Combat Veterans Face Higher Mortality Rates

November 11, 2008, Oklahoma City – Of all the obstacles facing soldiers when they return home from a war-zone deployment, dying in a car crash may not appear to be at the top of the list.

Overall, combat veterans were 25{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} more likely to die from post-conflict, injury-related deaths than their counterparts who served in the military during the same time period but who did not see combat. Amanda Demanda – Car accident attorneys fighting for their clients and helps them for the best justice.

But a recent study by an Army medical researcher shows veterans returning from a war zone are more than 25{cd9ac3671b356cd86fdb96f1eda7eb3bb1367f54cff58cc36abbd73c33c82e1d} more likely to die in a car accident than their military counterparts who didn’t see combat.

Dr. Joseph Knapik (kuh-NAP’-ick) presented his findings today during a seminar at the University of Oklahoma’s College of Public Health.

Knapik analyzed the findings of a host of studies on combat veterans from Vietnam and the first Gulf War.

He says the studies show combat veterans are more likely to speed and less likely to use seat belts or wear motorcycle helmets.

 

Posted in Gulf War Updates, Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Combat Veterans Face Higher Mortality Rates

Obama Administration Can Act Quickly to Restore Openness

Washington, DC, November 12, 2008 – The Obama administration can act quickly after taking office in January to reverse the secrecy trend of the last eight years and restore openness in the executive branch,
according to a set of new proposals posted online today by the National Security Archive. More than 60 organizations joined the recommendations, which call on President-elect Obama to restore efficiency and openness to the Freedom of Information Act process, reform the classification system to reduce overclassification and facilitate greater declassification, and ensure that presidential records are handled in accordance with the law and Congress’ intent.

“President-elect Obama can make a difference on Day One in the way his administration relates to the public,” explained the Archive’s general counsel Meredith Fuchs. “Secrecy got out of control in the last eight years, but a few focused directives will go a long way towards reopening the government.”

A diverse coalition of groups convened by the National Security Archive developed the three proposals. If adopted, the recommendations would establish the needed framework for accountability, integrity, and
greater effectiveness in the federal government. The proposals call on the president-elect to take the following actions during his first days in office:

* Issue a memorandum on the Freedom of Information Act that establishes a policy of maximum possible public disclosure of government records and directing an attorney general memo that reinstitutes the presumption of openness under FOIA, calls on agencies to use technology to engage with and inform the public, and commits to creating a more collaborative and less adversarial relationship with the public on issues involving access to information.

* Revoke President Bush’s executive order on the Presidential Records Act, which undermined the PRA by purporting to create new constitutional privileges for the family members and descendents of former presidents
and for former vice presidents; commit to working with NARA and Congress to ensure necessary oversight for the transfer and processing of the Bush presidential records; and establish a policy for the new administration to preserve all presidential records of administrative, historical, informational, or evidentiary value.

* Issue a presidential directive rejecting prior abuses of the classification system and tasking the relevant executive branch agencies to develop a new executive order on classification that will reduce overclassification, add internal mechanisms to prevent classification abuses, ensure consideration of the public interest throughout the lifecycle of classified information, and improve the declassification process and information sharing.

Visit the Web site of the National Security Archive for more information about today’s posting and to read the full text of the new proposals:  http://www.nsarchive.org

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Obama Administration Can Act Quickly to Restore Openness

Bush, Out of Office, Could Oppose Inquiries

November 12, 2008 – When a Congressional committee subpoenaed Harry S. Truman in 1953, nearly a year after he left office, he made a startling claim: Even though he was no longer president, the Constitution still empowered him to block subpoenas.

“If the doctrine of separation of powers and the independence of the presidency is to have any validity at all, it must be equally applicable to a president after his term of office has expired,” Truman wrote to the committee.

Congress backed down, establishing a precedent suggesting that former presidents wield lingering powers to keep matters from their administration secret. Now, as Congressional Democrats prepare to move forward with investigations of the Bush administration, they wonder whether that claim may be invoked again.

“The Bush administration overstepped in its exertion of executive privilege, and may very well try to continue to shield information from the American people after it leaves office,” said Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, who sits on two committees, Judiciary and Intelligence, that are examining aspects of Mr. Bush’s policies.

Topics of open investigations include the harsh interrogation of detainees, the prosecution of former Gov. Don Siegelman of Alabama, secret legal memorandums from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel and the role of the former White House aides Karl Rove and Harriet E. Miers in the firing of federal prosecutors.

