June 25, VCS Press Release: VCS to Appeal Court Ruling Against Veterans

June 25, 2008, Veterans for Common Sense and Veterans United for Truth Press Release: Court Rules that Veterans Should Seek Relief from VA and Congress, Veterans to Appeal

Senior Federal District Court Judge Samuel Conti has issued his decision in the landmark case brought on behalf of veterans suffering from PTSD and traumatic brain injury in July of 2007.  The trial was conducted from April 21 30, 2008, and included a week of testimony in early March.  The trial focused on the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care and adjudication systems for disabled veterans.  The trial included testimony from the heads of national veterans’ organizations, top VA officials and some of the leading experts in the country on the widespread failings of the VA system.

In his decision, Judge Conti held that it is “clear to the Court” that “the VA may not be meeting all of the needs of the nation’s veterans.”  He agreed with, and explicitly adopted, many of the factual assertions made by the veterans.  Those include the following:

• “The suicide rate among veterans is significantly higher than that of the general population,” and there is “a strong connection between PTSD and suicide.”
• “One out of every three soldiers returning from Iraq was seen in the VA for a mental health visit within a year of their return” with PTSD being a “leading diagnosis.”
• “The high rates of PTSD among Iraq veterans are the result of various factors, including multiple deployments, the inability to identify the enemy, the lack of real safe zones, and the inadvertent killing of innocent civilians, ” as top VA officials admitted.
• “Initiatives such as screening veterans at risk, a suicide prevention database, emerging best practices for treatment, and education programs were all still at the ‘Pilot Stage’ three years” after VA’s Mental Health Strategic Plan was adopted.
• “It is beyond doubt that disability benefits are critical to many veterans and any delay in receiving these benefits can result in substantial and severe adverse consequences.”
• The VA’s track record with respect to delays in processing veterans’ appeals “is troubling.”  It is taking veterans on average 4.4 years to adjudicate a benefits claim at the first two levels in the VA benefits system. 

Nonetheless, Judge Conti concluded that the power to remedy this crisis lies with the other branches of government, including Congress and the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, holding VA’s failures to meet veterans’ needs are “beyond the power of this Court” and would “call for a complete overhaul of the VA system.”  Judge Conti’s opinion states that Congress, and not the courts, needs to resolve the crisis facing our nation’s veterans.  This underscores the importance of the ongoing congressional hearings that seek to find the truth, and to address the problems faced by our veterans.  Now, more than ever, it is critical that Congress act.  Plaintiffs very much appreciate Judge Conti’s consideration, but disagree with his legal conclusions.  Accordingly, Plaintiffs plan to appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit so that these important legal questions can be addressed by a higher court.  The full text of the decision can be found at www.veteransptsdclassaction.org.

Paul Sullivan, Director of Veterans for Common Sense, commented that “This ruling will only cause us to redouble our efforts and our pursuit of justice for our nation’s veterans.  We will not rest until our job is finished.”  Bob Handy, the Director for Veterans United for Truth, added:  “Every time we feel discouraged or need to find our way, we always return to the VA’s motto, ‘To Care for Him Who Hath Borne the Battle, and His Widow and His Orphan,’ and that tells us what we need do.”

“The decision, if upheld on appeal, would suggest that veterans have no enforceable rights in America, and the Constitution does not apply to veterans.  For all Americans, the implications of this decision are profoundly disturbing,” remarked the lead counsel for Plaintiffs, Gordon Erspamer.  “Our fight on behalf of our veterans will continue.”  Sid Wolinsky added, “I know that we will not rest until victory has been achieved and the suffering of our veterans ceases.” 

Tragically, the VA has been neglecting wounded veterans returning from service in Iraq and Afghanistan who are in desperate need of ongoing care and support, including medical treatment and disability payments for living expenses. Among those suffering the most are returning veterans with mental disabilities such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).  Veteran suicides have reached an epidemic level, with over 120 veterans taking their own lives every week, and 1,000 suicide attempts per month amongst veterans under VA care.  This lawsuit was unprecedented in directly challenging the VA’s 600,000 case backlog in handling claims, appellate delays of five to ten years, the waiting lists that veterans face before receiving health care, and the inadequacy of VA care for PTSD.

The trial brought to light many critical facts that the VA had tried to conceal or downplay.  An internal e-mail from the VA’s head of mental health, Dr. Ira Katz, surfaced during the trial.  At a time when the VA was reporting only 790 veteran suicide attempts in all of 2007, Katz wrote, “Shh!…Our suicide prevention coordinators are identifying about 1,000 suicide attempts per month…Is this something we should (carefully) address…before someone stumbles on it?”  At trial it was also disclosed that the suicide rate of veterans is at least three times the national suicide rate and in 2005, the suicide rate for veterans 18-24 years old was three to four times higher than non-veterans.

We are grateful to Judge Conti for hearing our case and for allowing a public display of VA’s enormous systemic failures.

“By confirming many of the allegations in our lawsuit, VCS considers the Court’s ruling a very loud and bright warning shot over the bow for Congress and VA to overhaul VA now.  VA needs massive reform soon, before the situations becomes worse as hundreds of thousands more wounded, ill, and injured Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans flood into the VA system,” said Sullivan. 

“VCS stands willing to work with Congress and VA to resolve the many serious problems the Court confirmed. VCS intends to work closely with our attorneys, Morrison & Foerster and Disability Rights Advocates, as we move forward with an appeal. VCS thanks the dozens of dedicated MoFo and DRA attorneys, donating their time and effort for free, who worked very hard on this case for nearly one year,” Sullivan added.

