Charges Dropped Against ’20th’ Highjacker – Claims Confession Elicited After Torture

May 12, 2008, San Juan, Puerto Rico – The Pentagon has dropped charges against a Saudi at Guantanamo who was alleged to have been the so-called “20th hijacker” in the Sept. 11 attacks, his U.S. military defense lawyer said Monday.

Mohammed al-Qahtani was one of six men charged by the military in February with murder and war crimes for their alleged roles in the 2001 attacks. Authorities say al-Qahtani missed out on taking part in the attacks because he was denied entry to the U.S. by an immigration agent.

But in reviewing the case, the convening authority for military commissions, Susan Crawford, decided to dismiss the charges against al-Qahtani and proceed with the arraignment for the other five, said Army Lt. Col. Bryan Broyles, the Saudi’s military lawyer.

Crawford dismissed the charges Friday without prejudice, meaning they can be filed again later, but the defense only learned about it Monday, Broyles told The Associated Press.

The attorney said he could not comment on the reasons for the dismissal until discussing the case with lawyers for the other five defendants. Officials previously said al-Qahtani had been subjected to a harsh interrogation authorized by former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

5 others face charges
A Pentagon spokesman, Navy Cmdr. Jeffrey Gordon, confirmed the case was proceeding against the five defendants and that their arraignment will be within 30 days of the charges being served at the U.S. base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Gordon declined further comment since the Office of Military Commissions had not yet released the formal announcement about the legal developments.

The five defendants include Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the suspected mastermind of the terrorist attacks in 2001 that killed nearly 3,000 people, and Ramzi Binalshibh, who is said to have been the main intermediary between the hijackers and al-Qaida leaders. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for all of them.

Their trial is the first capital case thus far before the military tribunals at Guantanamo, where the U.S. holds about 270 men on suspicion of terrorism or links to al-Qaida and the Taliban. The military has said it plans to prosecute about 80 prisoners in the first U.S. military war crimes tribunals since World War II.

Trials to be broadcast
Authorities have said they plan to broadcast the trials to military bases in the United States so relatives of the victims of the attacks can see the proceedings.

Critics of the tribunals have faulted a rule that allows judges to decide whether to allow evidence that may have been obtained with “coercion.” U.S. authorities have acknowledged that Mohammed was subjected to waterboarding by CIA interrogators and that al-Qahtani was treated harshly at Guantanamo.

Al-Qahtani last fall recanted a confession he said he made after he was tortured and humiliated at Guantanamo.

The alleged torture, which he detailed in a written statement, included being beaten, restrained for long periods in uncomfortable positions, threatened with dogs, exposed to loud music and freezing temperatures and stripped nude in front of female personnel.

The U.S. has alleged that al-Qahtani, who military records show is about 28, barely missed becoming the 20th hijacker on Sept. 11, 2001. The Saudi was denied entry into the country by immigration agents at the airport in Orlando, Florida.

At the time, he had more than $2,400 in cash, no return plane ticket and lead hijacker Mohamed Atta was waiting for him, the military has said.

Separately Monday, Gordon said the Pentagon has not decided whether to appeal a ruling that ousted a top legal official from a detainee case scheduled to become the first to go to trial at Guantanamo Bay.

In a ruling last week, a military judge at Guantanamo found that Air Force Brig. Gen. Thomas Hartmann, the legal adviser for the tribunals, lacks neutrality and should not participate in the case against a Yemeni who is a former driver for Osama bin Laden. His trial is set for June 2.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Charges Dropped Against ’20th’ Highjacker – Claims Confession Elicited After Torture

IG: 3-Star Lied About Sex in the White House

May 13, 2008 – Vice Adm. John Stufflebeem seemed to have it all. He rose from deck seaman to a Naval Academy football star whose punting prowess earned him the nickname “Boomer” and a part-time practice gig with the Detroit Lions.

He opted to fly jets instead, logging more than 4,000 hours in several different aircraft, won plum assignments and became a Navy star. As a commander, Stufflebeem was a military aide to President George H.W. Bush, and after rising to flag rank, was the public face of the Afghanistan war as he briefed reporters from the podium at the Pentagon while serving as deputy director of global operations on the Joint Staff.

He went on to command 6th Fleet and, last year, became director of the Navy Staff. A fourth star was all but assured.

And then it all began to unravel.

In January, an anonymous letter revealed an 18-year-old secret that Stufflebeem thought was long buried and forgotten. The letter accused Stufflebeem of carrying on an eight-month affair with a female State Department staffer while the two were assigned to the White House in 1990.