Mr. Bush has used his executive powers to block Congressional requests for executive branch documents and testimony from former aides. But investigators hope that the Obama administration will open the filing cabinets and withdraw assertions of executive privilege that Bush officials have invoked to keep from testifying.

“I intend to ensure that our outstanding subpoenas and document requests relating to the U.S. attorneys matter are enforced,” said Representative John Conyers Jr., Democrat of Michigan and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. “I am hopeful that progress can be made with the coming of the new administration.”

Also, two advocacy groups, the American Civil Liberties Union and Human Rights First, have prepared detailed reports for the new administration calling for criminal investigations into accusations of abuse of detainees.

It is not clear, though, how a President Barack Obama will handle such requests. Legal specialists said the pressure to investigate the Bush years would raise tough political and legal questions.

Because every president eventually leaves office, incoming chief executives have an incentive to quash investigations into their predecessor’s tenure. Mr. Bush used executive privilege for the first time in 2001, to block a subpoena by Congressional Republicans investigating the Clinton administration.

In addition, Mr. Obama has expressed worries about too many investigations. In April, he told The Philadelphia Daily News that people needed to distinguish “between really dumb policies and policies that rise to the level of criminal activity.”

“If crimes have been committed, they should be investigated,” Mr. Obama said, but added, “I would not want my first term consumed by what was perceived on the part of Republicans as a partisan witch hunt, because I think we’ve got too many problems we’ve got to solve.”

But even if his administration rejects the calls for investigations, Mr. Obama cannot control what the courts or Congress do. Several lawsuits are seeking information about Bush policies, including an Islamic charity’s claim that it was illegally spied on by Mr. Bush’s program on wiretapping without warrants.

And Congressional Democrats say that they are determined to pursue their investigations – and that they expect career officials to disclose other issues after the Bush administration leaves. “We could spend the entire next four years investigating the Bush years,” Mr. Whitehouse said.

But if Mr. Obama decides to release information about his predecessor’s tenure, Mr. Bush could try to invoke executive privilege by filing a lawsuit, said Peter Shane, a law professor at Ohio State University.

In that case, an injunction would most likely be sought ordering the Obama administration not to release the Bush administration’s papers or enjoining Mr. Bush’s former aides from testifying. The dispute would probably go to the Supreme Court, Mr. Shane said.

The idea that ex-presidents may possess residual constitutional powers to keep information secret traces back to Truman.

In November 1953, after Dwight D. Eisenhower became president, the House Un-American Activities Committee subpoenaed Truman to testify about why he had appointed a suspected Communist to the International Monetary Fund.

Truman decided not to comply and asked his lawyer, Samuel I. Rosenman, for help. But there was little time for research.

Edward M. Cramer, a young associate at Mr. Rosenman’s law firm, recalled being summoned with two colleagues to their boss’s office at 6 p.m. and told to come up with something. The next morning, they helped dictate Truman’s letter telling the panel he did not have to testify – or even appear at the hearing.

“I think, legally, we were wrong” about whether Truman had to show up, Mr. Cramer, now 83, said in a phone interview from his home in New York.

But the committee did not call the former president’s bluff. It dropped the matter, and Truman’s hastily devised legal claim became a historical precedent.

In 1973, President Nixon cited Truman’s letter when he refused to testify or give documents to the committee investigating the Watergate scandal.

Mr. Cramer recalled, “Nixon used it, and we said ‘Oh, Jesus, what have we done?’ “

The first judicial backing for the idea that former presidents wield executive privilege powers came in 1977, as part of a Supreme Court ruling in a case over who controlled Nixon’s White House files. The decision suggested that Nixon might be able to block the release of papers in the future. But it offered few details, and Nixon never sought to do so.

In 1989 and 1990, judges presiding over criminal trials related to the Iran-contra affair blocked requests by defendants to make former President Ronald Reagan testify and release his diaries.

But the Supreme Court has never made clear how far a former president may go in trying to block Congressional demands for documents and testimony – or what happens if a president disagrees with a predecessor about making information public.

“There is no relevant precedent on the books,” Mr. Shane said.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Bush, Out of Office, Could Oppose Inquiries

Newspaper Editorial: VA Puts Credibility Through Shredder

November 11, 2008 – When veterans need health care, they at least expect their claims will be fairly evaluated. Yet Department of Veterans Affairs investigators have found that VA benefits offices around the country had documents stacked in a queue for shredding that were key in making decisions on veterans’ pension and disability claims.