Posted in VA Claims Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on June 25, VCS Press Release: VCS to Appeal Court Ruling Against Veterans

VCS in the News: Judge Rules Court Won’t Step in to Aid Vets

Paul Sullivan, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense, one of the plaintiff organizations, chose to look on the bright side. Conti “confirmed many of our allegations” and issued “a huge alarm bell for Congress and the VA to take action now,” said Sullivan, a Gulf War veteran.

June 26, 2008, San Francisco, CA – The federal government is subjecting veterans to long delays in obtaining mental health care and medical benefits, but the power to change the system rests with officials and Congress, not the courts, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled Wednesday in dismissing a lawsuit by veterans’ advocates.

U.S. District Judge Samuel Conti said veterans’ groups had failed to show a “systemwide crisis” in mental health care that would justify the courts intervening in the workings of the Department of Veterans Affairs. And he said courts lack authority to order the sweeping changes the plaintiffs seek, such as forcing the VA to make quick decisions on whether veterans are eligible for care and ordering the agency to promptly improve suicide prevention programs and mental health care.

Conti conceded that evidence presented during a two-week nonjury trial in April showed that veterans had high rates of suicide and post-traumatic stress disorder, and that in some cases were being forced to endure long waits for medical referrals and care.

The VA is understaffed and takes an average of nearly 4 1/2 years to hear veterans’ appeals of benefit denials, and a long-range improvement plan the agency adopted four years ago is still mostly in the pilot stages, the judge said.

But Conti said, “The remedies sought by plaintiffs are beyond the power of this court and would call for a complete overhaul of the VA system.

“Congress has specifically precluded district courts from reviewing veterans’ benefits decisions and has entrusted decisions regarding veterans’ medical care to the discretion of the VA secretary,” the judge, a World War II veteran who was appointed to the bench by President Richard Nixon, said in his 82-page ruling.

Lawyers for the veterans said they would appeal.

“If the judge is correct, the VA can do whatever it wants, and all the rights (of veterans) are unenforceable,” said attorney Gordon Erspamer. “That just can’t be the law. There’s got to be a remedy somewhere for the poor slobs who are fighting for our country.”

Paul Sullivan, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense, one of the plaintiff organizations, chose to look on the bright side. Conti “confirmed many of our allegations” and issued “a huge alarm bell for Congress and the VA to take action now,” said Sullivan, a Gulf War veteran.

VA spokesman Phil Budahn said the agency was pleased with the ruling.

The suit was filed last year by Sullivan’s organization, which is based in Washington, and a second group in Santa Barbara, Veterans United for Truth. They accused the VA of making mental health care virtually unavailable to thousands of discharged soldiers through perfunctory exams, delays in referrals and treatment, and a prolonged and complex system of awarding medical benefits.

They cited internal department e-mails, released in response to the suit, that reported 18 suicides a day among all veterans and 1,000 suicide attempts a month among those under VA care. About 30 percent of the nation’s 24 million veterans receive medical care from the department.

One e-mail from VA official Ira Katz in February referred to the 1,000 monthly suicide attempts and cautioned, “Shh! . . . Is this something we should (carefully) address ourselves in some sort of release before someone stumbles on it?”

The plaintiffs also cited a recent Rand Corp. study estimating that 300,000 troops returning from Afghanistan or Iraq suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder or major depression. They also noted a May 2007 report by the VA’s inspector general that found more than 60 percent of the agency’s health centers lacked suicide-prevention strategies for returning veterans, and 70 percent had no tracking systems for veterans at risk of suicide.

In Wednesday’s ruling, Conti said members of the two veterans groups “have faced significant delays in receiving disability benefits and medical care from the VA,” often with “dire consequences.”

But he said the evidence also showed that a majority of returning veterans are being seen within 30 days at clinics offering mental health services. While federal law entitles veterans to five years of care from the VA after they are discharged from the military, Conti said, “it is beyond the power of this court to determine when and how such care shall be provided.”

Likewise, he said, the law allows the VA to set the timetable for implementing the five-year mental health plan it issued in 2004, which includes a suicide-prevention program.

Conti also rejected the plaintiffs’ request to shake up the VA’s system of approving medical benefits and handling appeals. They argued that their rights are violated by a system that denies them the right to have a lawyer in pressing initial claims, takes an average of 4.4 years to decide appeals, and allows a VA office to reduce awards of more than eight years of benefits, or $250,000 in cash, without notifying veterans that their cases are being reviewed.

Although the system’s slow pace is troubling, Conti said, only 4 percent of veterans appeal denials of benefits, and the VA would have to divert money and staff from processing claims to meet the timetables the plaintiffs seek.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on VCS in the News: Judge Rules Court Won’t Step in to Aid Vets

Goodbye Jim Hinde

June 26, 2008 – Jim Hinde was the real deal. He was born and raised in Ohio. He was a Vietnam Vet who rambled homeless and broke in the early ’70s, lived in the skid road missions, and rode the freights. He settled in Seattle as a father and musician, and wrote a whole bunch of songs. He became such a solid force in the Seattle busking scene that when he died unexpectedly the morning of June 9, the whole city gasped and half of the Pike Place Market went home early.

The wind blew real hard all that day. Jim didn’t like the hard winds because they reminded him of the typhoons when he was in the Navy. That was a time that haunted him. It kept him from sleeping and woke him up with night sweats–Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), the shadow partner that Uncle Sam gives to his military veterans. Jim would spend the last years of his life pursuing his claim for service-related disability benefits from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Not just for himself but for all vets. Maybe it wore him out.

