a recent analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics.

Not conceding Virginia’s military vote, the Obama campaign is reaching out to those voters through events such as Michelle Obama’s meeting with military spouses in Norfolk last month.

Frank McKinney, a Virginia Beach Vietnam vet and one-time Republican, favors Obama.

McKinney, who retired as a commander after 30 years in the Navy, said Obama “puts the interests of the troops who have sacrificed so much at the front of his priorities,” including the Democrat’s pledge to bring home many in the Middle East if elected.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Senator McCain Seen to Have an Edge with Military Members

Deployment Can Sometimes Interfere with Right to Vote

September 4, 2008, St. Paul, MN – For military men and women serving outside of their home states, the question of voting isn’t always whether they want to, sometimes it’s whether their votes will be counted.

Deployment status and distance from native soil are but two of the impediments that can hinder soldiers, sailors and airmen from exercising their right to vote.

If figures from the 2004 presidential election are any indication, those barriers have severely limited voter participation among enlisted men and women.

About 1 million military members requested ballots that year, but only 330,000 or so were returned and counted, according to the federal Election Assistance Commission.

“That’s about a 70 percent failure rate,” said commission Chairwoman Rosemary Rodriguez.

Among military members stationed domestically, the 56 percent voting success rate is considerably higher, she said.

How those numbers compare to previous election cycles is difficult to gauge; the commission was not established until 2002 and not funded until 2004.

Roughly 6 million American military members and civilians are covered by the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, a federal law governing absentee ballot voting in federal elections. Of those, about 2.8 million are military members, their dependents and federal civilian employees, while the rest are citizens living abroad.

In its own armed forces voter participation surveys, the U.S. Department of Defense comes to a different conclusion. Its figures show that nearly two-thirds of those who tried to vote successfully cast a ballot.

Regardless of which agency’s numbers are more accurate, officials with both agree that one of the basic challenges for that population is submitting an absentee ballot.

Complicating matters are laws that vary from state to state about how to transmit absentee ballots to voters and receive them back, Rodriguez said.

This year, the Virginia General Assembly passed a law to allow Americans covered by the absentee voting act to receive ballots electronically. But they must be mailed back.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Deployment Can Sometimes Interfere with Right to Vote

Compilation of Presidential Candidate Positions on Foreign Policy Issues

August 27, 2008 – Back in April, we put together a list of resources that compiled and compared candidate positions on a number of foreign policy issues. It’s August now, things have changed, positions have evolved, and more organizations are keeping track. Here’s an updated list:

    * Center for U.S. Global Engagement – Candidates’ Corner: Candidate profiles with quotes and positions on development, diplomacy and other foreign policy issues.
    * Citizens for Global Solutions – ’08 or Bust: Candidate comments on 13 global issues with comparison matrix, ability for users to enter candidate quotes and videos, and responses to CGS’s Presidential Candidate Questionnaire from back in  the Clinton, Edwards, Obama, and Richardson days of yore.
    * Council for a Livable World – Presidential Election Center: Blog on candidate speeches, media analysis and commentary on the elections.
    * Council on Foreign Relations – Campaign 2008: Candidate positions by candidate and on 20 different foreign policy issues, a campaign blog, and candidate interviews, speeches, debates and opeds.
    * One Campaign – One Vote ‘08: Videotaped replies to questions about poverty and global disease posed to candidates by ONE Campaign members.
    * Foreign Policy: The Foreign Policy “Passport” blog has running commentary on the candidate’s foreign policy positions.
    * Friends Committee on National Legislation – Presidential Candidates Report: Summary of candidate positions on Iran, Iraq and nuclear weapons.
    * The Save Darfur Coalition Presidential Candidates on Darfur: contains links to videos and positions on Darfur and Africa policy.
    * Caucus for Priorities: Candidate positions on the defense budget and nuclear weapons.
    * German Marshall Fund: A site that highlights and provides analysis on the presidential candidate’s positions on transatlantic issues.
    * Human Rights First: HRF’s Elect to End Torture ’08 Campaign features a regular blog which scrutinizes the presidential campaigns and the Democratic and Republican parties on their positions on torture
    * Kaiser Family Foundation 2008 Candidate Issue Spotlight: Global Health and HIV/AIDS
    * NPR: A compilation of audio and video clips and news stories organized by issue areas
    * The Secure America Challenge: Partnership for a Secure America presents candidate responses to 5 questions on international development, human rights, energy security and climate change, nuclear terrorism and US-China relations.
    * The Washington Post: Candidate “Issue tracker” covers a number of purely domestic issues, plus the environment, globalization, immigration and the Iraq War.