The VA has been dogged for years by accusations that it is at best careless and at worst deliberate in its misplacement of veterans’ documents. Now it appears as though there is truth to some of the allegations. An internal review found that nearly 500 documents were put in shredding bins improperly. Such documents were found at two-thirds of the VA’s 57 benefits offices, including at Bay Pines in St. Petersburg.

Investigations are continuing, but the findings so far demonstrate that the VA needs to employ more electronic record-keeping. The agency processes 162-million pages a year. With all this paper-pushing, important material is bound to get misplaced or lost. And when that happens, it can delay a determination on a benefits claim for months or years, and lead to an improper denial.

We remember the botched attempt at computerization at Bay Pines VA Medical Center, where more than $100-million was spent on a system that failed to perform properly. But a technology transition for the VA’s benefits offices is necessary – albeit one with tighter controls and oversight. And at some point, every veteran should have Web-based access to his claim file.

Another issue is the VA’s compensation system, which encourages adjudicators to move claims rather than judge them correctly. Documents such as key medical assessments may get destroyed as a way to make denials easier. These kinds of shenanigans have been unearthed before.

A problem can’t be solved until it’s identified. Now that it’s clear that improper document shredding is occurring, the VA has a big job to do, starting with changing the culture of carelessness that seems endemic. A new policy that requires more oversight of shredding should help, but Congress should proceed with plans to take a closer look.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Comments Off on Newspaper Editorial: VA Puts Credibility Through Shredder

Iraq and Afghanistan War Veterans Join the Homeless

November 11, 2008 – Ethan Kreutzer joined the Army at the age of 17 and fought with the 19th Airborne in Jalalabad, Afghanistan. When he retuned home, he had no money, no education and no civilian job experience. He soon became homeless. He slept in an alley off Haight Street, behind two trash cans.

June Moss drove from Kuwait to Iraq as an Army engineer in a truck convoy. When she returned to the United States, she lost her home, and drove her two young children from hotel to hotel across Northern California.

Sean McKeen, a hardy, broad-shouldered 21-year-old with a wide smile, went to Iraq to clear land mines, and to get money for college. When he returned home, he became homeless in less than a week. He found himself sleeping in a cot in a crowded homeless shelter in San Francisco.

They are all part of a growing trend of homelessness among returning war on terrorism veterans.

More than 2,000 military personnel return home to California each month. Most have no specialized job experience, education or an easy familiarity with civilian life. And many have post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), making it difficult to get along with friends and family, and almost impossible to hold down a job.

“You feel like the whole world is against you when you get home,” said Kreutzer. “I was sleeping on the sidewalk, whereas I had been wearing a uniform less than a year before.” Soft- spoken and restless, Kreutzer was recruited in a 7-Eleven while still in high school. After five months in Afghanistan, he had a mental breakdown, diagnosed as PTSD. When he returned to the United States, he spent almost four years living on the streets.

Kreutzer said he’s met several veterans of the war in Iraq on the streets of San Francisco, or sleeping in Golden Gate Park. He also said he met several veterans of the war in Afghanistan, like himself, who were in similar situations.

Kreutzer now lives in a temporary housing facility for veterans on Treasure Island, run by the group Swords to Plowshares. He attends PTSD counseling with other war on terrorism veterans so that he can learn to maintain a job and house. “I was haunted by a lot of issues, a lot of things that I saw over there that were not good things. There are some times when I can wake up in a room and think I’m still there. I still remember what it tastes like, the air over there. I see all the rocks, I see the people,” said Kreutzer.

One of the symptoms of PTSD is isolation and withdrawal, according to Amy Fairweather, director of the Iraq Veterans project at Swords to Plowshares. “So that interferes with your ability to get a job. People sit in the dark by themselves,” she said.

Fairweather is seeing large numbers of homeless war on terrorism veterans come through her doors.

“Homelessness can happen very quickly, if they don’t get the help they need. Their mental health will get worse, they will become more depressed,” she said. “We are seeing Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, who are homeless, coming in very quickly. After Vietnam, it generally took about five to 10 years to end up on the streets. We’re seeing people on the streets three months after they come home.”

Moss spent 12 years with the military and had purchased a house with a VA home loan, but she fell behind on payments.

“When I got back from Iraq, I knew something was wrong,” she said. Diagnosed with PTSD, she found herself awake at night devising ways to keep her family safe. “I decided to move the refrigerator in front of the door to bunker us in,” she said. “Then I would stay up all night baking cookies because I didn’t want to go to sleep. Eventually, I stopped leaving the house altogether.”