Jim was one of the founders of the Pike Market Performers Guild, an organizing body of Seattle street performers. With his work ethic and background, he was an enormous asset for getting all the nuts and bolts in place to create and produce the annual Pike Market Busker Festival. Organized collectively, the Guild seeks to raise the profile and legitimacy of street performers, who by nature are a little outside the social norm. Jim could bridge that gap. The festival has now become an established part of the city’s culture, and busking a celebrated art form.

Jim Hinde loved the Pike Place Market and he spent a great deal of time there. One of his favorite sayings was, “If you’re going to milk the cow, you have to feed the cow,” meaning that if he was going to make his living there he was also going to support it. And he did. He won an Emmy for his work on the PBS documentary “Pike Place Market, Soul Of A City.” In his voice-over you can hear the love and connectedness. In many ways he was the voice of the soul of the city.

When the Iraq War kicked in, all the vets got a jolt of emergency adrenalin and Jim began his final campaign–countering the national jingo fever with songs of peace and social justice written from the perspective of experience. He knew because he’d been there. Songs like “Marching To the Border” where the singer says “no” to America’s war and heads for Canada, taking half the inductees with him; “Frank Dennis and Me,” about his old shipmates in Vietnam, and how marching to someone else’s gun kills the soul of a person; “The Perp Walk,” about the arrest of Bush and company for war crimes; and the great anthem “Shout Down the Wind,” a call for all of us to take to the streets and stop the machine in its tracks. Jim was a frequent presence at anti-war rallies and demonstrations in Seattle. As a member of both Veterans For Peace and Vietnam Veterans Of America he became a driving force for change. Before he died he was working as one of the main organizers for the national VVA convention. He never did anything he couldn’t give a hundred percent to.

When Jim began to work seriously on his PTSD claim he went to the VA hospital and was diagnosed with high levels of cortisol, a hormone in the blood which is a responder to stress. In combat situations this is the stuff that makes a person hyper-alert and helps them to survive. But over time it eats at the tissues of the heart, and in a PTSD veteran that hyper-alertness does not go away and the cortisol is always there. Jim died of a heart attack. A case can be made that Jim’s combat experience killed him 35 years later, like a real slow bullet.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Goodbye Jim Hinde

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt Make $1M Donation to Iraqi Children

June 26, 2008 – The Hollywood couple made the donation via their charity, the Jolie-Pitt Foundation.

The money will go to the Education Partnership for Children of Conflict and will help 8,000 children who have lost parents, homes or the opportunity to go to school.

Jolie is known for her charity work and is a goodwill ambassador for the UN’s Refugee Agency. She has visited Iraq twice in the past year.

The actress said in a statement: “These education support programmes for children of conflict are the best way to help them heal.”

The couple hope other Hollywood celebrities will follow their lead and donate a portion of their earnings.

“We hope to encourage others to give to these great organisations,” said Pitt.

During her last trip to Iraq in February, Jolie spoke of the urgent need for aid in the war-torn region.

“There are over two million displaced people and there never seems to be a real coherent plan to help them. There’s lots of goodwill and lots of discussion but there seems to be a lot of talk at the moment and a lot of pieces that need to be put together,” she said.

The 32-year-old Tomb Raider star is currently in France awaiting the birth of twins.

Their arrival will take the couple’s brood to six – they are already parents to Maddox, six, Pax, four, Zahara, three, and Shiloh, two.

Earlier this month it was reported that Jolie had given birth, sparking a worldwide media frenzy, but the story turned out to be a hoax.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt Make $1M Donation to Iraqi Children

High-Tech Testing for War Veterans with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

June 25, 2008 – An Elk Grove Village hospital plans to use brain-imaging technology to determine whether combat veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder also might suffer from undiagnosed traumatic brain injuries.

A “magnetic stethoscope” primarily used to study epilepsy and autism will help determine how brain function is altered by PTSD, officials at Alexian Brothers Medical Center said Wednesday.

The MEG technology—short for magnetoencephalography—allows doctors to read magnetic signals produced by the brain when exposed to visual or auditory stimuli, said Jeffrey Lewine, director of the Alexian Center for Brain Research. There are other highly sophisticated tvs diode enabled medical equipment required for testing & diagnosing trauma related studies being used for ascertaining signals that help draw much detailed inference. Those signals appear to differ in a veteran who only has PTSD compared with one who has PTSD and traumatic brain injury, Lewine said.

The combination can be hard to diagnose but critically affect proper treatment, according to Lewine. “You have to know what you’re treating to get the right treatment,” Lewine said. “Behavioral testing doesn’t always distinguish the different components. We need to look at the biology.”
He hopes to develop diagnostic techniques that will lead to faster treatment.

Almost 20 percent of soldiers who have returned from Iraq and Afghanistan—nearly 300,000—have reported symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder or major depression, according to a recent study by the RAND Corp., a non-profit that researches issues associated with policy problems.

About 19 percent said they thought they might have suffered a traumatic brain injury while deployed, according to the study.

The Elk Grove hospital’s veterans imaging program will be part of an expanded support system aimed at serving veterans in the northwest suburbs suffering from duty-related neurological and psychiatric problems, officials said.

Participating in the hospital’s effort are the Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Northwest Suburban Veterans Advisory Council.

State funding approved last year targets veterans with PTSD, officials said.

“Isn’t it about time we do this in the United States of America?” said state Sen. Dan Kotowski (D-Park Ridge), who sponsored the legislation.