Please let us know in the comments section if we’ve missed any good resources for identifying foreign policy positions!

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Compilation of Presidential Candidate Positions on Foreign Policy Issues

Editorial Column: Veteran Suicide Epidemic, The Shame of America

September 3, 2008, Molalla, OR – The Portland Tribune and Peter Korn have provided an uncommonly great service to Oregon Veterans and their families in the paper of August 21, 2008. Even the Oregonian Newspaper seems to be pussy wussy about the subject.

Peter Korn points out that the battle Veterans suicide rate is at least twice that of non-Veterans with the rate of young war Veterans between 18 and 24 to be about seven times more than civilians. These are the guys doing the killing and the fighting.

This is far beyond “battle fatigue” or PTSD, the modern term. As a WWII Infantry Scout and point man with PTSD and as a physician who has treated at least 400 Vietnam PTSD battle Veterans, I think I may have the answer. This is shocking even to me. I may even have a partial “cure”.

The Army Infantry wanted 18 to 20 year old robust fighting “men” who would follow orders without questioning and charge a machine gun etc. without hesitation. If anything got in the way, kill it. These are the guys with the highest suicide rate.

I was in an Intelligence and Recon section of 6 privates and a sergeant. We were the Pointmen and Forward Observers. These jobs are the most dangerous and almost suicidal. I wonder at my own survival but I paid the price like any of my fellow pointmen or scouts. Most never got to come home.

My comrades were 18 or 19. I was the “old man”. I was 21 and 22. None of the young guys were able to talk of our mutual experiences. That is PTSD.

The Army Infantry wants its “men” to be macho when attacking or even off duty. Army beer helped but we ended up with a bunch of alcoholics and lung cancer from tobacco. One could not admit fear even to your closest buddy in your foxhole.

I read that the Army has changed. I scarcely believe that, and from what I read in The Tribune the Veterans want nothing to do with the VA Hospital System which doesn’t seem to have any idea what or how to treat some 300 thousand PTSD Veterans from the current extravaganza going on in Iraq etc.

Yes, I have PTSD. I earned it the hard way. I still have nightmares and I know that sound I hear in the night is a German Tiger Tank and the loud noise is heavy artillery and as I grab for my rifle and can’t get it I wake up in a sweat.

I got over some of the PTSD by hard work either as a heavy construction millwright or working for two doctor degrees. I still take medications to sleep after 60 plus years from the tanks and the bombs.

According to some, there is something worse than getting seriously wounded or picking up scraps of a buddy. That is killing another human even if he was trying to kill you. If it is women or children it’s even worse.

An Infantry slogan could be KILL OR DIE. That is the basis for PTSD and Veterans Suicide.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Editorial Column: Veteran Suicide Epidemic, The Shame of America

Feds Pursue Local Nurse’s Whistleblower Complaint Against Prescott VA

August 30, 2008 – The United States Office of Special Councel has decided to pursue a federal whistleblower complaint filed in May against Prescott’s Northern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System, said James Mitchell, chief of staff and director of communications for the OSC.

Registered nurse Jerri Bedell said she was fired from the Prescott VA’s Community Living Center two days after writing a lengthy letter to a supervisor outlining her concerns about abuse and neglect of veteran patients.

Bedell – who has a master’s degree in nursing with additional certification in geriatric care and more than 20 years experience nursing and teaching – worked at the center for three years.

Mitchell said the OSC assigned an investigator in its San Francisco office to the case on Aug. 25. The OSC investigates cases only that it believes it has adequate evidence of proving, Mitchell explained.

“It’s possible our investigator would go to Prescott in the course of the inquiry,” Mitchell added.

He said the investigation – which is concerned only with whether Bedell was fired in retaliation for complaining about abuse and neglect of veterans at the Prescott VA – could take months to complete, depending on the total case load of the individual investigator and the complexity of the allegations.