Moss lost her job and her income, and the bank foreclosed on her home.

She moved her two kids between temporary housing units and hotels until her PTSD was under control. Now, she has a temporary house for her family, and a full-time job at the VA. “It’s because of my kids that I go to therapy and take my medication. If it wasn’t for them, I don’t know what would happen,” she said.

Other veterans are not so lucky. McKeen was exposed to more than 300 bomb blasts in Iraq. He suffers from traumatic brain injury as well as PTSD. When he returned home, he slept on couches at friends’ houses, and in his car while looking for a job. He spent many nights wandering the streets before he ended up in a shelter.

“It’s like a culture shock returning home, but you are supposed to be used to it,” he said. “Unless you are in war, nobody can understand what it’s like. And they expect you to just function normally by yourself after that?”

The Department of Veterans Affairs estimates about 2,000 war on terrorism veterans have become homeless upon returning to the United States. It’s still a small number, when compared to the staggering numbers of homeless Vietnam War-era veterans, but one that could balloon in the coming months.

At the Palo Alto VA, the inpatient programs for PTSD and TBI are crowded with war on terrorism veterans – an indication that a large number are at risk for homelessness, according to director of homeless programs Keith Harris.

“Before it gets to the point where someone is living on the street, what they are typically doing is struggling with a mental health disorder, burning their bridges with the people around them, family, employers, spouses,” he said. ” I don’t believe there is a large chunk of returnees literally homeless without a roof over their heads, but I think a large chunk of them are at risk for it.”

The homeless shelter at the Palo Alto VA is full. And many veterans still complain that the VA is unprepared and overly bureaucratic. Most have to wait six to eight months for claims to be addressed.

But by all accounts, the VA is far better prepared this time than it ever has been in the past. With an understanding that the looming homeless crisis is best treated as a mental health issue, it has hired 17,000 mental health workers, making it the largest mental health program in the country.

But with some 2 million active service members still fighting and undergoing the trauma of war, Moss wonders if any amount of preparation by the VA can address the fundamental problem of readjustment.

“I think the problem is war itself,” she said. “War changes a person. I talk to all vets. The same experiences we had coming home from Iraq are the same experience World War II (vets) saw, Vietnam saw, Korean War saw, so it hasn’t changed. I think the real problem is probably just war itself.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Iraq and Afghanistan War Veterans Join the Homeless

On Veteran’s Day, Don’t Forget About the War

November 10. 2008 – The War in Iraq has disappeared from the headlines. The ongoing economic crisis has Americans looking inward, wondering if they can keep their homes and their jobs, with little interest in death and destruction half a world away. According to the Pew Research Center, media coverage of the war has plummeted from an average of 15 percent of stories in July 2007, to 3 percent this February, to just 2 percent of stories during the last week of October.

Aaron Glantz: Most Americans want to put the war in Iraq behind them, but this feeling is based not on a coherent critique but on a kind of collective exhaustion.
The Soldier and the Student
US Military

Aaron Glantz: Today’s military members face red tape, false advertising and multiple deployments. What happened to the promises of the original GI Bill?

The war also disappeared as an issue in the presidential campaign. Both Barack Obama and John McCain barely mentioned the war in Iraq in their final debate. In his historic victory speech, Obama said “Iraq” only once. Some say the election results show Americans demanding a “change,” and in many ways they do. But they also show a collective desire to forget.

Most Americans want to put the war behind them, but this feeling is based not on a coherent critique but on a kind of collective exhaustion. In many ways, we as a country find ourselves in a mood like the one towards the end of the Vietnam War: we are tired and simply want to move on and forget the conflict ever happened.

Yet this feeling can come at a great cost, because it is this same dynamic that led to the betrayal of more than three million Vietnam veterans.

“When I go through airports I see soldiers just sitting up against a wall…by themselves,” says therapist and Vietnam veteran Shad Meshad, who heads up the National Veterans Foundation. “No one goes up to them; that positive energy toward them has faded. No one is spitting or shouting, but they’re still left with the fact that they’re responsible for what they did or didn’t do, and they’re supposed to think about that alone.”

Given the experience of Vietnam vets, Meshad believes that the American people ignore their veterans at their own peril. According to the Department of Veterans Affairs, eighteen veterans commit suicide every day and 200,000 sleep homeless on the streets on any given night. By 1986, the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Survey reported that almost half of all male Vietnam veterans suffering from post-traumatic-stress disorder had been arrested or jailed at least once–34.2 percent had been jailed more than once, and 11.5 percent had been convicted of a felony.