“This is the one thing we can agree on.”

Lt. James McCormick, 36, experienced symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder after suffering combat injuries in Afghanistan, said his father, Daniel McCormick, a lay member of the Alexian Brothers, a Catholic religious order. His son returned to the United States four months ago.

Daniel McCormick, director of vocations for the Alexian Brothers, said PTSD-related difficulties that soldiers face range from being jumpy or nervous to the inability to hold a job.

“As long as there are people, men and women will have to go to war,” he said. “And when they come home, we have to take care of them.”

Researchers will use MEG with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG), Lewine said. Together, the technologies will allow clinicians to generate sophisticated 3-D images of brain activity.

It’s important to know which medical issues a soldier is dealing with because treatments differ. Those suffering from both afflictions would be oversensitive to medications usually prescribed for someone with only PTSD.

Posted in Research, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on High-Tech Testing for War Veterans with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Veterans Share Concerns With Top VA Official

June 24, 2008 – Air Guard members often do short tours of duty overseas, but still may experience the stress and brutality of war, said Cathy Cook, a retired member of the Vermont Air National Guard.

Because of their short tours, Cook said, the U.S. Air Force doesn’t give them a critical document — DD form 214 — which would recognize their service as active duty and make them eligible for the full array of veterans services.

Cook explained this problem to Dr. James Peake, new secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, during a 90-minute meeting Monday that Peake had with 150 Vermont veterans and their advocates at the Holiday Inn in South Burlington.

“That’s the first I’ve heard of it,” Peake told Cook. He directed her to provide details to his staff.

Peake, a Vietnam veteran and a surgeon, took over the top job at the Department of Veterans Affairs six months ago. In introducing him, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., praised Peake for crisscrossing the country to listen to veterans. Sanders scheduled Peake for a full day of meetings in Vermont.

“Promises were made to veterans in our country, but these promises weren’t always kept,” Sanders said. “Taking care of veterans must be considered a cost of war.”

Sanders, who serves on the Senate’s veterans affairs committee, urged the crowd in South Burlington to speak up. “If we don’t know what the failures are, we can’t do our job.”

A World War II veteran in a garrison cap asked Peake about the practice of “tranquilizing” people to help them cope with bad memories. He said he knew all about bad memories since he’d fought in Okinawa and killed three enemy soldiers.

“For the next 17 years, I nearly drank myself to death,” he said. He asked Peake, “Are we setting people up for substance abuse by giving people tranquilizers to numb their feelings?”

Peake said the VA is working hard to find the best ways to use medication to treat post traumatic stress disorder. He said medications often are intended “to give somebody a good night’s sleep without dreams.”

Jon Turner of Burlington, who did two tours of duty in Iraq, told Peake he believed there was a tendency to over-medicate veterans. When he sought help, he said he was given six prescriptions.

Nick Palmier, a U.S. Marine who served in Iraq, said the military overreacts when people seek help, seeming to view everyone in counseling as potentially unstable.

He said after he saw a buddy die, he saw a mental health counselor. Subsequently, when home on leave, he had to check in daily with his sergeant. Now that he’s a civilian, he worries his mental health record could prevent him from getting jobs.

Peake agreed that “just because you need a little help doesn’t mean you have long-term problems.” He recounted how two years after his tour in Vietnam, he was walking down a corridor in medical school when a jackhammer started up. He reacted by dropping to the ground.

“You bring up the question of how do we do what is right by people,” Peake told Palmier.

Constance Quintin’s story made clear the answer to that question wasn’t simple. The Richmond woman recounted how her husband received too little service when he needed it most. He committed suicide. She said her husband served in the U.S. Coast Guard and the National Guard for more than 20 years, including war deployments.

He had lived with bipolar disease for years, she said, but developed side effects that led to medication changes. Doctors couldn’t get his disease back under control.

“He was calling almost daily with concerns about suicide,” Quintin said. In his final days, she learned later, he rehearsed hanging himself, but again sought help. He needed to be hospitalized, “but there was no bed available.”

“It was a series of ‘oops’ that led to his death,” Quintin said. “I want families not to have to go through what I went through,” she told Peake.

“I’m so sorry for your loss,” Peake said. His department is beefing up efforts to manage high-risk cases, he said, “but I’m afraid we will never prevent every suicide.”

Peake fielded a question about what more his department could do to help homeless veterans.

“Homelessness in veterans is down 20 percent over the past year,” Peake answered. Still, he said, “Any single veteran that is homeless is one too many.”

The Committee on Temporary Shelter in Burlington has applied to Peake’s department for funding to establish a transitional housing program for veterans. Ellen Kane, grants manager, said the agency was cautiously optimistic about its application for capital funding to provide 15 to 18 veterans a place to live and wrap-around case management services for up to two years. The agency expects to hear in the fall.

“Put in a good word for us,” Kevin Maloney, homeless veterans’ chairman for the Veterans of Foreign Wars, told Peake.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Veterans Share Concerns With Top VA Official

Anti-War Soldier Jonathan Hutto: People, Not Politicians, Will End the War in Iraq

June 25, 2008 – Active-duty sailor Jonathan Hutto signed up to join the Navy in December 2003, at the age of 26. Previously a college activist fighting police brutality in Washington, D.C., and later an organizer with the ACLU, he was not the sort of recruit one usually imagines enlisting in the U.S. military. But his experience as an activist would serve him well as he began to protest unjust practices within the armed forces, where almost from the start, he battled institutional racism and the unwillingness of the chain of command to punish it, while also fighting oppressive and arbitrary disciplinary practices by his commanding officers. In 2006, he co-founded Appeal for Redress, one of the only active-duty anti-war groups since Vietnam, devoted to ending the war in Iraq.