Meanwhile, Mitchell said, a second case involving disclosures of neglect and abuse that Bedell made in her whistleblower retaliation case is still developing.

“It may be referred to the Secretary of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs for investigation,” Mitchell said.

“Our first task is to see if we can make a substantial likelihood finding, which means we believe there is a better than even chance that the whistleblower’s disclosures are true,” Mitchell explained.

Because of the information contained in Bedell’s retaliation complaint, the OSC asked her to file a “disclosure” complaint in early June.

Prescott VA’s director, Susan Angell, has declined to speak directly to The Daily Courier. But when a staff member to Sen. John McCain asked Angell about some of Bedell’s charges, Angell – in a letter that The Daily Courier obtained – said that the Prescott VA fully investigated Bedell’s allegations.

“Most of the allegations were unsubstantiated,” Angell wrote. “Several allegations were found to be essentially a difference of opinion … Other allegations were found to be substantiated in part and corrective action was taken.”

Bedell denies that her complaints were fully investigated.

The Daily Courier has been looking into Bedell’s charges of abuse and neglect at the Prescott VA since June, after learning of Bedell’s firing.

During the past three months, The Daily Courier has spoken with four nurses with knowledge of the center’s caregiving practices.

The Daily Courier also spoke to more than two dozen patients, family members and other Prescott VA staff.

In addition, The Daily Courier has examined nearly 100 pages of documents, letters and e-mails, including Bedell’s federal whistleblower prohibited personnel practice complaint as well as the federal whistleblower “disclosure” document that federal officials asked Bedell to file.

Nurses, veteran patients and relatives of veteran patients at the Prescott VA say some of the nursing staff there – mainly at the center – abuse, neglect and overmedicate patients – actions the nurses say have sometimes lead to injury and in some cases may even have hastened death.

Prescott VA officials say the employees making the complaints are “disgruntled” and that family members are misinterpreting what they see.

The officials say every patient at the Prescott VA gets the same high-quality care and they flatly deny any abuse or retaliation is taking place.

VA CONFIRMS SOME PATIENT CARE PROBLEMS

However, during a recent interview with The Daily Courier, the same officials – Associate Director for Patient Care Services Marianne Locke and the center’s medical director, Dr. Jyoti Walavalkar, with Prescott VA spokesman Frank Cimorelli present – confirmed at least some of the accusations.

For example, Bedell in her whistleblower complaint says that a nursing staff member shoved a wheelchair-bound patient’s injured foot into a wall so hard that doctors had to reset the pins in the patient’s foot.

The term “nursing staff” at the Prescott VA refers to registered nurses, licensed practical nurses and certified nursing assistants.

Two other employees that The Daily Courier interviewed backed up Bedell’s charge.

Locke confirmed that the incident took place but said the employee responsible for the incident no longer works there. When told that nurses say the man is still there, Locke said she would find out the man’s status and get back to The Daily Courier. But VA officials later declined to comment further about that specific incident.

Officials did say that the Prescott VA takes situations like these “very seriously” and reviews them to assess and fix any personnel and training issues involving patient safety.

Bedell and the other nurses also said three veterans were overmedicated so badly for constipation that they were found laying in liquid pools of their own excrement from their armpits to their knees. Their explosive diarrhea continued until the medicine wore off.

Locke and Walavalker also confirmed that these incidents took place. They said a pharmacist and several nurses were retrained as a result. They also said that nurses should use their own judgment in determining how much medication to give.

The nurses who spoke with The Daily Courier also said some nursing staff members refuse to help patients.

“We’ve had issues with (some of the nursing staff) and we’ve addressed that appropriately,” Locke said.

NURSES SAY NEGLECT CONTINUES

But the nurses The Daily Courier has spoken with say problems with patient care continue. They said a few of the nursing staff deliberately treat patients badly while low staffing levels and poor communication among staff members lead to the kind of benign neglect from other staff members that endangers patients.

Examples of their concerns over the past few years – which are also alleged in Bedell’s whistleblower complaints – include:

• Patients left sitting in urine and feces for so long that they are found with their private areas sore and reddened or with crusted urine in their pelvic area.