“We’re going to repeat that same thing, I can sense it,” Meshad says, “if we don’t take action and Congress doesn’t create services to help these folks over the next ten or fifteen years.”

Indeed, there are already many signs that history is repeating itself. Consider the implications of an April 2008 survey by the Rand Corporation; it found that a majority of the 300,000 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans suffering from post-traumatic-stress disorder and of the 320,000 with traumatic brain injury are not receiving help from the Pentagon and VA medical systems. In its study, Rand noted that the federal government fails to care for war veterans at its own peril–noting PTSD and TBI “can have far-reaching and damaging consequences.”

“Individuals afflicted with these conditions face higher risks for other psychological problems and for attempting suicide. They have higher rates of unhealthy behaviors–such as smoking, overeating, and unsafe sex–and higher rates of physical health problems and mortality. Individuals with these conditions also tend to miss more work or report being less productive,” the report said. “These conditions can impair relationships, disrupt marriages, aggravate the difficulties of parenting, and cause problems in children that may extend the consequences of combat trauma across generations.”

“These consequences can have a high economic toll,” the report continued. “However, most attempts to measure the costs of these conditions focus only on medical costs to the government. Yet, direct costs of treatment are only a fraction of the total costs related to mental health and cognitive conditions. Far higher are the long-term individual and societal costs stemming from lost productivity, reduced quality of life, homelessness, domestic violence, the strain on families, and suicide. Delivering effective care and restoring veterans to full mental health have the potential to reduce these longer-term costs significantly.”

There is hope in this story, though.

When Barack Obama takes the oath of office on January 20, America will have a President who has shown an interest in and commitment to caring for America’s veterans. As a senator, Obama supported increased funding for the VA and an expanded GI Bill. His campaign platform sounded all the right notes about increasing the number of mental health providers, reforming the government’s bureaucratic disability-claims system, and increasing the number of Vet Centers, where returning veterans can find community as they make the difficult transition from war to civilian life.

But taking those steps will require hard work and support from the public that amounts to more than just lip service to “supporting the troops.” We must stay engaged on the issue of Iraq and our government’s treatment of its veterans and create an atmosphere where a repeat of the tragedy that followed the Vietnam War will not be tolerated. If we don’t, Barack Obama may follow our lead and rush quickly past the veteran who’s sleeping homeless on the street.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on On Veteran’s Day, Don’t Forget About the War

Seek Retirement for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

November 10, 2008, El Paso, TX – Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has received a significant amount of attention as a result of recent reports outlining the increasing number of men and women returning from war zones with PTSD.

PTSD is an anxiety disorder associated with a dramatic event in which the person experiences the threat of death or serious injury.

In spring 2007, the RAND Center for Military Health Policy Research reported that of the 1.64 million military service members deployed to war zones, 14 percent have screened positive for PTSD and another 14 percent for major depression.

However, the disorder is not limited to soldiers in war zones. In the United States, the most common cause for PTSD exposure is automobile accidents. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, about 2.5 million people are injured in automobile accidents annually. It is estimated that about 20 percent of those in automobile accidents suffer from the disorder.

PTSD is a biological disorder which can be manifested from exposure to excessive levels of stress. Basically, the body’s stress response system is overloaded.

Symptoms of PTSD include insomnia, nightmares, flashbacks of the traumatic event, startling easily, avoiding a situation that reminds the individual of the traumatic episode, difficulty in concentrating, emotional withdrawal, aggression and irritability.

According to a recent study by the Geisinger Health Systems, Vietnam veterans with a history of PTSD had a Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has received a significant amount of attention as a result of recent reports outlining the increasing number of men and women returning from war zones with PTSD.

PTSD is an anxiety disorder associated with a dramatic event in which the person experiences the threat of death or serious injury.

In spring 2007, the RAND Center for Military Health Policy Research reported that of the 1.64 million military service members deployed to war zones, 14 percent have screened positive for PTSD and another 14 percent for major depression.

However, the disorder is not limited to soldiers in war zones. In the United States, the most common cause for PTSD exposure is automobile accidents. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, about 2.5 million people are injured in automobile accidents annually. It is estimated that about 20 percent of those in automobile accidents suffer from the disorder.

PTSD is a biological disorder which can be manifested from exposure to excessive levels of stress. Basically, the body’s stress response system is overloaded.