The appeal itself is three sentences long:

As a patriotic American proud to serve the nation in uniform, I respectfully urge my political leaders in Congress to support the prompt withdrawal of all American military forces and bases from Iraq. Staying in Iraq will not work and is not worth the price. It is time for U.S. troops to come home.

According to Hutto, more than 2,000 military personnel, 60 percent of whom have served in Iraq, have signed the appeal.

This month, Nation Books published Hutto’s book, Antiwar Soldier: How to Dissent Within the Ranks of the Military. Part military memoir, part training manual, it lays out crucial things a soldier needs to know before resisting. The preface was written by David Cortright, whose 1975 book, Soldiers in Revolt, is considered the definitive chronicle of the Vietnam GI movement. With the Iraq occupation in its sixth year and no real end in sight, Antiwar Soldier comes at a critical time, and a moment where, increasingly, veterans and soldiers are revitalizing the anti-war movement.

AlterNet staff writer Liliana Segura recently exchanged e-mails with Hutto, who discussed, among other topics, why he joined the military; why he does not support a candidate for president; and what comes next for the anti-war movement.

Liliana Segura: You were raised in a left-leaning, politically conscious household and were an activist in college. Plus, in the book you describe how your mother used to chase away military recruiters from the house. Did you ever think you’d join the military?

Jonathan Hutto: No not at all. Nothing in my background or history would have supported me making such a move. The military was not represented as a proud tradition in my community, given the military was segregated until the early 1950s, with blacks still experiencing severe racism and repression throughout the Vietnam conflict. Both of my parents were born in a segregated/apartheid South, which shaped and informed my world view.

LS: Why did you choose the Navy?

JH: My mom was the primary reason for my decision. I was looking at the military at the age of 26, purely for economic and social adjustment reasons. One of the primary motivators was paying off a substantial portion of my student loan debt, which was $48,000, in the fall of 2003. Today, my loans stand at $24,000. I’ve always envisioned myself working toward advanced higher education, so the GI Bill was also seen as an incentive. My mom lobbied for me to look at the Navy, given the risk associated with service in the Army and Marines — plus I had two uncles that were veterans of the Air Force, one during the Korean conflict. The Iraq War was barely a year old when I decided to enlist.

LS: What surprised you the most about the Navy?

JH: I guess the word is “shocking” and not so much “surprising.” Nothing really surprised me; however, it was shock treatment to be exposed to the depths of internalized racism and imperialism. I vividly remember an instructor at boot camp speaking on the virtues of Barry Goldwater, the Republican nominee in 1964 that ran on an anti-Civil Rights platform. I remember seeing the Confederate flag as one of the many flags we marched under. Although I have seen that flag many times in my life, this is the first time I had to endure it from an institutionalized setting. Then I remember battle stations, the last phase of boot camp. This is when you stay up 24 hours completing different battle scenarios on a ship, in combat, in water, etc. I can remember the instructors giving these heroic war stories, many of these stories coming directly from the Vietnam conflict. Much of this ran counter to my core belief system. You can imagine how deep the shock treatment was, given that one of my first experiences leaving home in 1995 was standing in front of Frederick Douglass Memorial Hall, named in honor of the late great abolitionist on Howard University’s campus, for a student rally.

LS: You describe racism as one of your central grievances regarding the culture of the military. Can you elaborate on this? How much do you think it informs U.S. military policy on a larger scale?

JH: The major motivation for the U.S. ruling class missions abroad is hegemony, power and leverage over its rivals such as Russia, Japan, China, Iran and countries in Latin America such as Venezuela. The Iraq War is based on the Carter doctrine, named for former U.S. President Jimmy Carter. In his 1980 State of the Union address, Carter stated that any attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region would be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault would be repelled by any means necessary, including military force. This global imperial ideology requires racism, religious intolerance and xenophobia to justify the mission to the masses of the people, especially those within the working class and margins of society needed to bleed and die in these missions. Hence anti-Arab racism is used as a justifying ideology, along with an anti-Islamic ideology, both in terms of religion and culture.

The military needs racism, both formally and informally, as an inherent part of the indoctrination process, especially in boot camp, because dehumanizing the “enemy” is necessary for GIs to be fighters for the mission. To be an effective killer, you must see the other side as less than human. During Vietnam, soldiers, sailors and Marines were taught to see Vietnamese as gooks. During this current conflict, soldiers are taught to see Iraqis as Hajjis.

Although the military has made great strides to eradicate institutionalized racism organizationally, with more people of color and women within the senior enlisted ranks and officer ranks, the ideology of white racism is still prevalent within the culture. My first experience with white racism came at apprentice school, post-boot camp, for using the term “affirmative action” in my introduction to the class. All of us were asked why we joined the military by our instructors. I basically stated that I viewed the military as the best affirmative action employer in the country. Post my giving this statement, I was targeted severely by these instructors. I was told later it was due to my use of the phrase “affirmative action.” My worst experience with white racism would be having a noose paraded before my face by three noncommissioned white male officers. The noose incident was the culmination of other incidents such as some white male non-commissioned officers making mockery of Dr. King’s holiday.

LS: Your book — and your movement — is very historically rooted. Is the average soldier as conscious of U.S. military history, including the GI resistance movement?