• Nursing staff who sometimes handle patients roughly and openly mock them.

• Nursing staff who falsify medication and treatment records to show that treatments have been applied to patients or medicine given to them when it hasn’t been. This includes charting – verifying that a staff member has completed a patient care task – as long as two days ahead of time.

A Sept. 5, 2007, memo from supervisor Karen Martin to Bedell, which is included in Bedell’s whistleblower complaint, asked Bedell to document her witnessing of “staff pre-pouring meds and doing other work-arounds.”

“We want this documented so that we may start corrective measures,” Martin wrote.

• Patients found with pills scattered in their bed sheets or left laying on their nightstands.

• Missing medications.

• Staff overmedicating patients, sometimes without their knowledge, for the convenience of the staff – a practice known in the medical community as “chemical restraint.” In one case such overmedication resulted in a patient’s inability to eat or drink because of excessive sedation, Bedell said.

• Too frequent use of foley catheters in patients who don’t need or want them, leading to bloody, overflowing catheters that cause infection, pain and needless use of patient restraints. A foley catheter is a thin tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine.

• A nurse who accidentally left a cap on a foley catheter when she inserted it so no urine drained for several hours until the next shift discovered the problem.

• Two nurses who accidentally gave forced air instead of oxygen to a patient who had just returned from surgery.

• A patient who slept on a blanket because his sheets were dirty from not being changed.

• Nursing staff who put patients to bed after dinner without taking their clothes off, who hang up on patients when they put their call lights on and who take excessive time to answer call lights because they are chatting or surfing the Internet.

• A nurse who initially ignored a patient with a painful herpes chest wound saying, “What does it matter. He’s dying anyway.”

• An Aug. 19, 2007, memo – which also is part of Bedell’s whistleblower complaint – to housekeeping supervisor Steven Peterson, complaining about filthy rooms: “I just can’t tell you how disgusting some of the patients’ rooms are when I come in to work … especially the floors, sinks, bathrooms, toilets. We find things under the beds that have been there for days. Some of the sinks and mirrors look (like) they haven’t been washed in days. The floors are sticky around the patients’ beds. Bedside tables are never cleaned except by nursing staff.”

Peterson replied in a memo to Bedell the next day that “this will be checked into immediately.”

VA officials, in responding to questions about patient care at the center, declined to answer specific questions about employees or patients.

However, Cimorelli explained that when anyone reports an incident, the Prescott VA investigates it thoroughly.

He also said the center’s nursing staff “maintains appropriate standards of care.”

Locke also said the Prescott VA is not abusing or neglecting patients.

“These things are not happening here,” Locke said. “We have people who would like to see us in a bad light.”

Cimorelli said that when “adverse” events do happen at the center, staff reviews them carefully so they can learn from them.

He also said all medication errors, including medications not being given to patients, are “tracked and trended” and spot observations of staff passing medications also are conducted.

“Identified concerns are addressed immediately,” Cimorelli said, and staff always looks for opportunities for improvement. He said the Prescott VA’s medication error rate for the second quarter of fiscal year 2008 was “very low.”

DIFFERING VIEWS ON TERMINATION

Bedell’s termination notice, signed by Angell and obtained by The Daily Courier, said Bedell was fired “because on several occasions you have removed foley catheters from patients without orders to do so.”

However, Locke – an RN herself – and Dr. Walavalker emphatically stated in a July 3 interview with The Daily Courier that a nurse should immediately remove a bloody, overflowing catheter from a patient and does not need “orders” to do so.

“We have told the nurses to use their judgment,” Walavalker said.

One of the two patients that Bedell removed bloody catheters from wrote a letter to Bedell thanking her for her actions, which the patient says were done at his insistence. The patient’s letter is part of Bedell’s whistleblower complaint.

But Locke said, “That situation was investigated and found not to be as the nurse described it.” Locke declined to elaborate.

Bedell said she carefully monitored both patients after removing their catheters.

She says the last time she removed a catheter was on Jan. 28 and the issue never came up again until she was fired in April – two days after writing a lengthy email to Locke alleging patient mistreatment and that staff often falsifies records.

Prescott VA officials deny that they retaliate against anyone.