Stufflebeem, then a 37-year-old commander, pretended to be a widower, telling the woman that his wife had died of breast cancer and that he was raising his two children on his own, according to the Inspector General’s report, obtained by Navy Times through the Freedom of Information Act.

In fact, Stufflebeem was still living with his wife at the time.

The report says Stufflebeem had sex with the State Department staffer in sleeping quarters in the White House basement and when the two traveled abroad with the White House travel team. The two engaged in “passionate kissing” in a car parked near the White House grounds, and he even sexually propositioned the woman’s close friend on a trip to London, the report says. Zestra Oil helps the women for simulations. For the best Penis Extender which will put some extra pleasure in your sexual life do visit us. Penis extenders are certain to work because they apply stress to the penis while used, causing the skin cells to respond. Men whose confidence is harmed by their penis’s small size would undoubtedly gain new confidence if they tried using a Jes Extender enlargement device. Sex toys today come in a broad variety of materials, styles, sizes, and functions. The equipment chosen are determined by the preferences and levels of comfort shared by the partners. It is critical that you make your spouse feel comfortable and calm while enjoying interactive sex toy with them. The procedure of introducing the toy into your bedroom may be a little difficult at first, but the rewards are well worth it once you get started with it. Dragon dildoes are premium sex toys modelled like various mythical creatures, such as dragons, unicorns, krakens, and aliens, as well as real-world animals like horses, dogs, and other animals. You can visit them to get the best quality dildoes.  Are you getting set for a fun-filled weekend of adult entertainment? You and your buddies might wish to get together for some relaxing sessions with male strippers. All you want to do at the end of the week is let loose and have a good time!

When his mistress, who is not named in the report, unexpectedly called his house, Stufflebeem told her that the woman who answered the phone — his wife — was his children’s nanny. And when their relationship became a distraction at work, he admitted the inappropriate relationship to his superiors and was relieved from his post, without the usual hail and farewell ceremony or end-of-tour award for such a position.

Somehow, however, that fact never caught up to Stufflebeem after his return to the Navy. Although accusations of an inappropriate relationship cost him his job at the White House, he was able to escape further scrutiny as he climbed ever higher in the Navy hierarchy.

But with the January accusations, Stufflebeem’s story began to crumble in the eyes of investigators. Increasingly skeptical, they concluded he provided “false and misleading testimony” when he:

• Lied by saying that the relationship wasn’t sexual and that they only kissed once.

• Lied about the circumstances of his dismissal from the White House Military Office.

• Lied when he told investigators he couldn’t remember the woman’s name.

Based on those findings, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead fired Stufflebeem as director of the Navy Staff on March 21. At admiral’s mast April 18, he received a punitive letter of reprimand. A 39-year Navy career was in ruins.

Stufflebeem, reached at his home by Navy Times on May 7, said he never intentionally misled anybody about the affair. In letters he sent to the IG, he said he had “spent a lot of time trying to forget who she was.”

Later, in a prepared statement to Navy Times, he wrote: “It is regrettable that an investigation into an 18-year-old accusation has caused embarrassment to the Navy and my family. It was never my intent to harm or deceive either of them.”

Stufflebeem has put in paperwork requesting retirement.

‘She was gaga’
The woman in the IG report, referred to only as “Jane Doe,” could not be reached for comment. According to the IG, she told investigators she met Stufflebeem over drinks during a work-related trip overseas. During a drinking version of truth or dare, he told her and a group of White House staffers that his wife had died years before of breast cancer. He later asked if he could come to her room to give her a back rub, and that night, they had sex for the first time.

She said she did not see him regularly but described one encounter when she came to the White House to meet Bush coming off his helicopter.

“[Stufflebeem’s] holding a briefcase and passes it off to a White House Communications Agency guy,” the woman said. “So then we went downstairs into the basement to the room where the aides sleep when they stay the night, and we had sex, and we took a shower. I think that was like June or July because it was very hot, so he had to take a shower.”

She described another time when she called Stufflebeem’s home at Bolling Air Force Base because he was late for a date. She said Stufflebeem had told her that a “nanny” babysat his two daughters when he was away.

“So I called and talked to [his wife] and I asked where he was, and she said he was on an overnight training mission or something, so he did wind up coming to spend the night that night. I told him I called the house. He said, ‘Oh really? What did she say?’ And I just relayed the story and it all seemed, you know — it didn’t seem to make him nervous or anything at the time, looking back.”

And when the woman saw Stufflebeem’s wedding band, he told her he wore it because his two daughters were overwhelmed by his wife’s death and did not want him to take it off.