JH: Unfortunately, no — although many in the ranks do receive the stories from their relatives that fought in Vietnam. The public educational institutions in this country, coupled with boot camp, are not designed to give the rank-and-file soldier the proper U.S. military history or any notion that there was ever a movement of GIs within the enlisted ranks. The purpose of boot camp is to break you down and build you back up as a loyal servant with less capacity to think for yourself. However, the Appeal for Redress and Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) are demonstrating another kind of education taking place. Like Ron Kovic a generation ago, the Vietnam veteran turned peace activist and author of Born on the Fourth of July, these Iraq veterans are receiving an education on the ground in Iraq and within the complex that is changing hearts and minds every day. The movement will continue to grow.

LS: In a recent interview, you said the biggest challenge confronting the anti-war movement as a whole “is to build a culture of operational unity,” and you mentioned the National Assembly to End the Iraq War in Cleveland, Ohio, next weekend. What is the assembly, who will be there, and what are the goals?

JH: The National Assembly to End the Iraq War, gathering in Cleveland, Ohio, from June 27 to 29, is a strong attempt to bring together all elements of the anti-war movement from every constituency within the country. The major mass organizations including United for Peace and Justice (UPFJ), the Act Now to Stop War and End Racism (ANSWER) coalition and the Troops Out Now Coalition will all be present in Cleveland. The mission is to build an open … anti-war conference with the capacity and unity to build the largest mass mobilization against the war since 2003. This conference will also include proposals for local mobilizations before and after the November election. The conference is based on five principles, which are: 1. immediate withdrawal of all troops and bases from Iraq, 2. mass demonstrations as the central strategy, 3. unity of the movement in the streets, 4. democratic decision-making and 5. independence of the movement from all political parties.

LS: Do you support a particular candidate in the 2008 election?

JH:I do not support a particular candidate for president. I was unprincipled in flirting with the idea of Ron Paul, being that he was the only anti-war candidate within the Republican Party, which I felt was strategic, only to be propelled back to my progressive roots based on his “Ron Paul Letters,” which confirmed him as a staunch racist and anti-Semite.

I do not support a particular candidate and party because I believe the power resides within the people, not the politicians, toward ending this war in Iraq, curtailing other imperialist wars of aggression and building a better, just world. John McCain and Barack Obama are both committed to continuing the Iraq War, with potential future military missions in Pakistan and Iran. Obama is the greatest threat to our movement since JFK and arguably since FDR. He can do what John McCain cannot do, which is motivate our young to serve as cannon fodder for U.S. wars abroad while motivating working people in general to sacrifice for the preservation of corporate power at their own expense. Obama does not seek to end the Iraq occupation. His current plan would leave up to 200,000 troops in Iraq with no call at all for U.S. corporate interests to leave. The anti-war movement a generation ago could not depend on the likes of Johnson and Nixon to end the Vietnam conflict; the masses had to bring pressure. This is our challenge today.

LS: Your book is very much a how-to guide to dissenting within the ranks. How have people responded to this inside and outside the armed forces? What did you risk by writing it — and by forming Appeal for Redress as an active-duty member?

JH: The response from my colleagues within the Navy has been enormous. I am asked off base consistently for copies of the book, which I respond to consistently. The Appeal for Redress has sent out a little over 100 copies to active duty across the U.S., including some stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Amazon has been my only consistent indicator for how we are doing outside the military. We have consistently been in the top 100 in areas dealing with Iraq, human rights and race issues.

In terms of risk, one would think I risked being marginalized further within the ranks. I mentioned earlier the noose incident, which took place prior to us forming the Appeal for Redress. I certainly endured minor reprisals during that struggle against the noose in my shop, which I document in Antiwar Soldier. However, once we went public with the appeal, the chain of command has been hands-off, with the exception of the public affairs officer of my ship informing me of my First Amendment rights as a sailor occasionally. This hands-off approach is a validation of Frederick Douglass’ pronouncement 150 years ago when he stated, “The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those they oppress.” It means that oftentimes, oppressive conditions persist due to the endurance of the victim. Only consistent agitation and a demand for basic dignity can help to change an oppressive environment and situation.

LS: What has been your biggest victory thus far with Appeal for Redress?

JH: First, demonstrating there is a base within the armed forces opposed to this war. It helps to dispel the myth that everyone within the military is monolithic and supports the mission 100 percent. Simply because one takes an oath to defend the Constitution does not mean they have sacrificed their rights embodied within that document.

Second, the appeal being a conduit through which active-duty (troops) get involved within the broader anti-war struggle such as Iraq Veterans Against the War. Liam Madden, co-founder of the appeal, currently serves on IVAW’s board of directors.

LS: What are you doing next?

We’re going to continue to push the Appeal for Redress and Antiwar Soldier to all active-duty, reserve and guard troops. I’ll continue to work within the mass movement through the National Assembly to End the Iraq War. The National Assembly speaks directly to my core beliefs and gives me the opportunity to work with everyone laboring to bring the troops home. I’ll probably remain within the complex for at least another three to four years at minimum, although I keep all my options open. No matter where I am, whether that is within the complex or teaching in a high school or college classroom, I’ll remain steadfast and committed to bringing about social justice and transforming this society from being thing-oriented to being people-based. Kwame Ture (aka Stokley Carmichael) taught us at Howard that the struggle is eternal and our people, those on the margins, are going to need us to do until we die. Therefore, we are committed to eternal struggle.