Symptoms of PTSD include insomnia, nightmares, flashbacks of the traumatic event, startling easily, avoiding a situation that reminds the individual of the traumatic episode, difficulty in concentrating, emotional withdrawal, aggression and irritability.

According to a recent study by the Geisinger Health Systems, Vietnam veterans with a history of PTSD had a 50 percent chance of dying from heart disease in their 50s compared to those veterans without the disorder. Many individuals with PTSD delay treatment and thus may manage their symptoms with drugs and/or alcohol.
Treatment of PTSD includes exposure therapy, stress inoculation training, cognitive therapy, eye- movement decentralization and reprocessing, psychodynamic and group therapy. Some doctors may prescribe psychiatric medication, such as Zoloft and other selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors.

All of these treatment procedures have a level A of effectiveness, meaning the treatments have been shown to be successful in randomized clinical trials.

To help its returning war-zone veterans overcome PTSD, the Department of Defense has earmarked more than $300 million for research on the disorder and brain injuries. The Veterans Administration also has designated significant resources to the treatment of former service members who may have suffered these conditions.

The key to a more successful outcome is early recognition and treatment. In El Paso, the military has treatment programs available for active-duty personnel.

Dependents and retirees are eligible to receive care under the Tri-Care insurance program. Retirees also can receive care at the Veterans Administration facility.

PTSD should be considered a stress injury and care should be sought as soon as symptoms begin to emerge.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Seek Retirement for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

November 11, VCS in the News: New Austin VA Clinic to Serve Growing Veteran Population

“Opening a larger facility in Austin is very good for our veterans and their families,” Sullivan said, “especially given the increase in demand for care due to patients from all wars flooding into VA.”  

November 11, 2008 – As he leaned against a pillar in front of Austin’s veterans clinic, Larry Martino needed maybe a second to absorb news that a new clinic is in the works.

“Good,” said Martino, a 60-year-old Vietnam War veteran with thick glasses, a University of Texas T-shirt and a cane that helps him walk on a recently replaced knee. “I’ve been coming here two years now, and I’ve seen a huge increase in the number of patients. They don’t have enough space; even the doctors don’t have enough space.”

Other patients reacted similarly to word that the federal Department of Veterans Affairs , which runs the Austin clinic, is planning to build a new facility to deal with the area’s growing population of veterans, whose contributions will be celebrated today, Veterans Day.

About 21,000 veterans from 10 counties now seek medical care at the Southeast Austin clinic, a one-story building that sits where East Oltorf Street dead-ends at Montopolis Drive.

By 2025, that number is expected to reach 30,000.

The VA has set aside $18.5 million for a new clinic, which local officials said was secured by Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin. The new clinic will be about three times as large as the Montopolis building, which will still be used by the VA. The new clinic is scheduled to open in 2012.

The VA is deciding between two Austin locations. Local officials said they could not release specifics until one is selected in December; regardless, plans call for it to be the largest VA clinic in the nation.

Most surgeries and overnight stays will still be handled 68 miles north of Austin, at the VA hospital in Temple, which is the hub of the VA’s Central Texas arm because of its proximity to Fort Hood. But the new Austin clinic will allow the addition of some new services, VA officials say.

The Montopolis facility is crowded. Cars sometimes park in the grass, and before some building renovations freed up space, patients at times had to circle for 45 minutes in the morning looking for a spot. Tandy Kinard, one of the clinic’s patient advocates, said the scramble among staff to find work space is sometimes resolved by time sharing.

The clinic is also seeing a range of new issues. The World War II veterans are dying, but a wave of Iraq and Afghanistan war vets now rely on the VA. As of May, about 837,000 troops who had left the military had served in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and 39 percent had already sought VA care, according to a VA report obtained by advocacy group Veterans for Common Sense.

The report concluded those numbers will rise, although no one can say with certainty by how much.

Ryan Crunk, a 26-year-old Iraq war veteran from Kerrville, is among those who could be seeking VA care for decades. Now an Austin Community College student with plans to attend Texas A&M University, Crunk registered with the Austin clinic Friday, talking as a nurse wrapped an elastic band around his arm and began drawing blood.

“They got me in quick,” said Crunk, who spoke in a deep voice and shook hands with a vise-like grip. He wore a trim red-brown beard, camo shorts and sandals, one of which was strapped to the plastic foot at the end of his prosthetic right leg. He chose the prosthetic after doctors could not repair the damage caused by a nail-covered grenade that tore into his leg on the day of Iraq’s first post-Saddam Hussein election, in 2005 .