One VA employee, who asked that her name not be used, said Angell recently held a staff meeting during which she told employees that if they didn’t like the conditions at the Prescott VA, they should leave.

Cimorelli said Angell often meets with groups of employees.

“One of the areas she discusses is the privilege of serving veterans,” Cimorelli wrote in an email. “This privilege requires a high degree of commitment and compassion by employees. If this level of expectation is not comfortable for an employee, she asks them to think about making choices that fit their own individual needs.”

STAFFING SHORTAGE

Many of the center’s problems stem from an overworked and exhausted staff pushed to the limit by too many patients with increasingly serious health issues, the nurses told The Daily Courier.

They say morale at the center has plummeted, turnover has risen, and a tense climate of fear has taken hold.

Locke agrees that the center is struggling with a serious nursing staff shortage. An internal VA management memo that The Daily Courier obtained called the shortage a “crisis.”

Locke said that between the center and the acute care facility, which is in a different building, 10 nursing staff positions are unfilled.

She says they are working to fill the shortage by hiring temporary nurses and by asking staff to work overtime as well as by not operating at full capacity. The center has a total of 85 beds, Locke said, but fills only 60 to 65 beds.

Locke said the center typically has one nurse – either a registered nurse or a licensed practical nurse – and one to two certified nursing assistants on each of five wings. But, Locke said, sometimes supervisors have to send even those nurses and CNAs elsewhere to help out.

A memo, entitled “Staffing Issues and Patient Safety” that Locke sent to staff this past spring said officials had decided to divert admissions to the center as much as possible and to share staffing between units.

“But this is not reliable, as all units are experiencing staffing issues…,” Locke wrote.

NOT OUR FIRST RODEO

Cimorelli, the Prescott VA’s spokesman, said the Prescott VA would weather any investigation that any reports of abuse may prompt.

“This isn’t our first rodeo,” Cimorelli said. “We know what it is to deal with Congressionals,” he continued, referring to members of Congress.

Prescott VA director Angell does, too.

She was the associate director at Bay Pines VA Medical Center in Florida in 2004 when several Congressional committees and the VA Inspector General’s office conducted investigations there.

That round of investigations turned up mismanagement by senior staff at Bay Pines and lead to an upper management shake-up there.

Before the VA Inspector General’s investigation of Bay Pines concluded, Angell volunteered for a temporary assignment in Afghanistan.

According to the Aug. 11, 2004, final report on Bay Pines by the Office of Inspector General, “In many areas of (the facility), a culture of safety and accountability was not evident. Communication that was important for patient safety was not discussed out of fear of adverse consequences.”

The report also said that, “Senior leadership needed to better manage and administer facility operations … Factors such as … employee mistrust in leadership’s ability to manage and treat them fairly, morale challenges, and a growing workload demand generated by a rapidly expanding veteran community contributed to lapses in providing timely care and ensuring administrative accountability.”

The report about Bay Pines, where Angell was second in command, stressed that, “One important tenet of a culture of safety is the ability for an employee at any level to feel empowered to express a view against the authority gradient without fear of adverse consequences.” The Bay Pines report did not specifically name Angell although it did refer to an interview officials had with the associate director.

The Prescott VA employees who The Daily Courier spoke with say the same mismanagement that investigators found at Bay Pines is happening in Prescott.

Mary Garrison, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 2401 at the Prescott VA, says management there wouldn’t have so many problems if it would accept responsibility for its poor supervisors.

“They don’t even want (people to file) reports,” Garrison said. “And they badger the employees that (do) file the complaints.”

She says most employees with complaints simply give up after awhile.

Many of the people The Daily Courier spoke with for this article said the Prescott VA has plenty of good employees. But there are problems, they say, and the VA needs to fix them.

“There are good staff there and basically the care is good,” Bedell told The Daily Courier. “The staff that are bad are few in number; the staff that are overworked and stressed are many and (they are) making mistakes.”

VA spokesman Cimorelli said the Prescott VA would deal with any problems it has.

“If there’s problems here, then we are going to address it,” Cimorelli said. “If there’s sensitivity issues, then we’re going to address that, too.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Feds Pursue Local Nurse’s Whistleblower Complaint Against Prescott VA