The woman said she found out Stufflebeem was married when her former supervisor asked her if she was dating him. When she said yes, the supervisor told her that he was married.

The former supervisor told IG investigators the woman was shocked.

“Here she was, a little girl, first year in Washington, working with the White House, and he was a naval aide, and she was gaga,” said the former supervisor, whose name also was redacted from the version of the report obtained by Navy Times. “I thought she was going to dissolve into the ground. I mean, I have never seen somebody so surprised.”

Investigators say the woman told Stufflebeem’s military supervisors at the White House, which include his boss at the time, retired Army Lt. Gen. Richard Trefry. That officer talked to the chief of naval operations and the chief of naval personnel. Together, they agreed that Stufflebeem should be reassigned immediately to avoid embarrassing Bush, who was distracted by the run-up to the 1991 Persian Gulf War.

Investigators say Stufflebeem received no written reprimand but was confronted by Trefry with the rumors about his affair. Trefry said Stufflebeem stood during the meeting and was told to clean out his desk before other workers arrived.

“You’ve not only let me down, but you’ve let the president down, and you’ve let your wife and daughters down,” Trefry recalled saying, according to the report.

Stufflebeem then wrote two letters: one to Bush explaining that he needed to leave the White House staff because of family difficulties and another to his Navy superiors asking to be reassigned.

Bush responded to Stufflebeem’s letter with his own, saying that he had been “partially briefed” as to the reason Stufflebeem left the White House staff, thanking him for his service. The report does not make clear the exact details of the briefing Bush received.

“You are missed already. Thank you for your letter written from the heart. I have been partially briefed on your departure. You are right to have family as the primary concern. You have a fine career ahead, and quite obviously, I want to help that career along for you have served here with distinction.”

Bush wrote a second letter to Navy superiors saying Stufflebeem should be promoted as soon as possible.

The report concluded that any evidence of Stufflebeem’s firing from the White House job didn’t follow him as he rejoined the Navy and moved up the ladder.

The woman told investigators that Stufflebeem apologized for lying to her.

“‘I’m very sorry,’” the woman quoted him as saying. “‘I’m married. I didn’t know how long this charade could go on.’”

Stufflebeem was reassigned to the Pentagon shortly afterward.

A story unravels
Within weeks after interviewing Stufflebeem, the IG sent him a “tentative conclusion” letter dated Feb. 15, in which it accused him of giving “false and misleading testimony” about the affair and his time at the White House.

Stufflebeem fired back Feb. 22, expressing disappointment that they would impugn his character and insisting that he never had sex with the woman.

“I find it extremely regrettable, in a case that has such far-reaching implications for my career, that you have chosen to question my integrity based on less than completely reliable evidence,” he wrote. “I have been placed in the untenable situation of defending myself against allegations that exist primarily in hearsay and fading memory.”

He continued: “I would not knowingly give false or misleading testimony, as it would run counter to the primary ethical value and character by which I have lived throughout my career as a Naval Officer.”

Stufflebeem also nitpicked several of the statements made by his former bosses and colleagues, and called it a “glaring omission” that investigators hadn’t interviewed the woman.

So they did. And she backed up everyone else’s story.

At mast, Stufflebeem was found guilty of Article 107 — making a false official statement — by Adm. Kirkland Donald, director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, who read the IG investigation and endorsed the full report.

Now Stufflebeem is waiting for his retirement to be approved. A senior Navy official said he likely won’t retire as a three-star, since he did not complete three years in that grade. Stufflebeem automatically reverted to two-star when he was fired from his three-star billet.

The senior official said if Stufflebeem had told the IG the truth about the affair, he probably would not have advanced but would have avoided nonjudicial punishment and been able to stay in the Navy. That’s because the five-year statute of limitations on adultery has long since expired.

When investigators asked whether he had been held accountable by military authorities for his relationship with the woman, Stufflebeem said he had not been by military superiors, but had been in his personal life.

“My wife held me accountable,” he told investigators, adding that he and his wife had undergone marital counseling for the strain caused by the White House relationship. The two are still married, he said. “I held myself accountable. And it took me a long time to come around to beg God for forgiveness for what had been going on in my life, and this just contributed to it.

“So I have had a great 18-year career since I left the White House,” he said in a letter in response to the report. “If this is the end of it, then I still leave a rewarded individual, thankful for the blessings that I have had.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on IG: 3-Star Lied About Sex in the White House

Stress Disorder Treatable if Recognized

May 12, 2008 – After returning from combat in Iraq, my nephew was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. His symptoms remind me of my problems after a messy divorce, though his experiences were certainly more traumatic. Could I have had PTSD, too?