Posted in Gulf War Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , | Comments Off on Anti-War Soldier Jonathan Hutto: People, Not Politicians, Will End the War in Iraq

Editorial Column: A Victory for Justice

June 25, 2008 – The right of a prisoner to challenge his confinement is central to the American way of justice, and to our reputation as a fair and compassionate nation.

So it is a relief to have those values reaffirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court, although by a scarily narrow 5-4 margin. The justices’ majority ruling this month is the latest to criticize the Bush administration’s treatment of so-called enemy combatants detained at Guantanamo Bay. It says the detainees rounded up after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks have a constitutional right to challenge their confinement in civil court under the principle of habeas corpus.

Dissenters have decried this Supreme Court ruling as a dangerous, even disastrous, decision. Justice Antonin Scalia went so far as to say it would “certainly cause more Americans to be killed” by terrorists. But this is the rhetoric of fear that has given the Bush administration permission to trample on the Constitution in the name of national security. Fear rather than reason has permitted abuse of prisoners that most reasonable people would view as torture, and it has denied prisoners due process for years.

This behavior has shown the world a side of the United States at odds with the human rights standards to which we hold other nations.

The 270 detainees remaining at Guantanamo are not all innocent. Many are bad guys no doubt guilty of criminal acts. But they are not being set free — they are merely being given the chance to plead their cases through legal channels.

This ruling is the third rebuff from the high court of the administration’s attempt to end-run the Constitution on this issue. Instead of trying again to deny detainees basic rights, it should concentrate on preparing evidence to justify holding them.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Editorial Column: A Victory for Justice

‘Who Do They Talk To?’ Executive Director of SVAS to Head National Initiative for Wounded Soldiers

June 25, 2008 – A consortium of high-ranking officials from all four military branches has asked Tom Iselin, executive director of Sun Valley Adaptive Sports (SVAS), to help create a comprehensive national program for reintegrating wounded war veterans into society. SVAS has been at the forefront of serving wounded service members from Iraq and Afghanistan.

“After serving all these service members in our community, I really feel compelled to use my gifts and skills to serve as many as I can,” Iselin said.

Iselin cites three main components for the health of wounded service members: recovery, rehabilitation, and reintegration. Recovery involves the initial stages of stabilization, when the wounded service member is brought from the field to a major medical center for treatment. Rehabilitation occurs when the patient receives physical therapy, occupational therapy, mental therapy and recreational therapy. Reintegration, the final step, is achieved when the wounded soldier leaves the hospital and returns to military duty or civilian life.

Iselin’s contribution focuses on the final step of reintegration.

The national reintegration plan calls for the coordination of national, state and local organizations to direct resources, from mental health to vocational training to job placement, to the service members’ communities.

“We will need the community to be a part of that transition and reintegration,” Iselin said. “So what I am doing is making a visual model that will show how these organizations are working together and connected with the circle,” providing education, training, vocation, health, family support, faith and recreation.

“I’m answering this question: ‘When they get home, who do they talk to?'” Iselin said. “Because in the end these young men and women are going to come back home, and when they do they need to get into this circle of care in order to thrive and to have long-term sustainable health and wellness.”

The idea is to get a local organization to be the liaison between the wounded warrior and the community. The organization will then fold in locals like a business owner who offers a job, a mental health provider that offers family therapy, or a nonprofit like SVAS that offers recreational recovery.

“It would be like a clearing house,” Iselin said. “Someone will have to take the initiative and have the passion to help manage this stuff, because it cannot be done in Washington. To me, the most logical organization that exists in each city would be Rotary Club or American Legion.”

The goal of the program is to create a dependable, long-term holistic approach to restore wounded warriors and their families to the highest possible level of functioning.

“We want them not just to live, but to thrive,” Iselin said. “This is the goal that is coming from Washington. Historically, the government has provided health, education and training, but now they want people to do more, to give them the tools and opportunities they need to be the people they have always wanted to be.”

“Of all the people I have ever worked with, Tom [Iselin] is just really fabulous,” said George Schaefer, a 40-year veteran of the federal government who retired from the office of the Under Secretary of Defense in December 2007 and now sits on the SVAS board.

“He has the niche of SVAS, which is excellent, but he also sees the bigger view, the bigger picture of what is really needed. The DoD has recognized this, that the DoD alone cannot solve the problem. It needs a total American support system that is not just VA, but includes the states and the local communities, because when [the veterans] go back to their communities, that is when they really need the help. We’ve learned of the consequences of not taking care of our people who come back from fighting regardless of why we went in there.”

Since October 2001, about 1.6 million U.S. troops have been deployed to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. According to a report from the Department of Defense, as of June 24, 2008, 4,105 American soldiers have died in Operation Iraqi Freedom and 30,275 have been wounded.

But a recent study jointly conducted by RAND Health and the RAND National Security Research Division, titled “Invisible Wounds of War: Psychological and Cognitive Injuries, Their Consequences, and Services to Assist Recovery” believes those numbers will only grow exponentially over time.

The study sited two particular types of injury that are becoming more and more common: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBI). PTSD is a psychological trauma that if untreated can lead to depression, substance abuse and even suicide. TBI is a term used to describe a range of injuries from mild concussions to severe head wounds.

The RAND report estimates that 300,000 service members may suffer some form of PTSD while 19 percent or 320,000 service members may have experienced TBI during deployment. Original estimates for TBI were between 50,000-70,000.

TBI are the most common injuries of the current war. SVAS will focus its programs solely on service members who have suffered TBI or visual impairment, which according to Iselin and Tom Zampieri of the Blind Veterans Association, is another fairly common but overlooked injury associated with TBI.