“I have zero complaints with the health care I’ve received,” Crunk said, including the year he went to the VA’s Kerrville clinic. “Everything I’ve needed, from psychological help to physical pain relief, I’ve gotten.”

Paul Sullivan, a VA critic and head of Veterans for Common Sense, said the new clinic is a needed step.

“Opening a larger facility in Austin is very good for our veterans and their families,” Sullivan said, “especially given the increase in demand for care due to patients from all wars flooding into VA.”

Austin clinic director Greg Vrentas could not say what the average wait time is at the Austin clinic. But Vrentas, a retired Special Forces operative who oversaw the rebuilding of medical facilities in Afghanistan, said every patient gets an appointment within 30 days , as the VA requires. He said the new facility will help cut wait times and expand services.

“Whatever way a vet needs help,” Vrentas said, “we try to provide it.”

To free up space, Vrentas had the clinic’s mental health unit moved recently to the Southgate building, at Oltorf Street and Interstate 35. The move created room for a women’s clinic, which is scheduled to open in a few weeks.

Women now make up about 15 percent of the fighting force and 14 percent of the veteran population. Minnie Bowie-Garcia , the Austin clinic’s women’s program coordinator, said 1,800 women in Austin have enrolled with the VA.

The VA has also started a home care program that tends to patients across Central Texas who are too frail or otherwise incapable of regular clinic visits. It cares for 34 patients now and should have about 800 in two years, said Tim Reese, the program coordinator.

“This is not your father’s VA,” said Reese, a retired colonel who served 24 years in the Army Nurse Corps .

The Central Texas arm of the VA has had ups and downs proving that point. A recent study of VA regions ranked Central Texas 118th out of 139 in patient satisfaction. Norma Perez, a post-traumatic stress disorder coordinator in Temple, also drew a congressional inquiry after advising mental health workers in a memo to “refrain from giving a diagnosis of PTSD straight out” because “we really don’t have time to do the extensive testing that should be done to determine PTSD.” And the Central Texas VA still has not determined what to do with Dr. Robert Van Boven , a VA researcher working at the University of Texas who alleges that the VA wasted millions of brain injury research dollars and says his superiors are trying to fire him for petty reasons.

But by some measures the Central Texas system’s care has improved dramatically. In 2006, it opened a world-class hospital in Waco that specializes in treating patients who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder. Four years ago , the VA ranked Central Texas 126th in overall care. Last year, despite low patient satisfaction numbers, Central Texas ranked 31st in overall care and first in accessibility.

The disparity was evident in the reactions of Callie Bradford, 54, and her father, Frank Walker, 91, who had just been prescribed medicine to lower his blood pressure.

“It’s wonderful” that the VA is planning a larger clinic, Bradford said. She said the staff is sometimes impolite, possibly as a result of the cramped quarters, and added that “maybe with a larger building, you won’t have people so crowded there’s nowhere to sit.”

“Don’t focus on the negative,” said Walker, a retired pastor and World War II veteran, patting his daughter gently on the hand. “I’m leaving (the clinic) with great joy in my heart. My health has been meticulously cared for.”

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on November 11, VCS in the News: New Austin VA Clinic to Serve Growing Veteran Population

Nov 10, Civil Liberties News: VCS Urges Our Members to Sign Petition to Close Guantanamo Bay Prison Camp

The ACLU and Brave New Foundation are collaborating on a series of videos containing direct testimony from those with firsthand knowledge of the system of injustice that thrives at Gitmo.

November 10, 2008 

Dear President-Elect Obama,

Nothing would make me prouder than to see you act on your first day in office to restore America’s moral leadership in the world. With one stroke of your pen, you can close Guantánamo Bay prison, shut down military commissions, and ban torture. The restoration of American freedom is in your hands. Give us back the America we believe in. see the complete letter>

VCS urges our members and supporters to please view the ACLU / Brave New Foundation video and sign open letter.: http://www.closegitmo.com/

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Nov 10, Civil Liberties News: VCS Urges Our Members to Sign Petition to Close Guantanamo Bay Prison Camp

Obama’s Afghanistan Challenge

November 10, 2008 – During his quest for the presidency, president-elect Barack Obama scored considerable points with the American public when he stated that America must “get off the wrong battlefield in Iraq and take the fight to the terrorists in Pakistan.” That is where bin Laden and al Qaeda are, he emphasized.