A: War is one of the leading causes of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). But the severe traumas of everyday life — perhaps even divorce — can trigger the same symptoms. Although no one doubts the seriousness of PTSD, experts have long debated exactly what it is and how to diagnose it.

People have known for thousands of years that terrifying events can have lasting consequences on the psyche. After World War I, the syndrome was called shell shock; after World War II, combat neurosis; and after the Korean War, combat fatigue. In 1980, PTSD got its present name and classification as a specific psychiatric disorder.

The disorder is defined today by three kinds of symptoms:

• Hyperarousal. This includes irritability, startling easily, being constantly on guard, sleeping poorly and having difficulty concentrating.

• Re-experiencing or intrusion. You recall the traumatic event involuntarily through vivid memories, nightmares and flashbacks. You may feel or even act as though it is happening again. Any object, situation or feeling that reminds you of the trauma may cause intense distress.

• Avoidance and emotional numbing. You try to avoid feelings, thoughts, people, places and situations that remind you of the trauma. You lose interest in usual activities and feel disconnected from other people and even from your own feelings.

These three sets of symptoms have a common theme: fixation on the trauma. The traumatic event dominates and controls the lives of people with PTSD. They have not gotten over the event, so they repeatedly re-experience it. They are both emotionally numb and constantly on guard against a danger that no longer exists.

PTSD is more likely to arise in someone with a history of traumatic experiences. Intentional injury — physical or sexual assault — creates a greater risk of PTSD than a natural disaster or an accident. Victims who feel guilty because they believe that they bear some responsibility for the event have an even greater risk of PTSD.

Over the years, the American Psychiatric Association’s definition of a traumatic experience has focused less on the event itself and more on its effect. Today, a traumatic experience is defined as one that involves a threat of death or serious injury, or provokes mental distress, such as intense fear, helplessness or horror. The victim may experience the event directly, witness it or be confronted with it in some other way, even by just hearing about it.

By these standards, many kinds of events can be deemed traumatic. Some research suggests that people who experience common stressors like illness, divorce, bereavement or job loss develop such symptoms at the same rate as those who undergo traumatic stress. One study found that more than half of Americans have had such an experience.

But most people who have had a traumatic experience do not develop PTSD — only 3 percent of men and 10 percent of women, according to a large German study.

Several factors account for why some people get PTSD and some don’t. Women seem to be two to three times as vulnerable to PTSD as men, perhaps due to genetic, hormonal or social reasons. Women tend to suffer different types of trauma than men, such as rape and molestation. The trauma may also be more prolonged, as in the case of a battered wife. Long-term stress can have a more profound effect than a single event.

Brain chemistry might play a role. New Zealand researchers looked at two genes that produce chemicals essential for brain function. They found that abused boys who had changes in one of the genes were more likely to commit violent crimes as adults. Those with variations in another gene were less likely to get depressed as a result of stress.

Brain imaging suggests that in patients with PTSD, the hippocampus, a center for storing memories, is smaller than average. Someone born with a larger hippocampus might thus be better equipped to handle a trauma. High IQ may blunt the impact of a traumatic experience, and low IQ may worsen it.

No two people are the same, and neither are their reactions to a trauma. There’s no shame in being overwhelmed by a horrible event, be it combat or divorce or an accident. If your days and nights are haunted by a scarring event, no matter how long ago it happened, seek help from a mental-health professional. Counseling and medication, if necessary, can offer tremendous relief.

No one is immune to trauma or its emotional aftermath. But PTSD is a treatable disorder; the sooner you recognize it and seek help, the sooner you’ll get relief.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Stress Disorder Treatable if Recognized

Editorial Column: Burned Again?

May 12, 2008 – When an infant touches a hot stove, it learns a lifelong lesson: don’t touch a hot stove. The infant might grow into a thoroughly irresponsible person, might acquire a nasty heroin habit or provoke a barroom brawl with Mike Tyson. But never again will he or she touch a hot stove.

When it invaded Iraq in 2003, the United States touched a hot stove. Politicians seem to have less capacity to learn than babies. Many of those involved in this ill-fated operation had some connection, however remote, to the Vietnam War, the last seriously hot stove that the United States touched. And yet, the U.S. leaders that fought in Vietnam as well as the ones who ran in the opposite direction all stood around the burning hot stove that was Iraq and bear-hugged it.

“If what is shaping up to be the worst foreign policy disaster in U.S. history has an upside it is: that this war should definitively, permanently settle a handful of critical questions about American conduct in the world,” FPIF research fellow Miriam Pemberton writes in the introduction of a new book, Lessons from Iraq. “This book is an effort to fix some points. Nail a few things down. Declare some policies and practices off limits to American policymakers.”