Iselin’s work with the federal government and its reintegration plan, however, will not be limited to just TBI and visual impairment.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on ‘Who Do They Talk To?’ Executive Director of SVAS to Head National Initiative for Wounded Soldiers

Iraq Vet Driven by Friend’s Death

June 25, 2008 – On the eve of last month’s Senate vote on Sen. Jim Webb’s GI Bill, Patrick Campbell clicked “send” on one last lobbying e-mail to staffers. Then he broke down and cried.

Campbell, the legislative director for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, had started his message by laying out all of the latest developments on Webb’s bill.

In the final paragraphs, the Iraq war veteran shared the news that was foremost in his mind, news that he hadn’t shared with anyone outside his unit.

“Yesterday,” he wrote, “one of my buddies from Iraq committed suicide.”

It should have been a heady week for Campbell, a week in which the former staffer for Sen. Barbara Boxer (Calif.) and other Democrats shared a rally stage with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-­Calif.), saw the Senate vote overwhelmingly in favor of Webb’s bill and graduated from law school at Catholic University.

But Campbell and the other soldiers in his unit had recently received notice that they’d be headed back to Iraq early next year. And then, in the midst of all that was happening in Washington, Campbell got word about his friend, a sergeant who had taken him under his wing during his tour of duty in Iraq.

Saturday afternoon, Campbell walked off the stage at the Catholic University graduation, handed his diploma to his parents and headed straight to the airport to fly to the sergeant’s funeral.

In 2007, at least 115 active-duty soldiers and National Guard and Reserve troops committed suicide, the highest rate since the Army began keeping records in 1980. IAVA estimates that between 30 percent and 40 percent of returning war veterans will face “serious mental health injury” — especially post-traumatic stress disorder — and that those numbers are exacerbated by long tours and frequent redeployments.

Campbell says the memory of his friend motivates him to fight for better care.

A former student body president at the University of California at Berkeley, Campbell was on the Capitol Hill fast track by the time he hit his mid-20s. But sitting with co-workers at a Capitol Hill apartment on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, Campbell had a feeling of helplessness that he couldn’t shake.

So he walked to the still-smoldering Pentagon and asked if he could help search for bodies. He was turned away, and in that moment, he vowed that he’d become a medic himself. After a few twists and turns on and off Capitol Hill, Campbell joined the National Guard in 2003, squeezing basic training into his first year of law school.

He spent almost a year patrolling the streets of Baghdad with his unit, dodging the constant dangers that accompanied every neighborhood patrol. Although he admits that his unit was “very lucky” and he did not have to treat any major traumatic injuries, Campbell treated many Iraqi civilians.

It wasn’t always easy being a former congressional aide from California assigned to a tight-knit unit from the Louisiana bayou, but Campbell said “the sergeant” — that’s what he calls his late friend, out of respect for the privacy of the man’s family — was the one person who would always include him.

“When we would raid a house, we would have to split up into teams,” Campbell remembered. “I could tell a lot of the younger guys weren’t too excited about kicking in the door with a medic by their side. But he would always take me. … I trusted him, and he trusted me.”

After their tour of duty ended in October 2005, Campbell and the sergeant went their separate ways. Campbell returned to Washington, where he eventually signed on with IAVA. The sergeant went back home to Louisiana, where Campbell said the transition to civilian life took its toll.

“When these guys go [into battle], they learn to shut down their emotions,” said Campbell. “What helps you in Iraq is now hurting you at home.”

During a particularly rough patch earlier this year, Campbell said, the sergeant received a letter notifying him that his unit would be going back to Iraq.

“It was just too much,” said Campbell. “[The sergeant] sent a text message to someone at the armory, and they sent the police to go find him. They found him in a boat a couple days later. He had shot himself.”

Campbell said the funeral was “wonderful and horrible” all at once. It was the first time the unit had been back together since leaving Iraq. But only the sergeant’s body was there, laid out in an open casket, despite a gunshot wound to the face.

Campbell said that the transition from military to civilian life often hits Guard and Reserve troops particularly hard. He experienced it firsthand. After returning from Iraq, he said, it took a full year of his own reckless behavior and an ultimatum from his best friend before he admitted that he needed counseling for combat stress.

Even then, Campbell said he didn’t fully break down until days later, when a preview for an Iraq war film sent him over the edge. He said he spent hours in the theater, crying.

At IAVA, Campbell is helping to push for legislation that would provide returning soldiers with mandatory one-on-one screenings with mental health professionals within six months of returning from combat. He is also working toward increased access to mental health services in rural areas, a particular problem for some of the soldiers in his unit from remote parts of Louisiana.

Campbell wants Congress to lead the charge for a holistic approach to veterans’ mental health, including help for family members and targeted advertising campaigns to reduce the stigma that soldiers attach to counseling. He has also fought hard for the passage of the educational benefits in Webb’s GI Bill, which is expected to win Senate approval this week. He says the benefits would give returning soldiers a sense of purpose and “a reason to get up in the morning.”

Campbell said he’s “still on the hook” for another tour of duty in Iraq, although he does have the option of deferring it. If he does have to go back, he said he wants to go back with his old unit, even if it is a man down.

Until then, Campbell said, he thinks of the sergeant every day as he prepares for work.

At the funeral in Louisiana, Campbell promised his fallen friend that every lawmaker on Capitol Hill would someday know his story. “The last thing I said to him as I stood over his casket was, ‘I am never going to let them forget you.’”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Iraq Vet Driven by Friend’s Death