Troops At Odds With Ethics Standards

Washington Post

More than one-third of U.S. soldiers in Iraq surveyed by the Army said they believe torture should be allowed if it helps gather important information about insurgents, the Pentagon disclosed yesterday. Four in 10 said they approve of such illegal abuse if it would save the life of a fellow soldier.

In addition, about two-thirds of Marines and half the Army troops surveyed said they would not report a team member for mistreating a civilian or for destroying civilian property unnecessarily. “Less than half of Soldiers and Marines believed that non-combatants should be treated with dignity and respect,” the Army report stated.

About 10 percent of the 1,767 troops in the official survey — conducted in Iraq last fall — reported that they had mistreated civilians in Iraq, such as kicking them or needlessly damaging their possessions.

Army researchers “looked under every rock, and what they found was not always easy to look at,” said S. Ward Casscells, the assistant secretary of defense for health affairs. The report noted that the troops’ statements are at odds with the “soldier’s rules” promulgated by the Army, which forbid the torture of enemy prisoners and state that civilians must be treated humanely.

Maj. Gen. Gale S. Pollock, the acting Army surgeon general, cast the report as positive news. “What it speaks to is the leadership that the military is providing, because they’re not acting on those thoughts,” she said. “They’re not torturing the people.”

But human rights activists said the report lends support to their view that the abuse of Iraqi civilians by U.S. military personnel was not isolated to some bad apples at Abu Ghraib and a few other detention facilities but instead is more widespread. “These are distressing results,” said Steven R. Shapiro, national legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union. “They highlight a failure to adequately train and supervise our soldiers.”

The study also found that the more often soldiers are deployed, the longer they are deployed each time; and the less time they spend at home, the more likely they are to suffer mental health problems such as combat trauma, anxiety and depression. That result is particularly notable given that the Pentagon has sent soldiers and Marines to Iraq multiple times and recently extended the tours of thousands of soldiers to 15 months from 12 months.

“The Army is spread very thin, and we need it to be a larger force for the number of missions that we were being asked to address for our nation,” Pollock said.

The authors of the Army document argued that the strains placed on troops in Iraq are in some ways more severe than those borne by the combat forces of World War II. “A considerable number of Soldiers and Marines are conducting combat operations everyday of the week, 10-12 hours per day seven days a week for months on end,” wrote Col. Carl Castro and Maj. Dennis McGurk, both psychologists. “At no time in our military history have Soldiers or Marines been required to serve on the front line in any war for a period of 6-7 months.”

And although U.S. casualties in Iraq are far lower than in the Vietnam War, for example, military experts say that Iraq can be a more stressful environment. In Vietnam, there were rear areas that were considered safe, but in Iraq there are no truly secure areas outside big bases. “The front in Iraq is any place not on a base camp” or a forward operating base, the report noted.

The authors recommended that soldiers be given breathers during combat tours and intervals of 18 to 36 months between such tours, substantially longer than they are allowed now.

Overall, 20 percent of the soldiers surveyed and 15 percent of the Marines appeared to suffer from depression, anxiety or stress, the Army reported. That was in keeping with findings of past surveys, as was the conclusion that more than 40 percent of soldiers reported low morale in their units.

Strains on military families also are intensifying. About 20 percent of soldiers said they were planning a divorce or separation, up from 15 percent in the previous year’s survey. Marital problems seem to grow with the length of a deployment, the survey found. Ten percent of soldiers deployed for less than six months reported that infidelity was a problem in their marriage, compared with 17 percent among those who had been in Iraq longer than that.

“The story I heard from my wife and daughter a lot is, ‘You’re not the same person that left to go over there,’ ” said retired Sgt. Coby Thomas, who developed post-traumatic stress disorder after serving in Iraq. “People expect you to be like you were and pick up where you left off, and they’re not prepared for the changes.”

Thomas, who suffered a traumatic brain injury while protecting a convoy south of Baghdad in December 2004, agreed that the stress on soldiers is increasing with multiple tours of duty. “You’re talking about fourth deployments; it’s the same people going over again and again,” he said.

Retired Air Force Tech. Sgt. Scott Shore said multiple deployments over a 19-year military career left him with severe post-traumatic stress disorder. His last deployment was in 2004 in Iraq’s Sunni insurgent stronghold, Anbar province, where he provided medical care and saw combat.

“That seemed to be the straw that broke the camel’s back,” Shore said in a telephone interview from Browns Mills, N.J. Shore said he has suffered flashbacks and nightmares that contributed to the breakup of his first marriage. “I don’t go into crowds, I don’t like driving, I don’t like doing a lot of different things because I’m always on the lookout for the next ambush, the next IED,” he said.

The Army has surveyed mental health issues in Iraq three times before, but this was the first time that Marines were included and that ethical questions were posed. Those were added by order of Army Gen. George W. Casey Jr., who until February was the top commander in Iraq. The surveyors did not say why Casey, who is now chief of staff of the Army, made the changes, but they came following revelations about Marines killing 24 civilians in November 2005 in Haditha, Iraq, and about their commanders not seeing reason to investigate.

Military officials sought to boost troops’ awareness of ethical issues, first after the Abu Ghraib prisoner-abuse scandal broke in the spring of 2004 and again after news of the Haditha killings emerged.

Asked for his reaction to the data indicating that the majority of Marines would not report wrongdoing, Rear Adm. Richard R. Jeffries, the Marine Corps’ chief medical officer, answered gingerly. “I know the Marine Corps is concerned that this may be of some significance,” he said, “and they’re looking very closely at this with several groups and several teams that have now taken in consideration to see what this means and what we may do differently if there is a problem here.”

Pollock said that, in response to the report, completed last November, the Army has altered training to place more emphasis on “Army values, suicide prevention, battlefield ethics and behavioral health awareness.”

This entry was posted in Veterans for Common Sense News and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.