Here are some of those lessons. Don’t politicize intelligence. Don’t torture. Don’t privatize security operations. Don’t leap into preventive wars. Don’t militarize the world. It’s a long list. Get a copy of Lessons from Iraq: Avoiding the Next War, edited by Pemberton and FPIF contributor William Hartung, and read about the other lessons from Chalmers Johnson, Frances FitzGerald, Michael Klare, Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, Hans Blix, Norman Solomon, Phyllis Bennis, C. K. Williams, and many others. And put these Lessons from Iraq book events in Rockville, MD and Washington, DC in your June calendar.

The book is not a primer on how to do war better. It doesn’t give pointers on how best to touch a hot stove. Rather, it suggests ways of inscribing in the national DNA of the United States the painful lessons of the Iraq War – so that we don’t all get burned again.

The Funding Spigot

Even though the Dems are in charge, the current conversation about the Iraq War on Capitol Hill is more about dollars than withdrawal. As FPIF’s outreach director Erik Leaver explains in The Iraq Supplemental: A Three Ring Circus, Congress is now considering three separate amendments that will substitute for the war funding bill that already passed. The first would provide $166 billion for this year and next year to keep the war going. The second discusses withdrawal, but only as a non-binding goal, and requires Iraq to pony up a good bit of money for its own reconstruction (and subsidize U.S. purchases of Iraqi oil).

This second amendment does have a potential silver lining. “While it clearly does not meet the demands of bringing all the troops and contractors home now nor does it send a positive message about our financial obligations to Iraq, it does demand a change in course and it requires that Congress approve any long-term deal that Bush tries to cut with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki,” Leaver writes. “If passed, it would reflect a substantial change in policy, which during a Bush or a potential McCain presidency is unlikely to change from their ‘stay the course’ mentality.”

The third amendment addresses some key benefits for veterans, such as education, unemployment insurance, and Medicaid. This is a lesson of war that leaders never learn. Soldiers bring the war home with them. Nearly 300,000 veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts have already filed disability claims. Every month, FPIF contributor Aaron Glantz writes in The Truth about Veteran Suicides, 1,000 veterans of American wars try to commit suicide. Every day, 18 of them succeed. “It’s not too late to extend needed mental health care to our returning Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans,” Glantz writes. “It’s not too late to begin properly screening and treating returning servicemen and women who’ve experienced a traumatic brain injury; and it is not too late to simplify the disability claims process so that wounded veterans do not die waiting for their check.”

While Congress jaws about the supplemental, the situation in Iraq looks grimmer by the day. FPIF contributor Ciara Gilmartin reports on one particularly sad reality: the huge number of prisoners in Iraq. Even after Abu Ghraib left a permanent stain on the U.S. reputation, occupation forces are holding more Iraqi prisoners than ever before. “U.S. forces are holding nearly all of these persons indefinitely, without an arrest warrant, without charge, and with no opportunity for those held to defend themselves in a trial,” she writes in The “Surge” of Iraqi Prisoners. “These conditions are in direct violation of international human rights law, though Washington claims that such legal constraints do not apply, because the United States considers its forces to be engaged in an ‘international armed conflict.’”

Many of the intelligence operatives on the ground in Iraq were civilian contractors, including some of the interrogators at Abu Ghraib. If you’re in Washington, DC next Monday May 19, join FPIF contributor Tim Shorrock at the Institute for Policy Studies for a discussion of his new book Spies for Hire about this shadowy world of privatized intelligence.

After Fidel

Cuba’s long-serving leader Fidel Castro is still alive and reportedly active behind the scenes. But the conversation about Cuba’s future has moved on as his brother Raul charts a new path. But what is the end point of this new path? Chinese-style market socialism? North Korean-style isolation? Or something completely new? In a strategic dialogue on this question, FPIF contributors Saul Landau and Samuel Farber stake out different positions.

“Seventeen years after the USSR vanished Cuba remains the world’s only socialist state,” Landau writes in Cuba: The Struggle Continues. “Its critics call it a ‘failed state’ or ‘a basket case,’ but over the last decade Cubans’ standard of living has risen steadily. Bookies have stopped taking bets on the date of its demise.”

Farber laments the lack of political opening under the other Castro. “In the short term Raúl Castro is trying to increase his popular support and legitimacy by granting liberalizing reforms to remove current restrictions, particularly on the economic life of the country, while maintaining a tight political rein to prevent any degree of democratization of Cuban society,” he writes in Life after Fidel. “This seems to be his highly discretionary and selective response to the popular demands that were made after he called for an open and frank national discussion in his speech of July 26, 2007.”