Taking advantage of the Iraq war’s unpopularity, Obama promised to send more American troops to the Pakistan-Afghan front as they become available from Mesopotamia, making that proposal a central plank in his foreign policy platform. His pronouncement on the Afghan war theater was also meant to give Obama credibility in an area he was deemed weakest: foreign affairs.

But with the election now over, the challenges facing the incoming president in the turbulent Afghanistan-Pakistan region are much more complex than those espoused on the campaign trail. And their resolution will also require more than the two extra brigades Obama said he will send to Afghanistan next year.

On the issue of troop numbers alone, military analysts agree more foreign soldiers are needed in the Afghanistan-Pakistan area of operations. According to the military website, strategypage.com, the Taliban has increased its number of fighters by 20 to 30 percent this year due to an upsurge in drug revenues. As well, defeated al Qaeda fighters and bomb makers from Iraq have rallied to the terrorist organization’s border sanctuaries in Pakistan where their presence has been felt in the Afghanistan conflict.

In turn, this growth in al Qaeda and Taliban numbers has caused an increase in violence in Afghanistan this year and a corresponding larger number of American and allied casualties. But perhaps even worse from both the security viewpoint and the winning of hearts and minds, NATO troops and Afghan troops have had to withdraw from areas they once controlled due to a lack of boots on the ground, leaving the local population to the mercies of the Taliban. A senior Canadian officer said the Canadian contingent would need to double its numbers to 5,000 to keep the Taliban away from important districts around Kandahar, the Taliban’s birthplace.

As a result, military experts have estimated that the number of American and NATO troops in Afghanistan should be tripled from the present 50,000-60,000 to about 150,000, and the Afghan army and national police be increased from its present size of about 120,000 to 500,000. These numbers are similar to those which were responsible for successfully bringing a war-torn Iraq under control, a country smaller in size and population than Afghanistan.

But the question is whether Obama, who promised to bring American troops home from Iraq within 16 months after being elected, would be willing to redirect them so soon to Afghanistan. And will he be willing to send the large numbers deemed necessary to do the job? Failure to do so would lead to the suspicion that Obama was simply using the Afghanistan conflict and the call to fight bin Laden and al Qaeda as an excuse to end the Iraq war the Democrats detest.

Another major challenge facing the Obama administration in Afghanistan is the Afghan government itself. Corruption is rife among Afghan officials and police, who have lost much trust among the Afghan people. Money for rebuilding the country has gone missing. And even President Hamid Karzai and his brother have been accused of accepting bribes from drug gangs. It is here, in the all-important civil sector, that the war may be lost since no viable state can be set up without the Afghan people’s support. With such misrule, even if the Taliban were defeated, Afghanistan would probably relapse into the warlordism of the 1990s without a NATO presence.

What should hearten the incoming president, though, is that conditions in Pakistan are improving regarding the war against Islamic extremists on Pakistani territory. This is good news for Obama, since events in Afghanistan are a consequence of what is happening in Pakistan.

The Pakistan government outlawed the Taliban and launched an all-out offensive against it and al Qaeda last August in their border sanctuaries. Hundreds of Taliban and al Qaeda fighters have been killed since then and hundreds more foreign combatants have been arrested. The Pakistani Taliban is so hard-pressed, it has offered to lay down its arms and hold talks with the government, an offer President Asif Zardari, in his determination to eliminate the extremist threat to seize the Pakistani state, has so far refused. But it will still be some time, Pakistani officials admit, before that threat will be completely eliminated.

The Pakistani government’s resolute action against al Qaeda and the Taliban, however, may let Obama off the hook on one of his more controversial campaign promises. Obama stated he would send troops into Pakistan without that government’s permission if “actionable intelligence” existed that al Qaeda was planning another terrorist attack against America and the Pakistanis were failing to act on it. This statement made him unpopular in Pakistan, one of the few countries where he trailed in the popularity polls during the election campaign.

In the end, Obama may bring his own tools to the table to deal with the challenge of Afghanistan. He has stated he believes in a multilateral approach in dealing with international problems, so he may include countries such as Russia, Iran and the Central Asian states in talks regarding the Afghanistan conflict. The president-elect also said it will be necessary to “win over the hearts and minds of 1.3 billion Muslims” or ‘it was going to be very difficult for us to win the long war against extremism.” This represents a greater challenge, of which Afghanistan is a part; but success here would constitute Obama’s greatest achievement of all.

Posted in Veterans for Common Sense News | Tagged | Comments Off on Obama’s Afghanistan Challenge