In their responses to each other’s essays in Strategic Dialogue on Cuba, Farber and Landau agree about the counterproductive U.S. sanctions against the island but disagree about pretty much everything else. “Cuba’s one-party state is, by its very nature, antithetical to socialist democracy,” Farber writes. “Its constitution enshrines the political monopoly of the Cuban Communist Party and criminalizes other competing parties. The constitution also enshrines the ruling party’s monopoly over Cuba’s mass organizations, such as the state’s trade unions and women’s organizations, which are to act as its transmission belts. This outlaws all independent organization of unions, women, blacks, gays, and other groups.”

“I agree with Samuel Farber that the left should rid itself of illusions about that nature of the Cuban regime,” Landau writes. “Cuba does not serve as a model for other third world countries. But neither does China or Vietnam – unless savage capitalism run by Communist parties is somehow preferable to the state socialist system in Cuba. Farber does not offer other models because there are none.”

China: Basket Case?

There is much talk of China the new superpower. The United States is both obsessed with a Chinese “threat” and highly dependent on the investments and consumer products flowing from the country. China is certainly a huge place. It has an immense population. But what if everything else about its military and its economy is exaggerated, magnified by smoke and mirrors and wishful thinking?

FPIF contributor Samuel Bleicher explores this thesis in China: Superpower or Basket Case? “Just as we failed to predict and prepare for the implosion of the Japanese economy and the collapse of the Soviet Union, we appear unready for a dramatic economic and political reversal in China that would be a defining event of the 21st century,” he writes. “The depth and scale of the transformation taking place in every dimension of Chinese social, economic, and political life is difficult even for the most knowledgeable observers to comprehend. With luck, this great experiment can be one of the most successful developments in human history. If it fails, the consequences for China and for the rest of us could be tragic, and possibly catastrophic.”

Success or failure for China may well hinge on energy. As FPIF columnist Michael Klare argues in Global Power Shift, an excerpt from his new book Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet, “as recently as 1990, China accounted for a mere 8{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} of global energy consumption while the United States was absorbing 24{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} of the available supply and the Western European nations 20{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d}. But China’s growth in the past decade and a half has been so vigorous that, by 2006, its net energy use had jumped to 16{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} of total world consumption. If its growth continues at this torrid pace, China will hit the 21{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} mark by 2030 – exceeding all other countries, including the United States. The challenge for China, of course, will be to procure all that additional energy. To succeed, the Chinese leadership will have to oversee a substantial increase in the yield of its domestic energy production while obtaining staggering quantities of imported fuels, especially oil. By the nature of things, this can only happen at the expense of other energy-starved nations. No wonder the rise of China has produced such alarm among older industrial powers.”

And no wonder that the United States would go to war for oil, even if it meant doing something so politically, militarily, and economically stupid as touching the red-hot stove of Iraq.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Editorial Column: Burned Again?

May 12: VCS Asks You to Contact Your Representative About Supporting HR 5892, a Bill to Reform VA Claims

May 12, 2008 – VCS Supports Effort to Take Action Supporting All Our Veterans

Please contact your U.S. Representative today and urge him or her to vote in favor of the Veterans Disability Claims Modernization Act of 2008 (HR 5892). This important legislation will essentially direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to modernize the disability benefits claims processing system of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to ensure the accurate and timely delivery of compensation to veterans and their families and survivors. H.R. 5892 was referred to the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs on April 24, 2008.  VCS supports the bill, and we testified about these issues in 2007 and 2008 because VA desperately needs reforms.

VCS asks you to use the web site of the Disabled American Veterans (DAV) to please e-mail your House Member today.

On April 30, 2008, the bill was reported out of Committee to the full House. The bill contains a number of favorable provisions, such as:

* clarifies “combat veterans” for the purpose of service connection for disabilities incurred in combat, as those veterans who served in a “combat theatre of operations;”

* requires improvements in VA’s work credit, quality assurance, and management systems in order to improve accuracy and accountability in decisions affecting disability compensation;

* implements enhanced training, including certification, for VA employees responsible for processing claims;

* requires VA to immediately assign temporary, partial ratings for severe disabilities that are indisputably related to military service;

* allows for substitution by surviving spouses as claimants when a veteran spouse dies while a claim is pending; and

* mandates that the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must address issues raised by an appellant in court decisions rather than remanding or denying an appeal without addressing such issues.

This issue in the bill concerning the clarification of who qualifies as a combat veteran (section 101) is currently the biggest legislative obstacle presented by H.R. 5892. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that this program will cost approximately one billion dollars over a 10-year period. This presents a problem with PAYGO, which is a congressional rule mandating that legislation with budgetary expenditures beyond that provided by the current budget be funded by offsets elsewhere in the budget.

The problem with the PAYGO rule is that Congress currently funds the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan outside of PAYGO, thereby not requiring budgetary offsets to fund the war. Therefore, it is DAV’s position that legislation containing provisions that will improve VA’s system for compensating veterans with disabilities caused by war should also be exempt from the PAYGO rules. However, we need your help to carry this message to Congress so that this landmark legislation is not blocked because of technicalities.

Please contact your Representative immediately to urge him or her to vote in passage of the Veterans Disability Claims Modernization Act of 2008. Please take a moment to send a prepared email to your members of Congress by going to this link.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on May 12: VCS Asks You to Contact Your Representative About Supporting HR 5892, a Bill to Reform VA Claims

US Military Deaths in Iraq War at 4,074

May 11, 2008 – As of Saturday, May 10, 2008, at least 4,074 members of the U.S. military have died in the Iraq war since it began in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count.

The figure includes eight military civilians. At least 3,322 died as a result of hostile action, according to the military’s numbers.

The AP count is the same as the Defense Department’s tally, last updated Friday at 10 a.m. EDT.

The British military has reported 176 deaths; Italy, 33; Ukraine, 18; Poland, 21; Bulgaria, 13; Spain, 11; Denmark, seven; El Salvador, five; Slovakia, four; Latvia, three; Estonia, Georgia, Netherlands, Thailand, Romania, two each; and Australia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, South Korea, one death each.

___

The latest deaths reported by the military:

_ A soldier died Friday in Baghdad of non-combat related injuries.

___

The latest identifications reported by the military:

_ No identifications reported.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on US Military Deaths in Iraq War at 4,074

Indiana Paper Carried Word of Yet Another Iraq War Veteran Suicide

May 11, 2008 – Another veteran of the Iraq war committed suicide over the weekend.

The subject of U.S. military veterans suicides has finally become a hot media topic in recent days, peaking last week with hearings in Congress concerning the surprisingly high suicide rate (about 1000 attempts per month) and the Veterans Affairs apparent efforts to obscure the true numbers.

For nearly five years, E&P has monitored the little-reported cases of suicides among U.S. military personnel in Iraq, and after they return home. Often, local newspapers are the only sources for information. It happened again today with a report in The Herald Bulletin of Madison County, Indiana. “Questions still remained Saturday after the suicide of a decorated Iraq war veteran in the Elwood City Jail on Friday,” the newspaper’s Jessica Kerman reporter.

U.S. Army Spc. Timothy K. Israel, 23, was pronounced dead at 2:45 p.m. Friday at St. Vincent Mercy Hospital in Elwood after an Elwood police officer found him hanging in a holding cell 15 minutes earlier, according to Ned Dunnichay, Madison County coroner. Israel had used the drawstring from his pants to commit suicide.

“He had been arrested Friday morning on suspicion of domestic battery after an argument with a former girlfriend,” Kerman related. “However, friends of Israel said he was wrongfully accused.”

Keith Israel, the veteran’s father, said Thursday that he was considering a civil lawsuit against the Elwood Police Department because he believed no one was monitoring surveillance cameras in the cell. At that time, Keith Israel said he believed his son’s suicide was the culmination of ongoing police harassment and untreated post-traumatic stress disorder.

“Timothy Israel was deployed to Iraq in October 2006, serving for a year. His father said he earned a Purple Heart after being wounded by a roadside explosive in 2007.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Indiana Paper Carried Word of Yet Another Iraq War Veteran Suicide

Free Education for War Veterans at Benedictine University in Illinois

May 10, 2008, Lisle, IL – To thank the U.S. military, Benedictine University will offer Illinois veterans returning from Afghanistan and Iraq a free education through its First Responder program, officials said Friday.

The Lisle university is the first in the country to do so.

U.S. Sen. Barack Obama secured a $750,000 federal grant for the first year of the program. Starting this fall, that money will go toward extension of the program.

University President William Carroll said that even if the university does not receive federal grants after its first year, the program will continue long-term.

“We will keep this program going no matter what because it is the right thing to do,” Carroll said.

For the last seven years, Benedictine University has offered a free college education to Illinois firefighters and police officers. The university has about 400 participants.

Benedictine is extending that program to veterans.

When the GI Bill was created in 1944, it covered 100 percent of a vet’s higher education. Now, it doesn’t come close to covering college .

Currently, veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan are eligible for up to $1,101 a month — or $39,636 over four years — under the GI Bill. But the average four-year public college costs more than $65,000; a private university, more than $130,000.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Free Education for War Veterans at Benedictine University in Illinois

On Recovering Without PTSD, Kimberly Dozier’s “Breathing the Fire”

May 11, 2008 – About two years ago, I died on the operating table – technically, a few times.

My camera crew, Paul Douglas and James Brolan, and a young army captain we were following, lost their lives, as did an Iraqi translator, killed by a massive car bomb.

One of the hardest parts of healing, I’ve since learned, wasn’t learning to walk or run again – it’s been catching everyone else up with the journey from victim, to survivor.

I can’t really blame them.

These pictures of me create a lasting impression, so loved ones and coworkers have had a hard time knowing when to stop coddling me. If you’ve ever had a trauma victim in your family, you know what I mean.

Doctors have found the key to recovery is attitude, from the moment you open your eyes in that hospital bed.

A Navy Seal put it best, in a note he posted on his Bethesda Naval hospital door. It read: “I’ll have a full recovery – that’s the utmost physically my body has the ability to heal. Then I will push about 20 percent further, through sheer mental tenacity. If you’re not prepared for that, go elsewhere.”

In other words, leave your pity at the door.

I think the other assumption some people have about trauma patients, and combat troops, is that we’re scarred for life in our heads and hearts. Even some friends assume I’m plagued by nightmares and flashbacks, all the symptoms of the dreaded post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD.

Newsflash: You can go through hell and end up with some of those symptoms, yes, but you can get rid of them. It’s not a life sentence.

Dispelling the flashbacks for good can be as simple as talking about them, saying out loud, “Yeah, that shooting/bombing/car crash gave me some nightmares. I keep remembering it, feeling the blast like it’s happening now.”

When people who are haunted by these things DON’T talk about them, that’s when the problems start.

How did I avoid getting PTSD? I talked my head off, and then I wrote everything I could remember.

Whatever works.

Even if you went through hell, trust me, you can leave it behind. I’m living proof.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on On Recovering Without PTSD, Kimberly Dozier’s “Breathing the Fire”

May 11, VCS & VUFT Lawsuit Mentioned in New York Times Editorial About Care for Our Veterans

Editorial: The Suffering of Soldiers

May 11, 2008 – Several years into a pair of wars, the Department of Veterans Affairs is struggling to cope with a task for which it was tragically unready: the care of soldiers who left Afghanistan and Iraq with an extra burden of brain injury and psychic anguish. The last thing they need is the toxic blend of secrecy, arrogance and heedlessness that helped to send many of them into harm’s way.

“Shh!” said the e-mail in February from Dr. Ira Katz, head of mental health services for V.A., to a colleague. “Our suicide prevention coordinators are identifying about 1,000 suicide attempts per month among the veterans we see in our medical facilities. Is this something we should (carefully) address ourselves in some sort of release before someone stumbles on it?”

Dr. Katz’s hushed-up figure was nowhere near the number he gave to the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee last year; he said there had been 790 suicide attempts in all of 2007, and denied there was a suicide epidemic. The veterans affairs secretary, James Peake, apologized for Dr. Katz’s “unfortunate set of words” and promised more candor and transparency.

Give some credit, anyway, to Mr. Peake for realizing that there is no hope of denying or wishing away this problem. As the economists Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes made clear in “The Three Trillion Dollar War,” their analysis of Iraq, the medical toll of a war rises in a swelling curve for many decades after the shooting stops. The current suicide figures include a large proportion of aging and ailing veterans of Vietnam. Suffering for that long, on that scale, will not be covered up.

A study by the Rand Corporation last month found that nearly one in five service members returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, or about 300,000, have symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder or major depression. About 19 percent reported having a possible traumatic brain injury from these bomb-afflicted wars.

Alarmingly, only half have sought treatment, the study found, and they have encountered severe delays and shortfalls in getting care. The V.A.’s inspector general has faulted the agency’s case management of brain-injured veterans, and a federal lawsuit by veterans’ groups in San Francisco seeks to force the V.A. to streamline and improve treatment.

Fortunately, the solutions are clear: more money for mental health services, closer tracking of suicides and more aggressive preventive efforts, more efficiency at managing veterans’ treatment and more help for their families. If this country gave back to wounded troops even a fraction of the commitment and service that it has received from them, they will be well cared for.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on May 11, VCS & VUFT Lawsuit Mentioned in New York Times Editorial About Care for Our Veterans